03/08/2026
"It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change." — Charles Darwin
Over the centuries, horse trainers have come up with many names to describe unwanted behaviours. These labels generally imply that the problem lies with the horse's attitude or temperament. Labels include nasty, mean, malicious, stupid, stubborn, lazy, difficult, chicken-hearted, honest, dishonest, go-ey, too forward-thinking, too keen, cheeky and arrogant.
These terms that blame the horse are problematic because they justify not looking to ourselves as the problem.
New Age trainers have also muddied the waters with inaccurate, complex, yet superficially salient terms to describe horses, such as alpha-mare, leader, dominant, emotional and disrespectful. These terms imply a sense of permanence to apparent dominance-related issues.
However, the correct way to see dominance in horses is as "bilateral dominance," where each horse only knows his/her relationship with each of the others and, more importantly, for whatever resource.
To build a training system on the notion of dominance is not only anthropocentric, but also bound to be limited, inaccurate and ineffective.
Modern Horse Training: Equitation Science Principles & Practice, Volume 2 by Andrew McLean.