24/02/2026
Political representation in Syria has long been treated as a procedural question of elections by acclamation. LUGARIT's latest paper argues instead that representation under the Assad regime functioned as a deeply engineered system—designed to manage loyalties, distribute power, and manufacture legitimacy through a mix of formal elections and informal networks. By unpacking how this system operated, the paper sheds light on why rebuilding fair representation today is as much a political and social challenge as it is a technical one.
🌐 Link: https://link.lugarit.com/sIia
🌍 Title: Political and Societal Representation in Syria: A Historical Review and Future Challenges
📅 Date: 24 February 2026
📚 Publisher: LUGARIT
✍️ Authors: Zaidoun Zoabi + Omar Abdulaziz Hallaj
EN | ع The paper is available in both English and Arabic.
الورقة متاحة باللغتين الإنجليزية والعربية
💡 Key insights:
- Representation under the Assad regime was not about reflecting societal interests, but about engineering loyalty and control.
- Electoral systems, districting, and quotas were designed to favour regime-aligned actors and weaken genuine competition.
- Unannounced quotas and non-electoral mechanisms played a central role in managing sectarian, familial, tribal, and economic balances and pitting social factions against each other to undermine the aggregation of oppositional forces.
- Business elites, religious figures, and state-controlled civil society acted as parallel channels of representation.
- Future reforms will face entrenched interests, deep mistrust, demographic gaps, and the challenge of integrating fragmented governance realities.
📖 🎧 Read or listen to the paper on our website to better understand how past representational systems shape today’s transition debates—and what it will take to build inclusive, credible representation in Syria.
📷 Photo: The assembly hall of the parliament building. Damascus, Syria. October 2025. Photo © Unknown Photographer. Photo editing by LUGARIT.
Paper