02/10/2026
I've lost count of how many times I've been told, "You're overqualified for this role."
At first, it sounds like a compliment. After all, if someone has more experience, stronger skills, and a proven track record, wouldn't they be able to deliver better outcomes?
But in today's job market, "overqualified" can sometimes become a barrier rather than an advantage.
The reality is that employers often worry that experienced candidates may become bored, leave quickly, or expect a higher salary. Meanwhile, many highly skilled professionals are applying for roles below their previous level simply because the market is challenging and opportunities are limited.
I've come to realise that taking an interim, contract, or lower-level role isn't necessarily a step backwards. It can be a strategic move. It keeps you active, visible, connected, and generating income while positioning you for your next opportunity.
Careers are rarely linear. Sometimes the smartest decision is not waiting for the perfect role, but taking the right role for where you are today.
To anyone currently hearing the word "overqualified" — don't let it knock your confidence. Your experience still has value. The challenge is helping employers understand how that value can benefit them.
Perhaps the question isn't whether someone is overqualified.
Perhaps the question should be: "Can this person create value and help us achieve better outcomes?"
I'd be interested to hear your thoughts. Have you ever been told you were overqualified for a role?