26/06/2026
I was an accidental attendee at the 12th Met Office NAME Users Workshop this week (I’d intended to do the training course then stay on for the workshop but failed to gain a place on the training course but went to the workshop anyway).
So, I spent two enjoyable days in the company of Met. Office, university and some industry users of NAME.
The talks about the use of NAME to backtrack and determine the source of detected spikes in emissions of random chemicals and to explain airborne levels resulting from widespread sources such as farming were interesting as was the work with understanding the plumes from volcanoes and understanding how windborne pests can invade (UK and New Zealand examples).
I was, of course, particularly interested in the use of NAME in an emergency. Two issues were discussed (1) NAME produces such a wealth of information that choosing what to provide to the decision makers is not straight forward and (2) the colours, tones and shapes you use to present the data pictorially can influence the decisions made.
I found it very interesting, useful and thought provoking. This work deserves a wider audience.
My thanks to the organisers for letting me attend despite my limited claims to be a user (I run NAME as part of the PACE Probabilistic Accident Consequence Evaluation Software but no more).