31/07/2026
What's your decision making archetype?
and more importantly, how do you make decisions when you're regulated vs reactive?
From all the research I have done, and experience seeing this in the real world, I can see 4 major archetypes for decision making.
The Driver - they make things happen, they turn vision into action. They are unstoppable... but when they move into a reactive state they turn into a firefighter, confusing motion with progress, and solving problems to self soothe.
The Intellectual brings genuine depth to topics most people just skim the surface of. They connect the dots others miss, and have the highest standards... but in a reactive state preparation becomes avoidance, learning a substitute for doing.
The Anchor is the person that others orientate around and gravitate towards, their presence makes people around them feel genuinely safe and they give from genuine abundance... but in a reactive state that giving becomes people pleasing and resentment follows.
The Visionary sees what is possible before everyone else, and leads the way for everyone else. They are always ahead of the curve, people come to them for new ways of looking at their problems... but in a reactive state the ideas come quicker than the implementation and projects get started but never completed.
Of course everyone will have a mix of these, but everyone also has a dominant pattern.
Which felt most like you?
Take the quiz (link in bio) and find out which your dominant pattern is!
