RM Sustainability Consulting

RM Sustainability Consulting Helping fashion & textile SMEs turn complex sustainability regulations into simple, practical steps that unlock opportunities.

DPPs | CSRD | ISO14001 | B Corp | Carbon Reports | Certified B Corp Business I work with fashion and textile businesses that want to do sustainability properly, not just look good on paper. I support SMEs through B Corp certification, GHG assessments, Ecovadis, DPPS, Net Zero strategies, waste reduction projects, and social impact initiatives that actually mean something. From mapping supply chain

s and measuring Scope 3 emissions, to redesigning take back schemes and managing B Corp applications start to finish, I bring structure, clarity, and a sense of humour to what can otherwise be an overwhelming process. Clients include independent brands, manufacturers, and purpose led platforms. Whether they’re getting ready for CSRD, need help translating impact into comms, or want a trusted expert on speed dial, I help them go further, faster.

When you started your brand, waste was not on the agenda.You were thinking about the product. The supplier. The customer...
25/06/2026

When you started your brand, waste was not on the agenda.

You were thinking about the product. The supplier. The customer. Whether the fit was right and whether the margin worked. Waste was something that happened after. Something the warehouse dealt with.

That model made sense for a long time.

It is not the model anymore.

The old version: design it, sell what you can, deal with what is left over. Write off the rest. Move on to next season.

The new version: use what was left over to inform what you order next. Which categories had high unsold stock? Which products came back damaged? Which lines should be cut or reduced before the next buying round?

That shift is not just good practice. It is increasingly what the economics demand.
Under EPR, the fee structure is based on volume placed on the market.

Less volume, lower fees. Reducing waste is not just an environmental decision. It is a margin decision.

On the ESPR destruction ban: from July 2026 this applies to large companies selling into the EU. If you are a smaller brand, your direct legal timeline is later. But the brands you sell to, and the retailers you supply, face it in July 2026.

They will ask their supply chain about unsold stock before that date arrives.

Knowing your own numbers is how you answer that question confidently instead of hopefully.

You did not start this brand to think about waste. But eight weeks ago I started sharing content about exactly this and if any of it has landed, the next step is straightforward.

The compliance quiz in my bio takes ten minutes. Seven questions. It tells you which regulations actually apply to your brand, where your gaps are, and what to prioritise first.

No jargon. No 200 page guide. Just a straight answer.

23/06/2026

I realised something looking at how fashion brands handle waste reduction.

The ones who make progress are not the ones with the biggest sustainability budgets. They are the ones who stop treating waste as an environmental problem and start treating it as a buying problem.

Because most textile waste is not created in the factory. It is created in the buying meeting. When someone orders 20% more than they need because they would rather have too much than too little. When nobody looks at last season's sell through rate before placing the next order.

The waste starts upstream. By the time it reaches the warehouse, it is already a done deal.

That is why the Impact Ledger reports waste by product category and season, not just in total. Because the total number is interesting. The breakdown by category is actionable.

If you know that one category has a low unsold stock rate and another has a high one, you do not have a brand wide waste problem. You have a category problem. And that is a problem you can fix in the next buying round.

The regulation is coming regardless. But the commercial case for getting on top of your waste data is right here, right now, with or without EPR.

Comment BUYING and I will send you the three questions to bring to your next buying meeting.

18/06/2026

RM Sustainability Consulting is our 2026 North West Green StartUp of the Year, a brilliant win for founder Rodica Murphy. 🏆

Fashion and textiles is a high-impact, high-waste industry facing tightening regulation, yet most smaller brands feel overwhelmed by carbon reporting, B Corp and EU rules and simply don't know where to start.

A certified B Corp herself, Rodica built the consultancy to cut through that confusion for fashion and textile businesses. She measures carbon footprints, builds net zero strategies, guides brands through certification and compliance, and designs circular programmes that keep stock out of landfill, turning compliance into something commercially useful rather than a burden.

Helping businesses do better for the planet and build stronger futures in the process. Their journey continues at Ideas Fest this September. ⛺

'Our waste rate? Um, it is pretty low, I think.'I hear this a lot. And it is never said with any bad intent. It is just ...
18/06/2026

'Our waste rate? Um, it is pretty low, I think.'

I hear this a lot. And it is never said with any bad intent. It is just what happens when waste has never had a proper home in the business.

There are two versions of that conversation and they lead to completely different places.
The first version sounds like guessing. 'We donate most of it.' 'Returns are not that bad.' 'Our waste is pretty minimal.' These answers feel fine until someone asks a follow up question. Then they fall apart.

The second version sounds like data. An unsold stock rate with a number attached. A breakdown by product category. A primary disposal route with a certified partner named. A direction of travel since last quarter.

To be clear, the numbers in the carousel are illustrative. The point is not the specific percentages. The point is the difference between having a number and not having one.

Between knowing which category is underperforming and lumping everything together as 'waste.' Between being able to answer the question and hoping nobody asks it again.

The gap between those two versions of the conversation is not a new software platform. It is not a data science hire.

It is one structured document that pulls together what your buying, warehouse, and finance teams already know but have never read in the same place.

That is what the RM Impact Ledger is. A working document. Quarterly. By product category. Clear enough to change a decision.

And the starting point is simpler than most brands expect.

Ask your warehouse team how many units went unsold last season. Just the total. Not the breakdown. Not what happened to them. Just the number.

That is step one. Everything else follows from there.

Comment READY and I will send you the checklist of what data to gather before you start.

16/06/2026

Most fashion brands treat waste as a cost line. Something you write off at the end of each season and try not to think about.

That worked when nobody was watching.

Now everybody is watching.

Buyers want waste data. Investors want circularity metrics. The EU wants disclosure on unsold stock. And under EPR, you are going to pay fees proportional to the volume you put on the market.

The problem is not the regulations. The problem is that most brands do not have the data to respond to any of this. Their waste numbers live in someone's head, not in a system.

The solve is simpler than you think. You do not need a new software platform. You need one structured document that tracks production, unsold stock, returns, and end of life routes by product category and season.

That is what the RM Impact Ledger does. It is not complicated. It is just structured. And structure is what turns 'we think our waste rate is okay' into 'our waste rate is 7.2% and here is how we are reducing it.'

Start this week. Pull one season of data into a single document. Even a rough version is better than nothing.

Comment TRACK and I will send you the simplest version of a waste tracker you can start using this week.

What actually changes when a brand starts measuring waste properly.Not in theory. In practice. Because the gap between k...
11/06/2026

What actually changes when a brand starts measuring waste properly.

Not in theory. In practice. Because the gap between knowing you have a waste problem and actually seeing it in data is bigger than most brands expect.

Here is what consistently comes up.

The unsold stock rate is almost always higher than the estimate. Not because anyone is being dishonest. Because the number has never lived in one place.

It is spread across buying decisions, end of season markdowns, warehouse write offs, and donation runs. Add it up and the total surprises people.

Returns are not one problem. They are three. Damage, fit, and change of mind each point to a completely different fix.

A brand addressing returns as a single category is probably solving for the wrong one. Breaking them down by reason is usually where the most actionable finding sits.

The disposal route that feels right is often not the cheapest one. Donation gets chosen because it sounds better than landfill and that is fair.

But most brands have never compared the actual cost per unit across donation, recycling, resale, and landfill once you factor in transport, sorting, and administration. When they do, at least one assumption turns out to be wrong.

None of this requires new software or a new team member. It requires one structured place where the data you already have gets read together rather than separately.
That is what the RM Impact Ledger is built to do. One report. Every product category. Every season. Clear enough to change a decision in your next buying meeting.

Save this and share it with your ops or finance director. It is the kind of thing that changes a conversation.

Comment LEDGER and I will show you what the Impact Ledger covers and whether it makes sense for where your brand is right now.

09/06/2026

Let's talk about the RM Impact Ledger.

When I first built it, I thought brands would use it because they cared about reducing waste.

Some do. But most of the brands that adopt it do so because they are terrified of being asked a question they cannot answer.

A buyer asks 'what is your unsold stock rate?' and they do not have a number. A retailer sends a sustainability questionnaire and the waste section is blank. An investor asks about circularity metrics and they have to wing it.

The Impact Ledger was built to solve that specific panic. Not the existential crisis of textile waste. The very practical crisis of someone important asking you a question and you not having the data.

Here is what it tracks: production volumes by product category. Unsold stock by season. Returns by reason (damage, fit, change of mind). End of life route for everything that did not sell (donation, recycling, resale, landfill). Cost per route.

It is not glamorous. It is structure. But it is the difference between guessing and knowing.

And knowing is worth a lot when someone important is asking.

If you want to see what the Impact Ledger looks like for your brand, DM me 'LEDGER' and I will walk you through it.

Your waste data lives in five spreadsheets and two people's heads.If that landed, keep reading.Most fashion brands can t...
04/06/2026

Your waste data lives in five spreadsheets and two people's heads.

If that landed, keep reading.

Most fashion brands can tell me roughly what their best seller was last season. Very few can tell me their unsold stock rate by product category. Almost none can tell me what each disposal route actually cost them.

That is not a criticism. It is just what happens when waste is treated as a back office problem rather than a data problem.

Here is the difference it makes.

If a buyer, an investor, or a retailer asks about your waste and unsold stock, there are two versions of that conversation.

Version one sounds like: "Our waste rate? It is pretty low, I think. We donate most of our unsold stuff."

Version two sounds like: "Our unsold stock rate is 8.3% across all categories. Category A is performing at 3%. Category D is at 22% and we are addressing that in the next buying round. We track quarterly."

The first answer gets a follow up question you cannot answer. The second one closes the conversation.

The difference between those two answers is not a bigger team or a new software platform. It is one structured tracking system that pulls the data you already have into one place.

That is what the RM Impact Ledger does. And the starting point is simpler than most brands expect.

Ask your warehouse team how many units went unsold last season. Just the number. Not the breakdown, not the reason, not what happened to them. Just the total.

That single number is where tracking starts.

The carousel above shows what comes next. Save it for when someone asks.

Save this. You will need it when someone asks about your waste data.

02/06/2026

Here is something nobody tells you about the ESPR ban on destroying unsold textiles.

It does not just mean you cannot burn your unsold stock. It means you have to prove what you did with it instead.

From July 2026, large companies selling apparel and footwear in the EU must disclose how much unsold product they have and what happened to it. The ban on destruction applies first to large and medium enterprises. Small businesses get an extended timeline.

But here is the bit that matters for SMEs: your buyers will ask you about it before the regulation asks you about it.

If Selfridges or Zalando or ASOS updates their supplier requirements to include unsold stock disclosure, which they will, you need to have the answer ready. Not because you are legally required to. Because your commercial relationships depend on it.

The question is not 'does this regulation apply to me?' The question is 'will my buyers ask me about it?'

The answer to the second question is almost certainly yes.

Practical step: take your top three retail accounts. Check their most recent supplier sustainability questionnaire. If unsold stock is not on there yet, ask them when it will be. Then get your numbers ready.

If you are not sure where to start with this, the compliance quiz in my bio gives you a clear picture in ten minutes.

You did not get into fashion to become a waste management expert.And yet here you are, reading about EPR schemes on a Th...
28/05/2026

You did not get into fashion to become a waste management expert.

And yet here you are, reading about EPR schemes on a Thursday afternoon.

That is not a failure. That is just what running a fashion brand looks like in 2026. The product decisions and the compliance decisions have started arriving in the same inbox.

The good news is that getting on top of this is not as complicated as the legislation makes it sound. It comes down to three things.

Know your numbers. How much do you produce? How much goes unsold each season? What happens to returns? If you cannot answer those questions with data rather than a rough estimate, that is the starting point. Not the regulation. The numbers.

Know your exposure. Which EU countries do you sell into? Does each one have a textile EPR scheme announced? Do you need to register with a Producer Responsibility Organisation? This is a finite list of countries, not an infinite compliance problem. You can map it in an afternoon.

Know your timeline. Large companies face the ESPR unsold stock ban from July 2026. If you are a smaller brand, your direct legal deadline is later.

But your buyers are large companies. They face it in July 2026 and they will ask their supply chain about it before then.

So the practical deadline for you is whatever date your biggest retail account sends their next supplier questionnaire.

EU EPR schemes must be operational by April 2028. UK textile EPR has a clear direction but no confirmed timeline yet.

You have time. But the brands that use it well are the ones who start before they are forced to.

The compliance quiz in my bio takes ten minutes. Seven questions.

A straight answer about where your brand actually stands.

Address

Manchester

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 4am
Tuesday 9am - 4am
Wednesday 9am - 4am
Thursday 9am - 4am
Friday 9am - 4am

Telephone

+447763404277

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when RM Sustainability Consulting posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to RM Sustainability Consulting:

Shortcuts

Share