02/06/2026
Teams don’t burn out all at once.
They usually send warning signs first.
In September 2025, SafeWork NSW reportedly ordered UTS to pause parts of a restructure because of the risk of psychological harm to staff.
Because change risk is no longer just:
“Will the project land?”
It is also:
“What is this asking people to carry?”
Most major change programs asks people to absorb more:
More decisions. More uncertainty. More meetings. More pressure. More “just for now” workarounds. More BAU while the future state is still being built.
Some stretch is normal.
But there is a point where stretch turns into overload.
And the early signs are often easy to miss.
They look like:
→ Good people stop asking questions
Not because they agree, but because they’re tired of raising the same concerns.
→ Meetings go quiet
Less debate. Less challenge. More silence.
→ Decisions slow down
Not because people are resisting, but because everything feels urgent.
→ Small issues trigger big reactions
A changed deadline or another request lands harder than it should.
→ Leaders hear “we’re fine” too often
Especially from teams that clearly are not fine.
→ People start protecting their own patch
Not because they don’t care, but because they’re trying to cope.
This is where wellbeing, psychosocial safety and change governance overlap.
It is not enough to ask:
“Are we on track?”
We also need to ask:
“What is the load doing to our people?”
Because by the time overload shows up as burnout, conflict, sick leave or resistance, the warning signs have usually been there for weeks.
Which sign appears first in your teams?