CleverTiger9474

  • Home
  • CleverTiger9474

CleverTiger9474 Contact information, map and directions, contact form, opening hours, services, ratings, photos, videos and announcements from CleverTiger9474, Private investigator, .

Post  #23 — 💸$9 Million Sitting. $957,000 Spent. One Park That Never Got Built.💸Someone filed a Maryland Public Informat...
30/05/2026

Post #23 — 💸$9 Million Sitting. $957,000 Spent. One Park That Never Got Built.💸

Someone filed a Maryland Public Information Act request a few weeks back. Here’s what’s sitting in the accounts for the Dominion park.

According to Calvert County’s own Workday project ledger, dated May 6, 2026, the project designated CIP-000065 Dominion Energy Regional Park has a current budget of $9,300,000. Revenue of $9,300,000 has been recognized. Actual expenses to date total $956,751.72. That is approximately 10 percent of the budget. The project status is listed as “In Process.”

Source: Calvert County Government Workday report, “Budget vs Actual Revenue & Expenses by Project — UPDATED,” CIP-000065 Dominion Energy Regional Park, May 6, 2026 (picture attached).

The FY2027 Commissioners Capital Budget, on page 240, classifies the $9,300,000 in Prior Approval funding as “Private contributions.”

Source: Calvert County, MD, FY 2027 Commissioners Capital Budget, page 240, CIP-000065 Dominion Energy Regional Park. — https://issuu.com/calvertcountymd/docs/calvert_county_fy_2027_commissioners_capital_budge

Dominion Energy Cove Point’s documented contributions to the park, as stated in the Parks & Recreation Director’s October 21, 2019 memo to the Board of County Commissioners, totaled $4.1 million by that date.

Source: Calvert County Department of Parks & Recreation Interoffice Memorandum, October 21, 2019, “Facility Naming Request — Property Formerly Known as Offsite Area A.” — https://www.calvertcountymd.gov/DocumentCenter/View/52810/512-CCPR-Naming-Request-Memo

By October 2020, the County’s own press release stated Dominion’s donations totaled “more than $6 million.”

Source: “Dominion Energy Regional Park and Cove Point Park Master Plan Approved,” The Southern Maryland Chronicle, October 6, 2020. — https://southernmarylandchronicle.com/2020/10/06/dominion-energy-regional-park-and-cove-point-park-master-plan-approved/

The County does not publicly itemize the source of the remaining roughly $3 to $5 million classified as “Private contributions” in the current budget.

On August 11, 2020, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Dominion Energy Regional Park master plan at an estimated total cost of $32.9 million. The vote was 4-1. Commissioner Earl F. “Buddy” Hance dissented, stating that he could not in good conscience support a plan that calls for spending so much money, and that “it’s just too much.”

Source: “Calvert commissioners approve master plan for Dominion Energy Regional Park,” Southern Maryland Newspapers Online, August 19, 2020. — https://www.somdnews.com/news/local/calvert-commissioners-approve-master-plan-for-dominion-energy-regional-park/article_4311c1be-ccd0-58a8-a14f-38a25e5078ba.html

The FY2027 Commissioners Capital Budget shows the current total estimated project cost at $14,650,000, which includes $5,350,000 in new debt funding planned for future fiscal years: $3,350,000 in FY2029 and $2,000,000 in FY2030.

Source: FY 2027 Commissioners Capital Budget, page 240. — https://issuu.com/calvertcountymd/docs/calvert_county_fy_2027_commissioners_capital_budge

The FY2025 Parks & Safety Capital Outlay request shows the County purchased $120,568 in operating equipment tagged specifically for Dominion Energy Regional Park in FY2025. This included a blower, a mower, a utility cart, a synthetic turf groomer, a debris collector, and a truck described in the request as “the main truck for the new Dominion Energy Regional Park.”

Source: Calvert County FY2025 Capital Outlay — Parks & Safety. — https://www.calvertcountymd.gov/DocumentCenter/View/53079/711-FY2025-Capital-Outlay-Parks-and-Safety

The FY2027 Capital Improvement Plan lists CIP-000065 with a project type of “New” and a funding status of “Future,” with “Service Expansion” as the project driver — eight years after the County took ownership of the land.

Source: FY 2027 Commissioners Capital Budget, CIP Project Type list, page 65. — https://issuu.com/calvertcountymd/docs/calvert_county_fy_2027_commissioners_capital_budge

In March and April 2026, Natelli Holdings — the developer behind the proposed Appeal Digital Park data center — offered the County a $30 million commitment to build a regional park at a different location, as a condition of being allowed to purchase 133 acres of the original park land for a data center.

Source: “Natelli Holdings Presents Data Center And Regional Park Plans At Calvert Commissioners Meeting,” The BayNet, March 25, 2026. — https://thebaynet.com/natelli-holdings-presents-data-center-and-regional-park-plans-at-calvert-commissioners-meeting/

Source: “A rural county fears a data center ‘freight train,’” Paul Schwartzman, The Washington Post, April 13, 2026. — https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/rural-county-fears-data-center-171104672.html

In coverage of the data center proposal, the Washington Post reported that Calvert officials “say they have not been able to fund” the original park.

Source: The Washington Post, April 13, 2026. — https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/rural-county-fears-data-center-171104672.html

—— The Math Ain’t Mathing ——

Why does the FY2027 budget classify $9,300,000 as “Private contributions” when the County’s own documents account for $4.1 million from Dominion as of October 2019 and “more than $6 million” as of October 2020? Where is the rest of it from, and when did it arrive?

Why is the FY2027 outyear budget set at $14,650,000 when the master plan approved in 2020 was estimated at $32.9 million? Did the scope shrink, or did the price?

Why is the County planning to borrow $5,350,000 in new debt in FY2029 and FY2030 to finish a park the County says it has been unable to fund — on land it has owned for eight years?

Why was the project still listed as “New,” “Future,” and “Service Expansion” in the FY2027 Capital Improvement Plan, after eight years of ownership and a fully approved master plan?

Why is Natelli Holdings offering $30 million — more than double the County’s current budgeted project cost — for permission to build a data center on this specific parcel?

If the budgeted numbers for a park the County has owned for eight years don’t match the money sitting in the County’s own account, what other budgeted numbers should the public be checking?

If you want the rest of the story — the 2018 transfer agreement, the warranty waivers, the naming process, and what was actually on the land when the County took it — say so in the comments.

Today is Memorial Day.It's a day to remember the people who gave their lives in service to this country — and the famili...
25/05/2026

Today is Memorial Day.

It's a day to remember the people who gave their lives in service to this country — and the families who carry that loss long after the rest of us have moved on to the long weekend. I have family who have worn the uniform, so this day sits close. But I won't claim a grief that isn't mine; today belongs to those who lost someone, and I'm thinking of them.

I think it's worth saying plainly what those men and women died for, because it's bigger than a slogan.

They didn't just die for an idea of "freedom" in the abstract. They died defending an entire structure — a country built on the principle that the people govern themselves. The right to speak. The right to ask questions. Elections that mean something. Courts, records, and laws that apply to everyone, including the powerful. A government that answers to the governed and not the other way around. That whole framework — messy, imperfect, and still the best thing we've built — is what they were protecting.

It's easy to take that structure for granted because it's just… here. It's the air we breathe. But it exists because generation after generation of people decided it was worth dying for.

So today, no arguments and nothing else. Just gratitude for them, and for everything they made possible.

To everyone who lost someone: thank you. I'm holding you in my thoughts today.

22/05/2026

Heads up to everyone sending documents and tips — I see them and I’m grateful. Life pulled me in a few directions this week, so I’m slower than usual and have some catching up to do. Nothing is getting lost. I see the questions about a timeline of events, and I’m planning to put a large one together this weekend. I did see the update to the county’s website about the partial site plan application AWS submitted, and I still need to catch up on the Ethics Commission meeting from today — if it was recorded, I’ll be watching it. Keep sending what you find — the material you all are surfacing is the backbone of this. [email protected]

19/05/2026

Just going to leave this here………

POST  #22 Behind the Meter, Front of the Meter, and a $5,015 ParcelIn December 2025 the federal government changed the r...
18/05/2026

POST #22 Behind the Meter, Front of the Meter, and a $5,015 Parcel

In December 2025 the federal government changed the rules for how a power plant can sell electricity directly to a single customer instead of putting it on the grid. In February 2026 BGE filed a $263.5 million substation expansion to do exactly that — on Constellation land at Calvert Cliffs, for a load larger than anything that has been publicly disclosed in Calvert County. This week, a 17.97-acre parcel sitting under a recorded utility right-of-way in the exact corridor that infrastructure runs through goes to public auction for $5,015.

I want to walk through what the documents say, because the pieces only make sense when you put them together.

1️⃣ The 2024 Fight That Nobody Was Told Was Happening

For most of 2024, Constellation Energy was working to sell electricity from its nuclear plants directly to data center customers without putting that electricity on the grid. This is called “behind-the-meter” — the plant generates power, the data center sits next door, the electricity never enters the transmission system that serves the rest of us.

In November 2024 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission rejected an interconnection service agreement between PJM, Talen Energy, and PPL that would have facilitated expanded behind-the-meter sales to a co-located Amazon data center at the Susquehanna nuclear plant in Pennsylvania. The vote was 2-1. American Electric Power and Exelon had argued the arrangement could shift up to $140 million in annual transmission costs to other ratepayers across the PJM region.

Source: https://www.utilitydive.com/news/ferc-interconnection-isa-talen-amazon-data-center-susquehanna-exelon/731841/

Maryland’s General Assembly was watching. In the 2024 legislative session, the House amended Senate Bill 1 — a retail electricity consumer protection bill — to address behind-the-meter arrangements that would pull electricity off the grid for a single customer without contributing to grid costs. Constellation publicly opposed those amendments. The final bill, signed as Chapter 537 of the 2024 session, directed the Maryland Public Service Commission to study co-location and report its findings to the General Assembly.

Source: Maryland Matters, “The strange journey of Senate Bill 1” — https://marylandmatters.org/2024/04/08/the-strange-journey-of-senate-bill-1/

The Maryland PSC issued that study on December 17, 2024, under Administrative Docket PC 61.

Source: Maryland PSC, Report on Co-Location, Senate Bill 1/Chapter 537, Section 6 —https://www.pscmaryland.com/wp-content/uploads/SB1-MD-PSC-Report-on-Co-location-V4_20241217.pdf

On November 22, 2024 — between the FERC rejection and the PSC report — Constellation Energy Generation filed its own complaint at FERC (Docket EL25-49) alleging that PJM’s tariff was “unjust, unreasonable, and unduly discriminatory” because it failed to establish rules governing service to load co-located with behind-the-meter generation. The complaint included correspondence between Constellation and Exelon utilities concerning possible co-located load at the Calvert Cliffs and Limerick nuclear power plants.

Source: Utility Dive — https://www.utilitydive.com/news/constellation-ferc-complaint-pjm-co-located-load-data-center/734001/

In the same month FERC rejected the Susquehanna deal — November 2024 — Constellation filed the first substation concept plan with Calvert County at 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway under application CSPR-143246. The infrastructure pathway had already started.

Source: https://www.calvertcountymd.gov/documentcenter/view/51677

2️⃣ The Front-of-the-Meter Workaround

On June 11, 2025, Talen and Amazon announced a restructured deal. Instead of behind-the-meter, they signed a 17-year, $18 billion power purchase agreement under which up to 1,920 megawatts of nuclear power would flow through the PJM grid to Amazon. That structure is called “front-of-the-meter.” Same physical arrangement — nuclear plant on one side, data center on the other — but on paper the electricity now technically passes through the grid. Talen will act as the retail power supplier to AWS; PPL Electric Utilities will be responsible for transmission and delivery.

Source: Power Magazine — https://www.powermag.com/talen-amazon-launch-18b-nuclear-ppa-a-grid-connected-ipp-model-for-the-data-center-era/

On December 18, 2025, FERC issued its order in the Constellation complaint proceeding consolidated with the show cause docket. The Commission found PJM’s existing tariff “unjust and unreasonable” and directed PJM to establish new transmission service categories for co-located loads based on the large load’s “net withdrawals from the system,” rather than requiring traditional front-of-the-meter network transmission service.

The new framework charges co-located customers based on what they pull from the broader grid — not on the full generation capacity they consume — because so much of the electricity is going directly to the customer next door without ever serving the rest of the system.

Source: Utility Dive, “FERC orders PJM to craft large load colocation rules” — https://www.utilitydive.com/news/ferc-pjm-colocation-data-center/808368/

So between November 2024 and December 2025, the federal regulatory pathway shifted from “you can’t do behind-the-meter cost-shifting without meeting a high burden” to “here is the new transmission service framework that lets co-located customers connect on a net-withdrawals basis.”

3️⃣ Camp Canoy: BGE’s $263.5 Million Filing

On February 3, 2026, BGE filed PJM Need Number BGE-2025-011 in Calvert County. I read the slides directly. Here is the language verbatim:

“Cut into existing 500kV Calvert Cliffs to Waugh Chapel and Calvert Cliffs to Chalk Point lines. Extend 4 lines 0.1 miles each to a new substation, Camp Canoy. Camp Canoy substation will be initially installed as a 3-bay breaker and a half configuration, ultimately expandable up to 5-bays. Install 1-175 MVAR, 500kV capacitor bank at new Camp Canoy substation. New customer will be radially served by two new 250 feet 500kV lines from new Camp Canoy substation to a customer owned substation. Estimated transmission cost: $263.5M.”

Source:https://www.pjm.com/-/media/DotCom/committees-groups/committees/teac/2026/20260203/20260203-item-09---bge-supplemental-projects.pdf

“Camp Canoy” is the land BGE purchased during the original construction of Calvert Cliffs Units 1 and 2 — originally a YMCA camp on the Chesapeake Bay shore — now Constellation property. Camp Conoy Road begins on HG Trueman Highway just north of Middleham Chapel.

The PJM slide does not provide a publicly disclosed total load figure on its face, but the substation is described as “ultimately expandable up to 5 bays” with a 175 MVAR capacitor bank — engineering that supports a load substantially larger than the 500 MW publicly described for the Amazon site or the 300 MW publicly described for Natelli.

The “customer owned substation” referenced in the BGE filing is the CSPR-143246 substation already in Calvert County planning since November 2024 at 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway. Two substations — one new from BGE, one already being permitted by Constellation — on the same property.

4️⃣ Three Layers at One Address

At 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway, three layers of infrastructure are in active planning right now.

The 988-acre data center site filed under MDE Tracking No. 202561277 (filed September 5, 2025 by WSSI for Minut Developers LLC). The site sits in a 100-year floodplain. The adjacent waterbody Johns Creek carries a TMDL impairment for biological conditions and metals. National Wetlands Inventory and DNR wetlands are present. Sensitive and endangered species concerns are flagged as Group 3. Maryland Historical Trust flagged the site for archaeological resources. Retention ponds triggered a dam safety review.

Source: MDE Wetlands and Waterways Search Portal, Tracking No. 202561277 — https://mdewin64.mde.state.md.us/ECollaboration/SearchPortal.aspx

The CSPR-143246 substation site plan, filed November 2024 by AECOM Technical Services for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC. 780.59 acres zoned I-2 Heavy Industrial. A general note on the plan states: “No sanitary service is anticipated for this project; however, water service will be required.”

Source: https://www.calvertcountymd.gov/documentcenter/view/51677

The new Camp Canoy substation under BGE-2025-011, filed February 2026.

The neighbors of all of this have a name. Karl Ellwein of Neighbors of Camp Canoy Road spoke at the April 15, 2026 joint meeting of the Calvert Planning Commission and Environmental Commission. He said: “What we have is existing quiet and the impact of what they want to build is dramatic. We know that’s going to be loud.”

Source: SoMD News — https://www.somdnews.com/recorder/news/local/environmental-panel-presents-data-center-recommendations-in-calvert/article_c8f8427d-40e4-489e-9ae0-16897110c9e5.html

5️⃣ What This Costs the People Who Already Live Here

On April 28, 2026, SMECO briefed the Board of County Commissioners. SMECO is the cooperative that serves 161,000 members across Calvert, Charles, Prince George’s, and St. Mary’s counties.

Source: SMECO Calvert County Commissioners Data Center Briefing — https://www.calvertcountymd.gov/DocumentCenter/View/54435/SMECO_data_center_presentation

SMECO told the commissioners that PJM wholesale capacity prices have risen from $28.92 per megawatt-day in 2020 to a projected $329.17 per megawatt-day for the 2026-2027 delivery year. That is an 800 percent increase. PJM spokesman Daniel Lockwood publicly attributed it to “unprecedented and continuing growth in demand from the proliferation of high-demand data centers in the region.”

Source: PJM Inside Lines — https://insidelines.pjm.com/pjm-auction-procures-134311-mw-of-generation-resources-supply-responds-to-price-signal/

What SMECO did not emphasize in that briefing, but PJM’s own announcement does: the BGE zone, which Calvert County sits in for transmission purposes, did not clear at $329.17. It cleared at $466.35 per megawatt-day — higher than the cap — because the BGE zone is capacity-constrained.

Maryland has retired approximately 6,700 megawatts of generation since 2018 and added only 1,600 to 1,700 megawatts. That is a net deficit of about 5,000 megawatts before any new data center load is added.

SMECO told commissioners on April 28 that it “does not have unilateral authority to enforce cost-sharing measures beyond existing law.” The law that would govern cost-sharing — SMECO’s own large-load tariff — is required to be filed with the Maryland Public Service Commission by September 1, 2026.

The infrastructure is being approved before the rules that determine who pays for it are written.

On March 24, 2026, Tom Natelli Jr. told the Calvert Board of County Commissioners: “We are required to pay for our connection. Existing rate payers will not be subsidizing these large loads.”

Source: SoMD News — https://www.somdnews.com/recorder/news/local/data-center-developer-proposes-site-and-park-in-lusby/article_1f85b73c-235a-4d24-93df-4f42d2246c59.html

That promise will be measurable in writing on September 1, 2026, when SMECO files its tariff. As of today, it is a verbal commitment made by a developer at a county commissioners’ meeting. As covered in posts #10, #11, and #19, this is the same county where developer commitments have already required public records requests to verify.

6️⃣ The Parcel: $5,015 to Enter the Corridor

On Friday, May 22, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., Calvert County will hold its annual tax sale at the County Administration Building, 150 Main St., Prince Frederick.

Source: https://www.calvertcountymd.gov/m/newsflash/home/detail/3126

One parcel on that list is 9400 H G Trueman Rd, Lusby. Account 01-021125. The opening bid is $5,015.16 on a parcel assessed at $196,500.

Source: Calvert County Tax Sale Property Viewer (picture attached) — https://geocortex.calvertcountymd.gov/

The parcel is 17.97 acres, vacant, with no primary structure. The owner of record passed away decades ago. The last transfer was in 1989 between family members. The estate is administered from a mailing address in Towson, Baltimore County, 75 miles from the parcel. The parcel is flagged with an unpaid Agricultural Transfer Tax recapture.

Source: Maryland SDAT, Account 01-021125 (picture attached) — https://sdat.dat.maryland.gov/RealProperty

I pulled the 1989 deed at Liber 483, page 661 of the Calvert County land records. The deed expressly excludes a 1977 conveyance to Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative recorded at Liber 208, page 800.

I then pulled Liber 208, page 800. It is a 200-foot wide transmission right-of-way granted by Undine H. Prince to Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc., recorded March 28, 1977. The grant includes “the right, from time to time, to cut down, trim, remove and keep cut all trees and brush upon the land adjoining the Property, which might... interfere with, or be liable to interfere with, or fall upon, any poles, structures, wires, cables, conduits or other improvements which the Grantee, its successors or assigns, may at any time or times construct or maintain upon, over, or under the property.” The associated plat at page 802 labels the easement “PROPOSED 200′ RIGHT OF WAY UNDINE H. PRINCE.”

Source: MDLandRec (pictures attached) — https://mdlandrec.net

The parcel sits directly along the 500 kV transmission corridor that exits Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant and runs westward across HG Trueman Road. Calvert County’s own GIS labels an adjacent feature “BG&E Field.” The Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s environmental documents for Calvert Cliffs confirm that “BGE holds title to the land beneath the South Circuit line” and that the two 500 kV circuits exiting CCNPP run parallel for approximately 9 miles before diverging. The width of that combined right-of-way is documented at 350 to 400 feet.

Source:https://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensing/renewal/applications/calvert-cliffs/ccv3.pdf

Southern Middle School sits directly across HG Trueman Road from the parcel — the same school proximity flagged in Post #15.

On Friday, the opening bid to acquire this 17.97-acre parcel, in this corridor, with this recorded utility easement, is $5,015.16.

7️⃣ What I Am Not Saying, and What I Am

I am not saying BGE or SMECO is bidding on this parcel. I have no documentation of any utility’s intent. I am not saying anyone will bid. The tax sale is public; anyone can.

I am saying that the federal regulatory pathway for routing nuclear-plant electricity to a single co-located customer was rebuilt in December 2025. I am saying BGE filed in February 2026 to spend $263.5 million on Constellation land at Calvert Cliffs to do exactly that. I am saying the rules that determine whether SMECO’s 161,000 ratepayers — across four counties — subsidize that infrastructure are not filed with the Maryland Public Service Commission until September 1, 2026. I am saying BGE-zone wholesale capacity prices have already cleared at $466.35 per megawatt-day for next year, higher than the regulator’s cap, in a state that imports 40 percent of its electricity.

And I am saying that on Friday at 10:00 a.m., 17.97 acres under a 1977 SMECO transmission right-of-way, in the exact corridor where this is all converging, opens for public bidding at $5,015.16.

Documents are linked. Pictures are attached. Read them yourself.

I’ll leave you with one last question - why no BOCC meetings for the next two weeks? If someone is out of the county I say we have it anyway! Only takes three right?

15/05/2026

All aboard the document train, Calvert. 🚂

I have a public folder of documents anyone is welcome to read. Viewer access with the link — you do not need to request anything, just click and read.

The folder is organized by topic: Zoning Ordinance materials, the Rowan Digital Infrastructure NDA package, the Natelli Investments NDA package, and MDE Public Information Act responses.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HB_wMVFbklAl5FiQzqws_69a3t_yvQ9f

I have kept the PIA request letters themselves out of the folder because they contain personal information. The responses and the underlying documents are what is posted.

There is also a Facebook Posts subfolder. A lot of people have asked me for the Word document versions of what has already gone up on the page. I will add the rest of those sometime this weekend.

The MDE folder is where I could really use help. Cat Decker received a ton of documents from her PIA request. There are 22 files in there and it’s an all hands on deck situation. State records on the proposed data center site that have not been worked through in public yet. Things like environmental review status, federal correspondence, rare and threatened species findings, and historic resource impacts. None of this has been part of the county-facing conversation so far.

Calvert Data Center - Minut Developers:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/19on8viBB-tO-aRyrryl3oIhXYU-Fo3Lp

As part of the same data center records request, MDE also sent a second folder. This one is apparently related to environmental cleanup at the site. Feel free to look through these too.

LRP The Harbours at Solomons - Calvert County Data Center:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1-zy-RWVknZnGTUsGRE8kXAjqyuAmELBU

Some of you may know more about parts of this than I do. Wetlands science, federal permitting, historic preservation, utility regulation, real estate law, county procurement — these are deep fields and I am one person reading as fast as I can. Let’s pull our collective knowledge together. If you read something that stands out — a date, a signature, a name, a sequence, a phrase that does not match what residents were told publicly — say so.

Comment here, DM, or email [email protected]. And if you share one of these documents yourself in another conversation, let me know what comes up. The reactions and questions people raise elsewhere are part of what gets us closer to the full picture.

One thing - treat each other with respect. I am not dealing with childish antics on this one. If you spam the post you will be reported to Facebook. We can all agree to disagree but especially if you’re in the no data centers FB group….read the room! Everyone needs to put their big boy and big girl panties on and recognize that there is a lot of information in these records, and together we can make a decision for ourselves and our community.

Teamwork makes the dream work! Let’s get to work!

Address


Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when CleverTiger9474 posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

  • Want your business to be the top-listed Business?

Share