24/07/2026
CHALLENGE #1
How do you government, companies and organisations commissioning artificial reefs judge and assess artificial reef units and their suitability for their objectives? Most do not have the experience or training in how to compare reef units.
CHALLENGE #2
How do artificial reef designers or those working with artificial reef designers effectively discuss the proposed designs and the strengths and weaknesses of each? With a set of grading criteria we think it will help designers know what to focus on improving or reducing.
We are building basically houses for marine life. On land we have developed ways to describe and judge and price our dwellings - one bedroom, 4 bed, 2 car garage, 1 bathroom, patio, entertainment room, pool, garden etc etc. But for reef units there is no method yet and can be confusing.
We have been thinking about this for quite awhile and have developed a grading system that grades reef units on the following essential criteria (draft! open to adding more):
1. Opportunities for Nature (how many features does it have that provide opportunities for nature)
2. Cost (manufacture, transport, deployment)
3. Sustainability (including carbon footprint)
4. Longevity
5. Stability
6. Suitability for Target Species (no good scoring 5 star if the features aren't actually any good for target species!)
We have built a spreadsheet where reef units are scored against these criteria by answering a range of questions. A score for each criteria is then produced.
It’s quite complex and we will be sharing it next week once we figure out how to sum it up and describe, and I'll rate a few generic no-brand reef units as examples.
We are keen for feedback on practicality and usefulness!!
Stand by...and have a great weekend!