25/09/2026
Before you think about skimming over this post and moving on, The Fragile World Briefing 👇 is written for leaders and managers who realise that they are navigating conditions that no longer behave as expected.
#7. Legacy Thinking: A Definition of Insanity
"Legacy thinking is, categorically, a victim of its own success, having been remarkably successful at maintaining business as usual, a world organised around shareholder value, and the self-interest of a select few. It facilitates extraordinary blind spots, extraordinary gaps in an organisation’s cap(ability) to confront transformational change, both internal or external.
Critically, the thinking that got institutions to here won’t get them to there. The same instincts that built resilience in a stable world become a hindrance in one that no longer holds still.
What makes it dangerous, increasingly, is that it doesn’t hold the intended status quo. It feeds Fragmentation, Rapidity, Alienation, and Ground-shift. It compounds existential challenges that were never isolated to begin with, while offering the comforting illusion that yesterday’s playbook still applies."
If you haven't got the time to read the Briefing, you may be interested in contemplating the reflections; namely:
👉 Which part of your organisation’s design - or culture - would you build differently if you were starting today?
👉 If historical strength no longer guarantees future strength, what is your organisation still betting on that it shouldn’t be?
👉 What from the past could now be stifling your organisation?
The link to the Briefing is in the comments. 👇
Otherwise, I look forward to reading your thoughts or what came out of the reflections for you. Where are you seeing legacy thinking? And what are the ripples, subsequently, created?