19/06/2026
Recruitment has always been expensive. Now it's becoming risky as well.
Shorter windows to assess new hires. Increasing employment legislation. Rising salary costs. Higher employer taxes. The cost of getting a hire wrong is climbing fast.
And yet I still see SMEs making hiring decisions based on a decent interview, a good CV, and "I had a good feeling about them."
The problem is that interviews are a terrible predictor of performance on their own.
Some people interview brilliantly and then struggle when faced with pressure, ambiguity or the reality of the role. Others are less polished in an interview and go on to become exceptional employees.
When the stakes were lower, a few hiring mistakes were survivable. In the current climate, many businesses can't afford that luxury.
One wrong hire means recruitment costs lost, training time lost, management time drained, team disruption, lost productivity — and potential legal risk if things don't work out cleanly.
What actually works: a structured interview process, a practical task or real-work assessment, clear scoring criteria, psychometric assessment where appropriate, and proper probation reviews from day one.
The goal isn't to make recruitment harder. It's to stop discovering six months later that your gut feeling was talking absolute rubbish.
The days of hiring someone because they seemed nice over a coffee are disappearing. If you want to build a more robust process, I can help with that.