21/04/2026
There’s been a lot of talk recently about “unbossing” and “conscious unbossing,” particularly in relation to Gen Z and their apparent reluctance to step into management roles.
Articles in both The Guardian and Forbes point to similar underlying reasons. Management is widely seen as stressful, under supported and disproportionately demanding for the rewards on offer. Many younger professionals are also prioritising personal growth, skills development and autonomy over titles or hierarchy, having watched previous generations burn out in roles that asked a lot and gave little back.
What’s interesting, though, is that many organisations are responding by flattening structures and talking about “unbossing”, as if reducing hierarchy alone solves the problem. In practice, leadership doesn’t disappear when you remove layers, it just gets redistributed! Decisions still need to be made, people still need support and direction and accountability still needs to exist somewhere!
The tension I see in organisations is that managers are expected to step back while remaining accountable, and individuals are expected to step up without always having the confidence, skills or permission to do so. When that gap isn’t addressed, autonomy can get uncomfortable quickly, and leadership becomes something people actively avoid rather than aim to grow into.
If organisations want unbossing to work, the answer isn’t fewer leaders, it’s better prepared ones. That means investing in leadership development earlier, making expectations explicit, supporting people through the relational and emotional load of leadership, and allowing leadership to look different from the models many of us grew up with.
This shift isn’t really about structure. It’s about how we value leadership, how we support people into it, and whether we make it a role that feels sustainable, human and worth saying yes to.