Stuart Earl

Stuart Earl Investor | M&A Advisor | Leader of Australia's #1 Business Marketplace

14/09/2026

If your business has been stuck at the same revenue ceiling for the last two or three years, the ceiling is not the market.

I hear the market blamed a lot, and occasionally it is true. Far more often it is one of two things happening inside the business.

The first is that the owner has become the bottleneck.

Every decision, every escalation, every important client relationship still routes through you. Growth then stops exactly where your available hours stop. No amount of additional effort shifts it, because effort was never the constraint. You are already working hard. That is the problem, not the solution.

The second is that the system stopped scaling at the point the team did.

What worked perfectly well at four people quietly broke at twelve. Nobody rebuilt it, because everybody was too busy delivering the work to notice that the thing holding them back was the process itself. So the business absorbs more people and produces the same result, and everyone concludes they need to try harder.

Most founders can feel which one it is. Very few can name it with any precision, because they are too deep in delivering the service or managing the team to get above it and look down at the whole thing.

That is exactly where Business Transformation Architects comes in. Not consultants offering opinions from a distance. Partners working inside the business, building the scale and optimisation that breaks the ceiling properly rather than for one good quarter.

If that sounds like where you are right now, comment GROW below and we will be in touch.

12/09/2026

I recently told an owner he was not ready to sell. Once he got past that, he is now on track to get significantly more when he does.

A lot of owners come through the free exit readiness scorecard, and some move into the paid review to understand where the business sits on risk, value to a buyer, and achievable price.

This particular owner was relatively keen to get moving on a sale. To be fair to him, there is a lot of genuinely valuable structure sitting inside that business. We also have buyers actively looking for businesses in his industry at the moment, so on the surface it looked like a straightforward match.

After going through the structure of the business properly, it became clear that it would not serve him to sell today.

There is a lot of dependency on him and on other family members working in the business. The financials are not clear or particularly well structured, so there is work to do before any buyer starts digging. And on top of both of those, he is currently part way through launching into a new geographical location that will almost certainly add another thirty percent on top of profit within the first twelve months.

Selling now means a buyer inherits that upside instead of him. He would be handing over growth he has already paid for.

So we are working to lock all of that down. Remove him and the family members from operations. Clean up the numbers. Let the new location season so it shows properly in the financials.

Twelve months out, that is potentially two to three times what he would be worth today.

Comment EXIT below if you want to know where yours sits.

10/09/2026

A P&L came through showing $180,000 in profit.
By the time we finished pulling it apart on the last session, the business was losing $15,000.
Nothing in the file was false. It just wasn't the number a buyer would actually inherit.
Line by line, here is what came out:
Replace the owner with a manager on a market salary. Minus $90,000.
Charge market rent instead of the below-market lease. Minus $40,000.
Strip the one-off contract that isn't repeating. Minus $30,000.
Correct the add-backs that were never one-offs. Minus $15,000.
Move the owner's unpaid labour into cost of goods. Minus $20,000.
That's $195,000 stripped out of a stated $180,000 profit.
Then there's the one almost nobody checks. Ask an owner whether they pay themselves market rate and most say yes. Ask whether that comes out as salary or dividends and the answer is usually "I'd have to check with my accountant." Dividends are paid out of profit. They never show up on the P&L as an expense. So the wage bill in front of you is missing an entire salary you will still have to fund from day one.
The profit figure is where the work starts, not where it finishes. The only number that matters is the one left standing after you've paid for everything the owner is currently doing for free.
Comment DEAL and I'll send you the link for the next session.

10/09/2026

Most advisors stand firm on the side they are representing. I see myself as an advocate for the deal, and why that deal is beneficial for everyone at the table.

I see this play out often in the acquisition space. Advisors, lawyers and accountants standing firm and being somewhat combative all the way through the negotiation process.

What plays out next is entirely predictable. The other side digs their heels in. Suddenly you are at a sticking point, and very often the deal either falls over or is significantly delayed. Nobody at that table is better off, including the advisors who thought they were doing their job.

The reason I see myself as an advocate for the deal is straightforward. If nobody is advocating for the deal itself, both sides end up suffering.

One thing I see both buyers and sellers get wrong is not thinking about what the other party actually needs, or where they are coming from. As soon as you start thinking that way, you can put yourself in their shoes and acknowledge that maybe you are being a little bit rigid on something that does not really matter to your outcome.

By all means have your go and no go scenarios. If something happens a certain way, you walk away. You should know exactly what those are before you sit down.

But everything outside of those needs to be somewhat negotiable to make sure a good deal actually gets done.

Most deals that die did not die on price. They died because nobody in the room was advocating for the deal.

Comment DEAL below and tell me where you have seen this happen.

09/09/2026

We reject about as many sales mandates as we take on. Here is what we are actually testing in that first conversation.

We speak to a lot of business owners every month about supporting them through the sale or exit of their business. There are a few things we look for early to work out whether someone is genuinely a motivated seller, or someone who likes the idea of selling.

The first is motivation, and whether there is a legitimate reason behind wanting to sell.

Selling a business is a process. Due diligence can drag on. Legal teams and advisors can slow things down significantly if you are working with the wrong ones. If the motivation is not really there, that seller is far more likely to reach a difficult point and say, this is too hard, I am going to hang on to it. That is months of everyone's time, including the buyer's, gone for nothing.

The second is expectation around price.

I am all for getting the best price for your business. What we are not about is trying to sell a business for two times what it is worth. That is a long wait for the owner and a very hard sell for us as their advisors.

What matters is whether an owner can take feedback on why a price is not achievable in the business's current state. If it is not achievable today, that is genuinely fine. Go away, do the work, and come back when the number is real.

The third is expectation around terms. If you are asking an above market price, being open to terms is important. You have to give the buyer one lever to pull.

Comment EXIT below if you want a straight answer on where yours sits.

08/09/2026

A buyer of mine walked away from a solid deal recently, and the business was not even the problem. The owner was.

One of the things we look at when assessing a deal is the owner profile, and specifically what role that person plays in the business at the present time.

On this particular business, the owner had managed all of the customer relationships personally, and had done so for twenty years. A big portion of the revenue came directly out of those relationships. That alone was considered high risk, because relationships do not transfer automatically with a contract of sale. They transfer if the person on the other end decides they will, and that decision gets made after you have paid.

Then we asked one of our standard questions during the process, and it effectively ended the deal.

When was the last time you, as the owner, had a holiday.

There was a bit of silence.

Then he said, oh, we take holidays every year because we close down for two weeks at the end of the year, so last December.

Read that answer back slowly. What he was actually telling us is that if he goes away, the business does not keep running. It stops completely.

For a business buyer that is not a risk you price in. That is a risk you walk away from.

The uncomfortable part is that most owners sitting in this position genuinely do not see it. It has been normal for so long that it stopped registering as a problem at all. It only becomes visible when someone tries to buy it.

Buyers, have you come across a business this dependent on its owner? Comment DEAL below.

07/09/2026

I see more lawyers and accountants kill deals than anyone else, and it is because they are the wrong professionals for the job.

M&A is a very specific niche area. Not every lawyer or accountant is going to be the right one to work with you on a deal, whether you are selling or buying. Being an excellent commercial lawyer does not automatically make someone an excellent transaction lawyer, and the gap between the two shows up at exactly the wrong moment.

Something I have experienced more than once recently, and see all the time, is a seller or a buyer engaging the wrong advisor, receiving advice that is technically defensible and commercially useless, and losing the deal as a result.

We have been working on a sales mandate for quite some time now. We have had a term sheet signed and we have been working through the contract. It has been sitting essentially ready for completion for about two months.

The final piece was getting stuck with one particular advisor on points that were, frankly, unnecessary. We could have had that deal done two months ago. We only got it over the line because we persisted and because both parties genuinely wanted it done.

Very often when it gets stuck like that, one party walks away and the deal falls over entirely. Not because the business was wrong, not because the price was wrong, but because someone at the table was fighting a battle that did not need fighting.

So before you engage anyone, understand what experience they actually have with acquisitions. Not how long they have been in practice. What transactions they have closed, on which side, and at what size.

What experience have you had with advisors? Comment DEAL below.

05/09/2026

Many brokers see their job as representing the profit as high a number as possible. It is your job as the buyer to know what the real number is.

That is not a criticism of brokers. It is just how the incentive works, and you should assume it is switched on in every deal you look at.

One thing I see happen often is business buyers getting stuck on the number that the broker has come up with, using it as the basis for everything that follows, and never properly verifying the add-backs sitting behind it.

Trust it on face value if you like. Then verify it during due diligence, and make sure you are genuinely confident in that number before you sign anything.

Because getting this wrong has the potential to hit you twice.

The first hit is on price. You pay a multiple for every dollar of profit above what is actually real. On a three multiple, ten thousand dollars of soft add-backs is thirty thousand dollars of purchase price you should never have paid.

The second hit is on funding, and this is the one that lasts. Lenders size the facility off that profit number. When the real profit shows up in your first year of ownership, being able to service the debt and pay yourself gets considerably tighter than you modelled.

The purchase price is a one off mistake. The cash flow is the mistake you live with every single month.

This is why due diligence on the profit number is not a formality. It is the single piece of work that most affects what your life looks like as the new owner.

Buyers, what did you find when you went looking? Comment DEAL below.

03/09/2026

Sub two million dollar businesses do not sell for three main reasons, and unfortunately most sellers find out when it is too late to do anything about it.

The first is owner dependency.

How dependent is that business on the current owner. How many roles are they doing. What holes are created by removing the owner after settlement. If you are currently the only person who manages client relationships, complaints, service delivery and admin, that is high risk for a buyer. Removing yourself from the day to day operations is the single biggest thing you can do to improve your outcome.

The second is messy financials.

Messy financials will at the very least slow a deal down, and at worst kill one completely. If a buyer cannot validate the foreseeable revenue and profit after they take over, it is highly unlikely they will buy. What they are paying for is history. What they are committing to is future profit, and they need to be able to verify it.

If your finances are all over the place, or you have personal expenses running through the business that cannot be validated, you are creating unnecessary friction. It is worth spending time with your accountant to clean that up well before you go to market.

The third is unrealistic price expectation.

There are tried and trusted methods of valuing a business and they are widely known. If your business sits vastly outside that, buyers will not negotiate you down. Very often they will not even inquire.

All three are fixable with enough runway. None are fixable in the month before listing.

Comment EXIT below and I will tell you which one is yours.

02/09/2026

Every business owner is being told to leverage AI. Almost none of them know where to start.



I have a lot of these conversations at the moment, and they nearly all begin the same way. The owner knows they should be doing something with AI. They have read enough to feel behind. They have no idea what the first move actually is.

Here is the honest position.

AI is a true force multiplier. Deploy it in your business the right way and it will optimise the value you can provide to your clients, and it will optimise the profits left over at the end of the year. That part is not hype, it is happening.

But if your processes are a mess and your team runs on tribal knowledge, AI will speed that mess up.

It does not fix a broken process. It executes the broken process faster, more often, and with less human checking than you had before. You have not solved anything. You have automated the problem and made it harder to see.

The founders getting the most output from AI are the ones who set the foundation right first. Documented systems. Clean data. Clear structure. Once those exist, the tools have something solid to work against and the gains actually compound instead of evaporating three months later.

That is the work we do before any tool gets added to a business.

If you want to know how your business can leverage AI in the right way rather than the fast way, comment AI below and we will reach out.

Address

Brisbane, QLD

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Stuart Earl posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Featured

Share

Category