CleverTiger9474

15/06/2026

Post #28 A BIRD'S EYE VIEW OF DATA CENTER ALLEY
⠀
I flew into Dulles recently and took some pictures out the window on the way down (see the photos below). I want to show you what I saw, because numbers on a page don't land the way the view from the sky does.
⠀
I know this is Northern Virginia. And I know Calvert isn't Northern Virginia, so maybe we shouldn't be comparing the two at all. But the commissioners keep doing it — so here we are.
⠀
That bright blue building in the photos is one of NTT's data centers. Here is what NTT publishes about one of its Ashburn buildings, VA3: 112,000 square feet of data floor space, 16 megawatts of critical IT load, in a two-story building.
⠀
Source: NTT Global Data Centers, Ashburn VA3 Data Center data sheet
https://services.global.ntt/en-us/pdf-viewer/bd89e876-0692-4a5a-b28c-9d3943bf34a5
⠀
That is one building. NTT's full Ashburn operation is nine data centers, planned across two campuses. At full build-out, NTT states it is designed to reach 224 megawatts of critical IT load and 970,000 square feet of data floor space.
⠀
Source: NTT Global Data Centers, Ashburn VA3 Data Center data sheet
https://services.global.ntt/en-us/pdf-viewer/bd89e876-0692-4a5a-b28c-9d3943bf34a5
⠀
Now Calvert. The Appeal Digital Park proposed in Lusby is, in the developer's own words, being designed for 300 megawatts of power at peak capacity, with an application already made to SMECO for 300 megawatts to be delivered to the site. The fact sheet describes four buildings of roughly 220,000 square feet each, about 70 feet tall.
⠀
Source: Appeal Digital Park FAQ and Fact Sheet, Natelli Holdings
https://www.appealdigitalparkcalvertmd.com/fa-qs-and-fact-sheet/
⠀
So set them next to each other. NTT's entire nine-building Ashburn campus is designed for 224 megawatts. One proposed Calvert project is designed for 300. The two are measured a little differently — NTT reports critical IT load, the developer reports peak power capacity — so read this as scale, not a meter-for-meter match. But the scale is the point.
⠀
I'm not telling you what to feel about that. I'm showing you the published numbers and the view from the window, and asking you to picture four 70-foot buildings like the ones in these photos sitting in Lusby — just on the park land we were promised. And that's before you even count the separate project on the Constellation side.
⠀
If you want to see just how many different companies are packed into that one stretch of Northern Virginia, here's a map of them all. Look for yourself:
⠀
https://www.datacentermap.com/content/nova/

14/06/2026

The Commissioner and the Marina
⠀
Todd Ireland is a Calvert County commissioner, and since December 16, 2025, president of the Board. His official county biography describes nearly 29 years as a Calvert County Sheriff's Deputy, retiring as a captain in 2021, and notes that he has worked on the water his entire life, fishing and crabbing on the Chesapeake Bay and Patuxent River. He lives on his family's farm in Huntingtown.
⠀
Source: https://www.calvertcountymd.gov/3558/Ireland-Todd
⠀
Source: https://www.calvertcountymd.gov/137/Board-of-County-Commissioners-BOCC
⠀
Recently he sat for two interviews where he was invited to talk about himself — one with Logan Nagle, one with Dylan Johnson. Both times he told the same story that's in his bio: his sheriff's career and his life on the water, fishing and crabbing. Neither time did he mention the business he runs now.
⠀
Source: https://fb.watch/HId6bzRTUP/ (with Logan Nagle)
⠀
Source: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=27856557297280887&id=100000599704134 (with Dylan Johnson)
⠀
It shows up on his public filings, though. His annual financial disclosure statement on file with the county lists Jetty Marine Services LLC. Those statements are public records — not posted online, but open for review in person at the County Administration office, 175 Main Street, Prince Frederick.
⠀
Source: Calvert County financial disclosure statements — available for public inspection at the County Administration office
⠀
The state's business registration for Jetty Marine Services LLC names Todd M. Ireland as its resident agent, at a Huntingtown address. The LLC was formed in October 2024 — while Ireland was already a sitting commissioner.
⠀
Source: Maryland Business Express — Jetty Marine Services LLC, Department ID W25528423
⠀
A search of Jetty Marine Services LLC turns up a May 2025 press release for the Solomons Inn Resort + Marina. It states that Solomons Harbor Marina (located in the Lusby Town Center) is now operated by Jetty Marine Services LLC, and it lists Todd Ireland as the contact, at 410-474-7919.
⠀
Source: https://www.pr.com/press-release/937022
⠀
The marina and the resort aren't owned by Ireland or by Jetty Marine Services LLC, though. Both waterfront parcels — 205 Holiday Drive, where the marina sits, and 155 Holiday Drive, the resort hotel — are owned by Solomons Joint Venture LLC.
⠀
Source: Maryland SDAT Real Property — account 199560 (205 Holiday Drive) and account 199579 (155 Holiday Drive)

That distinction matters, because I've seen it said that Commissioner Ireland owns a marina, and I haven't found any record showing that. What the records show is narrower: he runs one — Solomons Harbor Marina — through Jetty Marine Services LLC, and it's happening at the same time the Solomons Inn Resort + Marina, the property it's part of, is undergoing a major redevelopment under new ownership.
⠀
Source: https://www.solomonsresort.com/
⠀
Source: https://www.pr.com/press-release/937022
⠀
Through all of it, Commissioner Ireland hasn't been the one to bring any of it up.

I'll be honest about why I'm posting this one. I keep getting messages asking whether Commissioner Ireland owns a marina, so I went and looked. This is what the public record shows — no more, no less. It's a bit of a one-off from what I usually dig into, but enough people asked that I figured I'd put what I found in one place.
⠀
Every piece of this is a public record. Read them for your self.

12/06/2026

Todd Ireland’s campaign page lists, under “Historic Investment in Education”: dedicated over 40% of the operating budget to schools, “increased funding year-over-year,” and “exceeded state requirements.”

You can read it in his own words here:
https://sites.google.com/view/ireland4calvert/home
⠀
Set that next to the record.
⠀
The part the commissioners actually control is the local contribution to Calvert County Public Schools. In FY25 and FY26, the Board held that local contribution at Maintenance of Effort — the legal minimum a Maryland county can give its schools without losing state aid. Not a target. The floor.
⠀
“Increased year-over-year” and “the legal minimum” are not opposites. A number can go up and still be the least the law allows. That’s what this was.
⠀
And “exceeded state requirements” — Maintenance of Effort IS the state requirement. Meeting the minimum is not exceeding it.
⠀
It’s also worse than just holding the line. In FY25 the county required the school board to spend $22.5 million of its own fund balance to absorb a state-aid cut, and to cut 3% across the board with no layoffs allowed. When that state aid came back the next year — about $21 million, part of the largest overall state-aid increase of any county in Maryland — the county kept the local contribution at the floor and put none of the recovery back into school funding. The $22.5 million the schools spent was never replaced.
⠀
All while the county sits on roughly $104 million in unassigned fund balance — about $73 million above its own adopted reserve policy. School funding is a lawful use of that money. The commissioners chose the floor.
⠀
“40% of the budget” is true and beside the point — schools are the biggest piece of any county budget. The question was never the percentage. It’s that the part the commissioners decide was set at the minimum.
⠀
I documented every line of this — the motion, the dollar figures, the letters to the Governor, the fund balance — in Post #17, each claim sourced to a primary document.

Read it and decide for yourself:
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EoNk1yRcC/

10/06/2026

Post #27 DATA CENTERS: NATIONAL, STATE, AND COUNTY BY COUNTY
⠀
⠀
Yes — a data center can push our electric costs up no matter where it lands: Calvert, Charles, Prince George’s, anywhere. That’s the point made in the interview I shared, and it’s a fair one. But it leads me somewhere different: if it’s going to cost us either way, why aren’t we pushing back and asking for more? So this is a short history of how we got here — national, to the state, to county by county. Because the same pitch being made in Calvert was made almost everywhere else first, and a lot of those places, are now pausing, tightening the rules, and in some cases reversing course.
⠀
Source: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1NRni5qaGE/
⠀
Everything below links to a primary or published source. Where a statute is involved, I’m not a lawyer; I’m pointing you to the text, not interpreting it for you. The documents are public. Read them and reach your own conclusion.
⠀
⠀
1. THE FEDERAL PUSH — AND WHERE CONGRESS LANDED
⠀
On July 23, 2025, President Trump signed Executive Order 14318, “Accelerating Federal Permitting of Data Center Infrastructure,” directing federal agencies to speed permitting, ease regulatory requirements, and open federal land for large data centers — those needing more than 100 MW of new electricity, costing at least $500 million, or tied to national security. It came paired with a federal “AI Action Plan.”
⠀
Source: https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/07/accelerating-federal-permitting-of-data-center-infrastructure/
⠀
The Department of Energy then named four federal sites — in Idaho, Tennessee, Kentucky, and South Carolina — for data center and power projects.
⠀
Source: https://davisgraham.com/news-events/the-trump-administrations-progress-to-site-data-centers-on-federal-lands-initial-steps-but-work-remains/
⠀
On March 4, 2026, the White House gathered seven AI and hyperscale companies — among them Google, Microsoft, Meta, Oracle, Amazon, OpenAI, and xAI — to sign a voluntary “Ratepayer Protection Pledge” meant to keep households from absorbing data centers’ electricity costs. It carries no legal enforcement.
⠀
Source: https://bipartisanpolicy.org/explainer/strategic-federal-actions-aim-to-strengthen-ai-and-energy-infrastructure/
⠀
Congress, by contrast, has passed no binding data center law. The White House has urged Congress to preempt state AI rules it considers too burdensome.
⠀
Source: https://www.11alive.com/article/news/politics/sanders-ocasio-cortez-ai-data-center/507-4f259cb3-35f2-41b9-8cd5-617ffd57043f
⠀
But binding federal action has stalled. A provision to bar states from regulating AI was stripped from the fiscal year 2026 defense bill after bipartisan opposition; the AI language that remained is about the military’s own systems and computing, not the commercial buildout. After it failed, the administration moved to preempt state AI rules by executive order — a step that has no force of law on its own.
⠀
Source: https://www.meritalk.com/articles/ndaa-drops-ai-moratorium-tmf-renewal-but-packs-major-cyber-provisions/
⠀
Source: https://www.crowell.com/en/insights/client-alerts/executive-order-tries-to-thwart-onerous-ai-state-regulation-calls-for-national-framework
⠀
In March 2026, Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez introduced a bill (S.4214) to pause new AI data center construction until federal safeguards exist. It was widely described as unlikely to advance, and lawmakers in both parties have rejected a construction moratorium.
⠀
Source: https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/senate-bill/4214/text
⠀
Where there has been cross-party movement, it is on cost. House Energy and Commerce Democrats asked federal energy regulators to keep families from bearing data centers’ grid costs.
⠀
Source: https://www.aol.com/articles/debate-over-ai-heats-gop-205500327.html
⠀
And Maryland’s Senator Chris Van Hollen introduced legislation requiring companies to pay for the grid expansion they drive.
⠀
Source: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/legislation-introduced-to-end-data-center-tax-breaks-in-maryland-and-arizona/
⠀
The net effect: Washington has pushed to build faster while passing no binding rules of its own — which has left the real regulation to the states and counties below.
⠀
⠀
2. THE STATES: WHO PAYS, AND WHO PAUSES
⠀
No state has banned data centers outright. As of June 1, 2026, no broad statewide moratorium had been enacted anywhere.
⠀
Source: https://www.datacenterbans.com/
⠀
New York came closest: on June 5, 2026, its legislature passed a one-year moratorium on permits for new large-scale data centers and sent it to the governor. If signed, it would be the first statewide freeze in the country.
⠀
Source: https://spectrumlocalnews.com/nys/central-ny/politics/2026/06/05/data-center-moratorium-approved-
⠀
The biggest category of new state law isn’t about banning the buildings — it’s about who pays for the power.
⠀
Florida (SB 484), signed in May 2026, bars utilities from shifting data center costs onto residential and small-business customers and requires large users to pay their full cost of service. Oklahoma (HB 2992) set similar cost rules; Washington (SB 5982) tied large data centers to clean-energy deadlines.
⠀
Source: https://www.datacenterbans.com/
⠀
California, Ohio, and Utah enacted laws requiring developers to cover their own energy costs, and South Carolina and Maryland passed rate-negotiation laws in 2025.
⠀
Source: https://www.multistate.us/resources/state-data-center-policy-101
⠀
On the pause side, Maine’s legislature passed an 18-month moratorium, but Governor Mills vetoed it in April 2026 and the override failed; most other state-level moratorium bills have stalled, which has pushed that fight down to cities and counties.
⠀
Source: https://www.mainepublic.org/politics/2026-04-29/janet-mills-successfully-vetoes-bills-on-data-centers-and-sealing-criminal-records
⠀
⠀
3. MARYLAND
⠀
A reminder before the statutes: I’m not a lawyer, and what follows points to the text, not a legal opinion.
⠀
Maryland’s 2025 Next Generation Energy Act requires the Public Service Commission to set a separate rate class for data centers so ordinary customers don’t carry their costs. The law states that residential customers should not bear the financial risk of large-load customers connecting to the grid.
⠀
Source: https://marylandmatters.org/2026/01/03/data-center-regulations-2026/
⠀
In a December 16, 2025 special session, the General Assembly overrode the governor’s veto to order a statewide study of data centers’ environmental and economic effects, due to the legislature by September 2026.
⠀
Source: https://technical.ly/civics/maryland-data-center-impact-study-veto-override/
⠀
The issue runs straight through Calvert. In 2024, the debate over Senate Bill 1 turned on whether a data center drawing power directly from Calvert Cliffs “behind the meter” would effectively pull the plant off the regional grid — with one estimate of up to a $4 billion impact on ratepayers.
⠀
Source: https://marylandmatters.org/2024/04/08/the-strange-journey-of-senate-bill-1/
⠀
In the 2026 session, roughly 30 data center bills were filed. Two are worth noting because they did not pass. HB120 would have paused new data center construction statewide. HB560 would have repealed both the state sales-and-use tax exemption for data center equipment and the authority counties hold to reduce or eliminate the local assessment on that equipment. Neither advanced.
⠀
Source: https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/hb0560?ys=2026RS
⠀
For scale on the existing state break: Maryland has reported giving up about $22 million in sales and use tax through 2025, against 276 jobs reported at those facilities.
⠀
Source:https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/cmte_testimony/2026/wam/17hj0gB_GyO0gwlfeouMhwxX7radqrlyd.pdf
⠀
⠀
4. WHAT MARYLAND COUNTIES HAVE ACTUALLY DONE
⠀
The statewide pause failed, so counties are acting on their own. A partial map as of June 2026:
⠀
Frederick cut the land open to data centers roughly in half — from about 5,000 acres to about 2,500, concentrated near the old Eastalco site — through a Critical Digital Infrastructure overlay adopted in early 2026.
⠀
Source: https://frederickcountymd.gov/9122/Data-Centers
⠀
Prince George’s had 2020 “by-right” approvals; after a $5 billion project was approved before most neighbors knew, the council passed a moratorium in September 2025 and a task force recommended a public hearing for every data center.
⠀
Source: https://www.bayjournal.com/news/energy/maryland-counties-to-data-center-industry-slow-down/article_c8362372-9a29-4ef9-925a-c81840390a95.html
⠀
Baltimore County voted unanimously in February 2026 to pause permitting through as late as the end of 2026 and repealed its 2024 data center regulations.
⠀
Source: https://www.bayjournal.com/news/energy/maryland-counties-to-data-center-industry-slow-down/article_c8362372-9a29-4ef9-925a-c81840390a95.html
⠀
Montgomery, with a project moving at the former Dickerson coal site, saw the county executive propose limiting data centers to industrial zones, requiring them to supply most of their own power, and a six-month moratorium.
⠀
Source: https://www.bayjournal.com/news/energy/maryland-counties-to-data-center-industry-slow-down/article_c8362372-9a29-4ef9-925a-c81840390a95.html
⠀
Charles (next door): the planning commission recommended denial of its data center zoning amendment in March 2026, citing potable-water use and who bears infrastructure costs.
⠀
Source: https://thebaynet.com/charles-county-planning-commission-votes-to-deny-data-center-zoning-amendment/
⠀
Howard, Carroll, Harford, Queen Anne’s: Howard’s council passed a moratorium awaiting the executive’s signature, Carroll passed a 12-month pause, Queen Anne’s joined, and Harford is moving toward a permanent ban; Baltimore City is considering a pause.
⠀
Source: https://www.cbsnews.com/baltimore/news/maryland-data-center-ban-moratorium-development-regulations/
⠀
⠀
5. THE MONEY: PROPERTY TAX, AND WHAT A PILOT IS
⠀
A PILOT — Payment In Lieu Of Taxes — is a negotiated fixed payment a company makes instead of the ordinary tax. Depending on the terms, it can lock in revenue, or function as a discount.
⠀
The pitch is real: data centers can become large taxpayers. In Loudoun County, Virginia, data centers paid about $733 million in property taxes in 2024 — roughly a third of the county’s property tax revenue.
⠀
Source: https://jlarc.virginia.gov/landing-2024-data-centers-in-virginia.asp
⠀
The counterweight is also documented: data centers employ very few people once running. An industry analysis put it at about 157 permanent jobs on average, and one Microsoft site in Illinois drew more than $38 million in exemptions for 20 permanent jobs.
⠀
Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/06/20/tax-breaks-for-tech-giants-data-centers-mean-less-income-for-states.html
⠀
Maryland’s tax structure has two layers, and they are not the same thing:
⠀
The state sales-and-use tax exemption on data center equipment is uniform Maryland law. A county cannot change it.
⠀
Source: https://commerce.maryland.gov/fund/data-center-maryland-sales-and-use-tax-exemption-incentive-program
⠀
The local personal-property tax is a county choice. Maryland has no state personal-property tax; seven counties — including Frederick — don’t levy one, while Calvert and most others do. So Calvert would capture personal-property-tax revenue on data center equipment that Frederick cannot. One caveat: computer equipment depreciates quickly, so those figures depend on the operator continually replacing equipment.
⠀
Source: https://commerce.maryland.gov/about/taxes
⠀
Source: https://www.discoverfrederickmd.com/157/Incentives-Taxes
⠀
And the lever: Maryland also authorizes a county to reduce or eliminate that local assessment — the very authority HB560 tried to repeal. Whether Calvert uses it to fully tax data center equipment or to discount it is a county decision, in Calvert’s hands.
⠀
⠀
6. HOW THE CASE IS BEING SOLD, AND WHAT INDEPENDENT SOURCES SAY
⠀
A primer titled “Weighing the Evidence,” branded with a trades union, has carried the optimistic figures — a typical large data center bringing hundreds of permanent jobs and, in its words, helping “bridge Maryland’s budget gap.” The same policy firm that wrote that primer also authored Calvert’s Economic Development Strategic Plan. Those are facts; readers can weigh the overlap.
⠀
Set against independent sources: on jobs, the permanent-employment numbers above. On rates, Virginia’s own legislature found data centers pay their current costs but will raise system costs for everyone because of new infrastructure built to serve them — and residential rates rose about 32% nationally between 2020 and 2025.
⠀
Source: https://jlarc.virginia.gov/landing-2024-data-centers-in-virginia.asp
⠀
Source: https://www.brookings.edu/articles/new-evidence-on-data-center-employment-effects/
⠀
The point isn’t to argue. It’s to set the claim and the independent number next to each other.
⠀
⠀
7. THE TRANSPARENCY QUESTION, WITH TWO DOCUMENTS
⠀
You can’t file a records request on a company. You can file one on the government body that holds the company’s documents — and a confidentiality stamp does not override public-records law.
⠀
Spotsylvania County, Virginia: a resident’s records request unsealed a 33-page Amazon water contract stamped “Confidential” on every page. The contract itself concedes its terms are subject to Virginia’s public-records law.
⠀
Source: https://poweredbywho.com/stories/amazon-spotsylvania-mattameade-water-contract
⠀
Source:https://poweredbywho.com/docs/contracts/amazon-spotsylvania-mattameade-wsa-2024-11-22.pdf
⠀
Culpeper, Virginia: a records request produced a reclaimed-water agreement showing a data center developer operating as a Delaware LLC — the same use of shell entities and code names a national watchdog has documented across the industry.
⠀
Source: https://poweredbywho.com/stories/virginia-data-centers-water-culpeper
⠀
Source: https://goodjobsfirst.org/cloudy-data-costly-deals-how-poorly-states-disclose-data-center-subsidies/
⠀
⠀
BACK TO CALVERT
⠀
Calvert is the site of an Amazon (AWS) application. The same company was the original operator behind a campaign a city council in Tucson, Arizona, unanimously rejected.
⠀
Source: https://azluminaria.org/2025/08/06/tucson-city-council-rejects-project-blue-amid-intense-community-pressure/
⠀
On the benefit question the interview raised, the county already has a working template for exactly this kind of deal. Its agreement with Dominion Cove Point is a PILOT that includes a 42% tax credit on new and repurposed equipment — structured around the same equipment-depreciation problem a data center presents.
⠀
Source: Calvert County Comprehensive Plan, 2025
⠀
And the county has been building the machinery for a data center version of that deal. In the 2025 General Assembly, a Calvert County Delegation bill (HB949) would have authorized the county to negotiate payment-in-lieu-of-taxes agreements with data centers; it died in committee.
⠀
Source: https://mgaleg.maryland.gov/mgawebsite/Legislation/Details/hb0949?ys=2025RS
⠀
Separately, the county hired a consultant to design a data center incentive program and draft authorizing legislation (see Post #20). A county official says no deal has been signed. All of it is on the record.
⠀
A developer has told residents the project could mean close to $50 million a year to the county, driven by personal property.
⠀
Source: Thomas Natelli, T-Bone and Heather radio interview, March 2026
⠀
Whether that figure holds depends on the equipment question above — and on whether the county taxes that personal property or discounts it.
⠀
None of this tells you what to think. But it does provide you with the documented facts to draw your own conclusion. It tells you what is documented — here, and everywhere else. The rest is yours.
⠀
Every source above is public. I’ve tried my best to put documents I can’t link to out here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HB_wMVFbklAl5FiQzqws_69a3t_yvQ9f

10/06/2026

This sounds familiar 🫣👀

why are local governments treating their citizens like this?

10/06/2026

Before Post #27 goes up, please watch this.

This is Dylan Johnson and Calvert County Commissioner Todd Ireland getting into the part of the data center question that actually hits residents: the taxes. The benefit being promised comes down to tax revenue — especially the personal property tax on all the equipment inside a data center. Calvert charges that tax. Some Maryland counties, like Frederick, don’t — which means the very same building is taxed completely differently depending on where it lands. And as of right now there’s no signed county deal or PILOT for this project; the only break on the table is the state’s sales-and-use tax exemption on data center equipment.

That’s the tax math at the heart of this. Post #27 is the other half: what these tax deals have actually delivered — and cost — in the states and counties that already said yes. Watch this first, then read that, and decide for yourself.

Source: interview with Calvert County Commissioner Todd Ireland by Dylan Johnson.
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1NRni5qaGE/

08/06/2026

Post #26 I AGREE WITH TODD IRELAND
⠀
Yep. You read that right. I agree with Commissioner Todd Ireland. On one thing, anyway: our county employees are probably swamped and stressed right now.
⠀
I heard Ireland in a recent interview (clip below, full interview linked). Ireland said staff have been "getting blasted with PIAs," public information requests, and put the number at "well over 300 PIAs since January." Ireland said staff are spending countless hours filling them, that even when some requests are the same each one still has to be handled individually, and that some county employees are worn down by it. Ireland was also clear that residents have every right to ask: "If people have questions, they deserve to get their answers if they want."
⠀
Source: https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1NRni5qaGE/?mibextid=wwXIfr
⠀
On all of that, I agree. Those are real hours, taken from the people who actually do the work, and it isn't their fault we are asking for all of these documents.
⠀
This is what I have asked for from the start. More transparency. Put the documents out there so we don't have to request them one at a time. I've also suggested a town hall, so questions could be answered in one place instead of all of us digging on our own. That hasn't happened. And when records don't get posted and questions don't get answered, what you get is hundreds of PIAs.
⠀
So here's my proposed solution to fix this issue:
⠀
1. The County already built a public information page for the data center project. It could do the same for public records: post the documents it has already released through past requests, so people can check there first before filing a new one. That alone would save staff a lot of time.
⠀
2. If there's a record you've been thinking about requesting, or one you wish was just posted, tell me in the comments. I'll compile them into one list the County could use to post those documents in one place, and note any they don't intend to release.
⠀
One ground rule, the same one I hold myself to: it has to be a real public record you can name. A contract, a report, a payment, an actual document the County keeps. Not a rumor, not something secondhand. If it's a genuine record, it belongs on the list.
⠀
I'll go first.
⠀
Request: Please provide the sole source contract information for fiscal years 2024 through 2026.
⠀
For context, here's why I'm asking. The County posts its bid results online, and anyone can read them.
⠀
Source: https://www.calvertcountymd.gov/3954/FY-2026-Bid-Results
⠀
For the competitive bids, the page works the way it should. Next to most of them you can open a document that shows what was bid and what it cost. For the sole source awards, the ones where the County bought something without competitive bids, there is nothing to open. This year's page lists three, and each one says only "Awarded."
⠀
Sole Source 2026-039, Kings Landing Septic System Pump, awarded to Earnshaw Brothers
⠀
Sole Source 2026-050, Kelly HVAC, awarded to Kelly HVAC
⠀
Sole Source 2026-051, Unisource, awarded to Unisource
⠀
No price. No explanation. A sole source award is allowed under the County's procurement rules in certain situations. It is also the kind of purchase the public has the most reason to see, because there is no competing bid to show the price was tested. I'm asking across three years because that covers the same period as a lot of the big decisions people have questions about. The same page also skips numbers in its sequence, so it isn't a complete record either. I'm not saying anything is hidden. I'm saying that from the page, a resident can't tell. So post the documents, fill in what's missing, or honestly, just update the page.
⠀
I've tried to do my part. The documents from the PIA requests I've used in these posts are in a public Google Drive, here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HB_wMVFbklAl5FiQzqws_69a3t_yvQ9f
⠀
One last thing, and it matters to me. I saw a post about political signs being defaced. I don't condone that, for anyone. I understand the frustration, I feel it too, but that is not the way to handle it. If you're fired up, put it where it counts. Show up to a meeting. Speak during public comment. Vote. And talk to the neighbors and friends who have no idea any of this is going on.

08/06/2026

I agree with Todd Ireland on one thing: our county staff are swamped, and that isn't fair to them.

In this interview Ireland says the County has had well over 300 public information requests since January, and that staff are spending countless hours on them.

I think there's a simpler way: post the records once so people don't have to keep asking.

Full post, my records request, and the document links are in Post #26 on my page.