22/02/2026
MASSAD BOULOS: ALGERIA IS NOT AN OBSERVER, BUT A CENTRAL PARTY TO THE SAHARA DISPUTE
That clarity stands in open defiance of the Algerian military junta’s obsessive insistence – recycled yet again after Madrid – that it is a neutral bystander
BENI MELLAL – In his first media appearance following the Madrid talks, Massad Boulos, Special Adviser to US President Donald Trump for African and Middle Eastern affairs, did what he invariably does when he speaks on the file.Political leadership books
The American official dismantled – methodically and unequivocally – the long-standing Algerian fiction that it is merely an “observer” in the Western Sahara dispute. In doing so, he stripped away diplomatic camouflage, forced Algeria to confront the reality it has spent decades denying, and summoned the ruling regime back to the facts it has long tried to outrun.
Speaking to Deutsche Welle on February 14 on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference, Boulos anchored his remarks in the binding authority of the United Nations, indicating that UN Security Council Resolution 2797 explicitly names Algeria as a party to the conflict.
“This is a very old conflict – more than fifty years – and therefore extremely complex,” Boulos said, stressing that the process remains “fully framed by the decisions of the Security Council and the UN-led track.” The formulation was deliberate and lethal to Algiers’ narrative, collapsing its observer myth and locking the Algerian state firmly into the architecture of responsibility it has long sought to evade.
That clarity detonates the Algerian regime’s most cherished lie and ritualized falsehood – rehearsed again after Madrid – that it is a neutral bystander. Boulos’ intervention renders the claim legally void and diplomatically obscene.
He described UN Security Council Resolution 2797, adopted in October, as “an important and historic decision,” precisely because it breaks with decades of strategic ambiguity by explicitly naming the parties involved.
The resolution, Boulos noted, “clearly identifies the parties concerned: Morocco, the Polisario Front, Algeria, and Mauritania – each involved to different degrees.” There is no interpretive maneuvering left.