01/31/2024
My response to all the people who believe E. Jean Carroll's allegations against Donald J. Trump:
1. Do you really believe that Trump who was known by everybody 30 years ago would go to the ladies lingerie department of Bergdorf Goodman in the middle of the day and walk in the dressing room area with lots of people trying on clothes and s*xually assault Carroll, without her screaming for help and without anyone noticing?
2. E. Jean Carroll has accused many men of s*xual assault over the years, including a babysitter's boyfriend, a camp counselor, a dentist, a college date, one of her bosses, and a CBS chief executive, Les Moonves. She appears to be a person who repeatedly sues and/or defames people hoping to get a nuisance payoff OR a s*xually promiscuous woman who feels guilty and claims it was against her will to assuage her guilt.
3. There's no confirming video evidence (Bergdorf Goodman could find no surveillance tape of the incident or of Trump or Carroll being in the lingerie department) because of Carroll's decades-long delay in proceeding with litigation, which hinders the defense more than the plaintiff in this "believe-all-women" era.
4. Carroll didn't file a report the alleged day it happened and so no percipient witnesses were identified who could be called to support Carroll's testimony or Trump's defense.
5. Carroll conveniently first alleged the assault in 2019 when she was promoting her book "What Do We Need Men For?", which featured a list of "The Most Hideous Men of My Life." That sounds like she's a man-hater, which comports with all her previous allegations mentioned above.
6. Carroll told her lawyer in 2023 that she couldn't remember date and, at various times said it was in the 1980s, in the 1990s, in 1994, in 1995, in 1996, or in the 2000s. How is a defendant to defend himself against such vagueness. Vagueness is usually fatal to a case -- except where Democrats are suing Conservatives in a court tried by a former colleague?
7. The Donna Karan blazer dress she claims to have worn that day was not even marketed until after Carroll's alleged r**e dates.
8. Carroll's social media posts make her seem obsessed with s*x, such as (1) "How do you know your 'unwanted s*xual advance' is unwanted, until you advance it?" and (2) "S*x Tip I Learned From My Dog: When in heat, chase the male until he collapses with exhaustion ... then jump him!"
9. Carroll said in The Daily, a New York Times podcast, "Every woman gets to choose her word. Every woman gets to choose how she describes it. This is my way of saying it. This is my word. My word is 'fight.' My word is not the 'victim' word. I have not -- I have not been r**ed," she continued. "I have -- something has not been done to me. I fought. That's the thing."
10. Carroll's story is strikingly similar to a 2012 episode of Law and Order SVU "Theater and Tricks" wherein a person described a r**e fantasy in Bergdorf Goodman! The character said, "Role-play took place in the dressing room of Bergdorf's. While she was trying on lingerie I would burst in." Carroll admitted being aware of this episode and admitted the similarities with her allegations against Trump were "amazing."
11. Carroll's attorney, Roberta Kaplan, had a prior connection to Judge Lewis Kaplan that was not and SHOULD HAVE BEEN disclosed and should have disqualified him from trying her case. Judge Kaplan was a partner at a lawfirm with Carroll's attorney and was in a position to supervise her, so Trump could have petitioned to have him recused. His rulings were blatantly in favor of Carroll and it's a severe breach of the ethics code to fail to disclose such a prior relationship of the judge with one party.
12. Carroll's lawsuit was only able to be filed so many years after the STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS had expired, because the NY Democratically controlled legislature passed the Adult Survivors Act in 2022 that tolled the Statute of Limitations for ONE YEAR to let her file against Trump the day after it became effective (so her attorneys knew they were getting the "special dispensation" to "get Trump). The purpose of a statute of limitations is to protect defendents from having to defend against ancient allegations when documents, videos, and witnesses are no longer available. This change in the New York law seems to be an Ex Post Facto law prohibited by the U.S. Constitution.
13. Anderson Cooper broke to a break in an interview with Carroll when she shockingly said, "I think most people think of r**e as s*xy..." ... cut to break... Carroll seems obsessed with s*x and probably fantasized about all those men she's reported as s*xually assaulting her in order to sell her books, gain publicity for herself and extort money IMHLO.
