EnabledFuture

EnabledFuture Using our Hexazity™️ framework & EnabledFuture Uplift™️ toolkit ♻️

A Sustainable Future Without Compromise

We offer closed loop circularity consulting, training & thought leadership across chemicals, energy, critical metals and hydrocarbon value chains.

EnabledFuture® Green Chemistry Social Media Competition 🥬🏆After months of ferocious weather, dustnados in parks, and dem...
16/08/2026

EnabledFuture® Green Chemistry Social Media Competition 🥬🏆

After months of ferocious weather, dustnados in parks, and demand for home-installed personal cold boxes, we thought it was a great time to get the focus back on sustainability. 🌤

🎓 Are you aged 18 to 21 and in full time study? Then this one's for you. ✅️

🧪 The chemical industry says it's going green (not in our local park it isn't!). We're inviting you to fact-check! ❎️

EnabledFuture®️ is running a weekly social media competition until the end of October 2026
It's basically a licence to be the most sceptical person in your seminar group.👀

The challenge: The 12 Principles of Green Chemistry get quoted in every lecture, every corporate report, every "our sustainability journey" post and all over brand packaging. Green fatigue syndrome is a real thing. 🤢

🐍But are these so-called green principles actually being delivered where they matter most? Do they protect what you care about? 🌎

Do the biggest chemical plants being built right now pay the 12 Green Chemistry principles more than lip service? 👄

🏭 We mean the genuinely huge stuff - the market-makers who can outcompete newcomers and badge themselves as sustainability leaders.

So that's mega-complexes, giant chemical plants and integrated sites going up in major world regions. The projects you might not see on a green billboard. 📗

🚀Your mission:

🏭Pick a high volume chemical. Hold it up to scrutiny against the 12 Principles. Consider each one in turn - then post your verdict - video or text are both fine but you must use both hashtags from the image on this post. #️⃣

🕛 The 12 Principles (exactly as written by the ACS):
1. Prevention
2. Atom Economy
3. Less Hazardous Chemical Syntheses
4. Designing Safer Chemicals
5. Safer Solvents and Auxiliaries
6. Design for Energy Efficiency
7. Use of Renewable Feedstocks
8. Reduce Derivatives
9. Catalysis
10. Design for Degradation
11. Real-time analysis for Pollution Prevention
12. Inherently Safer Chemistry for Accident Prevention

Get past the press releases - the receipts for this one are in the detail, and the connections. Sharp pattern recognition skills will get you to the top spot every time. 🌍📊✅️♻️

🥵 Hot takes welcome (within platform rules). Maybe come up with a brand new set of 12!

What you win:
🏅One winner every week gets a free pass worth £100 to the EnabledFuture®️ Circular Economy Virtual Festival Day taking place during Circular Economy Week on 30 October 2026 🏆 — a genuinely good line on your CV and a virtual room full of people hiring interns and soon to be graduates.

🔚Deadline: October 29 2026.
The rules: Original work only. If you use data, back it up with it's source.

⏸️ Keep it platform-compliant.
Tag use and use the hashtags from the image on this post so we actually see it.

Competition starts now! 😙


2018:  presents in Brussels on a world addicted to fossil fuels.2026: Extreme temperature records across the globe.This ...
07/08/2026

2018: presents in Brussels on a world addicted to fossil fuels.

2026: Extreme temperature records across the globe.

This is the net result of a supply chain that treats sustainability as cosplay. Time for a change.

06/08/2026

You can't delete the truth.

Dual-Use Chemicals: Why Small Criminal Diversion Can Threaten Large Legitimate MarketsIn industrial chemical markets, a ...
03/08/2026

Dual-Use Chemicals: Why Small Criminal Diversion Can Threaten Large Legitimate Markets

In industrial chemical markets, a dual-use product may be manufactured at million-ton scale to serve legitimate demand. Only a small fraction may be diverted into crime, yet that fraction can produce consequences far beyond its volume: many victims, organised networks, enforcement burdens, secondary harms, scrutiny and political pressure.

This creates an important asymmetry. The criminal market may be too small to sustain industrial production, but large enough to act as a catalyst that threatens the legitimate one.

The supply chain responds by creating an entrenched "self-healing" structure.

Supply and capital are elastic. If one producer stops or restricts sales, competitors can expand, new capacity can appear and the network can reform around the departing firm. The same applies to investors: one divests, another takes the position. Unilateral restraint is absorbed by the system.

Several pressures discourage action. A producer risks losing sales and market share. An investor may face fiduciary and competitive pressures. An abrupt withdrawal may also be interpreted as an admission that earlier risks were known. As long as demand remains intact, supply and capital can rotate without changing the equilibrium.

The non-substitutable element is legitimate high-volume demand. Criminal diversion is parasitic on that demand but it cannot by itself support million-ton plants.

The decisive risk arises when illicit harms overlap with independent health or environmental concerns linked to the same chemical family, such as occupational exposure, consumer applications, environmental persistence, microplastic pathways or cumulative toxicity.

These pressures reinforce one another. Criminal diversion generates political and reputational force. Independent harms strike the core customer base directly.

Together they increase the likelihood that downstream users will abandon the material, reformulate products, specify substitutes or demand safer alternatives.

Once legitimate demand begins to fracture, the economic rationale for large-scale production weakens. Plants built for high utilisation cannot be sustained by a small illicit market.

Without demand destruction, the system can remain effectively indifferent to external harms.

Producers and investors continue to rotate, while consumers face a gap between recognition of a problematic product and scalable safer alternatives. That interval is a genuine availability and safety hiatus.

Only coordinated restriction across enough of the industry, or binding external rules applied equally to all participants, reliably alters the equilibrium.

The small criminal fraction may be the catalyst, but the fate of the market is ultimately decided by legitimate demand and ethical product design.


EnabledFuture will be at the Battery Cells & Systems Expo this week.Looking forward to the best UK  battery event of the...
07/07/2026

EnabledFuture will be at the Battery Cells & Systems Expo this week.

Looking forward to the best UK battery event of the year - in Birmingham.🔋 🐂

Pleased to connect via the show app for professional engagements.🤝💼

The emergence of the term "social licence to operate" (SLO) has sparked discussions around its role in the oil, gas, and...
04/07/2026

The emergence of the term "social licence to operate" (SLO) has sparked discussions around its role in the oil, gas, and petrochemical industries, especially amidst decades of environmental failures.

SLO broadly refers to the need for ongoing acceptance of operations through stakeholder engagement. Despite being over 30 yrs old, with roots traced back to Prof Florence Hamrick's 1996 PhD thesis, the practical application of SLO remains challenging.

Currently, major oil and gas companies are facing increased local anger and legal actions related to their polluting activities. Shell is under scrutiny for its impact on the Niger Delta, while TotalEnergies has been ordered by a French court to disclose climate risks. Since the 2015 Paris Agreement, over 80 active lawsuits have targeted major fossil fuel producers.

As a non-legal process, SLO is both a threat and an opportunity. At best - it achieves positive change and earns companies better public relations while reducing the risk of litigation or project opposition.

Meanwhile outright critics label SLO as "ethics-washing,".

EnabledFuture®️ notices a more delicate nuance - that while the absence of SLO can increase corporate risk, having it does not fully guarantee delivered benefits. At worst it can end being perceived as no more than any other corporate exercise - in which case having SLO might be a net negative.

If SLO is coded in as a short-term business risk-management tool and is not dovetailed well with the company's long-term ESG strategy, it can actually serve to provoke a stronger backlash.

A second weakness of SLO is the baseline. Fossil fuel and extractive industries do not begin from a neutral position. Social media empowers affected communities to share their experiences directly with a global audience, and often for the first time. Communities feel seen and heard - but not by industry.

If extractive and manufacturing industries including oil and gas are to earn genuine SLO they will need to make substantial reparations and visible changes in the fastest possible time frame.

To move forward EnabledFuture®️ sees these actions as the bare minimum:

👩‍⚖️ Companies must work to resolve ongoing lawsuits promptly.

🙇‍♂️They must implement tangible remedial actions rather than issuing reports with plans and written reassurances.

🕐 They must appreciate the immediacy of SLO. Unlike the longer-term focus of ESG, it demands sustained good behaviour, and genuine efforts to build trust against a backdrop of fulfilling promises.

💷 They must provide financial support and the means to rebuild for those communities who have, and continue to, experience harm from industrial activities.

🛠 There must be engineered solutions to halt further environmental damage - prioritised over short-term profits.

🔇 Take home message:

🚧 There is no shortcut to SLO. It must be as tangible and visible as the problems it purports to address.

EnabledFuture Position Statement on Metals, Resources and Industrial GrowthSunday 21st June 2026EnabledFuture (HQ London...
21/06/2026

EnabledFuture Position Statement on Metals, Resources and Industrial Growth

Sunday 21st June 2026

EnabledFuture (HQ London UK) does not support deep-sea mining of virgin metals or minerals.

We believe that the protection of marine ecosystems and biodiversity must take precedence over the extraction of new resources from fragile and poorly understood environments.

Damage to living species and ecosystems cannot be accepted as collateral damage in the pursuit of commercial objectives.

Our work on metals, minerals and industrial technologies is guided by the principles of the waste hierarchy / 9R framework, the United Nation's Sustainable Development Goals (UNSDGs) and insights gained through research we carry out in our Hexazity®️ Tech Lab.

We prioritise solutions that minimise overall resource consumption, extend product lifetimes, support closed-loop material systems and reduce dependence on virgin raw materials.

Much of our research focuses on technologies that deliver significant reductions in metal demand while maintaining or improving performance, efficiency and reliability.

Where non-metal alternatives demonstrate a superior lifecycle environmental footprint, we include and evaluate those options objectively within our studies.

Increasingly, combinations of metal and non-metal systems are proving to be practical pathways towards reducing demand for newly mined materials while delivering effective technical performance.

EnabledFuture is critical of business models that assume endless growth in material consumption or that pursue market dominance through the rapid scaling of production capacity to multi-million-tonne levels without fully considering resource constraints and environmental impacts.

We are especially concerned that those strategies are leading to supply deficits in critical industrial metals and subsequently presenting deep-sea mining as a necessary commercial response.

The transition to a sustainable future must not become a race to extract more resources from increasingly vulnerable ecosystems.

Innovation should focus on resource efficiency, circularity, durability and responsible consumption rather than the continual expansion of material throughput.

EnabledFuture supports a future in which technological progress, industrial efficiency and environmental stewardship advance together.

EnabledFuture stands for A Sustainable Future Without Compromise.

Do you buy consulting subscription or bespoke studies? Do you have a clear idea of whether the data in each is measured ...
01/06/2026

Do you buy consulting subscription or bespoke studies?

Do you have a clear idea of whether the data in each is measured or modelled? Here's the low down from an insider expert...

Subscriptions by nature cannot contain proprietary information.

They are not like bespoke studies which often require confidential data to achieve the necessary depth.

Bespoke studies often require non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to be in place to set the conditions for how that data is used and shared. This is especially common for technical and commercial due-diligence studies and in projects involving lenders and capital raises.

There ought not be any confidential data crossover from bespoke to subscription.

This is actually a very pragmatic split. As a buyer of consulting for ongoing business planning - it isn't as important to have that deep dive or to pay for more than you need. It also reduces your burden on managing third party confidential data.

Subscriptions are (or should be) high-value products without confidential data. Their purpose historically has been weighted to inform rather than advise.

One problem is potential pressure from some subscription clients for deliverables to be heavier on insights and in the increasingly competitive consultancy space - boundaries can get pushed.

To protect integrity and maintain objectivity assumptions and, well-defined methodologies around any data synthesis and modelling need to be explicitly detailed.

If a consultancy states for example that their reports contain oil refining industry "asset-by-asset" and "real-world proprietary data" what do they actually mean by this?

Do they mean each site?

Each refinery unit?

Each catalyst layer?

Each stream from each unit?

Each utility and feedstock contract cost?

The margin achieved on every completed trade?

Every time a unit undergoes maintenance, efficiency and actual downtime?

Individual capital item cost (actuals)?

Every employee's salary and contractor's fee?

The answer is obviously not.

If I'm wrong then I strongly suggest clients check their contracts to see if the consultants have agreed to include the data in the deliverables for one, and as a minimum, to ask for clear evidence of its existence.

If the answer is in fact no - then any claim not to have data models or synthesised data is, putting it politely, nonsensical.

So what?

The real question here is not whether the data has been modelled. It is whether the model contains bias or selective criteria that would influence a particular outcome.

If so, the data - no matter how granular - carries that methodological bias with it.

Then we must address why there is a bias. Whose interest does it serve?

Is it you?

Or is it who provided the data?

Or is it who modelled the data?

Are you paying for someone else's success?

Follow EnabledFuture as we help you separate more consulting facts from fantasy.

20/05/2026

Do you invest significant sums in consulting? If so, are you satisfied with the quality and defensibility of the deliverables?

If you are unsure, here are a few things worth scrutinising.

1. Forecasts are not facts - but they should still be meaningful.

A robust market forecast model should include:

• Accurate historic data
• The current market year
• Clearly identified demand applications
• Transparent segmentation methodology

If historic data does not align with known industry performance, production volumes, or traded volumes, treat the forecast with caution because this may distort the output of the entire model.

Segmentation quality also matters.

If the “Others” category in a market breakdown is too big (>25%) - it might obscure any value to the client if the highest growth niches are not visible.

Even at

🔋China has built a battery empire on steroids. The upstream, midstream, downstream, circularity and innovative drive ele...
20/04/2026

🔋China has built a battery empire on steroids. The upstream, midstream, downstream, circularity and innovative drive electric models to boot. It has all the biggest speed, strength, and strategic focus of the biggest cat in the jungle. 🐅 It's probably unstoppable.

🦁 With >70% of the global EV battery production capacity, China's growth doesn’t just perturb battery industry dynamics - it dictates them.

🧋When it comes to critical minerals China is in danger of a “milkshake moment”: the straw sucking noisily at air - and desperate for a refill.

It isn’t dysfunction but
success meets desire for more.

📈 Chinese momentum is unmistakable:
🔺️ CATL Q1 2026: Revenue RMB 129.13 billion (+52% YoY) and net profit RMB 20.74 billion (+48% YoY). This week it launched Shidai Resources Group, a new mining subsidiary with RMB 30 billion (~$4.4 billion) registered capital. Its pure mission: secure lithium, nickel and other CRMs to fuel energy transition projections.

🔺️ BYD scaled to ~4.6 million NEVs in 2025 (including ~2.26 million pure BEVs).

🔺️NIO surpassed 100 million cumulative battery swaps, delivering 5.28 billion kWh across its expanding network.

🇨🇳 This dominance didn’t happen overnight and the conditions can't be replicated. Trying to put the brakes on the Chinese battery industry is like hanging on to undercarriage of a Cheetah in a 0-60 mph 3-second sprint towards the tastiest looking zebra in the desert. 🦓

📜 China won early - it success traces back to A123's strategic win in the LFP battery material patent dispute with Hydro-Quebec and partners in 2013, which unlocked low-cost, safe LFP technology for entry-level EVs and mass consumer acceptance. While scaling LFP domestically, China also mastered NCM cells with Asian technology partners — but LFP gave it an unbeatable cost advantage and market access that took out a lot of zebras. 🏹

🔮Global OEMs who caught the e-mobility scale vibe early also thrived:

🔺️Tesla (Shanghai Gigafactory + long-term Chinese deals),
🔺️Toyota (hybrid sales that keep it the world’s largest car OEM),
🔺️Hyundai who just tipped 4 M car sales (now offering a competitively priced ~£25,000 BEV in the UK market).

🦳 European legacy players (VW, BMW, Mercedes-Benz) are now scrambling to invest, source, partner and scale inside China’s integrated ecosystem. But acceleration is not a skill - not when the territory has already been micro-mapped and the prey is surrounded by big cats.

What we have witnessed over Q1- 21C in the battery energy leader's club is strategic entrepreneurship at its finest. 👌

EnabledFuture™️'s take? The West will have to come up with more than hopium if it wants to achieve any meaningful damage limitation.

What does this mean for global supply chains, technology leadership, and the pace of the energy transition? Can China continue to steer around global conflicts? Will the big cat survive? 🐆

Address

London

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when EnabledFuture posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to EnabledFuture:

Shortcuts

Share