05/04/2018
Society for Employee Relations SFER Change The Name "Human Resources" To Something More Descriptive PLEASE
Names matter.
It has been many years since the word "Personnel Departments" became described with an equally weightless word, "Human Resources Department"...
These two descriptions do not do anything, especially in this era, to create cohesive and engaged employees and departments that are respected and considered more than the employer hatchet team or the picnics and fun team.
The term human capital is even more perplexing as it rips the humanity off employees, and now equates them to mere capital for the organization.
Names matter. It creates a difference in perception, understanding and behaviors of those who hear and use such names. For example, what if the president was described as the "man in the White House"... This is very similar to the low effect with which human resources affects people.
When human resources began to have more responsibilities apart from the administrative ones, the name evolved from personnel to something very similar.
There are many problems that are stomping the evolution of the Human Resources Profession, and the name issue is not a cosmetic one. Human Resources in successful companies has become an analytics, human, employee empowerment, and employer financial creation department. However, nothing in the name describes it with the power it deserves.
I think the seriousness that people give to a matter is dependent in large part to its description, and of course the psychological and other more visible actions of that thing.
Can anyone imagine if bombs were described as "things that go boom?"
While successful companies are reviewing the value provided by human resources departments, they would be well served to consider the function that HR departments SHOULD be performing, and name them accordingly. And please, "Employee Horror place" should not be remotely encouraged in the grapevine description of HR.