10/04/2026
A self acclaimed activist "Verydarkman" publicly called out Blord’s brand, l∆beled him a ch£∆t and a th!£f, and told the public not to patronize him. That is a direct ∆tt∆ck on someone’s business and R£putat!on. By law, that f∆lls under l!bel and d£f∆mat!on.– Lady gives an insight of what really happened between Billionaire business man, Blord and p00r man pikin, Verydarkman.
Before Blord put up that billboard, let’s start from the beginning.
How do you d∆m∆ge someone’s bus!πess in the name of activism? If your goal is to make things cheaper for the common man,
why not start with things people actually use every day, electricity, airtime, food, cement etc?
He knows very well he can’t drag bigger brands like that. If he did, there would be serious consequences. There was even a time he dragged a small brand and got l0cked up. What if Blord had taken that same route? He didn’t. That shows restraint. Before judging Blord reaction, look at what led to it.If someone publicly calls your business a sc∆m and tells people to ∆void you, your first reaction would likely be legal action But Blord didn’t do that. Both sides have said and done pr0vocat!ve things.
But if we are being honest, the person who first ∆tt∆cked a business publicly and tried to damage it would be the one facing legal C0nsequences first.There is a saying that says “Don’t start what you can’t finish” because they are people ready to go lower! Blord was ready to go l0wer with the activist, which wasn’t the right actions he should have taken. When you want to jμdge things, always start from the genesis and what led to it. I will always speak fact because I’m not here on the interπet to k!ss peoples nyash
