A Cryptocurrency

A Cryptocurrency We deal with Cryptocurrencies. We specialize in offering advice to all entities that want to invest in the cryptocurrency market.

We now have a new consulting service in the purchase of Cryptoart

Trump vs Harris on Crypto: Everything You Need to KnowThe U.S. is fast approaching one of the most consequential electio...
02/11/2024

Trump vs Harris on Crypto: Everything You Need to Know

The U.S. is fast approaching one of the most consequential elections in its 248-year history — and the result could define the country’s direction for decades to come.

But beyond long-running issues such as jobs, wages, immigration, taxes and healthcare, one topic in particular has come into real focus during this campaign: crypto.

After years of heavy-handed enforcement by the SEC, and regulatory uncertainty for companies and consumers alike, this is an industry looking for solutions from the next administration.

In recent years, we’ve seen crypto become more of a bipartisan issue — with Democrats and Republicans alike pushing for America to cement itself as an industry leader.

And there’s a good reason why politicians are beginning to take notice of the sector: it’s home to a big chunk of undecided voters, and prospective donors with deep pockets.

Data from Consensys and HarrisX suggests 92% of crypto investors are planning to cast a ballot on November 5 — 11% of whom say this issue will determine who they support.

A further 12% said they would be much more likely to back a pro-crypto candidate, and given how the result could hinge on Electoral College votes in a small number of states, this matters.

For American voters still trying to make up their minds — and investors watching in interest from abroad — Cryptonews has compared the crypto stances of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris side by side to offer a clearer idea of what their presidencies could look like.

You might also like
Trump Presidency Could Propel Bitcoin to $125K, Harris to $75K: Standard Chartered
What Do They Say About Crypto?
It’s fair to say we have a clearer idea of Donald Trump’s vision for crypto. That’s primarily down to two reasons: he’s explicitly courted the industry’s support, and he’s been in the race longer.

By contrast, Kamala Harris’s campaign was at a disadvantage from the get-go. Joe Biden abruptly pulled out of the race in July after a catastrophic TV debate performance, and she was only officially confirmed as the Democratic nominee a month later.

Voters have been looking for signs that Harris would embrace a new approach toward digital assets — and mark a clear departure from her predecessor’s stance.

While there have been some signs of progress here, it’s fair to say her support for crypto is nowhere near as emphatic as Trump’s appears to be.

But as these key quotes from both candidates below show, Trump hasn’t always been a huge fan of Bitcoin as he is now.

You’ll notice that Harris hasn’t actually gone on the record to talk about crypto that much — and given how Trump spoke at Bitcoin 2024 and has even released his own NFT collections in the past, she had little chance of matching his enthusiasm.

But you could argue that this nod to digital assets behind closed doors to donors, however brief and vague, is a strong hint that things will be different if she wins the keys to the Oval Office.

What Do They Say About Crypto Regulation?
While you may think that crypto firms would balk at the prospect of regulation, many entrepreneurs believe clarity would help the sector to grow — and improve the credibility of this asset class among everyday investors.

All of this means close attention is being paid to the policies that Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are suggesting if elected, as legislation could spell the difference between the U.S. becoming a crypto superpower or an irrelevance.

When it comes to quotes from both candidates, it’s only Trump who has spoken vocally about his plans. The Harris camp have offered an insight into their thinking through policy papers.

Let’s get a little bit of context on what both candidates are saying here. Trump has long railed against the SEC, and has vowed to fire its chair Gary Gensler “on day one” — a move that may be difficult to achieve in the eyes of some legal experts.

By contrast, that last-minute announcement from Harris came in a document outlining how her Democratic administration would support black men — and significantly, showed she accepts how crypto can be beneficial to demographics where financial inclusion is lower.

You might also like
Trump Win Could Spark Altcoin Rally, Says Bitwise’s Matt Hougan
What Are Their Plans Regarding Crypto?
Some in crypto circles have raised eyebrows that Harris has focused her crypto policies on one part of society, rather than referring to the whole of America.

But we can get a clearer idea of how her presidency would affect investors by delving into her tax policies.

Harris has previously pledged that taxes wouldn’t rise for households bringing in less than $400,000 a year, but there would be changes for investors with broader shoulders.

Those who earn more than $1 million annually could see their capital gains tax rate rise from 20% to 28%.

A particularly radical proposal that would affect an even smaller subset of Americans concerns taxing unrealized capital gains among those with a net worth above $100 million. That means there would be liabilities to pay on everything from property to stocks and crypto, even if it isn’t sold.

By contrast, Trump hasn’t formally unveiled any changes to capital gains as yet — but rumors abound that he’s in favor of a reduction from 20% to 15%.

One thing he has done is unveil a slate of crypto-specific policies, which include:

Stopping the U.S. government from selling Bitcoin seized from criminals, and establishing a “strategic reserve”
Establishing a dedicated Crypto Advisory Council to steer regulation
Blocking a central bank digital currency from launching in America
Taking steps to ensure all remaining BTC is mined in the U.S.
Questions have been raised about how achievable some of these ideas are — especially when it comes to taking complete market share over Bitcoin mining.

How Much Crypto Do They Hold?
Beyond the rhetoric seen on the campaign trail, it’s worth looking at the investment portfolios of both candidates. Why? Because it gives a sense of whether they’re putting their money where their mouth is.

Public disclosures help shed light on their strategies — and it’s pretty instructive to see whether or not they have exposure to digital assets, joining 17% of their fellow Americans.

So, when you compare both candidates side by side, we see that only Trump has taken the plunge to invest in crypto. And while Harris does hold exchange-traded funds, the latest filings suggest they don’t include ETFs tracking Bitcoin’s spot price — products that have proven hugely popular since being approved by the SEC back in January.

What Now?
America has a choice to make — and crypto forms but one part of the bigger picture.

Some economists have warned that some of Trump’s policies in other areas, namely surrounding tariffs, could ultimately spur inflation — and affect the crypto markets indirectly.

Critics have even claimed that Trump may not follow through with his campaign promises to the crypto community, and may have just been saying what they want to hear to win their support.

As election day draws nearer, one thing has become clear: there’s optimism in the crypto markets.

Whether the result is clear on the night or in the weeks and months that follow, the outcome could have a huge impact on Bitcoin’s value.

PolitiFi Meme Coins For Joe Biden Replacements Surge After Poor Debate PerformanceA slew of new PolitiFi meme coins are ...
07/07/2024

PolitiFi Meme Coins For Joe Biden Replacements Surge After Poor Debate Performance

A slew of new PolitiFi meme coins are seeing major volatility on Wednesday around speculation that President Joe Biden might not secure the Democratic Party nomination for the 2024 Presidential election.😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎😎

16/03/2024

Big Bitcoin Price Swings Wipeout Traders as ETF Buyers Battle Profit-taking Sellers – Where is BTC Headed Next?

The Bitcoin (BTC) price saw big swings on Friday, with droves of traders on both the bullish and bearish sides getting their positions wiped out as US spot Bitcoin ETF buyers continue to battle against profit-taking sellers.

BTC began Friday’s session above $71,000 before selling off sharply during Asian trading session.

Having dropped to as low as $65,500 the Bitcoin price abruptly rallied back to $70,500 during US trading hours.

It was last trading around $68,000, with leveraged futures positions worth $200 million having been wiped out, as per coinglass.com.

This marked the most punishing day for the bulls since March 4, when long positions worth $244 million were liquidated.

Since printing fresh record highs near $74,000 on Thursday, Bitcoin has lost bullish momentum.

Profit-takers appear to have taken control of the market despite still elevated demand for spot Bitcoin ETFs.

Profits At Absurd Levels, On-Chain Analysis Reveals
As per CryptoCon, a 30-day moving average of a widely followed on-chain metric called the Realized Profit/Loss Ratio is at “absurd” levels.

CryptoCon was keen to point out that this doesn’t mean the market is necessarily close to topping.

But it does suggest that investors sitting on big profits are likely getting “antsy to sell”.

At current levels of around $68,000, the Bitcoin price is up over 60% year-to-date.

Massive spot Bitcoin ETF inflows have been the main driver of the rally. And they have been accelerating recently.

As per a JP Morgan research note, weekly inflows were the largest this week since their January launch.

Despite profit-taking and a 7.5% pullback from highs, it’s no surprise that many are still confident of Bitcoin’s bullish stance.

That’s despite the cryptocurrency hitting a new all-time before its April halving event, rather than after.

Where to Next for the Bitcoin Price?
In past Bitcoin bull markets, the price commonly reversed around 30% lower from local highs.

As recently as January, Bitcoin dipped from the at the time yearly high of around $49,000 to as low as $38,500.

That suggests that Bitcoin’s latest pullback potentially has legs. A retest of $50,000 isn’t out of the question, based on historical comparisons.

But ETFs may have changed the game.

Major institutional investors entering the Bitcoin market for the first time, with the knowledge of its volatility but also potential upside, are likely to be less price sensitive than past cohorts of Bitcoin investors.

They are also likely to have a “buy-the-dip” mentality that may help cushion BTC price declines.

Any BTC price dips now may struggle to extend beyond 10-15%.

That suggests $60,000 could be a near-term price floor.

Thank you for considering donating and financing our consultancy crypto company. We are dedicated to providing our clien...
12/06/2023

Thank you for considering donating and financing our consultancy crypto company. We are dedicated to providing our clients with the best possible advice and guidance when it comes to navigating the complex world of cryptocurrency. As you may know, the crypto market is constantly evolving and can be difficult to understand for those who are not well-versed in the industry.

By supporting our consultancy crypto company, you are not only helping us to continue providing top-notch services to our clients, but you are also investing in the future of cryptocurrency. As more and more businesses and individuals turn to crypto as a means of payment and investment, the need for knowledgeable and experienced consultants will only continue to grow.

Your donation and financial support will allow us to expand our team, invest in the latest technology and tools, and provide even more comprehensive services to our clients. We are grateful for any amount you are able to contribute and look forward to continuing to serve the crypto community with excellence.

20/04/2023

Bitcoin Threatens Break of This Key Support Area – How Low Could the BTC Price Go?

Three Arrows Capital's NFT Collection Set for Sotheby's Auction in Attempt to Repay Creditors
20/04/2023

Three Arrows Capital's NFT Collection Set for Sotheby's Auction in Attempt to Repay Creditors

EU Crypto Industry Calls to Arms as Bitcoin & Ethereum Ban in Cards AgainFrance-based hardware wallet manufacturer Ledge...
13/03/2022

EU Crypto Industry Calls to Arms as Bitcoin & Ethereum Ban in Cards Again

France-based hardware wallet manufacturer Ledger sounded an alarm about a possible EU-wide ban on cryptoassets that are using the proof-of-work (PoW) consensus mechanism, calling people to contact members of the European Parliament (MEPs) and oppose the move.

"At the last possible moment, certain parties offered amendments to MiCA [regulation on Markets in Cryptoassets] that would ban proof-of-work consensus protocols, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other popular blockchains and cryptoassets in Europe, issuing an ultimatum to the rest of Parliament: "accept our Bitcoin ban or we will oppose the entire MiCA package"," one of the main players in the crypto industry said.

(Ethereum, the second-largest cryptoasset by market capitalization, aims to move to the proof-of-stake consensus mechanism, which does not require energy-intensive intensive mining, but critics argue it's more centralized and less secure.)

The European Parliament Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) will vote on MiCA on Monday, March 14.

However, according to Patrick Hansen, Head of Strategy & Growth at Unstoppable Finance, a developer of a DeFi wallet, the MEPs will vote on two suggestions and one of them "doesn't plan a ban."

"There seems to be a very thin majority against the ban right now, but [to be determined]," Hansen said.

As reported earlier this month, a draft of MiCA that was first proposed by the European Commission in September 2020, was revised to remove language that proposed a ban on PoW-based cryptoassets.

However, even in the ECON votes for the ban on these cryptoassets and the European Parliament (EP) later confirms this, long and complicated negotiations are expected among the EP, the European Commission, and the EU member states. It might take years until MiCA comes into force.

Also, Lorenzo Vallecchi, an energy sector-focused journalist, opined that, if the "ban" is approved, "it basically says PoW miners have to respect specific emission standards, same as for the car industry, for instance."

While the shared draft also seemingly says that "small-scale" mining operations will be exempt from these standards, "the Commission will decide what "small scale" means within six months after the approval of the directive," per Vallecchi.

"I just hope the EU doesn’t shoot itself in the foot by creating a hostile environment for PoW," the specialist concluded.

In either case, Ledger warns that, if this ban is confirmed, then:

"The innovative and growing digital asset economy in Europe will vanish. Without Bitcoin and Ethereum, crypto exchanges and other crypto service providers cannot operate profitably. They will be forced to close, move, or block access to Europeans. DeFi protocols dependent on ETH will not be able to legally serve Europeans. Let’s be clear, this activity won’t stop, it will simply move to the United States or Asia, where it is currently welcomed."
"Consumer protection will be harmed by a Bitcoin ban in Europe. Due to the nature of digital assets, even if ‘banned’ digital assets will remain available in Europe, just not on safe and regulated EU platforms. This would present severe consumer protection concerns as consumers will be forced to access foreign platforms that may be hard to understand and have less (or no) regulatory oversight."
The company urged the European crypto community to contact their MEP and tell them:

"An outright ban of proof-of-work assets will cripple the EU market, encourage circumvention of law, worsen consumer protection, and push the industry outside the EU – all with no benefit to the environment! Please ask the ECON Committee to oppose Amendments ALT A and ALT G."

The MEPs that propose the ban claim that the PoW mechanism is not environmentally sustainable.

"If each of us must defend a more ecological and virtuous society, banning the PoW is a simplistic and caricatural view," Pierre Person, Member of the National Assembly for Paris's 6th constituency, reacted. "The issue is not the energy consumption of Bitcoin, but the origin of this energy. It would be more relevant to ban mining from fossil energies and promote players who turn to surplus renewable energy to improve the profitability of these means of production."

Dominated by Institutions, Bitcoin Mining is also Possible from Home🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡ndividuals might get a return on their i...
29/10/2021

Dominated by Institutions, Bitcoin Mining is also Possible from Home🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡🌡ndividuals might get a return on their initial investment from mining profits within about a year.
As mining difficulty rates increase and competition over block rewards ramp up, home-based miners will find it increasingly difficult to make a profit.
Individuals increase the chances of making mining profitable for themselves by joining a pool.
Cryptocurrency mining is big business. In the month of April alone, when bitcoin (BTC) hit its all-time high of around USD 65,000, BTC miners generated almost USD 3bn in revenue, resulting from sales of the coins they had obtained via either block rewards or transaction fees.

Such figures would lead most people to assume that Bitcoin mining is now largely the preserve of big organizations, commercial entities with the resources to invest in the construction of large plants capable of commanding a significant slice of Bitcoin’s massive hashrate, or the computational power. However, opinion on this question is very much mixed, with at least one miner -- known on Twitter as burn the bridge () -- recently affirming that it is possible for individuals to profitably mine BTC from the comfort of their own homes.

He told Cryptonews.com that, even with relatively inexpensive ASIC miners, individuals can earn money at home by joining a pool. On the other hand, mining companies argue that Bitcoin mining will remain out of reach for the vast majority of individuals, and that most people would be better off investing in a mining firm if they want to share in its profits.

Do-it-yourself home Bitcoin mining
Posting in mid-July, US-based Bitcoin community member econoalchemist shared data revealing that it is actually possible to make money by mining Bitcoin at home, at least if you lived in the United States and in an area of the country with relatively low electricity costs. In particular, he suggested that it’s more cost-effective mining bitcoin yourself than directly purchasing BTC with USD.

Speaking with Cryptonews.com, he explained that, contrary to what many might suppose, mining Bitcoin at home is feasible for the average US resident.

“Several ASIC distributors are located in the US, most homes have an abundant power capacity, and the average kWh rate is USD 0.13,” he said.

According to econoalchemist, an individual running a modest 80Th ASIC mining unit with a USD 0.13/kWh rate can accumulate BTC for 57% below the current market spot price.

“Continuing with this example, it means that over the course of a month, an individual would spend USD 327.60 in electricity operating their ASIC and they would earn 0.016386 BTC, a USD 786.52 value,” he added.

Econoalchemist pointed out that there is a range of more modest hardware options for anyone intrigued by mining.

“I recommend starting small with an S9 ASIC, these cost roughly USD 450 today and they will produce roughly 8,000 to 10,000 sats [USD 4.4] per day. The newer generation ASICs will cost anywhere from USD 5,000 to USD 10,000 each right now,” he said.

He added that most individuals will get a return on their initial investment from mining profits in both USD and BTC terms within about a year, other things being equal.

“There are a lot of variables that go into these considerations like overall network hashrate, network difficulty, kWh rate, BTC market price, upfront costs, infrastructure requirements and they are constantly changing. But for the average US resident, there is a wide buffer in both how low the price of BTC can go and how high the network hashrate can get before mining at home just doesn't make sense,” he explained, noting that he explored these considerations in more detail in an article published at the end of July.

It’s not only that mining Bitcoin at home (via a mining pool) is more cost-effective than buying it directly, but that mining provides a way of obtaining BTC without having to submit to know-your-customer (KYC) regulations.

“These regulations require users to attach their personally identifiable identities to their Bitcoin activity which exposes the individual to many risks such as third-party data breaches, unrealized capital gains tax, and 6102-style confiscation. Mining Bitcoin at home mitigates these KYC associated risks but there is another benefit in that the average US resident can get more bitcoin for their money by mining it at home than they can buying it through a risky DCA [dollar-cost averaging] service,” econoalchemist said.

Counter-arguments
Not everyone agrees that mining Bitcoin at home is the best strategy for individuals.

“Bitcoin mining is increasingly out of reach for most home-based operations. Given the scarcity and buying power required to obtain new equipment, energy, and infrastructure, home miners will largely need to rely on used equipment and colocation facilities,” said Zach Bradford, the CEO and President of CleanSpark, a Nevada-based energy technology and clean Bitcoin mining company.

Bradford also noted that as mining difficulty rates increase and competition over block rewards ramp up, home-based miners will find it increasingly difficult to make a profit. He admitted that in some cases certain miners may be able to perform reasonably well, but most will on average be priced out of the mining sector.

“I could imagine a scenario where someone is able to use stranded or excess renewable energy to increase access and bring down the cost of energy but competitive mining machines would still be too expensive for most home-based operations,” he told Cryptonews.com.

These misgivings aside, not everyone operating within the mining industry holds that Bitcoin mining is out of reach of the home-based individual. For BitRiver CEO and founder Igor Runets, individuals increase the chances of making mining profitable for themselves by joining a pool.

“Although customers of our colocation services are mainly institutional mining businesses, some of our customers are actually pools of individuals who combine their resources to get bulk pricing from both the machine sellers and the datacenter that provides hosting for those machines. Somebody with modest means could also join such pools to get the most out of their resources,” he told Cryptonews.com

Opinions are also mixed on whether home-based mining has been declining in recent years, or whether it’s making at least a modest resurgence, as knowledge of its feasibility spreads.

“It has been declining in tandem with the growth of large, well-funded companies across the world that are now mining [...] Mining equipment is so specialized now that it is often out of reach for DIYers and at-home miners,” said Bradford.

On the other hand, econoalchemist suggested that based on what he himself has witnessed since the end of 2020, mining from home has actually increased.

“Up until [Bitcoin blogger/expert] Diverter wrote Mining For The Streets the narratives around home mining were negative; ‘It's too expensive to mine at home,’ ‘You can't compete with industrial-sized miners,’ ‘You would be better off buying bitcoin from an exchange.’ Well, Diverter absolutely shattered those narratives and mopped the floor with them,” he said.

Since reading Diverter’s article, econoalchemist has written his own guide on home mining, which he says has helped spread knowledge about mining and given people enough confidence to solve common mining problems (e.g. too much noise and heat) by themselves.

“Fast forward to today and there is Steve Barbour designing the black box enclosure, Matt Odell showcasing home mining on his Citadel Dispatch podcast (Episode 31 & 38), and people like CoinHeated taking immersion cooling to the next level,” he said.

Taking a view somewhere in the middle of both poles, Igor Runets said that, while home-based mining has grown along with the popularity of cryptocurrencies since Bitcoin’s launch, industrial-scale mining has been growing much faster and accounts for most Bitcoin mining worldwide.

“This is not only because of the increasing economic infeasibility of small-scale mining but also because of the increasing noise and heat challenges for home-based operations,” he said.

Also, there’s a new service, launched this week by Compass Mining, a US-based online marketplace for Bitcoin mining hardware and hosting. Named At-Home Mining, it is described as a direct-to-consumer service that allows purchasing Bitcoin mining equipment for the home, with an ASIC mining machine being delivered to them, allowing customers to mine Bitcoin without having to pay additional hosting facility fees.

Some tips for would-be home miners
Assuming you might like to try home-mining for yourself, there are a few things you’d need to keep in mind.

First of all, join a mining pool, since finding a block is extremely unlikely if you’re mining solo.

“Personally, I like SlushPool; it is super easy to set up, they have a cool mobile app so I can monitor my ASICs while on the go, and they are not part of the Bitcoin Mining Council. By joining a pool, you will see mining rewards trickle in every day,” said econoalchemist.

Secondly, you need to be aware that scammers may try to take advantage of your eagerness to acquire mining hardware. Fortunately, there are a few more trusted channels you can use to source equipment.

“Use the Hardware Market Verfied Listings Telegram channel. MineFarmBuy and Kaboom Racks are reputable distributors and they post ads there often. Even if the ad has a Minimum Order Quantity (MOQ) don't hesitate to reach out to the seller, they will often consolidate several small orders to reach their MOQ,” econoalchemist explained.

On the other hand, Zach Bradford suggested that most individuals would be better off investing in a trustworthy mining company.

He says, “Do your research. Find a company that fits with your values [...] Setting up at home is probably prohibitive for most people at this point. But there are many ways to be involved in building and supporting the Bitcoin blockchain.”

____
Learn more:
- How Bitcoin Mining Might Help Nations With Domestic Energy Production
- Bitcoin Miners Adapt Fast As EU Mulls ‘Climate-Friendly Cryptoassets’

- Bitcoin’s Hashpower Estimate Up, Transaction Fee Revenue Estimate Down
- Bitcoin Miners, Take Notice - Biden’s Plan Would Remake the US Electricity System

- 9- and 14-year-old Bitcoin, ETH, RVN Miners ‘Make USD 30,000 a Month’
- What It’s Like To Mine Bitcoin As a Full-Time Job

Dominated by Institutions, Bitcoin Mining is also Possible from Home...........Individuals might get a return on their i...
02/10/2021

Dominated by Institutions, Bitcoin Mining is also Possible from Home...........
Individuals might get a return on their initial investment from mining profits within about a year.
As mining difficulty rates increase and competition over block rewards ramp up, home-based miners will find it increasingly difficult to make a profit.
Individuals increase the chances of making mining profitable for themselves by joining a pool.
Cryptocurrency mining is big business. In the month of April alone, when bitcoin (BTC) hit its all-time high of around USD 65,000, BTC miners generated almost USD 3bn in revenue, resulting from sales of the coins they had obtained via either block rewards or transaction fees.

Such figures would lead most people to assume that Bitcoin mining is now largely the preserve of big organizations, commercial entities with the resources to invest in the construction of large plants capable of commanding a significant slice of Bitcoin’s massive hashrate, or the computational power. However, opinion on this question is very much mixed, with at least one miner -- known on Twitter as burn the bridge () -- recently affirming that it is possible for individuals to profitably mine BTC from the comfort of their own homes.

He told Cryptonews.com that, even with relatively inexpensive ASIC miners, individuals can earn money at home by joining a pool. On the other hand, mining companies argue that Bitcoin mining will remain out of reach for the vast majority of individuals, and that most people would be better off investing in a mining firm if they want to share in its profits.

Do-it-yourself home Bitcoin mining
Posting in mid-July, US-based Bitcoin community member econoalchemist shared data revealing that it is actually possible to make money by mining Bitcoin at home, at least if you lived in the United States and in an area of the country with relatively low electricity costs. In particular, he suggested that it’s more cost-effective mining bitcoin yourself than directly purchasing BTC with USD.

Speaking with Cryptonews.com, he explained that, contrary to what many might suppose, mining Bitcoin at home is feasible for the average US resident.

“Several ASIC distributors are located in the US, most homes have an abundant power capacity, and the average kWh rate is USD 0.13,” he said.

According to econoalchemist, an individual running a modest 80Th ASIC mining unit with a USD 0.13/kWh rate can accumulate BTC for 57% below the current market spot price.

“Continuing with this example, it means that over the course of a month, an individual would spend USD 327.60 in electricity operating their ASIC and they would earn 0.016386 BTC, a USD 786.52 value,” he added.

Econoalchemist pointed out that there is a range of more modest hardware options for anyone intrigued by mining.

“I recommend starting small with an S9 ASIC, these cost roughly USD 450 today and they will produce roughly 8,000 to 10,000 sats [USD 4.4] per day. The newer generation ASICs will cost anywhere from USD 5,000 to USD 10,000 each right now,” he said.

He added that most individuals will get a return on their initial investment from mining profits in both USD and BTC terms within about a year, other things being equal.

“There are a lot of variables that go into these considerations like overall network hashrate, network difficulty, kWh rate, BTC market price, upfront costs, infrastructure requirements and they are constantly changing. But for the average US resident, there is a wide buffer in both how low the price of BTC can go and how high the network hashrate can get before mining at home just doesn't make sense,” he explained, noting that he explored these considerations in more detail in an article published at the end of July.

It’s not only that mining Bitcoin at home (via a mining pool) is more cost-effective than buying it directly, but that mining provides a way of obtaining BTC without having to submit to know-your-customer (KYC) regulations.

“These regulations require users to attach their personally identifiable identities to their Bitcoin activity which exposes the individual to many risks such as third-party data breaches, unrealized capital gains tax, and 6102-style confiscation. Mining Bitcoin at home mitigates these KYC associated risks but there is another benefit in that the average US resident can get more bitcoin for their money by mining it at home than they can buying it through a risky DCA [dollar-cost averaging] service,” econoalchemist said.

Address

London

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when A Cryptocurrency posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share