Equitas M&A

Directions Website

Equitas M&A Confidential business valuation and sell-side advisory services for owner-operated businesses in and around the GTA and Greater Hamilton Area.

10/07/2026

๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ?

The answer changes your entire outcome, and most owners don't know which one they're talking to.

A strategic buyer is usually a competitor, a supplier, a customer, or a company entering your market. They're buying your business to combine it with theirs.

They can pay more, because they see cost savings and revenue you can't capture alone. They also tend to want the customer list and the capability, not necessarily the people โ€” and the business often disappears into theirs within eighteen months. If your name is on the building and your team's future matters to you, understand that going in.

A financial buyer โ€” private equity, a search fund, a family office, an individual operator โ€” is buying the cash flow. They need the business to keep running, which means they need your management team and often need you for a transition.

They may pay less at headline. But there's often more structure available: a rollover stake, a second bite at the apple when they exit, a longer runway for your people.

Neither is better. They're different transactions.

The mistake is running a process aimed at one when the other would value you more, or accepting a strategic's number without understanding that the number came with a plan for your staff you weren't told about.

Know who's across the table, and why they want it.

10/05/2026

๐—ฆ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—Ÿ๐—ข๐—œ ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—น๐˜€ ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ธ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ต ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ. ๐—œ๐˜'๐˜€ ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ณ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐˜† ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ธ.

A meaningful share of deals that reach a signed letter of intent never close. Here's where they generally come apart, roughly in order of how often I'd expect to see it:

๐—™๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด. The buyer's lender re-underwrites the business and the numbers don't support the debt. Common with buyers who never had a committed source of capital, only an optimistic one.

๐——๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐˜‚๐—ฟ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐˜€. Not fraud. Usually housekeeping โ€” unrecorded liabilities, a lease with no assignment right, employee classifications that don't hold up, a related-party arrangement nobody documented. Individually small. Collectively they erode buyer confidence, and confidence is what closes deals.

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ. Buyer finds something, real or manufactured, and reprices at week ten when the seller is emotionally committed and has no alternative.

๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—น๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐˜. Genuinely common, and rarely discussed. An owner gets to the final stretch and realizes they hadn't thought past the wire transfer. What am I doing Monday morning?

๐—ช๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—น. The parties agree on price and then discover they never agreed on how much cash and receivables stay in the business.

Notice how many of those are preventable months before the LOI โ€” by getting your file clean, qualifying buyer capital early, keeping a credible second option alive, and being honest with yourself about what you actually want.

The LOI isn't the win. Closing is.

10/02/2026

๐—–๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ธ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ผ๐˜„๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—น๐—น ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ฒ.

You know the number. You've known it for years. "Our biggest client is about 30% of revenue, but the relationship is rock solid, we've had them fifteen years."

All true. And a buyer will still discount it, because the buyer isn't pricing your relationship. They're pricing what happens to their loan covenants if that client leaves in year two.

Roughly how it gets treated in practice:

Under 10% from any single customer. Generally a non-issue.

10โ€“20%. Noted, discussed, usually survivable without a material hit.

20โ€“35%. Now it's structural. Expect it to show up in terms rather than headline price โ€” more of the purchase price sitting in an earnout or held back, so the buyer isn't carrying that risk alone.

Above 35%. This is where deals get repriced or die. Some buyers screen it out before they ever look at your financials.

What actually helps, in order of effectiveness:

1. Genuine diversification. Slow, but it's the only real fix.
2. Contracts with term and assignability, rather than purchase orders and goodwill.
3. Relationships held by your team, not only by you โ€” so the customer isn't leaving with the founder.
4. Demonstrating that you've won and retained new accounts recently. It proves the machine works.

If your top client is north of 25%, that's a two-year project. Not a diligence conversation.

09/30/2026

๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜ ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ?

If you're thinking about selling in 2027, the next 90 days matter more than anything you'll do next spring.

Here's why the calendar works against owners who wait.

A buyer evaluating your business in, say, May 2027 will want to see your completed 2026 fiscal year. That's the year that anchors the valuation. Which means the decisions you make between now and December 31 โ€” how you take compensation, what you expense, what you capitalize, whether you defer revenue or pull it forward โ€” are being made right now, in the year a buyer will scrutinize hardest.

Most owners don't think about it that way. They run Q4 the way they always have, optimizing for tax, and then eighteen months later they're explaining to a buyer's accountant why the last full year looks softer than the two before it.

What I'd be doing in Q4 if a 2027 exit is realistic:

- Decide now whether tax minimization or a clean presentation of earnings matters more this year. You generally can't have both.
- Document every add-back as it happens, not from memory in a diligence room.
- Get your year-end close timeline down. If statements take four months, that's four months of dead air in a live process.
- Have the honest valuation conversation before you build the plan around a number you hope is true.

None of this requires you to commit to selling. It just keeps the option open at full value.

09/28/2026

๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ

Diligence is where deals die. Almost always for reasons that were fixable eighteen months earlier.

If you're planning an exit inside the next three years, here's what I'd want cleaned up now, while there's no buyer watching:

Financial statements. Consistent basis, year over year, reviewed at minimum. If your fiscal year-end reporting takes four months, fix that first.

Add-backs documented as you go. Every personal expense running through the business needs a paper trail. "Trust me, that was my vehicle" is not an add-back a buyer's accountant will accept.

Related-party transactions identified. Rent paid to a holdco you own, family on payroll, loans to or from shareholders. All normal. All need to be visible and explainable.

Contracts in writing and assignable. Verbal arrangements with key customers or suppliers are worth close to nothing in a change-of-control analysis.

Lease reviewed for assignment and term. A short remaining term with no renewal right is a live risk to the deal, and it takes time to renegotiate from a position of strength.

Equipment, inventory, and receivables reconciled to the books. Stale inventory and uncollectible AR found by a buyer become a price reduction. Found by you, they become housekeeping.

None of this is difficult. It's just work that has to happen before the pressure is on.

09/25/2026

"๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜† ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜€. ๐—œ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—น๐—ฒ โ€” ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ๐˜†'๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€ ๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€."

Before any financial information leaves your business, you want three things in place:

A signed NDA that actually protects you. Not the buyer's standard form, unamended. Pay attention to the definition of confidential information, the term, whether it survives, non-solicitation of your employees and customers, and what happens to your material if talks end.

A staged disclosure plan. Buyers don't need everything on day one. High-level financials and a blind profile first. Detailed customer data, contracts, and employee information come much later, and only to a buyer who has demonstrated capacity and intent.

Verification that the buyer can actually close. Strategic buyer or financial? Where is the equity coming from? Have they closed a transaction before? A buyer with no proven funding path costs you months and a great deal of confidential information.

The particular risk with a competitor who approaches you directly: sometimes the acquisition interest is real. Sometimes the objective is a look inside your business โ€” your margins, your customer list, your pricing.

Once they've seen it, there's no remedy that gives you back what they now know.

Control the information. Always.

09/23/2026

๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ผ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐˜„๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ธ โ€” ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐˜€ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜ ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—บ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐˜†.

1. Before they respond to an approach. The first substantive reply to an unsolicited buyer sets the anchor. Once a seller has floated a number or shared financials, both are very hard to walk back. A thirty-minute call before that reply is the highest-leverage half hour in the entire process.

2. Before a major structural decision. Estate freezes, holdco reorganizations, how compensation is taken, whether to purify for the LCGE โ€” these are your domain, not mine. But they're much easier to get right when there's a realistic view of what the business would actually transact for and on what timeline. A tax plan built on an aspirational number creates work for everyone later.

3. Before they tell anyone internally. Confidentiality discipline in a sale process is unglamorous and absolutely critical. Once staff, customers, or suppliers believe a sale is coming, the business starts to change under the seller's feet. There's a right sequence for who learns what, and when.

I don't need to be engaged to be useful in any of those three moments. Happy to take the call, give the honest read, and step back if it isn't the right time.

09/21/2026

๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ

A quick test, and I'd encourage you to answer it honestly.

If you were unreachable for six weeks โ€” no phone, no email, genuinely gone โ€” what would be broken when you came back?

Owner dependency is the single most common reason a good business gets a mediocre price. And it's the hardest one to fix quickly, which is why it needs to be addressed years before a sale, not months.

The specific questions a buyer will ask:

- Who holds the key customer relationships? If the answer is "me," the buyer is pricing in the risk that those customers leave with you.
- Who sets pricing and approves exceptions?
- Who does the estimating or the technical work that wins jobs?
- Is anything critical stored only in your head โ€” supplier terms, historical context, informal arrangements?
- Would your top three people stay through a transition, and is there anything in writing that makes that likely?

Every "me" in that list is a deduction. Not always to the headline number โ€” sometimes to structure instead, in the form of a longer transition period, a bigger earnout, or more money held back.

The fix isn't complicated. It's just slow. Document, delegate, and then genuinely step back far enough to find out whether it worked.

Do that for two years and you're selling a business. Skip it and you're selling a job.

09/18/2026

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ผ๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—น.

I've seen owners accept a lower headline number and walk away with more money, and accept a higher one and walk away with less. The difference sits in terms that don't make it into the handshake conversation.

Things I'd want you looking at before you get excited about a number:

Cash at close vs. paper. How much is actually wired on closing day? A vendor take-back or earnout is not the same money as cash.

Earnout mechanics. Who controls the business during the earnout period? What happens if the buyer changes the sales strategy, or allocates corporate overhead into your division? If you don't control the levers, you don't control the outcome.

Working capital peg. This one quietly moves hundreds of thousands of dollars and most sellers have never heard of it before diligence. How is normalized working capital calculated, and over what period?

Escrow and holdback. How much, for how long, and what releases it?

Indemnity caps and survival periods. What are you still on the hook for two years after you've left?

Non-compete scope. Geography, duration, and definition of "competing." I've seen definitions broad enough to prevent an owner from consulting in their own industry.

Any one of these can be worth more than a half-turn of multiple.

09/16/2026

๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ'๐˜€ ๐—ฎ ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ณ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ต๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—ฎ ๐˜ƒ๐—ฎ๐—น๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฎ๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐—ถ๐˜€, ๐˜€๐—ผ ๐—น๐—ฒ๐˜ ๐—บ๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐˜๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด๐˜€ ๐—ฝ๐—ฒ๐—ผ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐˜… ๐˜‚๐—ฝ.

A Broker Market Value Assessment (MVA) is what I prepare. It's a market-facing view of what a business would likely transact for, based on cash flow, comparable transactions, buyer appetite, and deal structure in the current market. It's built to inform a real-world decision about whether and when to go to market.

A formal valuation โ€” the kind prepared by a CBV for litigation, tax, or shareholder disputes โ€” is a different instrument entirely. Higher cost, longer timeline, different standard, different purpose. If you need one, you need one, and I'll tell you.

An online calculator that multiplies your EBITDA by an industry average is not a valuation. It's a lead magnet. Sometimes it's mine. It still isn't a valuation.

Where owners get hurt is using the third one to make a decision that required the first.

An industry multiple tells you what businesses in your sector have traded for on average. It tells you nothing about your customer concentration, your owner dependency, your lease, your capex cycle, or whether the two buyers most likely to want your business are currently acquiring.

Those are the things that move your number. Not the average.

Address

1100 Burloak Drive, 3rd Floor
Burlington, ON
L7L6B2

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Equitas M&A posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share