09/05/2026
Forty-two passed. Four failed. Nine could not be run at all.
That is what our own certification returned. Fifty-five checks against a restaurant we built ourselves. We wrote the number down, recorded the ruling on each failure next to it, committed the whole thing, and refused to call it certified.
Two of the four failures are the same wound: our kitchen tickets have headers and no bodies. All 1,830 item lines are absent. The ticket number, fired, ready, completed — those exist. What was on the plate does not.
So we wrote the ruling in advance: record it as a named limit now, it must never be described as complete.
That sentence is doing real work. There is a version of this where somebody builds a kitchen view on headers alone and it demos beautifully, because headers are what fills a screen and nobody clicks through. We closed that door in writing, before anyone could walk through it.
And nine checks never ran at all. Not passed, not failed — nine things we still do not know about our own demo, written into the same document as the things we do.
Nobody re-sorted the failure list by how it made us look. The moment you start sorting failures by how embarrassing they are, you have started editing.
Why publish a failing score on purpose:
https://api.lamaai.app/go/score?src=fb-score0905