17/06/2026
When you have worked across diplomatic residences in London, Paris, Moscow and the Middle East, you develop a particular relationship with scale.
These were not modest projects. The budgets were significant, the expectations exacting, and the properties themselves carried a weight of history and purpose that demanded a certain standard of thinking. Nothing could be casual. Every decision had to hold up under scrutiny, and under time.
What surprised me was not what excess looked like when it was done badly. That was expected. What surprised me was what it looked like when it was done well, and how little it relied on extravagance to achieve its effect.
The most resolved interiors I encountered in those years were not the most elaborate. They were the most considered. Proportion doing the work that ornamentation might have covered. Materials chosen for their quality rather than their statement. Atmosphere arriving not from what had been added, but from what had been left alone.
Restraint, I came to understand, is not a budget constraint or a stylistic preference. It is a discipline that comes from knowing exactly what a space needs, and having the confidence not to go beyond it.
That understanding has shaped every project I have worked on since, whether in a Knightsbridge residence or a Lake District farmhouse. The scale changes. The principle does not.