10/21/2026
😆😆😆
Trump threatened to shut a Canadian aircraft manufacturer out of the American market. Now he is promising to protect the very same company. And the reason behind this sudden reversal says a lot about how deeply the Canadian and American economies are connected.
President Donald Trump has backed down from his threat against Canadian aerospace giant Bombardier.
And this time, it appears American jobs helped change his mind.
Speaking in Kansas, Trump said:
"We're going to take care of Bombardier."
Quite a change from September, when he threatened to stop Bombardier from selling aircraft in the United States unless it moved more of its manufacturing operations south of the border.
So what changed?
Apparently, Trump discovered that the Canadian company he was threatening is also a major American employer.
Bombardier employs approximately 3,500 people across the United States, including around 1,500 workers in Wichita, Kansas.
And those jobs suddenly became politically important.
According to Reuters, Kansas lawmakers contacted the White House following Trump's threats, including Republican Senator Roger Marshall, who is facing a competitive reelection campaign.
During a campaign rally on Monday, Trump acknowledged Bombardier's American operations and said he did not want to hurt the company's workers.
Now, this is where the story gets particularly interesting.
Bombardier is headquartered in Montreal. Its Challenger and Global business jets undergo final assembly in Canada. Yet the company is also deeply integrated into the American economy.
According to The Canadian Press, Bombardier spends more than US$2.5 billion annually with approximately 2,800 American suppliers across 47 states.
Think about that for a moment.
A Canadian company purchasing billions of dollars in American goods and services every year.
Those purchases support American manufacturers, engineers, technicians and businesses throughout the aerospace supply chain.
So when Trump threatens Bombardier, the economic consequences do not stop at the Canadian border.
They can affect American workers and suppliers too.
And that is precisely why this reversal matters.
There is another major development that makes this story even more significant.
Bombardier recently announced a US$50 million investment in Wichita, where its defence operations are based.
The company is also planning an additional facility in Fort Wayne, Indiana.
In other words, while Trump was threatening to restrict Bombardier's access to the American market, the company was expanding its investment in the United States.
And when the political consequences of threatening those operations became clearer, his position changed.
The financial markets certainly noticed.
Bombardier shares jumped approximately 4.5% on Tuesday, October 20, following Trump's comments.
That is a meaningful market reaction to a political statement.
Investors clearly viewed the reduced threat of a US market ban as positive for the company.
But there is a bigger issue here.
What does this tell us about Trump's trade strategy toward Canada?
For months, Canadian businesses have faced uncertainty surrounding tariffs, market access and threats of additional restrictions.
Companies making major investment decisions need predictability.
Aircraft manufacturing is especially sensitive because production involves long development cycles, highly skilled workers, expensive equipment and international supply chains.
A sudden threat to close an important export market can affect business confidence, even if the threat is never implemented.
And Bombardier is not a small player.
More than half of its revenue comes from American customers, according to The Canadian Press.
That makes access to the US market extremely important.
But the relationship works both ways.
American suppliers also benefit enormously from Bombardier's operations.
This is something I believe gets overlooked whenever Washington talks about punishing Canadian companies.
Canada and the United States have spent decades building interconnected industries.
A product manufactured in Canada can contain American components, American technology and American engineering.
And American manufacturers often depend on Canadian customers and suppliers.
You cannot simply disrupt one side of that relationship without risking consequences for the other.
I also find the political timing interesting.
Trump's reversal came during a campaign appearance in Kansas, with the November midterm elections approaching.
Protecting local jobs is a powerful political message, particularly when those jobs are concentrated in a competitive electoral battleground.
That does not mean all the uncertainty surrounding Canada and US trade has disappeared.
It certainly has not.
But this development demonstrates that economic realities can sometimes force a change in political rhetoric.
And for Canada, I think there is an important lesson here.
Canadian businesses should continue strengthening their international competitiveness, diversifying export markets and investing in industries where Canada has a genuine advantage.
At the same time, Canada should never underestimate the economic leverage that comes from being deeply integrated into American supply chains.
Bombardier's situation shows that Canadian companies are not simply dependent on the United States.
Many are also significant contributors to American economic activity.
Trump wanted to pressure a Canadian company. But when American jobs became part of the equation, the threat suddenly looked very different.
That is the reality of an interconnected economy.
And it is one reason I believe Canada should continue building its economic strength rather than making investment decisions based on every new threat coming out of Washington.
Please like and share.
Sources: Reuters, October 20, 2026, The Canadian Press, Global News / Reuters, CP24.
