LASA lasa plc works land and land related isuse.....

12/09/2020

for all LASA memeberes My wish for you and for the ones you care about is, to have happy, stable, healthy and productive new year!!

ሊደረግ ነዉ?
10/10/2019

ሊደረግ ነዉ?

መልካም አዲስ አመት
09/09/2019

መልካም አዲስ አመት

05/09/2018
07/08/2018

አዲስ አበባ፣ ከየት ወደየት? (ዶ/ር ሺመልስ ቦንሣ)
July 18, 2018 – Konjit Sitotaw — Comments ↓
FacebookTwitterGoogle+EmailShare

አዲስ አበባ፣ ከየት ወደየት? (ዶ/ር ሺመልስ ቦንሣ)
=============
“የድሮዋ በረራ (የአሁኗ አዲስ አበባ) የአምሃራ፤ ጉራጌ እና ጋፋት ክርስትና ተከታዮች ይኖሩባት የነበረች ከተማ ነች”

በመጀመሪያ

የዛሬ አንድ መቶ ሠላሳ አንድ አመት እንደ ኢትዮጵያ አቆጣጠር በ1878 ንጉሰነገስት ምንሊክ ወደ አርሲ ሰራዊታቸውን ይዘው ይዘምታሉ። ባልተቤታቸው እቴጌ ጣይቱ ደግሞ እንጦጦ የነበረውን የመንግስት መቀመጫ ወደ አሁኗ አዲስ አበባ ያዛውራሉ። ለጤና ተመራጭ የሆነው ፍልውሃ ፊንፊን ይልበት የነበረው ቦታ ለከተማው መቀየር አንዱ ግብዐት ቢሆንም የአድዋ ድል፣ የመንግስቱ መረጋጋት፣ የእንጦጦ ቀዝቃዛነትና ባካባቢው የነበረው የማገዶ እንጨት እጥረት የአገሪቷን ዋና ከተማ ወደ አዲስ አበባ ለመቀየር ተጨማሪ ምክንያቶች ሆነው አገልግለዋል። ንግስቲቷ የአገሪቷን መናገሻ አዲስ አበባ ብለው ሲሰይሟት ሌላ ፡ ማለትም ስድስተኛ፡ ምክንያት እንድንፈልግ እንድንመረምርም ያደርገናል፣ ታሪክ ።

በስም ወይም ስያሜ ውስጥ ምን አለ? አዲስና አበባ አዲስ አበባ የሁለት ቃላት ጥምር ውጤት ነው፣ አዲስ እና አበባ። የቦታውን ልምላሜና ውበት ከሚወክለው አበባ ከሚለው ስያሜ ይልቅ እንደገና መጀመርን፣ መታደስን፣ መነሳትን የሚያሳየው አዲስ የሚለው ቃል የተለቀ ትርጉም የተሸከመ ስም ይመስላል። ባንድ በኩል ስያሜው የውጭ ወራሪ ጠላትን በማሸነፍ ከመጣው መረጋጋትና እርግጠኝነት በተጨማሪ ስለወደፊቱ የነበረውን ብሩህ ተስፋን፣ ወደፊት ማደግን መመንደግን፣ በአለም ማህበረሰብ ውስጥ ተገቢውን ቦታ አግኝቶ መከበርን ሲያመለክት በሌላ በኩል ደግሞ ወደሁዋላ ተመልሶ ማስታወስን፣ የጠፋን መመለስን ፣ የፈረሰ መገንባትን፣ እንደገና መታደስን ያሳያል። እስቲ በሁለተኛው ትርጉም ላይ በማተኮር ወደሁዋላ ተመልሰን የከተማዋን ታሪክ መረጃዎቹ በሚሉት መሰረት እንመርምር።

ከተማና ታሪክ፣ ከበራራ እስከ አዲስ አበባ

የከተሜነት ታሪክ በኢትዮጵያ ውስጥ ጥንታዊነቱን ለመረዳት በትንሹም ቢሆን የአገሪቷን ታሪክ ማንበብ ከተቻለም የከተሜነት ስልጣኔዋን የሚመሰክሩ የከተሞች ፍርስራሾችን {ለምሳሌም የሃን፣ አዱሊስን ፣ ቆሃይቶን}፣ ወይንም እስካሁን ያልጠፉትን ፣ ህይወት ያለባቸውን እነአክሱምን፣ ሃረርን፣ ጎንደርን መመልከት ይበቃል። በስነህንጻ፣ በስነጽሁፍ፣ በስነመንግስትና በኪነጥበብ አክሱም የደረሰችበትን የስልጣኔ ከፍታ የተረዳው ማኒ የተባለው ፐርሻዊ ጸሓፊ አክሱማዊት ኢትዮጵያን ከክርስቶስ ልደት በሁዋላ በአራተኛው ክፍለዘመን ከነበሩት አራት ታላላቅ ስልጣኔዎች አንዷ ናት ብሎ ምስክርነቱን ሰጥቷል። ሃረርና ጎንደርም የከተማነት ዝናቸው በብዙ ቦታ የናኘ መሆኑ ሰፊው ታሪካቸው ቆመው የሚታዩትም የስነሕንጻ ቅሪቶችም ማረጋገጫዎች ናቸው።

ይህንን ስንመለከት የአሁኗ አዲስ አበባ የዚህ ጥንታዊና ጥልቅ የከተማ ስልጣኔ ወራሽ እንጂ
ጀማሪ እንዳይደለች እንረዳለን ማለት ነው። እስቲ ስለአዲስ አበባ ትንሽም ቢሆን ታሪክን ወደሁዋላ እንበል። የኢትዮጵያ የታሪክ ድርሳናትም፣ ሆነ የውጭ ሀገር ጸሐፍት የሚያረጋግጡት አሁን ሸዋ ተብሎ የሚጠራውና የአገሪቱ መናገሻ አዲስ አበባ የሚገኝበት አካባቢ ከዛሬ 700 አመት በፊት ማለትም የሰለሞናዊው መንግስት ከተመሰረተበት ከ13ኛው ክፍለዘመን ጀምሮ የአገሪቱ ቁልፍ የፖለቲካ፣ የወታደራዊ፣ የኢኮኖሚና፣ የባህል ማዕከል ሆኖ ያገለግል እንደነበረ ነው። በጊዜው የነበረው ማዕከላዊው መንግስት ከቦታ ቦታ ተዘዋዋሪ ቢሆንም በተለያዩ የአገሪቱ አካባቢዎች ከተሞችን የመሰረተ ሲሆን ትልቁና በተደጋጋሚ የሚጠቀሰው ግን በራራ የተሰኘው ከተማ ነበር። ወረብ በራራ የምትገኝበት ቦታ ሲሆን በመሐከለኛው ዘመን ታላላቅ አብያተ ክርስቲያናት እና የነገስታቱ ቤተመንግስት የተሰራበት የነበረ በ16ኛው ክፍለዘመን ደግሞ ብዙ የውጭ ሀገሮችን የጎበኙት ፣ አባ ዳንኤል የተባሉ ኢትዮጵያዊ መነኩሴም ከኢየሩሳሌም ጋር ሁሉ ያመሳሰሉት ሀብታም አካባቢ ነበር። ሺሃብ አድ ዲን {በቅጽል ስሙ አረብ ፋቂህ} የተባለው የመናዊ የፍቱህ አል ሃበሻ {የሃበሻመወረር} መጽሃፍ ጸሐፊ የግራኝ አህመድን ጦር በማጀብ ወረብንና በራራን ያየ ሲሆን ወረብን የሀበሾች ገነት ብሎ ጽፎላታል።

የበራራ ከተማ በአሁኗ አዲስ አበባ አካባቢ በተለይም እንጦጦ ላይ የተመሠረተ ሲሆን የኢትዮጵያ መዲናነት ታሪኩ የሚጀምረው በአጼ ዳዊት ዘመነ መንግስት {እኤአ1380-1413} ሲሆን የሚያበቃውም በአህመድ ኢብን ኢብራሂም አል ጋአዚ {በቅጽል ስሙ ግራኝ አህመድ} ጦር በሚቃጠልበት የአጼ ልብነ ድንግል {እኤአ 1508-1540} ዘመን ነው። እኤአ በ1450 ለመጀመሪያ ጊዜ ከተማው ፍራ ማዉሮ የተባለ ቬኒሲያዊ {ጣልያናዊ} ባዘጋጀው የዘመኑ ፈር ቀዳጅ በሆነው የአለም ካርታ ላይም ለመስፈር በቅቷል። ካርታው መሬት ላይ ባሉ መረጃዎች ተመስርቶ የተሰራ ሲሆን እነሱም አዉሮፓ ከነበሩ ኢትዮጵያዉያንና በተለያየ ወቅት በተለይም በአጼ ይስሀቅ {እኤአ 1414-1430} እና አጼ ዘርዓ ያዕቆብ {እኤአ 1434-1468} ዘመን ኢትዮጵያን ከጎበኙ አዉሮፓዉያን የተገኙ ነበሩ። ሰዓሊ ማዉሮም ይህንን አስመልክቶ እንዲህ ይላል፣

“…{በካርታው ላይ የተመለከቱትን ስለአፍሪካ} ደቡባዊ ክፍሎች ማዉራቴ ለአንዳንዶች አዲስ ነገር ሊሆን ስለሚችል በጥንቶችም {በባለሙያዎች ሙሉ በሙሉ ሊባል በሚችል ስለማይታወቁ ከሰይቶ ጀምሮ ወደላይ ያለውን ጠቅላላ ስዕል ያገኘሁት ከቦታው ተወላጆች ነው ብዬ እመልሳለሁ። እነርሱም ቄሶች ሲሆኑ {በካርታው ላይ ያሉትን} ክፍለ ግዛቶች ፣ ከተሞች፣ ወንዞችና ተራሮችን ከነስማቸው በእጃቸው ለእኔ የሳሉልኝ እነርሱ ናቸው። ካርታው አሁን ድረስ ያሉ፣ እንዲሁም ስማቸው የማይታወቅ ቦታዎችን የጠቀሰ ሲሆን አቀማመጣቸውንም በመረጃ አስደግፎ ለማሳየት ሞክሯል። ለምሳሌም ከዘረዘራቸው ውስጥ የየረር፣ የዝቋላ፣ የመናገሻና የወጨጫ ተራሮች፣ የዱከምና አዋሽ ወንዞች፣ በወጨጫ ተራራ አካባቢ የሚገኙ የቤተመንግስት ፍርስራሾች፣ ይገኙባቸዋል።”

ከማዉሮ ካርታ በተጨማሪም በዘመኑ የነበሩ ኢትዮጵያዉያንና የውጭ ሰዎች ስለበራራና አካባቢው ብዙ መረጃዎችን ትተውልን አልፈዋል። አንዳንዶቹን ለመጥቀስ ያህል አሌሳንድሮ ዞርዚ የተባለ የቬኒስ ጣልያናዊ {15ተኛዉና 16ተኛው ክፍለዘመን} ፣ የመናዊው ሺሃብ አድ ዲን {16ተኛው ክፍለዘመን} ፣ እና አዉሮፓ የነበሩ የኢትዮጵያ መነኮሳት ፡ አባ ዞርጊ፣ አባ ሩፋኤል፣ አባ ቶማስና አባ እንጦንዮስ {15ተኛዉና 16ተኛዉ ክፍለዘመን} ይገኙበታል። እኤአ በ1529 ሽምብራ ኩሬ {በደብረዘይት ወይም ቢሾፍቱና ሞጆ መሃል ያለ ቦታ} በተደረገ ጦርነት ንጉስ ልብነ ድንግል መሸነፉና ወደሰሜን ማፈግፈጉ ወረብንና የአገሪቱ መዲናን በራራን ለጥቃት ያጋለጠ ሲሆን እኤአ በ1530 ቦታዎቹ በግራኝ አህመድ ጦር ለመያዝ ከተማዋም ለመቃጠል በቅተዋል። እንደሺሃብ አድ ዲን ትረካ ከሆነ የግራኝ ሰራዊት በአስር ቀናት ውስጥ ከአዋሽ ወንዝ መነሻ {የአሁኗ ግንጪ} ተነስቶ በራራ በመድረስ አጭር ቆይታ አድርጓል፣ ከበራራም ሆኖ ግራኝ የተወሰኑ ወታደሮቹን የስድስት ቀን የእግር መንገድ ወደሚፈጀው ደብረ ሊባኖስ ልኮ እንዳቃጠለ ይዘረዝራል። የተቃጠለው የኢትዮጵያ መዲና የነበረው በራራ ከተማ የሚገኝበትን የወረብ ግዛት እንዲያስተዳድር ሙጃሂድ የተባለውን ታማኙን መሾሙንም ይጽፋል።

ከዚህ ጊዜ አንስቶ እስከ 19ተኛው ክፍለ ዘመን ድረስ ስለበራራ የሚዘግብ ምንም የጽሁፍ መረጃ አልተገኘም። በ19ተኛው ክፍለ ዘመን መጨረሻ አካባቢ ግን የጥንቱን በራራ ታሪክ የሚያስታዉሱ ግኝቶች መታየት ይጀምራሉ። እኤአ በ1881 በንጉስ ምኒልክ የሚመራው የሸዋ ፣ እኤአ ከ1889 በሁዋላም የኢትዮጵያ መንግስት መዲናውን እንጦጦ ላይ ያደርጋል። እንደዘመኑ ትርክት ከሆነ {ድርሳነ ራጉኤል ላይ እንደተጻፈው} የንጉስ ምንሊክ እንጦጦ ላይ መከተም ከስትራቴጂካዊ ጠቀሜታ በተጨማሪ ታሪካዊ ትርጉም ነበረዉ፣ እሱም ታሪክ የዘከረዉን የጥንቱን የአጼ ዳዊት ከተማን እንደገና መገንባት፣ ወደአገሪቱ መዲናነትም መመለስ ነበር። ንግርቱም ታሪካዊ መሰረት እንደነበረው የሚያመላክቱ መረጃዎች በእንጦጦ {የጥንቱ በራራ ክፍል} የተገኙ ሲሆን ይህንንም በጊዜው ሀገሪቷን የጎበኙ የውጭ ሀገር ሰዎች {ዲፕሎማቶች፣ ተጓዦችና ወታደራዊ ባለሙያዎች} ዘግበዉታል። ቻርለስ ማይክል፣ ሲልቬይን ቪኘራስ፣ ሻለቃ ፓወል ኮተን፣ አልበርት ግሌይቸን፣ እና ቸዛሬ ኔራዚኒ፣ ጥቂቶቹ ሲሆኑ ሁሉም በቦታው የነበረዉን ጥንታዊ የመከላከያ ቅጽሩን ተመልክተው ስለጥንካሬዉና ግዙፍነቱ አድናቆታቸውን በጽሁፍ አፍረዋል። እንጦጦ ላይ የፔንታገን ቅርጽ {አምስት ጫፎች ያሉት} ያለው በዙርያውም 12 መመልከቻ ማማዎች የያዘ እንደመከላከ የሚያገለግል ቤተመንግስትና ግንብ የተገኘ ሲሆን ርዝመቱም 520 ሜትር ከፍታውም እስከ 5 ሜትር እንደሚደርስ ታውቋል። የስነህንጻና አርኪዎሎጂ ባለሙያዎች {ለምሳሌም ዴቪድ ፊሊፕሰን፣ ማይክል ዎከርና ማርክ ቪጋኖ እንደተነተኑት ግንቡ እኤአ ከ1550 በፊት የነበረዉን የፖርቱጋልና ስፔን የመከላከያ ግንብ አሰራር ዘዴ የተከተል ሲመስል ቢያንስ የ400 አመት ወይም በላይ ዕድሜ ያለዉና በ16ተኛው ክፍለዘመን መጀመሪያ አጋማሽ ምናልባትም በአጼ ልብነ ድንግል የተገነባ እንደሚሆን ነው።

የአዲስ አበባ ምንነት

እንግዲህ በጥንቷ በራራና በአሁኗ አዲስ አበባ መሐከል ታሪካዊ ግኑኝነት እንዳለ ካየን አሁን ደግሞ የሁለቱን ከተሞች በተለይም የአዲስ አበባን መልክ ወይንም ዋና መገለጫ ባህርይ ምን እንደሚመስል እንመልከት። የኢትዮጵያ ከተሞችና መዲናዎች {ለምሳሌም አክሱም፣ ጎንደር} ልክ እንደአገሪቷ ህብረብሄራዊ ገጽታ የነበራቸው ሲሆን በውስጣቸው የተለያየ ቋንቋ ተናጋሪ፣ የተለያየ እምነትና ባህል ተከታይ የሆኑና፣ በተለያየ የስራ ዘርፍ የተሰማሩ ኢትዮጵያዉያን እንዲሁም የዉጭ ሀገር ተወላጆች የሚኖሩባቸው ቦታዎች ነበሩ። ጥንታዊቷ አክሱም በሶስት ቋንቋ {ግዕዝ፣ግሪክ፣ ሳባ} የምትጽፍ፣ ከሶስት ቋንቋ በላይ የምትናገር፣ ከኢትዮጵያዉያን በተጨማሪ ግብጻዉያን፣ የመረዌ {ሱዳን} ሰዎች፣ የመናዉያን፣ የምስራቅ ሜድትራንያን {ፊንቄያዉያን፣ ግሪኮች፣ የጥንት ሶሪያዉያን} ተወላጆች እንዲሁም ህንዶችና ቻይናዉያን የኖሩባት ወይም ደግሞ የሰሩባት ታላቅ ከተማ ነበረች። ጎንደርም ብትሆን የክርስትና፣ የእስልምናና የአይሁድ እምነት ተከታዮች አብረው ኖረው {ተለያይተው የሰፈሩ ቢሆንም} ፣ በስራና በህይወት ተስተጋብረው መልኳንና ታሪኳን ውብና ዥንጉርጉር አድርገው የቀረጿት ከተማ እንደነበረች ታሪኳ ይመሰክራል። ሀረርም ከአራቱ የእስልምና ቅዱሳን ቦታዎች አንዷ ስትሆን በብዝሀነቷ እና በእምነት ማዕከልነቷ የምትታወቅ፣ በመቻቻል ታሪኳ የተመሰገነች በዚህም እንደ ታዋቂዉ የፈረንሳይ ገጣሚ አርተር ራምቦ እና እንግሊዛዊዉ ሪቻርድ በርተን ያሉ የውጭ ሰዎችን ለመማረክ የቻለች ምስራቃዊ እንቁ ነበረች፣ ነች።

የበራራም ታሪክ ቢሆን በብዝሃነት ያሸበረቀ እንደነበረ መረጃዎች ያሳያሉ። በከተማዉም ሆነ በዙሪያው ባሉ እንደ ወረብ ባሉ ግዛቶች ይኖር የነበረው ማህበረሰብ በብዛት ከአምሃራ፣ ከጉራጌ እና ከጋፋት {ሶስቱም ተቀራራቢ ቋንቋዎችን ይናገራሉ } የተዉጣጣ እና የክርስትና እምነት ተከታይ የነበረ ሲሆን በተጨማሪም የሌሎች ቋንቋ ተናጋሪዎችና እምነት ተከታዮች ይገኙ እንደነበረ ይታሰባል። ለዚህም ምክንያቱ ከተማው ከሌሎች የአገሪቱ ክፍሎች በተለይም ከምስራቅ ኢትዮጵያ በዛም በኩል አድርጎ ከአረቡና የህንዱ ስልጣኔ ጋር በንግድ እና በባህል የተገናኘ ስለነበረ ነው። በበራራ የታሪክና የስነህንጻ አሻራ ላይ የተገነቡት ሁለቱ ወራሽ ከተሞችም {እንጦጦና አዲስ አበባ} የነዋሪዎቻቸው ያሰፋፈር ታሪክ ከዚህ በተለየ መንገድ የተቃኘ አልነበረም፣ ይልቁንም የበፊቱን ታሪክ መሰረት አድርጎ ፣ ብዝሃነትን አቅፎና ደግፎ፣ ኢትዮጵያዊነትን ሆኖና ተላብሶ የተፈጠረ ቅኝት፣ ያደገ ማንነት ነው ያላቸው፣ በፊትም አሁንም።

አዲስ አበባ ስትመሰረት የነበራትን ጥልፍልፍና ድርብርብ ታሪክ በ19ኛውና በ20ኛ ክፍለዘመን መባቻ ላይ በሃገርኛና በጎብኝዎች የተጻፉ ስራዎች ዘግበውታል። ነገስታቱ በተለይም አጼ ሀይለ ስላሴ ከተማዋ ዘመናዊ ብቻ ሳይሆን ብሄራዊ ሆና እንድትፈጠር ወይንም እንድታድግ ያቀዱና የሰሩ ስለነበር አዲስ አበባ ከተማም፣ የሀገርም ምልክት ሆና በእሷ ውስጥ ኢትዮጵያን በኢትዮጵያ ውስጥም እሷን እንዲታይ፣ እኛም እንድናይ ሆና ነበር የተቀረጸችው። በእርግጥ በአገሪቱ መሪዎች እና በከተማ ቀራጮች አእምሮ ውስጥ የታለመችው አዲስ አበባ እንደታሰበችው ሁሉ መሬት ላይ ባትሰራም {ለምሳሌ የመሰረታዊ አገልግሎቶች እጥረት፣ የስራ አጥነት፣ የሀብት ልዩነት ቢስፋፋባትም } ከተማዋ የኢትዮጵያውያን ሆና ኢትዮጵያን ከነዥንጉርጉር ውበቷና ከነውስብስብ ችግሯ መስላና፣ ተመስላ እስካሁን አለች፣ ትኖራለች። አዲስ አበባ፣ አዱገነት ሸገራችን ከብዙ የአፍሪካዉያን ከተሞች በተለየ ድሃና ሀብታም ተሰባጥረው የሚኖሩባት፣ ነዋሪዎቿን ከነብዝሃነታቸው ሳትለይ አቅፋ የኖረች፣ ያኖረች፣ የምታኖር የኢትዮጵያ የልብ ትርታ፣ ነርቭ ማዕከል የሆነች ኦ አዲስ አበባ “ብረሳሽ ቀኜ ትርሳኝ“ የምንልላት ከተማችን፣ ችግሯም ችግራችን፣ ፍቅራችን እንደገናም ተስፋችን፣ የሆነች ማረፊያችን ሆናለች።

የአዲስ አበባ ማንነት

ይህችን ስብጥር የሆነች ከተማ፣ ንብርብር ታሪክ የተሸከመች ምድር፣ ከመሪዎቿ በላይ የብዙሃን ነዋሪዎቿ ድምር ውጤት፣ የእጅ ስራ ነጸብራቅ ሆና የኖረች ግማደ-ኢትዮጵያ የማን ናት? በብዝሃነት ጥልፍልፍ ተጸንሳ ለተወለደች፣ አድጋም ለጎለመሰች አዲስ አበባ ምንነቷና የማንነቷ ምስጢር በአንድነት ተጋምዶ፣ በልዩነት ውበት አሸብርቆ ደምቆ የተፈጠረ የሃገርነት ቋጠሮ ነው። አዲስ አበባ ልክ እንደኢትዮጵያ የነዋሪዎቿ ስብስብ ውጤት ብቻ ሳትሆን፣ ከድምርነትም በላይ እጅግ የጠበቀ፣ የጠለቀ ጥልፍ ስብጥር ናት። ለመሆኑ እዲስ አበባን ለመፍጠር ያልተጋ ኢትዮጵያዊ እጅ የት አለ ኦሮሞው ከአማራው፣ ጉራጌ ከትግሬው፣ ዶርዜ ከሀረሪው፣ ሶማሌ ከወላይታው፣ ምስራቁ ከደቡብ፣ ሰሜኑ ከምዕራብ፣ ወንዱ ሴቱ፣ ልጅ አዋቂዉ፣ አማኙ የማያምነው፣ ነጋዴው ከምሁሩ፣ ሀገሬዉ ከሌላው ተዋዶ፣ ተዋልዶ፣ ተናግዶ፣ ተቀናጅቶ የፈጠራት፣ ከተማ ከሚባል ነገር በላይ የሆነች ምስጢር አይደለችምን? ከቦታነት በላይ የዘለቀች ሁሉም እምነቷን ካመኑ፣ ሕይወቷን ኖረው ትርጉሟን ካወቁ አባል የምታደርግ፣ እጆቿን ዘርግታ የምትቀበል፣ የራሷ የምታደርግ ትልቅ ሃሳብ {Addis Ababa as an Idea} አልሆነችም? አዲስ አበባ አግላይ ከሆነ የኔነት፣ የኔ ናት ከሚል ህሳቤ ወጥታ፣ ርቃ አልፋ ሄዳ፣ የኛነት፣ የእኛ ናት ወደሚል ሰብሳቢ ሃሳብነት ያደገች ከተማ ሆናለች።

ይህ ማለት ግን ሁሉም እኩል ነበር? እኩል ታይቶስ ነበር? ብዙው አዲስ አበቤ አልተገለለም? እስቲ በምሳሌ እናስረዳ። በአጼ ሃይለስላሴ ዘመን በ1960ዎቹ አመታት በቁጥር 1768 የሆኑ ግለሰቦች 58% የሚሆነውን የከተማውን ቦታ ተቆጣጥረው ነበር። 24000 የሚሆኑት የከተማው ነዋሪዎች 7.4% {በግለሰብ 150 ካሬ ሜትር ማለት ነው} የከተማውን ቦታ ሲይዙ ከግማሽ በላይ የሚሆነው የከተማው ህዝብ መሬትም ሆነ መኖርያም አልነበረውም። በንጉሳዊው ዘመን፣ ከስርዓቱም መውደቅ በሁዋላ ባሉት መንግስታት በተለይ አሁን ጥቂቶችን በጠቀመ ልማትና ዘመናዊነት ስም ከተሜው ከኖረበት ቀዬው እየተነሳ ይፈናቀላል፣ ከኑሮውም ከማህበራዊ ህይወቱም ይቆራረጣል። በአዲስ አበባና በሌሎች ከተሞች ዙሪያ የሚኖሩት አርሶአደሮችም {ኦሮሞም አማራም ትግሬም ሲዳማም እና ሌሎች ኢትዮያውያን} በአነስተኛ ካሳ መሬታቸውን ይቀማሉ፣ ሰርቶ የመኖር መብታቸውን ይነጠቃሉ። እንግዲህ የአዲስ አበባንና የሌሎች ከተሞቻችንን ታሪክ ስንተርክ እነኝህንና ሌሎች ታሪካዊ በደሎችን፣ ዘመናዊ ነጠቃዎችን የተሸከመ ከተሜነትና ዘመናዊነት ይዘን መሆኑን ሳንዘነጋ ነው።

አዲስ አበባና የዘመኑ ትርክት በአሁኑ ሰዓት፣ እንደ በፊቱ ሁሉ፣ የአገሪቱ መዲና አዲስ አበባ ቅራኔዎች የሚፈጠሩባት፣ እንዲሁም የሚንጸባረቁባት ቦታ ሆናለች። ውጥረቶቹ በመሠረታዊነት መደባዊ ሆነው በብሄር ማንነት መነጽር ይተነተናሉ፣ በዛም ላይ ተንተርሶ ህዝብን ለትግል ማደራጃ ሆነው ያገለግላሉ። በአሁኑ ጊዜ ሁለት ትርክቶች የከተማውንም ሆነ የአገሪቱን ትኩረት ስበው ይገኛሉ ። ሁለቱም ታሪክን በተለያየ መንገድ ይመለከታሉ የራሳቸውንም በደሎች ያጣቅሳሉ። አንደኛው ህብርብሄራዊ ሆኖ ረጅም የታሪክ ምልከታ ይዞ አዲስ አበባን፣ ከፍ ሲልም ኢትዮጵያን በህብረብሄራዊ መነጽር እያየ በከተማውም ሆነ በአገሪቱ ያሉ የተንከባለሉ ብሶቶችን በመደብ መነጽር ይተነትናል። ሁለተኛው ብሄርን ማዕከል አድርጎ በቅርቡ የታሪክ እይታ ተመስርቶ ከተማውን፣ በከተማዉና በአገሪቱ ያሉ የተከማቹ በደሎችን በብሄር መነጽር ይሞግታል፣ አማራጮችንም ይጠቁማል።

ሁለቱም እይታዎች እነሱም ላይ የቆሙ ትንተናዎች የየራሳቸው እዉነቶች አሏቸዉ። የከተማዉን ብሎም የአገሪቷን ታሪክ እና ነባራዊ ሁኔታ በራሳቸው መንገድ ይተርካሉ ፣ ይሞግታሉ። ነገር ግን አዲስ አበባን በሁለቱ መነጽሮች ብቻ መመልከት የከተማዋን በዛውም የአገሪቷን ንብርብር እና ቁልፍልፍ ታሪክና እውነት አበጥሮ ፣ አብጠርጥሮ ለመረዳት የሚያስችል መንገድ አይሆንም። የጎደለ እይታን ይፈጥራልና። በተለይ ደግሞ መጤ እና ነባር የሚለው ትርክት በአንድ አገር ዜጎች መሐከል ደረጃ በማውጣት አንደኛና ሁለተኛ ዜግነትን በመፍጠር የማግለል አንዳንዴም የመንቀል ፖለቲካን ያመጣል። በሰዎች ህይወትም ላይ የሚወስን ነውና አደገኛም ነው። በቅርቡም በመንግስት የቀረበው “የልዩ ጥቅም መብት“ ከፍ ሲልም በአንዳንድ የዘውጌ ልሂቃን የተነሳው “የባለቤትነት“ ጥያቄ በከተማውም ሆነ በአገሪቱ ያለውን ውጥረት ያሳያል። የአዲስ አበባ የልዩ መብትና የባለቤትነት ፖለቲካ በኢትዮጵያ እየጦዘ ፣ እንዲጦዝ እየተደረገ ያለው የዜግነት፣ የአገርነትና ፣ የአገር ባለቤትነት ትልቅ ጥያቄ መገለጫ ነው። ታዲያ ምን ይሻላል።
የአዲስ አበባ ምሳሌነት አዲስ አበባ በብዙ መንገድ የኢትዮጵያ ተምሳሌት መሆኗ በየቀኑ የሚታይ እውነታ ነው ከተማዋን ማወቅ ማለት አገሪቷን መረዳት ማለት ነው። የአዲስ አበባን ችግሮች ተረድተን መፍታት ከጀመርን የኢትዮጵያን ጥያቄዎች የመሞገት ፣ ፈተናዎቿንም የመጋፈጥ ታላቅ ስራ ጀመርን ማለት ይሆናል። ከተማዋን የምንመለከትበት መነጽር ፣ ከፍታዎቿን፣ ዝቅታዎቿንና ተስፋዎቿን የምንተነትንበት መንገድ ለአገሪቷም ይሰራልና ለጊዜው እንደዚህ ብንጀምርስ፣ አንደኛ፣ እይታዎቻችን በብሄር ወይንም በመደብ ምልከታ ከማጥበብ፣ እኛም ከመጥበብ ሰፋ አድርገን ፣ ሁለቱንም ተቀብለን ሌሎችም አማራጮች እንዳሉ ግን አጥብቀን ተረድተን ፣ እንሱንም ፈልገን ፣ ሁሉን አቀፍ አገራዊ እይታ ብንፈጥርስ (avoiding the danger of a single story)

ሁለተኛ፣ ከተማችን እንዲሁም አገራችን የብዙዎች እኛነቶች ጥምር ውጤት መሆኗን አምነን ያንዳችን ችግር ወይም ብሶት እንደራሳችን ወስደን እይታቸውንም ዋጋ ሰጥተን ያጋመዱንን ገመዶች ብናጠብቅስ (having radical empathy for fellow countrymen) ሶስተኛ፣ በእኔነት እና በልዩነት ብቻ የገነገነውን ፖለቲካና ትርክታችንን በእኛነት ላይ፣ ድልድይ በመስራት ፣ ከእኛ ባሻገር ካሉ የኛዎች ጋር ባለን አንድነት ላይ አትኩረን። ብንሰራስ (Bridge building, crossing borders)

ሺመልስ ቦንሣ.

► መረጃ ፎረም - JOIN US

02/08/2017

Unit 164 - Land Information Systems and Cadastral Applications

1. Introduction

1.1 Importance of cadastral records and land information systems

access to and use of land are fundamental to life as we know it... food, fiber, habitation, recreation, and so forth
land parcel is the basic unit for access and control of land, land use decisions
current, reliable land information necessary for many public programs, for example:
land planning
infrastructure development and maintenance,
environmental protection and resource management
emergency services
social service programs
and so forth
basis for land markets, development, and other economic activity
1.2 GIS issues in land records

relating "legal" description of property to coordinate-based systems
ambiguous or overlapping boundaries
complex attribute relations
public access
2. Definitions

2.1 Cadastre

broad context -- description of legal and fiscal interests in land
typical context -- land ownership records
a joke -- combination of a cadaver and a disaster


Legal cadastre - parcel-based description of interests or rights in real property; typically supported by titles or deeds, and registry.

Functions of a legal cadastre:
define property rights (often in conjunction with formal and case law)
describe the extent (spatial, sometimes temporal) of property rights
support land transfer
provide evidence of ownership (e.g., using land as collateral)
program administration (e.g., enforcement of laws, targeting of incentives)
public land management
Fiscal cadastre - property valuation and land taxation.

Functions of fiscal cadastre (from Dale and McLaughlin, 1988):
information base for property taxation
distribution of funds from public programs
monitoring and supporting land markets
information for growth management and land use planning
2.2 Land information system (LIS)

Means to acquire, manage, retrieve, analyse, display land records.
LIS as component of GIS or vice-versa... a long-standing debate, mostly a matter of semantics and disciplinary orientation.
Typical LIS:
cadastre as a primary component
maintained by unit of government responsible for tracking land ownership, control; typically county government in US
parcel-oriented
hard copy maps and/or CAD or GIS software for spatial representations
relatively large (cartographic) scale (e.g., 1:4800 in rural areas, 1:1200 in developed areas)
bridge between legal (e.g., deeds) and technical (e.g., maps, GIS coordinates) land descriptions
may incorporate other technologies
parcel indexing systems (relational data base management systems)
fiche and document imaging systems
surveying
multipurpose cadastre (figure 1)
National Research Council effort of early 1980s
recognized limitations in manual systems
proposed automated methods for managing land records, linking to other spatial data
parcel as primary organizing principle
multipurpose land information system (figure 2)
alternative to multipurpose cadastre
parcels as one component of layer-based system
oriented to integration and analysis of data
geodetic reference framework as organizing principle
2.3 Land Tenure

Rights and obligations in land, along with system for defining and governing.
Difficult to capture all tenure rights in a land information system -- multiple dimensions.

definition of rights
"bundle of sticks" -- all the possible ways of using land, allocated between individuals (and organizations) and the state (or other form of society)
rules and procedures defining who possesses which sticks -- can be MORE EXPLICIT and MORE COMPLETE with automated land information system
responsibilities -- obligations of tenure possessor, e.g., land taxation, environmental protection
dimensions of rights (table 1)
2.4 Land records

Components of legal and fiscal cadastre maintained by local governments (typically counties)
Many components amenable to automation; appropriate data models still evolving

titles -- a description of a land parcel, potentially including:
description of location or boundary (e.g., bearings and distances survey description, metes and bounds description, public land survey system reference, lot number in platted subdivision, etc.)
method of conveyance (e.g., warranty deed, quit claim, etc.)
"Torrens" system, found in some British commonwealth nations, government backs claim to land title
deeds -- registration of land transaction with public authority (Register of Deeds)
land transaction are between individuals (no government guarantee)
only required government record is real estate transfer tax notice
registration is essentially voluntary, though typically done to support claim to land
grantor and grantee (conveyed from, to) used to organize records (manual system --> "book, volume, page" is reference)
chains of title -- a fully supported land claim must be traced back to original conveyance from government or crown, evidence tracing through all transactions to present is chain of title; abstract is summarization of chain of title
indexes -- to make chains of title easier to research, Register of Deeds may create grantor/grantee index, or parcel index. If all parcels are uniquely identified and linked to GIS representation, can search spatially into parcel index
tax roles, tax maps -- other than Registry (which is maintained as public service) the main interest of local government in land ownership information is tax assessment. Tax roles and associated tax maps:
account for all lands, their value and their owner.
may or may not be directly linked to Registry
may or may not be derived from deed/title descriptions
often used as source of data for GIS (Registry typically not involved in mapping)
often not maintained at accuracy needed to convey land, only to assess and collect taxes
related "layers" -- assessment, zoning, permits, etc.
private records
title insurance - private backing of title validity
title abstracts - summarization of evidence about ownership
plat maps -- approximations of land ownership parcels, derived from a variety of public and private data sources
3. History

3.1 Old stuff

Magna charta & English common law, definitions of property rights
Northwest Ordinance and related documents - basis for US property registry system
early land offices, deeds registries and property conveyance
land grants, Homestead Act of 1862
3.2 Evolving land rights and definitions

the "bundle of sticks" - evolving rights, and hence evolution of what government records
ad valorem taxation - need to account for land ownership
3.3 Beginnings of automation

70s - recognition of problems, the "Larsen report"
early 80's - NRC reports
initial experiments - North Carolina state supported program, Dane County Land Records Project, others
3.4 Maturing systems

IMAGIS (Indianapolis Mapping and Geographical Infrastructure System) multi-organizational land records system
Wisconsin Land Records Program - state support for local land records modernization
POLARIS -- Toronto's "privatized" land records systems
etc.
3.5 One concept for a modern system:

document imaging system -- deeds and other documents imaged transactionally (as registered), "dumb image" retrievable by remote terminal
digital parcel map
unique parcel identification number for every parcel
created from deed description -- direct tie to legal evidence
updated by transactional trigger from Registry
problems with land records resolved, e.g., redundancy, discrepancy
problems with land ownership adjudicated, e.g., gaps and overlaps
on-line parcel index and grantor/grantee index
access to all pertinent records for other government functions
public access interface for routine record retrieval by companies and citizens, with appropriate privacy restrictions/protections
4. LIS Players

4.1 Local government

Some with explicit mandates for maintaining land records - e.g., Deeds Registry
Others use local land information (whether in the form of automated records or paper maps, indexes, deeds, etc.)
tax assessor / real property listor
zoning administrator
and every other agency that needs to know who owns/uses the land, for example:
plat review
building inspection
land use planning
transportation planning and management
emergency response
waste management and disposal
protected area designation, monitoring
parks and open space
infrastructure management
public utilities
etc.
4.2 Public

Public interacts with local land information system primarily in land conveyances and land tax assessment; may also have some involvement in particular applications.
4.3 Land-related business and NGOs

development / real estate
banking
title abstracting and insurance
conservation & environmental protection
community, land use, economic development
etc.
5. Land records data (in GIS context)

The challenge -- using modern spatial information technologies to prop up a land records system developed 200 years ago for an agrarian society
5.1 Geodetic / geographic control frameworks

Land information system starts with spatial reference framework
local technical choices -- datum, coordinate system, linkage to national spatial reference system, other
linkage between coordinate system and legal system (deed description such as land description such as Public Land Survey System aliquot, metes and bounds, bearings and distances)
may involve recovering, remonumenting, measuring (GPSing) reference points used in property description
5.2 Conversion -- legal description to mathematical coordinates

digitizing existing maps (e.g., tax parcel maps)
new coverages - coordinate geometry from deed descriptions
orthophotos or ground surveys - interpretation of occupation boundaries
URISA/IAAO procedures for automation of parcel data (GIS Guidelines for Assessors)
5.3 Data quality

commensurate with source material, typically new compilation e.g., deed/COGO >> than existing cartographic products
occupation boundaries may be different than deed boundaries... which to portray??
accuracy should be commensurate with requirements of application
coordinates are generally not legal means to transfer property
other applications, e.g., planning, infrastructure management, etc. may not require conveyance-level accuracy
may start with existing lower quality records that supports some applications and build more accurate records overtime
5.4 Maintenance of dynamic layer

transactional updates - system design needs to accommodate constant changes AND maintain historical records
"ripples' through the organization - overall system needs to move changes in data from entry point (e.g., Register's office) to all others using land records
5.5 Access and use

"corporate data" data base design is common approach to allow access throughout organization;
information products - many different needs must be accommodated
public access - public access terminals, read-only access to data bases, standard and custom information products
costs and benefits
efficiency -- less costly retrieval & duplication of routine or required records
effectiveness -- better information for administration and management of government programs and activities
equity -- outcomes of decision-making
6. Land Information and cadastral system examples

Dane County, Wisconsin "citizen access" terminal to provide parcel-based information; a set of mapping tools will be added to provide support for creating simple parcel maps in 1998.
New York state Office of Real Property Services, using GIS in a variety of tax assessment and real property listing applications.
A commercial service (Direct Line Software) for searching deeds, titles, and so forth, along with a variety of related activities, facts, etc.
7. Summary

This unit describes the origin, components, functioning, and uses of land information systems, with particular emphasis on systems for maintaining cadastral (land ownership) data.
In the United States, the land records system evolved from English common law. Following the American Revolution, several Acts established a rudimentary deeds systems and various systems for granting state lands to citizens. The implication for GIS is that we are now using modern information technologies to support a system designed for a simple agrarian society. The system was not designed to provide proof of land ownership, nor was it designed to handle complicated land arrangements such as de-bundling the "bundle of sticks"... individual property rights.

The main component of a local land information system is the land ownership parcel. It may be described in many ways -- as a record on a deed, a description on a tax assessment record, surveying records, etc. The reconciliation of records in various forms will continue to challenge us as we attempt to automate these records.

One vision for a fully automated system would include more than just a GIS -- other computer-based components such as document management system, database management system, and resolution of organizational and legal problems. Such a system would support not only mandated land records management responsibilities of local jurisdictions, but would also serve the needs of a broad range of actors using land information for a wide variety of programs and functions.

8. Review and study questions

suggestions accepted!
9. References

Brown, P.M. and D.D. Moyer (1990-1996) Multipurpose land information systems: The guidebook. Federal Geodetic Control Committee. (NOAA).
Dale, R.F. and J.D. McLaughlin (1988) Land Information Management. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Chrisman, N.R. 1987. "Design of Geographic Information Systems Based on Social and Cultural Goals." PE&RS, 53(10):1367-1370.
Dueker, K.J. 1987. "Multipurpose Land Information Systems: Technical, Economic, and Institutional Issues." PE&RS, 53(10): 1361-1366.
Dueker, K.J and D. Kjerne. 1989. "Multipurpose Cadastre: Terms and Definitions." Technical Papers, 1989 ACSM-ASPRS Annual Convention, Vol. 5, pp. 94-103.
Kuhlman, K. 1993. "Building a Framework to Characterize Land Records Modernization." URISA 1993 Annual Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 146-151.
National Research Council (1980). Need for a Multi-purpose Cadastre. National Academy Press, Washington DC
National Research Council (1983).Procedures and Standards for a Multipurpose Cadastre. National Academy Press, Washington DC
Ventura, S.J. 1991. Implementation of Land Information Systems in Local Government - Steps Toward Land Records Modernization. Wisconsin State Cartographers Office, Madison, WI.
Ventura, S.J. (1995). "The use of geographic information systems in local government. Public Administration Review. 55(5):463-469.
Zwart, P.R. 1988. "Some Observations on the Real Impact of Integrated Land Information Systems upon Public Decision Making in Australia." Papers from the 1988 Annual Conference of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 1988, Vol. 1, pp. 68-79.
Evaluation

We are very interested in your comments and suggestions for improving this material. Please follow the link above to the evaluation form if you would like to contribute in this manner to this evolving project..
Citation

To reference this material use the appropriate variation of the following format:
Stephen J. Ventura. (1997) Land Information Systems and Cadastral Applications, NCGIA Core Curriculum in GIScience, http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/giscc/units/u164/u164.html, posted October 23, 1998.

The correct URL for this page is: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/giscc/units/u164/u164.html.
First posted: October 16, 1997. Last revised: October 23, 1998.

To the Core Curriculum Outline
To the Core Curriculum homepage

The National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis is an independent research consortium dedicated to basic research and education in geographic information science and its related technologies, including geographic information systems (GIS).

02/08/2017

Unit 164 - Land Information Systems and Cadastral Applications

1. Introduction

1.1 Importance of cadastral records and land information systems

access to and use of land are fundamental to life as we know it... food, fiber, habitation, recreation, and so forth
land parcel is the basic unit for access and control of land, land use decisions
current, reliable land information necessary for many public programs, for example:
land planning
infrastructure development and maintenance,
environmental protection and resource management
emergency services
social service programs
and so forth
basis for land markets, development, and other economic activity
1.2 GIS issues in land records

relating "legal" description of property to coordinate-based systems
ambiguous or overlapping boundaries
complex attribute relations
public access
2. Definitions

2.1 Cadastre

broad context -- description of legal and fiscal interests in land
typical context -- land ownership records
a joke -- combination of a cadaver and a disaster


Legal cadastre - parcel-based description of interests or rights in real property; typically supported by titles or deeds, and registry.

Functions of a legal cadastre:
define property rights (often in conjunction with formal and case law)
describe the extent (spatial, sometimes temporal) of property rights
support land transfer
provide evidence of ownership (e.g., using land as collateral)
program administration (e.g., enforcement of laws, targeting of incentives)
public land management
Fiscal cadastre - property valuation and land taxation.

Functions of fiscal cadastre (from Dale and McLaughlin, 1988):
information base for property taxation
distribution of funds from public programs
monitoring and supporting land markets
information for growth management and land use planning
2.2 Land information system (LIS)

Means to acquire, manage, retrieve, analyse, display land records.
LIS as component of GIS or vice-versa... a long-standing debate, mostly a matter of semantics and disciplinary orientation.
Typical LIS:
cadastre as a primary component
maintained by unit of government responsible for tracking land ownership, control; typically county government in US
parcel-oriented
hard copy maps and/or CAD or GIS software for spatial representations
relatively large (cartographic) scale (e.g., 1:4800 in rural areas, 1:1200 in developed areas)
bridge between legal (e.g., deeds) and technical (e.g., maps, GIS coordinates) land descriptions
may incorporate other technologies
parcel indexing systems (relational data base management systems)
fiche and document imaging systems
surveying
multipurpose cadastre (figure 1)
National Research Council effort of early 1980s
recognized limitations in manual systems
proposed automated methods for managing land records, linking to other spatial data
parcel as primary organizing principle
multipurpose land information system (figure 2)
alternative to multipurpose cadastre
parcels as one component of layer-based system
oriented to integration and analysis of data
geodetic reference framework as organizing principle
2.3 Land Tenure

Rights and obligations in land, along with system for defining and governing.
Difficult to capture all tenure rights in a land information system -- multiple dimensions.

definition of rights
"bundle of sticks" -- all the possible ways of using land, allocated between individuals (and organizations) and the state (or other form of society)
rules and procedures defining who possesses which sticks -- can be MORE EXPLICIT and MORE COMPLETE with automated land information system
responsibilities -- obligations of tenure possessor, e.g., land taxation, environmental protection
dimensions of rights (table 1)
2.4 Land records

Components of legal and fiscal cadastre maintained by local governments (typically counties)
Many components amenable to automation; appropriate data models still evolving

titles -- a description of a land parcel, potentially including:
description of location or boundary (e.g., bearings and distances survey description, metes and bounds description, public land survey system reference, lot number in platted subdivision, etc.)
method of conveyance (e.g., warranty deed, quit claim, etc.)
"Torrens" system, found in some British commonwealth nations, government backs claim to land title
deeds -- registration of land transaction with public authority (Register of Deeds)
land transaction are between individuals (no government guarantee)
only required government record is real estate transfer tax notice
registration is essentially voluntary, though typically done to support claim to land
grantor and grantee (conveyed from, to) used to organize records (manual system --> "book, volume, page" is reference)
chains of title -- a fully supported land claim must be traced back to original conveyance from government or crown, evidence tracing through all transactions to present is chain of title; abstract is summarization of chain of title
indexes -- to make chains of title easier to research, Register of Deeds may create grantor/grantee index, or parcel index. If all parcels are uniquely identified and linked to GIS representation, can search spatially into parcel index
tax roles, tax maps -- other than Registry (which is maintained as public service) the main interest of local government in land ownership information is tax assessment. Tax roles and associated tax maps:
account for all lands, their value and their owner.
may or may not be directly linked to Registry
may or may not be derived from deed/title descriptions
often used as source of data for GIS (Registry typically not involved in mapping)
often not maintained at accuracy needed to convey land, only to assess and collect taxes
related "layers" -- assessment, zoning, permits, etc.
private records
title insurance - private backing of title validity
title abstracts - summarization of evidence about ownership
plat maps -- approximations of land ownership parcels, derived from a variety of public and private data sources
3. History

3.1 Old stuff

Magna charta & English common law, definitions of property rights
Northwest Ordinance and related documents - basis for US property registry system
early land offices, deeds registries and property conveyance
land grants, Homestead Act of 1862
3.2 Evolving land rights and definitions

the "bundle of sticks" - evolving rights, and hence evolution of what government records
ad valorem taxation - need to account for land ownership
3.3 Beginnings of automation

70s - recognition of problems, the "Larsen report"
early 80's - NRC reports
initial experiments - North Carolina state supported program, Dane County Land Records Project, others
3.4 Maturing systems

IMAGIS (Indianapolis Mapping and Geographical Infrastructure System) multi-organizational land records system
Wisconsin Land Records Program - state support for local land records modernization
POLARIS -- Toronto's "privatized" land records systems
etc.
3.5 One concept for a modern system:

document imaging system -- deeds and other documents imaged transactionally (as registered), "dumb image" retrievable by remote terminal
digital parcel map
unique parcel identification number for every parcel
created from deed description -- direct tie to legal evidence
updated by transactional trigger from Registry
problems with land records resolved, e.g., redundancy, discrepancy
problems with land ownership adjudicated, e.g., gaps and overlaps
on-line parcel index and grantor/grantee index
access to all pertinent records for other government functions
public access interface for routine record retrieval by companies and citizens, with appropriate privacy restrictions/protections
4. LIS Players

4.1 Local government

Some with explicit mandates for maintaining land records - e.g., Deeds Registry
Others use local land information (whether in the form of automated records or paper maps, indexes, deeds, etc.)
tax assessor / real property listor
zoning administrator
and every other agency that needs to know who owns/uses the land, for example:
plat review
building inspection
land use planning
transportation planning and management
emergency response
waste management and disposal
protected area designation, monitoring
parks and open space
infrastructure management
public utilities
etc.
4.2 Public

Public interacts with local land information system primarily in land conveyances and land tax assessment; may also have some involvement in particular applications.
4.3 Land-related business and NGOs

development / real estate
banking
title abstracting and insurance
conservation & environmental protection
community, land use, economic development
etc.
5. Land records data (in GIS context)

The challenge -- using modern spatial information technologies to prop up a land records system developed 200 years ago for an agrarian society
5.1 Geodetic / geographic control frameworks

Land information system starts with spatial reference framework
local technical choices -- datum, coordinate system, linkage to national spatial reference system, other
linkage between coordinate system and legal system (deed description such as land description such as Public Land Survey System aliquot, metes and bounds, bearings and distances)
may involve recovering, remonumenting, measuring (GPSing) reference points used in property description
5.2 Conversion -- legal description to mathematical coordinates

digitizing existing maps (e.g., tax parcel maps)
new coverages - coordinate geometry from deed descriptions
orthophotos or ground surveys - interpretation of occupation boundaries
URISA/IAAO procedures for automation of parcel data (GIS Guidelines for Assessors)
5.3 Data quality

commensurate with source material, typically new compilation e.g., deed/COGO >> than existing cartographic products
occupation boundaries may be different than deed boundaries... which to portray??
accuracy should be commensurate with requirements of application
coordinates are generally not legal means to transfer property
other applications, e.g., planning, infrastructure management, etc. may not require conveyance-level accuracy
may start with existing lower quality records that supports some applications and build more accurate records overtime
5.4 Maintenance of dynamic layer

transactional updates - system design needs to accommodate constant changes AND maintain historical records
"ripples' through the organization - overall system needs to move changes in data from entry point (e.g., Register's office) to all others using land records
5.5 Access and use

"corporate data" data base design is common approach to allow access throughout organization;
information products - many different needs must be accommodated
public access - public access terminals, read-only access to data bases, standard and custom information products
costs and benefits
efficiency -- less costly retrieval & duplication of routine or required records
effectiveness -- better information for administration and management of government programs and activities
equity -- outcomes of decision-making
6. Land Information and cadastral system examples

Dane County, Wisconsin "citizen access" terminal to provide parcel-based information; a set of mapping tools will be added to provide support for creating simple parcel maps in 1998.
New York state Office of Real Property Services, using GIS in a variety of tax assessment and real property listing applications.
A commercial service (Direct Line Software) for searching deeds, titles, and so forth, along with a variety of related activities, facts, etc.
7. Summary

This unit describes the origin, components, functioning, and uses of land information systems, with particular emphasis on systems for maintaining cadastral (land ownership) data.
In the United States, the land records system evolved from English common law. Following the American Revolution, several Acts established a rudimentary deeds systems and various systems for granting state lands to citizens. The implication for GIS is that we are now using modern information technologies to support a system designed for a simple agrarian society. The system was not designed to provide proof of land ownership, nor was it designed to handle complicated land arrangements such as de-bundling the "bundle of sticks"... individual property rights.

The main component of a local land information system is the land ownership parcel. It may be described in many ways -- as a record on a deed, a description on a tax assessment record, surveying records, etc. The reconciliation of records in various forms will continue to challenge us as we attempt to automate these records.

One vision for a fully automated system would include more than just a GIS -- other computer-based components such as document management system, database management system, and resolution of organizational and legal problems. Such a system would support not only mandated land records management responsibilities of local jurisdictions, but would also serve the needs of a broad range of actors using land information for a wide variety of programs and functions.

8. Review and study questions

suggestions accepted!
9. References

Brown, P.M. and D.D. Moyer (1990-1996) Multipurpose land information systems: The guidebook. Federal Geodetic Control Committee. (NOAA).
Dale, R.F. and J.D. McLaughlin (1988) Land Information Management. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Chrisman, N.R. 1987. "Design of Geographic Information Systems Based on Social and Cultural Goals." PE&RS, 53(10):1367-1370.
Dueker, K.J. 1987. "Multipurpose Land Information Systems: Technical, Economic, and Institutional Issues." PE&RS, 53(10): 1361-1366.
Dueker, K.J and D. Kjerne. 1989. "Multipurpose Cadastre: Terms and Definitions." Technical Papers, 1989 ACSM-ASPRS Annual Convention, Vol. 5, pp. 94-103.
Kuhlman, K. 1993. "Building a Framework to Characterize Land Records Modernization." URISA 1993 Annual Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 146-151.
National Research Council (1980). Need for a Multi-purpose Cadastre. National Academy Press, Washington DC
National Research Council (1983).Procedures and Standards for a Multipurpose Cadastre. National Academy Press, Washington DC
Ventura, S.J. 1991. Implementation of Land Information Systems in Local Government - Steps Toward Land Records Modernization. Wisconsin State Cartographers Office, Madison, WI.
Ventura, S.J. (1995). "The use of geographic information systems in local government. Public Administration Review. 55(5):463-469.
Zwart, P.R. 1988. "Some Observations on the Real Impact of Integrated Land Information Systems upon Public Decision Making in Australia." Papers from the 1988 Annual Conference of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association, 1988, Vol. 1, pp. 68-79.
Evaluation

We are very interested in your comments and suggestions for improving this material. Please follow the link above to the evaluation form if you would like to contribute in this manner to this evolving project..
Citation

To reference this material use the appropriate variation of the following format:
Stephen J. Ventura. (1997) Land Information Systems and Cadastral Applications, NCGIA Core Curriculum in GIScience, http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/giscc/units/u164/u164.html, posted October 23, 1998.

The correct URL for this page is: http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/giscc/units/u164/u164.html.
First posted: October 16, 1997. Last revised: October 23, 1998.

To the Core Curriculum Outline
To the Core Curriculum homepage

Address

Lideta
Addis Ababa

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when LASA posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to LASA:

Share