03/27/2024
So instead of banning dangerous battery technology from making it to consumers we have the federal government pouring billions of our tax dollars into showing us how to survive the disaster. Notice that UL never commits to assigning a classification to the Lithium battery fire. Just use a lot of water (Class A extinguishing agent) and cover it with a reusable fire blanket that’s loaded with toxic HF. Last I checked NFPA Standard 10 considerers energized electrical equipment as a class C fire. Also Lithium is a heavy metal and should be classified as a Class D combustible metal fire. Where’s the research on the effectiveness of Class C and D extinguishing agents on Lithium ion battery fires? UL is taking enough federal grant money to look into this fire problem. Why are their research methods so inconsistent with the NFPA standards that fire departments follow with respect to all other fires?
Follow the money.
Chief Hughes
Battalion 1 (retired)
Chicago FD
Join FSRI for on Monday, April 29 for "Leading the Way With Research: Lithium-Ion Battery Safety, the New NERIS, and Risk Mitigation" to learn about the Take C.H.A.R.G.E. of Battery Safety initiative; progress on U.S. Fire Administration's new data collection system, ; and vital research being conducted by the Insurance Institute for Business & Home Safety - IBHS. For this panel discussion, FSRI team members Adam Barowy, Tom Jenkins, and Zoe Susice will be joined by Chief John Morrison and Dr. Ian Giammanco, PhD. Learn more and register here: https://lnkd.in/eqGRbG5q