Change & Transformation

Change & Transformation A leadership and organisational development consultancy based in the North East.

After 18 months with Change & Transformation, we’re saying goodbye to Jake as he moves on to the next stage of his caree...
15/09/2026

After 18 months with Change & Transformation, we’re saying goodbye to Jake as he moves on to the next stage of his career.

Jake first joined us through work experience and went on to become an important part of the team, taking on the role of Marketing Officer and making a real contribution during his time with us.

It’s been great to see how much he's developed since first joining, and we’re really pleased to see him taking the next step in his career and looking forward to what comes next.

We recently got together for a farewell lunch to mark the occasion and wish him well.

Thanks for everything Jake and all the best for what comes next! ☺️

What should office time actually be for? A lot of the conversation around hybrid working starts with the number of days ...
03/09/2026

What should office time actually be for?

A lot of the conversation around hybrid working starts with the number of days people should spend in the office. But there is a more useful question to answer first: what do we actually need people to be together for?

Hybrid working has changed more than where people sit, it has removed some of the informal contact that used to happen without much thought.

A new starter could overhear how an experienced colleague handled a difficult conversation. Someone could ask a quick question without arranging a call. Managers noticed when somebody seemed quieter than usual. People gradually got to know colleagues they didn't directly work with.

None of this required a meeting invite, but it helped people learn, build relationships and understand how the organisation really worked.

Technology has made it remarkable easy to stay connected to the work, but it doesn't necessarily mean we feel connected to the people we do it with. This is why asking people to come into an office, only for them to spend most of the day on online meetings, can feel so frustrating. The commute may have changed, but the experience of work hasn't.

Being more deliberate about office time means using it for the things where proximity genuinely adds something: solving difficult problems together, learning from others, having important conversations, and creating a stronger identity of the wider team.

There should be space designed around these things too. Not every minute needs to be turned into planned team activities. Some of the value comes from the conversation before the meeting, the question asked across a desk or simply knowing the people around you better.

Hybrid working has changed a lot and in many cases, it has made us more aware of the things the office previously provided almost by accident.

So perhaps the question isn't how many days people should come in.

It's what becomes better because we're together?

Why good managers don't choose between support and challenge
02/09/2026

Why good managers don't choose between support and challenge

You learn a lot about leadership when something goes wrong. Most leaders can set the direction when the information's cl...
31/08/2026

You learn a lot about leadership when something goes wrong.

Most leaders can set the direction when the information's clear and there's space to reflect on the best way forward. But the harder part comes when a project falters, a decision doesn't work, or the team simply doesn't know what happens next.

Those moments are part of work but they're also those that people tend to remember.

A leader may have talked openly about trust, learning and giving people autonomy. But when something goes wrong, people pay close attention to what happens next.

Does the conversation become about understanding what happened, or finding who was responsible?
Does uncertainty invite questions, or create pressure for an immediate answer?
Can someone say they got something wrong without becoming the problem themselves?

People are constantly learning from these responses and while a single difficult reaction won't define a culture, repeated experiences will. If raising a concern usually leads to frustration, it's only natural that people become more careful about what they raise. And if mistakes are usually dealt with through blame, problems are more likely to be managed quietly until they become harder to ignore.

In larger organisations, this matters even more. Bad news often has to travel through several layers before it reaches the people making the bigger decisions. If people learn to soften concerns as they move upwards, leaders can end up seeing a much cleaner version of reality than the one teams are actually working in.

Leading through this uncertainty means making it possible to understand what happened properly, challenge where needed and still leave people willing to speak up the next time.

This can be difficult given the pressure leaders are under too. But those small reactions often shape what people feel able to say long after the moment has passed.

Consider this: If something was starting to go wrong in your team, how early would you hear about it?

Ask a group of senior leaders what the strategy is and you'll get a confident answer. But ask a team three levels down w...
26/08/2026

Ask a group of senior leaders what the strategy is and you'll get a confident answer. But ask a team three levels down what it means for what they should stop doing this week , and the confidence disappears.

A common misconception about this issue is that it is a communication problem, that the team must have never heard the strategy. Usually though, it's a design problem, often showing up when deadlines, pressures and competing priorities appear.

This is something a strategy is supposed to help with, but when it doesn’t, people just fall back on other signals. What's loudest. What's measured. What a manager asked for yesterday. What's always been done. It's what happens when a strategy hasn't been built to survive contact with an actual decision.

You can see the difference clearly if you look at how two competing airlines once approached it. American Airlines and Southwest Airlines were in the same industry, facing the same pressures, and they each wrote a strategy to match. But with their teams, the strategies landed in very different ways.

American's read like a mission statement: to be an industry leader, look into the future and win. Where Southwest's read like a to-do-list: modernise the fleet, join up the network, grow a loyalty programme that people actually used. The American strategy sounded like the one with more ambition but in the end, it was Southwest's that made the biggest difference. And that was simply because every line of their strategy told someone exactly where to put their attention next.

That's the real test of a strategy, whether it tells someone what the priority is when multiple things are competing for the same time or budget. American's strategy couldn’t say that but Southwest's could.

The bigger the organisation, the harder this gets, because a strategy has to travel through more hands before it reaches anyone making a real decision. Ambition does matter when setting out a strategy, but it only holds if it can be translated into real choices.

A fair test for any strategy means asking this: if two reasonable things were competing for the same time or budget, would it actually tell you which one wins?

A massive well done to Claire, who recently completed a full year of working with us. Claire brings so much to the team:...
24/08/2026

A massive well done to Claire, who recently completed a full year of working with us.

Claire brings so much to the team: thoughtful challenge, real patience with clients and a quality of thinking that continues to strengthen the work we do.

She has also helped us develop as a team, bringing new insight and perspective into how we approach our work.

A brilliant first year. Well done again, Claire!

On Wednesday, we took some time away from day-to-day delivery to focus on something important: the principles that sit b...
21/08/2026

On Wednesday, we took some time away from day-to-day delivery to focus on something important: the principles that sit behind how we approach transformation.

We spent the day as a team exploring several of the models and ideas that inform our work, challenging our thinking and considering how they should show up more consistently in the way we work with organisations.

There's a real value in creating space like this. Bringing good people together, stepping away from immediate tasks and giving ourselves time to think properly helps us build a clearer, more joined-up approach - helped along by a great lunch from Alkaline Kitchen.

A useful day of discussion, challenge and reflection and another important step in continuing to strengthen the thinking behind our work.

What is this meeting actually for?
12/08/2026

What is this meeting actually for?

We’re delighted to welcome Garry Cummings to Change & Transformation. Garry brings more than 35 years of experience in l...
11/08/2026

We’re delighted to welcome Garry Cummings to Change & Transformation.

Garry brings more than 35 years of experience in local government, including senior leadership roles across finance, transformation, governance and service improvement.

As the former Deputy Chief Executive and Transformation Director at Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council, he has led major savings programmes, corporate transformation and service improvement. This experience is particularly valuable at a time when many councils are managing significant financial pressures and looking at how transformation can support more sustainable services.

Since retiring from the council in 2025, Garry has continued supporting local authorities through consultancy work and as a Finance and Sustainability Adviser for the Local Government Association.

His deep understanding of local government, combined with a practical and thoughtful approach to change, will add real value to our work with councils and public service organisations facing complex financial and service pressures.

It’s great to have you with us, Garry.

You start the day with a service already under pressure.Demand is rising, projects are becoming more intricate and vacan...
10/08/2026

You start the day with a service already under pressure.

Demand is rising, projects are becoming more intricate and vacancies are taking longer to fill, while the people still in post are carrying much more than a year ago. Residents still need support, members are asking when services will improve and your team needs direction and decisions you haven't had time to make.

None of this is unreasonable on its own, but the difficulty comes in holding it all at once, given that every choice can create the next problem somewhere else. Protecting quality in one area can mean the waiting list grows in another. Spending today's time on tomorrow's problems can mean there's less left for what's arriving right now. Saying yes to a new priority means asking a stretched team to absorb more, unless something else genuinely stops.

This is why public sector leadership often feels less like setting direction and more like negotiating the gap between what communities need and what the organisation can provide.

Under that pressure, leaders pull closer to the detail. Decisions are no longer delegated because the consequences feel too significant to leave with someone else, while meetings multiply because visibility feels like the only assurance left. This works, for a while. Then the queue of decisions gets longer than the day does, and you realise the thing you were trying to protect, your team's confidence to act without you, is what closeness has quietly worn away.

That's the moment the focus stops being on workload and becomes the leader you meant to be. You know what a good service looks like. You just haven't had the room to build it, and carrying that knowledge every day is its own kind of weight, nothing to do with being weak, everything to do with the gap becoming yours to hold alone.

The way out is doing something different: naming, out loud, what your service is protecting and what it has to let go of, so that choice belongs to the team, not whichever manager or priorities list ends up making it by default.

When did you last say out loud what your team can no longer do, rather than just doing it anyway?

Address

Stockton-on-Tees
TS182NB

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Change & Transformation posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Change & Transformation:

Shortcuts

Share