06/02/2026
Boundaries Aren’t Mean. They’re Necessary.
One of the biggest misconceptions about reinforcement-based dog training is that our relationships with our dogs are built on passivity.
That we float through life asking politely, negotiating endlessly, and obliging every single behaviour our dogs choose to offer.
You know…
“Would you like to recall today, darling, or shall we discuss your feelings about it first?”
Yeah. No.
Nothing could be further from the truth.
I have a lot of dogs. And because I have a lot of dogs, it’s absolutely imperative that I have control, connection, and clarity. My dogs do what I ask, when I ask, and sometimes that request is not up for a democratic vote.
Is that very nice to hear?
Is that soft and fluffy?
Is that a democracy?
No. And that’s okay.
Sometimes my dogs need to do something immediately because I’ve asked them to — regardless of distractions, regardless of whether they’re enjoying themselves, and regardless of whether they’d rather be doing literally anything else. I’m not particularly concerned in that moment about whether they like it or not. It’s a mandatory behaviour.
And that’s often down to safety.
Safety for my dogs.
Safety for other dogs.
Safety for people who don’t want my dogs near them — which they are absolutely entitled to.
Being a responsible dog owner isn’t just about advocating for your own dog. It’s about being a respectful member of society and understanding the balance between your dog’s behaviour and other people’s rights.
If you have a reactive or insecure dog and you saw me walking all of mine, you’d probably have a minor heart attack. But here’s the difference: because I have control, I can call my dogs back, and they understand that recall is instantaneous. It’s not optional. It’s a mandatory requirement. That reliability allows me to live my life harmoniously — with my dogs and with the world around us.
Now here’s the irony that people often miss.
Although these behaviours are mandatory, although my dogs are expected to do them when I ask, the reality is they actually want to. They want to be focused. They want to be engaged. They want to be “obedient” (yes, I said it). That willingness doesn’t come from force or fear — it comes from the foundation work.
That’s the secret sauce.
When the groundwork is right, compliance isn’t a battle. It’s a by-product.
So the question that usually follows is:
“How do you square that with being a trainer and dog owner who doesn’t use physical correction or punishment?”
Two words.
Consistency and clarity.
Consistency means being honest about what I actually care about enforcing — and letting go of the things I’m not consistent about.
Clarity means educating my dogs first, properly, and then being very clear about what behaviour works and what doesn’t.
And yes, sometimes there are consequences.
Is that punishment? Possibly.
But is it information? Definitely.
And here’s the crucial part — the information I provide is clear.
It’s not just about telling my dogs what I don’t want. It’s also about teaching them exactly what I do want in every situation I put them in. My dogs aren’t left guessing. They’re not navigating the world on hope and trial-and-error alone.
I actively look at the world from their perspective and educate them about it.
What they want.
What I want from them.
What I need from them.
And what I expect from them.
That education happens before I ask for reliability, before I raise criteria, and long before I expect instantaneous responses in high-distraction, high-stakes environments. Consequences — whether that’s removal of reinforcement, blocked access, or loss of opportunity — only exist within that framework of understanding.
This isn’t accidental.
It isn’t vibes.
And it definitely isn’t luck.
It’s an intentional approach to rearing dogs. To raising them. And to living with them.
There’s this odd idea that reinforcement-based training involves aligning your chakras, burning incense, and making sure you’re deeply connected to your dog’s inner child or inner puppy.
In reality?
It’s deeply practical.
It’s about education.
It’s about meeting needs.
It’s about emotional stability.
And it’s about structure.
Which brings me to what I call the Five Es:
• Emotional stability
• Education
• Enrichment
• Entertainment
• Exercise
If I want the level of control, focus, and harmony I have with my dogs, those boxes get ticked every single day. Not occasionally. Not when it’s convenient. Daily.
Because when a dog’s needs are met, boundaries don’t feel oppressive — they feel safe.
When information is clear, consistency becomes fair.
When consistency is fair, boundaries stop feeling harsh.
And when boundaries are understood, dogs don’t resist them — they lean into them.
So no — positive training is not permissive.
It’s not chaotic.
And it’s certainly not hands-off.
It’s clear.
It’s fair.
And it creates dogs who can exist confidently, safely, and respectfully in the real world.
And honestly?
That’s kind of the point.