Carpathia Operational Consultants

Directions Website Contact the business

Carpathia Operational Consultants We offer a wide range of consultancy services, from helping identify potential 'Icebergs' to guiding you around them. WE DO!
​
WE OBSERVE, WE LISTEN, WE ENGAGE.

Every business is unique, so we tailor our consultancy services to meet your exact specifications. Carpathia Operational Consultants are here to help you get to the heart of the matter, to help you sort out the sense from the nonsense, to reveal what's hidden. Our consultants have decades of experience in manufacturing and operations management, in a variety of sectors and businesses, from SMEs to those listed on the FTSE. We will certainly have seen your challenges before, we may even have lived through them ourselves! So if you can see the iceberg looming or have already hit one, get in contact.
​
HOW WE CAN HELP
By constantly challenging the way things are done combined with organisational analysis and re-focusing, we can help deliver;
Increased customer and employee satisfaction
Significant financial improvement
Increase in customer base
Increase service level- customer service
Analysing the organisation takes resource. You may not have the time, the people or the “know how”. You may not understand what you see or have the experience to start to to change what you find. You may not know how to engage, develop and mentor your employees. We start where it really counts. We engage the workforce. We reveal the norms and the behaviours. We identify the value in your business. We expose the waste. We solve the problems and then help you and your employees to implement solutions to achieve sustainable outcomes.

TWO FACTORIES. SAME PRODUCTIVITY PROBLEM. COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS.Imagine walking into two manufacturing business...
21/10/2026

TWO FACTORIES. SAME PRODUCTIVITY PROBLEM. COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SOLUTIONS.

Imagine walking into two manufacturing businesses.

Both are experiencing poor productivity.

Both are missing production targets.

Both have frustrated management teams.

And both believe their supervisors need to improve performance.

But when you investigate, the underlying problems are very different.

Factory A

The materials are available.

Equipment is reliable.

Production standards are realistic.

But supervisors struggle to organise labour, manage performance, coach their teams and respond effectively when things go wrong.

There is a genuine management capability gap.

Targeted development, coaching and clearer daily management processes could make a significant difference.

Factory B

The supervisors are experienced and capable.

But materials regularly arrive late.

Production plans change throughout the day.

Equipment reliability is poor.

And supervisors spend much of their time chasing components, rearranging work and compensating for problems outside their control.

Sending these supervisors on another leadership course won't resolve those issues.

They need improvements to the operating system around them.

Same symptoms. Different causes. Different solutions.

Of course, in reality, many manufacturing businesses have a combination of both.

That's why I believe operational improvement should begin with understanding how the business actually works, rather than immediately deciding what needs fixing.

Observe the operation.

Listen to the people doing the work.

Measure performance.

Understand the constraints.

Establish what is genuinely causing the losses.

Then decide where to intervene.

Because the wrong solution doesn't just waste money.

It can leave the original problem untouched while convincing people that improvement doesn't work.

Diagnosis before intervention.

How often do we see solutions being selected before the real problem has been established?

WE PROMOTE PEOPLE FOR WHAT THEY KNOW. THEN JUDGE THEM ON SKILLS WE'VE NEVER TAUGHT THEM.I've seen this happen throughout...
19/10/2026

WE PROMOTE PEOPLE FOR WHAT THEY KNOW. THEN JUDGE THEM ON SKILLS WE'VE NEVER TAUGHT THEM.

I've seen this happen throughout my manufacturing career.

An experienced operator is reliable, technically capable, respected by colleagues and knows the production process inside out.

A supervisory position becomes available.

They're promoted.

And almost overnight, the expectations change.

Yesterday, success meant producing good work, solving technical problems and meeting production standards.

Today, they're expected to:

Manage people and performance.

Plan labour and production.

Understand capacity and productivity.

Maintain safety and quality standards.

Coach and develop others.

Handle difficult conversations.

Resolve operational problems.

Make decisions that affect cost and delivery.

Yet how much preparation have we actually given them?

Often, very little.

We assume that because somebody understands how to manufacture the product, they'll naturally understand how to manage the operation.

But they're two very different skill sets.

And I think there's another important distinction.

Teaching somebody leadership skills is essential. But in manufacturing, we also need to teach them how to manage an operating system.

Understanding people is important.

So is understanding how labour, materials, equipment, processes, quality, safety, capacity and customer requirements interact.

A supervisor needs both.

And the organisation has responsibilities too.

We can't expect people to demonstrate effective leadership if we haven't provided the development, authority, support and time needed to exercise it.

Ideally, that development should begin before promotion, not after somebody starts struggling.

A promotion should be another stage in someone's development, not the day their development begins.

Perhaps before asking why a newly promoted supervisor isn't performing as expected, we should ask:

Did we actually prepare them for the job we gave them?

SOMETIMES REDUCING HEADCOUNT IS NECESSARY. BUT DO WE REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE REMOVING?I've spent many years studyin...
14/10/2026

SOMETIMES REDUCING HEADCOUNT IS NECESSARY. BUT DO WE REALLY UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE REMOVING?

I've spent many years studying work, measuring productivity and helping manufacturing businesses understand their labour requirements.

One thing I've learned is that reducing labour costs and reducing the amount of work are two very different things.

A business might remove three people from a department and immediately see a saving on its payroll.
But what happens to the work those three people were doing?

Does it disappear?

Does it move to another department?

Does overtime increase?

Do supervisors spend more time covering gaps rather than managing performance?

Does quality suffer?

Do lead times increase?

Are safety standards put under additional pressure?

Sometimes businesses have absolutely no choice. Financial pressures can make cost reduction essential to survival, and I fully recognise that.
But that makes understanding the consequences even more important.
Before making those decisions, we should be asking:
• What work genuinely needs to be done?
• What activities could be eliminated or improved?
• What capacity will remain?
• Where will the additional workload go?
• What are the implications for safety, quality, delivery and customer service?
• Which option creates the least operational risk?
Work measurement isn't just about calculating how many people a business needs.
It's about understanding how work is performed, what capacity is available and the consequences of changing it.

There may not always be a painless solution. But there should at least be an informed one.

And sometimes the greatest opportunity isn't reducing the number of people.
It's removing the unnecessary work that's preventing those people from being productive.

Lessons from the Factory Floor #4TWO DEPARTMENTS HIT THEIR TARGETS. THE BUSINESS STILL LOST MONEY.I've been working rec...
12/10/2026

Lessons from the Factory Floor #4

TWO DEPARTMENTS HIT THEIR TARGETS. THE BUSINESS STILL LOST MONEY.

I've been working recently with a shoe manufacturer on something that highlights a weakness in how we often measure production performance.

Take two departments: Cutting and Closing.

Cutting achieves its production target.

Closing achieves its production target.

Both report a successful week.

But what happens between them?

Missing components.
Quality defects.
Incorrect information.
Additional handling.
Rework.
Time spent chasing and correcting problems.

All potentially absorbed by the next department without being fully reflected in either department's performance figures.

We've recently started introducing measures to examine what actually transfers between departments and whether it arrives complete, correct and ready for the next operation.

The objective is to make those previously hidden losses visible.

Because the business doesn't get paid for individual departments achieving their targets.

It gets paid for delivering the finished product to the customer, at the right quality, cost and time.

And here's the interesting part.

A department can be efficient while the overall operation is inefficient.

If we only measure performance within departmental boundaries, we risk overlooking what happens between them.

That's why I believe operational performance needs to be measured across the whole production flow, not just within individual departments.

Sometimes the biggest losses aren't inside departments. They're between them.

Lessons from the Factory Floor #3We expect supervisors to lead. But have we ever measured how much time they actually s...
09/10/2026

Lessons from the Factory Floor #3

We expect supervisors to lead. But have we ever measured how much time they actually spend leading?

One exercise I've carried out with supervisors and production managers in manufacturing businesses has been to examine exactly where their working day goes.

Not where we assume it goes.
Where it actually goes.

We broke their responsibilities down into individual activities, mapped the time spent on each and created treemaps to visualise the results.

We then ranked those activities by priority.
It's a revealing exercise.

Chasing materials.

Resolving production problems.

Covering labour shortages.

Answering queries.

Correcting mistakes.

Attending meetings.

Completing administration.

Individually, many of these activities appear necessary.

Collectively, they can consume the very time we expect managers to spend coaching people, developing capability, improving performance and preventing problems from recurring.

And that's where an important question emerges.
Are we dealing with a supervisor who needs to become better at managing their time, or an organisation that needs to become better at managing the demands placed upon its supervisors?

Sometimes it's both.
But unless we understand where the time is going, we're making assumptions.

Before asking supervisors to become better leaders, perhaps we should measure how much opportunity we're actually giving them to lead.

You cannot improve what you haven't taken the time to understand.

Lessons from the Factory Floor #2For years, I thought being the person everyone called when things went wrong was a sig...
07/10/2026

Lessons from the Factory Floor #2

For years, I thought being the person everyone called when things went wrong was a sign of how valuable I was.

Earlier in my career, I regularly travelled a 200-mile round trip at weekends to deal with one particular piece of equipment.

The machine applied sachets into magazines.
It sounds relatively simple, but these were often high-end glossy publications being produced over the weekend against extremely tight on-sale deadlines.
The sachets were important marketing space for our customers and an important revenue stream for the business.

When the equipment wasn't running properly, there wasn't much time to figure it out.
And I became one of the people who could.

So when there was a problem, the phone would go.

And I'd get in the car.

At the time, I probably saw that as a positive.
I was the expert. I could get us out of trouble.

It was only when I moved further into management that I started looking at it differently.

If the operation repeatedly needed one particular person to travel 100 miles to site to keep an important process running, we didn't just have a machine problem.
We had a capability problem.

The answer wasn't for me to become even better at rescuing it.
It was to transfer what I knew.

How to set the equipment correctly.

What to look for when it wasn't running well.

How one adjustment affected another.

How to diagnose the fault rather than simply keep trying things until it worked.

That meant teaching, coaching and allowing other people to build the experience I'd accumulated over years.
And eventually I learned something that has stayed with me throughout my management and consulting career:

Being indispensable can feel like success.
Building a team that no longer needs you to rescue them is better leadership.

That's not about diminishing the value of experienced people.
It's about making sure their knowledge becomes part of the capability of the operation.

LESSONS FROM THE FACTORY FLOOR #1Earlier in my career, I spent a lot of time arguing about machine speeds.Before moving...
06/10/2026

LESSONS FROM THE FACTORY FLOOR #1

Earlier in my career, I spent a lot of time arguing about machine speeds.

Before moving into management, I was a machine specialist in commercial printing.

I knew the equipment.

And one argument came up repeatedly with senior management and planning.

A machine might have a quoted maximum speed.
So that's what we planned it at.
On paper, it made sense.
If the machine could run at that speed, why would we plan anything less?

The problem was that the machine didn't manufacture the spreadsheet.

Actual achievable speed depended on the job.
Pagination. Format size. Complexity. Set-up. The characteristics of the work going through it.
Some jobs could get close to the quoted maximum.

Others couldn't.

But if every job was planned using the headline speed, we were effectively planning to fail before production had even started.

And this was extremely time-sensitive work.
When the capacity inevitably wasn't there, one response was to buy more capacity.

More equipment gave us more theoretical capacity.

But it didn't necessarily solve the underlying problem because we still weren't properly understanding the capacity we already had.

Later in my career, I realised something else.

Being technically right wasn't enough.

I had to get better at explaining why.

Rather than simply challenging the plan, I learned to take the technical information from the OEM, understand the restrictions and then use work measurement and real production data to translate it into something management and planning could actually use.

Not:
"The machine won't run at that speed."

But:
"Here is what determines the achievable speed. Here is what we have measured. Here is the capacity this mix of work actually gives us."

That changed the conversation.
It's one of the reasons I'm still such a strong believer in work measurement today.
Not because measuring work is about proving somebody's number right or wrong.
It's because good measurement replaces assumptions with evidence.

A manufacturer's theoretical capacity and its usable capacity are not the same thing.

If you don't understand the difference, you can end up investing in more capacity while using the capacity you've already paid for inefficiently.

Leadership Lesson #10IF YOUR SUPERVISOR SPENDS ALL DAY FIREFIGHTING,DON’T BE SURPRISED WHEN THEY DON’T HAVE TIME TO LEA...
05/10/2026

Leadership Lesson #10

IF YOUR SUPERVISOR SPENDS ALL DAY FIREFIGHTING,
DON’T BE SURPRISED WHEN THEY DON’T HAVE TIME TO LEAD.

We ask frontline supervisors to do a lot.

Lead people.
Coach performance.
Manage quality.
Control labour.
Improve productivity.
Handle absence.
Maintain standards.
Support safety.
Solve problems.

Then we fill their day with:

Chasing materials.
Finding information.
Covering labour gaps.
Correcting avoidable problems.
Completing administration.
Escalating decisions they cannot make themselves.

And eventually somebody asks:

“Why aren’t our supervisors leading more?”

Sometimes the answer is capability.

But sometimes the role itself has been designed around firefighting.

A technically strong operator promoted into supervision already has a big transition to make.

They need to learn how to manage through others rather than simply being the person who knows how to fix everything.

If the operating system constantly pulls them back into doing, chasing and recovering, that transition becomes even harder.

Develop the leader. But also create the conditions that allow them to lead.

One question I think every operation should ask:

How much of your supervisor’s working day is actually spent supervising?

Leadership Lesson #9“People need to take more ownership.”It’s something I hear regularly in manufacturing.And sometimes...
02/10/2026

Leadership Lesson #9

“People need to take more ownership.”

It’s something I hear regularly in manufacturing.
And sometimes it’s absolutely true.
But before deciding that someone lacks ownership, I think there’s another question worth asking:

What happens when they actually try to take it?

Can the supervisor make the decision?

Do they have the information they need?

Are they clear about what they can decide and what genuinely needs escalating?

And when they do make a decision, are they supported — or is it questioned, reversed or taken back above them?

Because people learn quickly.

If every meaningful decision eventually needs approval from above, they start asking for permission.

If initiative is regularly second-guessed, they become cautious.

If responsibility is given without the authority to act, problems simply travel upwards.

Responsibility without authority creates escalation, not ownership.

Then we wonder why managers and supervisors aren’t taking enough ownership.
Leadership development can certainly help. People need the confidence, judgement and capability to make good decisions.
But training someone to take ownership only gets you so far if the operating system doesn’t actually allow them to own anything.

Good frontline leadership needs both capability AND authority.

Develop the person.

Give them clear expectations and boundaries.

Give them the information they need.

Then give them the space to make decisions — and hold them accountable for those decisions.

Before asking why someone won’t take ownership, ask what happens when they do.

LEADERSHIP LESSON #8Your best supervisor shouldn’t have to be there for the shift to perform.I’ve worked with some outs...
30/09/2026

LEADERSHIP LESSON #8

Your best supervisor shouldn’t have to be there for the shift to perform.

I’ve worked with some outstanding supervisors and production managers over the years.
The ones who know every machine.
Every product.
Every workaround.
Every person to speak to when something goes wrong.

They become incredibly valuable.
But there’s a point where being valuable can quietly become being indispensable.
And that creates a risk.

If performance drops significantly when one person is absent, the problem isn’t that they’re too good at their job.
It’s that too much of the operating system exists inside their head.

The strongest frontline leaders I’ve seen gradually make themselves less operationally indispensable.

They develop people.

They establish clear standards.

They create routines.

They transfer knowledge.

They make expectations visible.

They teach others how to make decisions rather than making every decision themselves.
That doesn’t reduce their value.

It increases it.

Because their capability starts appearing in the performance of the people around them.
For me, that’s one of the biggest transitions from experienced supervisor to genuine operational leader:
Your job isn’t to become the person everyone needs.
It’s to build an operation that doesn’t fall apart when you’re not there.

What do you think separates a great supervisor from someone who is simply very good at firefighting?

Address

2 Earlstrees Court
Market Harborough
NN174AX

Opening Hours

Monday 8am - 6pm
Tuesday 8am - 6pm
Wednesday 8am - 6pm
Thursday 8am - 6pm
Friday 8am - 6pm

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Carpathia Operational Consultants posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Carpathia Operational Consultants:

Shortcuts

Share

Category