Asset Protection Trust

21/06/2017

Having launched and led the battle against offshore tax evasion, America is now part of the problem

27/01/2014

Recent large-scale hacks at Target and Neiman Marcus are a reminder that credit card theft is a growing issue. Hackers find a way to install malware on point-of-sale devices, and then sit back as the credit and debit card numbers stream in. But who are those hackers, and what happens to the numbers…

19/06/2013

Bilderberg Group
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Bilderberg Group

Bilderberg Hotel in the Netherlands, name-giving location of the first conference in 1954
Formation 29 May 1954 (59 years ago)
Membership ~150 invitees, smaller core group
Chairman of the Steering Committee Henri de Castries
Website www.bilderbergmeetings.org[1]
The Bilderberg Group, Bilderberg conference, or Bilderberg Club is an annual private conference of approximately 120 to 140 invited guests from North America and Europe, most of whom are people of influence.[2][3] About one-third are from government and politics, and two-thirds from finance, industry, labour, education and communications.[2]
Contents [hide]
1 Origin
2 Organizational structure
2.1 Chairmen of the Steering Committee
3 Participants
4 Recent meetings
5 Criticism
6 See also
7 References
8 Further reading
9 External links
Origin[edit]

The original conference was held at the Hotel de Bilderberg in Oosterbeek, Netherlands, from 29 to 31 May 1954. It was initiated by several people, including Polish politician-in-exile Józef Retinger, concerned about the growth of anti-Americanism in Western Europe, who proposed an international conference at which leaders from European countries and the United States would be brought together with the aim of promoting Atlanticism – better understanding between the cultures of the United States and Western Europe to foster cooperation on political, economic, and defense issues.[4]
Retinger approached Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands who agreed to promote the idea, together with former Belgian Prime Minister Paul Van Zeeland, and the head of Unilever at that time, Dutchman Paul Rijkens. Bernhard in turn contacted Walter Bedell Smith, then head of the CIA, who asked Eisenhower adviser Charles Douglas Jackson to deal with the suggestion.[5] The guest list was to be drawn up by inviting two attendees from each nation, one of each to represent conservative and liberal points of view.[4] Fifty delegates from 11 countries in Western Europe attended the first conference, along with 11 Americans.[6]
The success of the meeting led the organizers to arrange an annual conference. A permanent steering committee was established, with Retinger appointed as permanent secretary. As well as organizing the conference, the steering committee also maintained a register of attendee names and contact details, with the aim of creating an informal network of individuals who could call upon one another in a private capacity.[7] Conferences were held in France, Germany, and Denmark over the following three years. In 1957 the first U.S. conference was held on St. Simons Island, Georgia, with $30,000 from the Ford Foundation. The foundation supplied further funding for the 1959 and 1963 conferences.[5]
Organizational structure[edit]



Prince Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld in 1942
Meetings are organized by a steering committee with two members from each of approximately 18 nations.[8] Official posts, in addition to a chairman, include an Honorary Secretary General.[9] There is no such category in the group's rules as a "member of the group". The only category that exists is "member of the Steering Committee".[10] In addition to the committee, there also exists a separate advisory group, though membership overlaps.[11]
Dutch economist Ernst van der Beugel became permanent secretary in 1960, upon Retinger's death. Prince Bernhard continued to serve as the meeting's chairman until 1976, the year of his involvement in the Lockheed affair. The position of Honorary American Secretary General has been held successively by Joseph E. Johnson of the Carnegie Endowment, William Bundy of Princeton, Theodore L. Eliot, Jr., former U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan, and Casimir A. Yost of Georgetown's Institute for the Study of Diplomacy.[12]
A 2008 press release from the 'American Friends of Bilderberg' stated that "Bilderberg's only activity is its annual Conference. At the meetings, no resolutions are proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements issued" and noted that the names of attendees were available to the press.[13] The Bilderberg group's unofficial headquarters is the University of Leiden in the Netherlands.[14]
According to the 'American Friends of Bilderberg', the 2008 agenda dealt "mainly with a nuclear free world, cyber terrorism, Africa, Russia, finance, protectionism, US-EU relations, Afghanistan and Pakistan, Islam and Iran".[13]
Chairmen of the Steering Committee[edit]
Prince Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld (1954–1975)[15]
Walter Scheel (1975–1977)[6]
Alec Douglas-Home (1977–1980)[15]
Eric Roll, Baron Roll of Ipsden (1986–1989)[16]
Peter Carington, 6th Baron Carrington (1990–1998)[6]
Étienne Davignon (1998–2001)[8]
Henri de Castries (since 2001)
Participants[edit]

Main article: List of Bilderberg participants


Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke leaving the 2008 Bilderberg Conference.
Historically, attendee lists have been weighted towards bankers, politicians, and directors of large businesses.[17]
Heads of state, including King Juan Carlos I of Spain and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands, have attended meetings.[9][18] Prominent politicians from North America and Europe are past attendees. In past years, board members from many large publicly traded corporations have attended, including IBM, Xerox, Royal Dutch Shell, Nokia and Daimler.[9]
The 2009 meeting participants in Greece included: Greek prime minister Kostas Karamanlis; Finnish prime minister Matti Vanhanen;[19] Swedish foreign minister Carl Bildt; U.S. Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg; U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner; World Bank president Robert Zoellick; President of the European Commission José Manuel Barroso; Queen Sofia of Spain; and Queen Beatrix of the Netherlands.[20]
In 2009 the group hosted a dinner meeting at Castle of the Valley of the Duchess in Brussels on 12 November to promote the candidacy of Herman Van Rompuy for President of the European Council.[21]
In 2013, a source involved in the planning for the group's meeting that year in Watford, UK, was reported to have admitted that people whose names are not publicly issued may sometimes turn up “just for the day”.[22]
Recent meetings[edit]

Main article: List of Bilderberg meetings
2013 (8–9 June) at the Grove Hotel, Watford, United Kingdom[23]
2012 (31 May – 3 June) at Westfields Marriott hotel in Chantilly, Virginia, USA
2011 (9–12 June) at the Suvretta House in St. Moritz, Switzerland
2010 (3–7 June) at the Hotel Dolce in Sitges, Spain[24]
2009 (14–17 May) at the Astir Palace resort in Vouliagmeni, Greece[25][26]
2008 (5–8 June) at the Westfields Marriott in Chantilly, Virginia, USA[13][27]
2007 (31 May – 3 June) at the Ritz-Carlton Hotel,[28] in Şişli, Istanbul, Turkey.
2006 (8–11 June) at the Brookstreet Hotel in Kanata, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada[29]
2005 (5–8 May) at the Dorint Sofitel Seehotel Überfahrt in Rottach-Egern, Germany[30]
Criticism[edit]

According to chairman Étienne Davignon, a major attraction of Bilderberg group meetings is that they provide an opportunity for participants to speak and debate candidly and to find out what major figures really think, without the risk of off-the-cuff comments becoming fodder for controversy in the media.[31] However, partly because of its working methods to ensure strict privacy, the Bilderberg Group has been criticised for its lack of transparency and accountability.[32] Concerns about lobbying have also arisen.[33][34] Due to its privacy, Bilderberg is also accused of conspiracies.[31][35] This outlook has been popular on both extremes of the political spectrum, even if they disagree about the exact nature of the group's intentions. Some on the left accuse the Bilderberg group of conspiring to impose capitalist domination,[36] while some on the right have accused the group of conspiring to impose a world government and planned economy.[37]
In 2001, Denis Healey, a Bilderberg group founder and, for 30 years, a steering committee member, said: "To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn't go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing."[38] In 2005 Davignon discussed these accusations with the BBC: "It is unavoidable and it doesn't matter. There will always be people who believe in conspiracies but things happen in a much more incoherent fashion... When people say this is a secret government of the world I say that if we were a secret government of the world we should be bloody ashamed of ourselves."[35]
In a 1994 report Right Woos Left, published by the Political Research Associates, investigative journalist Chip Berlet argued that right-wing populist conspiracy theories about the Bilderberg group date back as early as 1964 and can be found in Schlafly's self-published book A Choice, Not an Echo,[39] which promoted a conspiracy theory in which the Republican Party was secretly controlled by elitist intellectuals dominated by members of the Bilderberger group, whose internationalist policies would pave the way for world communism.[40] Paradoxically, in August 2010 former Cuban president Fidel Castro wrote a controversial article for the Cuban Communist Party newspaper Granma in which he cited Daniel Estulin’s 2006 book The Secrets of the Bilderberg Club,[41] which, as quoted by Castro, describes "sinister cliques and the Bilderberg lobbyists" manipulating the public "to install a world government that knows no borders and is not accountable to anyone but its own self".[36]
Proponents of Bilderberg conspiracy theories in the United States include individuals and groups such as the John Birch Society,[37][42] political activist Phyllis Schlafly,[42] writer Jim Tucker,[43] political activist Lyndon LaRouche,[44] radio host Alex Jones,[2][45][46] and politician Jesse Ventura, who made the Bilderberg group a topic of a 2009 episode of his TruTV series Conspiracy Theory with Jesse Ventura.[47] Non-American proponents include Russian-Canadian writer Daniel Estulin.[48]

Founded in 1954, Bilderberg is an annual conference designed to foster dialogue between Europe and North America. Every year, between 120-150 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media are invited to take part in the conference. About two thirds of the participants…

18/06/2013

US Intell Metada collection proceedings over Verizon networks under FISA Patriot Laws Court order.

Senior politicians reveal that US counter-terrorism efforts have swept up personal data from American citizens for years

24/04/2013

United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocols Thereto
Sixth session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, Vienna, 15-19 October 2012
Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime
Working groups established by the Conference of the Parties
Full text of the Convention and its Protocols
Status of ratification
Travaux Préparatoires
Legislative guides and glossaries of terms
Legal tools
The United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime, adopted by General Assembly resolution 55/25 of 15 November 2000, is the main international instrument in the fight against transnational organized crime. It opened for signature by Member States at a High-level Political Conference convened for that purpose in Palermo, Italy, on 12-15 December 2000 and entered into force on 29 September 2003. The Convention is further supplemented by three Protocols, which target specific areas and manifestations of organized crime: the Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, Especially Women and Children; the Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air; and the Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Fi****ms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition. Countries must become parties to the Convention itself before they can become parties to any of the Protocols.
The Convention represents a major step forward in the fight against transnational organized crime and signifies the recognition by Member States of the seriousness of the problems posed by it, as well as the need to foster and enhance close international cooperation in order to tackle those problems. States that ratify this instrument commit themselves to taking a series of measures against transnational organized crime, including the creation of domestic criminal offences (participation in an organized criminal group, money laundering, corruption and obstruction of justice); the adoption of new and sweeping frameworks for extradition, mutual legal assistance and law enforcement cooperation; and the promotion of training and technical assistance for building or upgrading the necessary capacity of national authorities.
The Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children, was adopted by General Assembly resolution 55/25. It entered into force on 25 December 2003. It is the first global legally binding instrument with an agreed definition on trafficking in persons. The intention behind this definition is to facilitate convergence in national approaches with regard to the establishment of domestic criminal offences that would support efficient international cooperation in investigating and prosecuting trafficking in persons cases. An additional objective of the Protocol is to protect and assist the victims of trafficking in persons with full respect for their human rights.
The Protocol against the Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air, adopted by General Assembly resolution 55/25, entered into force on 28 January 2004. It deals with the growing problem of organized criminal groups who smuggle migrants, often at high risk to the migrants and at great profit for the offenders. A major achievement of the Protocol was that, for the first time in a global international instrument, a definition of smuggling of migrants was developed and agreed upon. The Protocol aims at preventing and combating the smuggling of migrants, as well as promoting cooperation among States parties, while protecting the rights of smuggled migrants and preventing the worst forms of their exploitation which often characterize the smuggling process.
The Protocol against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Fi****ms, their Parts and Components and Ammunition was adopted by General Assembly resolution 55/255 of 31 May 2001. It entered into force on 3 July 2005. The objective of the Protocol, which is the first legally binding instrument on small arms that has been adopted at the global level, is to promote, facilitate and strengthen cooperation among States Parties in order to prevent, combat and eradicate the illicit manufacturing of and trafficking in fi****ms, their parts and components and ammunition. By ratifying the Protocol, States make a commitment to adopt a series of crime-control measures and implement in their domestic legal order three sets of normative provisions: the first one relates to the establishment of criminal offences related to illegal manufacturing of, and trafficking in, fi****ms on the basis of the Protocol requirements and definitions; the second to a system of government authorizations or licensing intending to ensure legitimate manufacturing of, and trafficking in, fi****ms; and the third one to the marking and tracing of fi****ms.

07/03/2013

SCANDAL ALERT! La Nacion (www.nacion.com) media group main shareholders: (amidst the Borbons and Vanderlats) involved in court fraud conspiracy action, against US citizens investors who forfeited title to "squaters" rights law in Herradura Terra Nova Parcels near Los Sueños project.

-La hermana, el cuñado y el primo del principal dueño de LA NACION pretenden quitarle tierras a un pensionado nortamericano en conflicto que lleva ya 14 años...

27/02/2013

FROM THE DESK OF LIC. JOSE JUAN SANCHEZ CHAVARRIA “2013 NEWS LETTER”: a business intelligence report:
To the Client and Associate of the Law Firm CR Law Ltda, following up with the 2012 news letter here is the 2013 version:
1. Statutory acts: 2012 was a year with some statutory legislation passed by the CR Parliament, relevant to the private international and investment sectors:
1.1 OECD: In accordance with the Laura Chinchilla administration policy of open borders and multilateralism in order to access sovereign funds, Costa Rica became 1st Central American country to sign the Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters:
(http://www.oecd.org/ctp/exchangeofinformation/conventiononmutualadministrativeassistanceintaxmatters.htm), of the OECD organization (www.oecd.org). This instrument provides for tax and tax relevant information exchange on an automatic and upon request basis, plus legal and regulatory adjustments and reforms that need to be implemented in order to comply with the international instrument guidelines.
1.2 Law N° 9024: Corporate Persons Tax Law: entered into force APRIL 1st 2012 (yes fools ‘day) this Law taxes all national and foreign juridical entities such as corporations (SAs), LLCs (Ltdas) and FLPs (family limited partnerships), the Law classifies the entities as “active” tax payer and “non - active” taxpayer depending on how the entity appears in the CR Revenue Administration taxpayer index (D-140 form). The tax is 25% of judicial-clerk minimum salary for non-active and 50% for active entities. Also entities incorporating for the first time shall pay the 50% sum of the salary prorated by 360 days of the year, so it is cheaper to incorporate in DECEMBER and more expensive to incorporate in JANUARY. Also entities in arrears are frozen in the Public Registry and on the third year of arrears will be de – registered by the Registry Mercantile and become eligible for liquidation of assets pursuant to 209 of the Code of Commerce. This date should be FEBRUARY 2014.
1.3 Immigration By Laws: On 17 MAY 2012 was published in the official newspaper La Gaceta (www.gaceta.go.cr): Minister of Governance and Police Decree N°37112 – GOB: By Laws and Regulations to the Law General of Immigration and Foreigners´ Affairs (Law N°8764), it is an extensive document with 356 articles and over 215 pages, which regulates and establishes procedures. Note: art. 90 regulates the Investor Status: owner of a usd200.000 real estate investment, and art. 99 regulates the self income Rentista Status with a CD lowered to usd60.000 to remain in the bank for two years, instead of the usd150.000 for five years originally.
1.4 Note: The Hague Apostille Convention of 1961 is in full effect since DEC 2011:
(http://www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=text.display&tid=37), so if your country is in the Convention you no longer need to notarize documents with the CR Consul.
1.5 Laws N°9068 and 9069: Law for the Enforcement of Fiscal Transparency and Law for Strengthening Tax Enforcement: These two laws result in my opinion from the failure of the Chinchilla Administration, for the 4th time in a row of administrations, to enact a Comprehensive Revenue Tax Code (with notions similar to the Internal Revenue Code), after the bill draft became repealed under Constitutional Court challenge actions. So they designed these laws to “tighten the screws” so to speak. They both overhaul the CR Tax Revenue Norms and Proceedings Code, so tax accountants must be very busy catching up with its changes, which include digital format of the accounting data bases of tax payers, and migration from paper tax returns to digital ones. So if you are an active tax payer you should discuss with your tax accountant these laws; I wont discuss it as it goes outside the scope of this paper.
1.5.1 Code of Commerce: These two Laws made some transcendental changes to the CR Code of Commerce amongst which:
a. art. 615: Bank Secrecy Law weakened: the article was redrafted to read that bank accounts are inviolable by the banks, however an EXCEPTION regime is made pursuant to request by the regulator SUGEF (CR securities exchange commission) or “authorization granted” to the CR Revenue Administration thereto.
b. art. 662: CR Trust transfer tax exemption eliminated: the Laws eliminated the tax exemption of property transfer taxes when transferring property between Settlor and Trustee. As a result such transfer pays 2.7% property transfer tax and Registry fees/tax stamps.
c. Companies´ Books: the accounting books became electronic and no need to legalize them with CR Revenue. The Shareholders Meetings, Registry and Board of Directors books, also became electronic or paper, as you wish, but must be legalized either: i. by the legal representative or Shareholders ´Proxy before the Mercantile Registry. Ii. By the legal representative on the digital platform: www.crearempresa.go.cr, but you ll need a digital signature to do it.
d. Shares and Shareholders´ Registry Book: bearer shares became eliminated totally from the 986 articles of the Code of Commerce, shares must be nominative ie with the Beneficiary´s name, and the doctrine of art. 140 becomes strengthened: Shareholders´ Registry Book registration.
1.5.2 Real Estate Property Transfer Tax Law N°6999: the Laws under comment also reformed arts. 2, 3, 4, 7, 10 and 12 of the Real Estate Transfer Tax Law, whereby tools are introduced in order to tax the transfer of corporations´ shares, as a means to convey real estate property and avoiding the transfer tax. Also the new property owners are under the obligation to declare to the Municipality the fair market value of the property. The Public Registry has to issue Regulations to these laws in respect to the enforcement or regulations that the laws mandate upon the Public Registry. Observers are wondering how the change of directors of the statute of entities which own real estate, is going to be regulated, as there is no presumption a transaction has occured result of the change of directors. Some commentators wonder if companies´ mergers between a shelve company and a holding company, as a transaction vehicle to convey the land, will remain untaxed. Also the property transfer tax is to be levied over the fair market value of the property.
1.6 Law N°9036: Transformation of the IDA into the INDER: This is a government agency in charge of running a rural parcel land expropriation and award program since 1948, property transfer transactions are levied .2% Agrarian Tax Stamp, so totaling 2.7% on property transfer transactions at the Public Registry, from previous 2.5%.
2. Real Estate: Enough of taxes, and the good news is that the market is perceived to be sustaining the momentum it gained in JANUARY result of the new years´ resolutions: I will buy the property this year, I will pay off the mortgage this year etc … so let us hope 2012 was definitely the rock bottom year we all are waiting to verify. That said local banks still need to get rid of some repossessed portfolios like Costa Montana in Jacó Beach, and other not so toxic assets. Nonetheless we have also observed previously stagnated properties finally being sold at cash prices. So the dynamic is there for you to seize the opportunity.
3. Law Firm: Please note that we have moved to AVENIDA PASTOR DIAZ, ie Jaco´s main avenue, building adjacent East side of the Municipality, former INS offices, ground floor. Feel free to contact us for a tax statement, corporate survivorship, estate planning or transactions. God bless you all and look forward to seeing you in the sunny Jacó Beach.

Lic. José Juan Sánchez Ch.
LLM International Law.

OECD Home › Centre for Tax Policy and Administration › Exchange of information › Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters

20/12/2012

December 20, 2012
National Register defines procedure for legalization of books
Filed under: I. 2012, l. December MasterLex News - Tags: - admin @ 15:56 pm - Comments (1)
The Registry of Companies yesterday issued Administrative Circular No. DRPJ -010-2012 In which instructs coordinators and registrars about the procedure from next January 7 shall continue for the legalization of the minute books of Membership Assembly of Register of Members and Board of Directors, they last if corporations.
Thus, within the time given to the effect, the National Register assumes this new role as he was entrusted reform introduced by Article 263 of the Commercial Code by the Law on Tax Management Building No. 9069.
To make the text of the Circular and Regulation that underlies it, download it by clicking on their names: CIRCULAR DRPJ-010-2012 and Regulation for the legalization of books issued by the Administrative Board of the National Register.
We would then provide a brief summary of some of the most relevant aspects.
Cost of legalization BOOK
Set to the sum of ¢ 15,000 that must be paid on registration fees and 75 ¢ stamp of Private Accountants Association of Costa Rica.
The costs shown will be the same regardless of whether the application is first book or in cases of corporate name change, merger or transformation when it is a new company, or when the application concerns books replacements for lost or damage.
AS TO THE BOOKS
In no case will require the physical presentation of the books to legalize. Those who are legalized under constitutions of corporations, both processed through CrearEmpresa as by presenting testimony printed in the Daily Record, may be both digitally and in paper format, with removable leaves and foliate. In the case of digital books, its content must necessarily endorsed with digital signature duly authorized by the public office of digital government.
The corporate books that take on paper should contain the following characteristics: a) be of removable sheets letter size with a maximum of 200 pages. B) Have the identification of the type of book and the volume number on the first page. c) contain the number of legalization located in the upper right corner of each page.
BOOKS LEGALIZATION formation of new companies
By joining the new company, the Register of Legal Persons assigned together with the corporate identification number, the authorization of legalization of books. This number is indicated in print in the documents submitted physically Register of Legal Entities, and communicated digitally for those cases through CrearEmpresa constitutions.
Therefore together to stamp duty payable for these inscriptions, from January 7, stakeholders should also cover the ¢ 15.075 of legalizing books. If omitted this payment, the recorder will indicate the fault and return the constitution without registering.
PROBATE OF BOOKS IN CASES OF TRANSFORMATION OR MERGER WITH RISE OF A NEW SOCIETY
As in the formation of new companies, in these cases the number assignment legalization of books is provided by the Registry when registering the respective document. Therefore, the timbres of legalization should also be made in conjunction with the rest of timbre and Rights.
In these cases, the solicitor who has custody will close the books had with the previous name or title, the reason for the closure.
PROBATE OF BOOKS IN CASE OF CHANGE OF CORPORATE NAME
When changing the corporate name of any company, should the solicitor responsible for the custody proceeding to close the books had with the previous name, the reason for the closure. In making the registration of the change of name of the company in the Register of Legal Entities, will keep the same number of books legalization to be entered in the new social books in folio first. This legalization will generate the payment of the prescribed fee.
PROBATE OF BOOKS AND REGISTERED COMPANY THAT HAS NEVER LEGALIZED BOOKS
It is noted that in these cases, management can be performed either on site CrearEmpresa for which requires the legal representative count with digital signature, and directly in the Registry of Companies, through public deed granting an application for legalization book by the legal representative, authorized agent or generalissimo of society. This document will be submitted to Journal Record and assigned to a registrar for the respective process. The document should be added ballot security and full banking paying the aforementioned legalization stamps.
PROBATE OF BOOKS IN CASES OF RENEWAL
In societies that have completed their books, when HAVE legalized by the Directorate General of Taxation, the ombudsman forced the custody of them must provide a reason for closing the last folio of them and proceed to apply for legalization of new books in accordance with the previous point. The new issue of legalizing assigned by the National Register should be on every one of the pages of new books.
REPLACEMENT PROCEDURE FOR LOSS OF SOCIAL BOOKS, loss, damage or theft
The replenishment of social books by any of these circumstances will be the sole responsibility of the ombudsmen or social representatives, and in those cases published by the social representative, notice once in the Official Gazette or in a national newspaper , indicating the causes or reasons for such replacement. At the opening of the new book to legalize and all pages must be entered legalization number awarded by the National Register. This legalization will generate the payment of the prescribed fee.
RESPONSIBILITY FOR GOOD USE AND CONSERVATION OF BOOKS LEGALIZED
This responsibility is solely for the Secretary of the Board, in corporations and the manager, in limited liability companies, unless for strong and unanimous agreement of all partners share or allocate other responsible, in which case on record properly seated and the agreement signed.

El Registro de Personas Jurídicas emitió ayer la Circular Administrativa No. D.R.P.J. -010-2012 en la que instruye a los coordinadores y registradores sobre el procedimiento que a partir del próximo 7 de enero deberán seguir para la legalización de los libros de actas de Asamblea de Socios, de Reg...