09/06/2026
🧠 We're asking the wrong questions about AI.
Is it conscious?
Can it think?
Will it replace us?
Psychoanalytic theorist Isabel Millar asks something different in The Psychoanalysis of Artificial Intelligence (2021): can it enjoy?
She's drawing on Lacan's concept of jouissance – a paradoxical form of enjoyment bound up with desire, lack, and the body. It's the excessive satisfaction we find in pursuing what can never fully satisfy us, where pleasure and suffering become intertwined.
Jouissance is what draws us to repeat certain experiences even when they frustrate, overwhelm, or hurt us. It's the fundamental force that makes us speaking, desiring subjects.
Millar sees AI not as something that has enjoyment, but as the external object that structures our relationship to jouissance. It produces the circuit of enjoyment in us, keeping desire circulating rather than fulfilled.
This turns our anxieties into self-reflection.
The real question was never will AI become human. It's: what does our pull toward it reveal about us? AI is a mirror of our desire. That's why Millar ends her book not on computing, but on Kant's oldest question: what is man?
A 2024 Science Advances study found that writers given AI story ideas produced work rated more creative, better written, and more enjoyable.Especially less experienced writers. But there was a catch: the stories all started to resemble each other. Individually better, collectively samey. The authors call it a social dilemma.
In MIT Media Lab's 2025 study, people who wrote essays with an LLM showed the weakest brain connectivity of any group, reported the least ownership of what they'd written, and often couldn't quote their own essay minutes later. The researchers call it cognitive debt.
The problem isn't that the output is bad – it's usually better. The problem is what gets stripped out on the way to it: the effort, the friction, the struggle to arrive at your own idea. To create is to shape something around a lack, not to have the blank filled in for you.
100 years ago, Freud's superego prohibited: don't, you mustn't, that's forbidden and guilt came from transgressing the no.
Žižek argues that in late capitalism the superego flipped its content but kept its structure. It no longer forbids enjoyment. It commands it. The injunction is now "Enjoy!" Be happy. Be fulfilled. Optimize, realize your potential, live your best life.
The command to enjoy abolishes the lack. It says you shouldn't have to want, wait, fail, or suffer. Satisfaction should be immediate, frictionless, on demand. Close the gap. Be satisfied now. Which is why, under this command, difficulty stops feeling like the normal condition of making anything real and starts feeling like personal failure – proof you're doing it wrong.
AI is the perfect technology of the "Enjoy!" command.
It removes the wanting, the waiting, the failing in between . It fills the emptiness on demand. AI doesn't impose a new culture on us. It fulfills the one we already had. It's the command to abolish the lack, finally given hands.
Where do you protect the gap? Where do you keep the space for wanting, waiting, failing – the space where your own idea can arrive?
These aren't just philosophical questions. They're increasingly practical ones.
In a world where AI can generate answers instantly, how do we stay connected to the parts of ourselves that create, desire, imagine, and struggle toward meaning?
This is exactly what we'll explore together in Desire, Lack, and Creativity in the Age of AI. A conversation at the intersection of psychoanalysis, creativity, technology, and what it means to remain human.
…
Desire, Lack, and Creativity in the Age of AI
📅JUNE 19, 2026 | 12:30 PM EET
📍 Online
🎙 Led by Tsvetomila Boradjieva / Immersive Leadership Catalyst (ILC)
👉 Comment ‘JOIN’ and we will send you the registration link
Written by Tsvetomila Boradjieva