15/09/2026
Most organisations treat human-centred leadership as a wellbeing agenda. Something HR owns. Something you get to once the growth numbers are safe.
I think that's exactly backwards.
A new Harvard Business Impact Enterprise perspective argues that human-centred leadership is the antidote to burnout and change fatigue. I don’t disagree as it's a well-made case, but I’d suggest it stops one step short of the real one!
In an era where AI makes analysis and expertise abundant, deeply understanding humans is the differentiator. Not a nice-to-have. The thing that tells you which problems are worth solving, for whom, how fast, and what impact you need to have.
My latest article builds on their argument and pushes it somewhere more uncomfortable: the leaders who can't read their own people won't be able to read their markets either, and the impact they intend to have over the next decade is being quietly decided by that gap today.
Have a read, then tell me in the comments: in your organisation, is human-centred leadership a wellbeing programme or a growth capability?
🔗 https://shorturl.at/1Pti3
If it resonates, repost it for the leaders in your network who need the same challenge.
🙋🏼♂️ If you’re a CEO and leading for innovation-led growth is on your agenda, DM me for a chat.