Arun Varshney & Associates

Arun Varshney & Associates The knowledge and insights to uncover opportunities and the commitment to see them through.

 Gifts Distribution
03/11/2021



Gifts Distribution

 Office Decoration
03/11/2021



Office Decoration

Diwali Celebration 2020 πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ₯³πŸŒ³πŸŒΊπŸŽ‰πŸŽŠπŸŽ
14/11/2020

Diwali Celebration 2020 πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ₯³πŸŒ³πŸŒΊπŸŽ‰πŸŽŠπŸŽ

Bank Audit and Masti - Combo Package πŸ˜€πŸ˜€
15/04/2019

Bank Audit and Masti - Combo Package πŸ˜€πŸ˜€

Prize distribution ceremony for the year 2018-19
24/03/2019

Prize distribution ceremony for the year 2018-19

Diwali Celebration πŸ™πŸ»πŸ˜ŠπŸ˜‡
07/11/2018

Diwali Celebration πŸ™πŸ»πŸ˜ŠπŸ˜‡

Celebrated CA ANKUR VARSHNEY birthday........ again wish you very happy birthday dear...............
21/07/2016

Celebrated CA ANKUR VARSHNEY birthday........ again wish you very happy birthday dear...............

30/11/2015

RBI Governors List:

Sir Osborne Smith (1 April 1935 – 30 June 1937)
Sir James Braid Taylor (1 July 1937 – 17 February 1943)
Sir C. D. Deshmukh (11 August 1943 – 30 June 1949)
Sir Benegal Rama Rau (1 July 1949 – 14 January 1957)
K. G. Ambegaonkar (14 February 1957 – 28 February 1957)
H. V. R. Iyengar (1 March 1957 – 28 February 1962)
P. C. Bhattacharya (1 March 1962 – 30 June 1967)
L. K. Jha (1 July 1967 – 3 May 1970)
B. N. Adarkar (4 May 1970 – 15 June 1970)
S. Jagannathan (16 June 1970 – 19 May 1975)
N. C. Sen Gupta (19 May 1975 – 19 August 1975)
K. R. Puri (20 August 1975 – 2 May 1977)
M. Narasimham (2 May 1977 – 30 November 1977)
Dr. I. G. Patel (1 December 1977 – 15 September 1982)
Dr. Manmohan Singh (16 September 1982 – 14 January 1985)
A. Ghosh (15 January 1985 – 4 February 1985)
R. N. Malhotra (4 February 1985 – 22 December 1990)
S. Venkitaramanan (22 December 1990 – 21 December 1992)
Dr. C. Rangarajan (22 December 1992 – 21 November 1997)
Dr. Bimal Jalan (22 November 1997 – 6 September 2003)
Dr. Y. V. Reddy (6 September 2003 – 5 September 2008)
Dr. D. Subbarao (6 September 2008 – 3 September 2013)
Dr. Raghuram G. Rajan (4 September 2013- Present)

21/11/2015

Goods & ST (GST), Concept &
Impact
GST is the biggest reform proposed in the Tax Regime of our
country after Independence. It is something that each of us must
understand as it is going to affect our lives in a very significant
manner.
PRESENT INDIRECT TAX STRUCTURE
First we need to understand the present indirect tax system. There
are endless taxes in the present system. Few of them have been
levied by the Centre and rest levied by the States. Govt. draws the
power to levy Tax from the constitution. There are many
shortcomings in the Present Indirect Tax structure. We will be
discussing them now:
Excise is levied on the manufacturing of products &its credit is not
available against liability of VAT. VAT is charged on the value of
Excise. Thus causing cascading effect i.e. Tax on Taxes.
Because of the multiple barriers our Logistics efficiency is very low
as the trucks have to wait in long queues to get the permit to enter
in different states. Our trucks travel on an average of just 260 kms in
a day as compared to the average of 440 kms in a day in European
nations and 660 kms in America.
There are multiple taxable events existing in our present system. As
for excise it is manufacturing of Goods whereas for Sales Tax it is
Sale of goods & Service Tax gets levied on the provision of Services.
Because of multiplicity of Taxes there is a high cost of compliance
for both assesses as well as for the Govt.
Because of different legislations involved, there are different
meanings assigned for the same term. All these shortcomings lead
us to adapt a new system of Taxation for ease of doing the business
and for the seamless flow of credit across the whole supply chain.
ROAD TO GST
As we have discussed just before, that the Govt. draws the power to
levy the tax from the constitution. Hence we require a constitutional
amendment for empowering the govt. to levy the Tax on concurrent
basis as in the proposed GST model, Both the Central and State
govt. will levy tax on a common base.
This GST amendment Bill has already been passed in the Lok Sabha.
Right now it is with a Select committee 0f Rajya Sabha which is going
to submit its report by the last working day of the first week of the
Monsoon session. Then it is required to be passed in the Rajya
Sabha by the 2/3rd of the members present and voting. Then the
bill needs to be passed in atleast 15 states legislatures by a way of
simple majority. Then it will be sent to the President for his
approval. Then the legislature bill will be put in the parliament and
state legislatures and after its approval there, it will become a law.
Its expected roll out date is 1st April, 2016.
WHAT IS GST?
GST is going to be a destination based tax. It will be charged on the
supply of Goods and Services. Since the word used is supply, hence
the Branch t/f and Stock T/f will also be covered under the ambit of
GST. Alcoholic liquor for human consumption is going to be kept
outside the ambit of GST.
TAXES THAT WON’T BE SUBSUMED IN GST
There will be no term like trader or provider of Service any more.
Everything will get covered under the term β€œSupply”. Except these
taxes. All indirect taxes will get subsumed under GST… 1) Customs
duty 2) Excise duty on To***co products 2)specific cess 3)taxes on
liquor 4)Electricity Cess 5)Property tax 6)Toll tax (7) Stamp Duty.
SALIENT FEATURES OF GST
The dual GST model shall have two components i.e. Central GST
and State GST. There will be two parallel Statutes –one at the Centre
and other under the respective State GST Act –governing the tax
liability of the same transaction.
The existing CST will be discontinued. Instead, a new statute known
as IGST will come into place. It will empower the CG to levy and
collect the tax on the inter-state transfer of the Goods and Services.
Rate of IGST will roughly be equal to the sum of CGST and SGST.
Taxable event will shift from Mfg. or Sale of Goods or Provision of
services to β€œSupply of Goods and Services”.
GST on export would be zero rated. Both CGST and SGST will be
levied on import of goods and services into the country. The
incidence of tax will follow the destination principle and the tax
revenue in case of SGST will accrue to the State where the imported
goods and services are consumed.
Full and complete set-off will be available on the GST paid on import
of goods and services. After introduction of GST, all the traders will
be paying both the types of taxes i.e. CGST and SGST. The rules for
taking and utilization of credit for the Central GST and the State GST
would be aligned.
The taxpayer would need to submit common format for periodical
returns, to both the Central and to the concerned State GST
authorities. Revenue from interstate transactions to accrue to the
destination state and not to the Origin state.
Under GST, registration is likely to be linked with the existing PAN.
The new business identification number is likely to be the 10-digit
alphanumeric PAN, in addition to two digits for state code and one
or two check numbers for disallowing fake numbers. The total
number of digits in the new number is likely to be 13-14.
It is estimated that the Government will keep the rate somewhere in
between from 16% to 27%. This represents the aggregate of CGST
and SGST payable on a transaction. There with be a two-rate
structure –a lower rate for necessary items and items of basic
importance and a standard rate for goods in general. There will also
be a special rate for precious metals and a list of exempted items.
INPUT UTILIZATION
Cross utilization of CGST and SGST credit not permitted except
under IGST.
SALIENT FEATURES OF 122ND CONSTITUTIONAL BILL
The Centre will compensate States for loss of revenue arising on
account of implementation of the GST for a period up to five years.
A provision in this regard has been made in the Amendment Bill.
The compensation will be on at appearing basis, i.e., 100% for first
three years, 75% in the fourth year and 50% in the fifth year.
It is proposed that Central Government would levy and collect an
additional tax at threat of not more than one percent, in respect of
the supply of goods in course of inter-state trade or commerce. The
tax is proposed to believe for a period of 2years.
The additional tax would be collected by the Centre and would be
The additional tax would be collected by the Centre and would be
apportioned to the state from where the supply originates. The
additional tax would be non- vatable.
GST COUNCIL:
A new Article 279A is proposed for the creation of a Goods &
Services Tax Council which will be a joint forum of the Centre and
the States. This Council would function under the Chairmanship of
the Union Finance Minister.2/3rd Representatives will be that of
State & 1/3rd of the Centre. All decisions will require 75% of the
votes. Thus, practically, any decision in GST Council cannot be taken
without consent of Union Government. It will have statutory powers
only in following situations:
(a) When petroleum products should be brought in the GST net
(b) Distribution of revenue of IGST and CGST among Union and
States
(c) Continuation of 1% tax on supply of goods inter-state
(d) Compensation to States for loss of revenue for period up to five
years.
The Council will make recommendations to the Union and the
States on important issues like tax rates, exemptions, threshold
limits, dispute resolution modalities etc.
Thus in nutshell, we can say Excise and Service Tax will be known as
CGST. CST will be known as IGST. In case of imports from outside
India, in place of CVD and SAD, IGST will be charged.
BENEFITS OF GST:
There are many benefits of GST. These can be categorised under the
following categories.
1) For economy 2) Consumer 3) Govt. 4) Business and industry.
Industrialists and tax experts are very positive about GST. This we
can make out from the following statements:
Crisil Agency claims that GST implementation will reduce logistics
cost for companies by up to 30% over 3-4 years due to savings in
warehousing cost and elimination of check posts.
Industrialist Adi Godrej said India’s GDP could grow over 10% if GST
rolls out by April 2016. He added: β€œThis will be extremely good for
the economy and our businesses will benefit a lot.”
Mr Aulbur, the Managing Director of Mercedes Benz India, said: β€œIf
GST is properly implemented, then it will have a double positive
impact on the industry.
HOW GST WILL AFFECT THE BUSINESSES?
Once GST comes into picture, it is expected that the businesses will
get affected in a significant way.
The costing of the products, thus their prices and margins will get
affected significantly.
Since the multiple state barriers will be eliminated, hence Supplychain
management will get affected very positively. Time taken to
transfer the goods from one state to the others will get reduced and
thus affect the way logistics are planned currently.
We would be requiring change in the IT infrastructure and the
software’s for computing GST and complying with the same.
DRAWBACKS OF CURRENT GST SYSTEM
The currently proposed GST system has some shortcomings as well.
Modisarkar’s GST bill keeps taxes on alcohol, electricity and real
estate outside the scope of GST. Taxes on petroleum also are out of
GST’ scope to begin with, but here at least, the bill provides for their
inclusion after approval of the GST Council. No such flexibility has
been provided for taxes on alcohol, electricity and real-estate, which
are important sources of revenue.
The GST bill provides for a 1% additional tax on interstate trade or
commerce.
We still do not know what their venue-neutral GST rate will be
Preliminary indications are that GST rate will be at around 27%.This
is a recipe for economic disaster.
Incidentally, India will be the only country in the world to have a
dual-GST system, comprising a central GST and a state GST. The best
systems elsewhere are based on a single GST model.
CONCLUSION
All the shortcomings of the present taxation regime lead us to
develop a new system of Taxation for the ease of doing business
and for the seamless flow of credit across the whole supply chain. If
we have been following some system that is now obsolete for years,
it does not means that we need to continue with it in the fore
coming years as well
There is a criticism today that the proposed model of GST is
fractured due to the compromises. But the compromised model in
any case would be better than no model at all. Also the bitter truth
is that a compromise often becomes necessary in Federal
democracies.
The dual model will be like a joint venture between centre and the
29+ states. In order to make this joint venture successful, one has to
take all the states on the board with the compromise this entails.
Some states might lose revenue after introduction of GST but you
cannot hold entire country hostage because of one or two such
states. One should keep in mind that an ideally perfect GST has
never been practised in any federal democracy.
Every expert was once a beginner. No full proof can be developed in
a single stroke. Over the years things may come out to be very
positive and it’s quite possible that the estimate of 1-2% rise in GDP
might be too low.

19/11/2015

The knowledge and insights to uncover opportunities and the commitment to see them through.

19/11/2015

History of Taxation Pre – 1922
"It was only for the good of his subjects that he collected taxes from them, just as the Sun draws moisture from the Earth to give it back a thousand fold" –
--Kalidas in Raghuvansh eulogizing KING DALIP.
It is a matter of general belief that taxes on income and wealth are of recent origin but there is enough evidence to show that taxes on income in some form or the other were levied even in primitive and ancient communities. The origin of the word "Tax" is from "Taxation" which means an estimate. These were levied either on the sale and purchase of merchandise or livestock and were collected in a haphazard manner from time to time. Nearly 2000 years ago, there went out a decree from Ceaser Augustus that all the world should be taxed. In Greece, Germany and Roman Empires, taxes were also levied sometime on the basis of turnover and sometimes on occupations. For many centuries, revenue from taxes went to the Monarch. In Northern England, taxes were levied on land and on moveable property such as the Saladin title in 1188. Later on, these were supplemented by introduction of poll taxes, and indirect taxes known as "Ancient Customs" which were duties on wool, leather and hides. These levies and taxes in various forms and on various commodities and professions were imposed to meet the needs of the Governments to meet their military and civil expenditure and not only to ensure safety to the subjects but also to meet the common needs of the citizens like maintenance of roads, administration of justice and such other functions of the State.

In India, the system of direct taxation as it is known today, has been in force in one form or another even from ancient times. There are references both in Manu Smriti and Arthasastra to a variety of tax measures. Manu, the ancient sage and law-giver stated that the king could levy taxes, according to Sastras. The wise sage advised that taxes should be related to the income and expenditure of the subject. He, however, cautioned the king against excessive taxation and stated that both extremes should be avoided namely either complete absence of taxes or exorbitant taxation. According to him, the king should arrange the collection of taxes in such a manner that the subjects did not feel the pinch of paying taxes. He laid down that traders and artisans should pay 1/5th of their profits in silver and gold, while the agriculturists were to pay 1/6th, 1/8th and 1/10th of their produce depending upon their circumstances. The detailed analysis given by Manu on the subject clearly shows the existence of a well-planned taxation system, even in ancient times. Not only this, taxes were also levied on various classes of people like actors, dancers, singers and even dancing girls. Taxes were paid in the shape of gold-coins, cattle, grains, raw-materials and also by rendering personal service.

The learned author K.B.Sarkar commends the system of taxation in ancient India in his book "Public Finance in Ancient India", (1978 Edition) as follows:-
"Most of the taxes of Ancient India were highly productive. The admixture of direct taxes with indirect Taxes secured elasticity in the tax system, although more emphasis was laid on direct tax. The tax-structure was a broad based one and covered most people within its fold. The taxes were varied and the large variety of taxes reflected the life of a large and composit population".

However, it is Kautilya's Arthasastra, which deals with the system of taxation in a real elaborate and planned manner. This well known treatise on state crafts written sometime in 300 B.C., when the Mauryan Empire was as its glorious upwards move, is truly amazing, for its deep study of the civilisation of that time and the suggestions given which should guide a king in running the State in a most efficient and fruitful manner. A major portion of Arthasastra is devoted by Kautilya to financial matters including financial administration. According to famous statesman, the Mauryan system, so far as it applied to agriculture, was a sort of state landlordism and the collection of land revenue formed an important source of revenue to the State. The State not only collected a part of the agricultural produce which was normally one sixth but also levied water rates, octroi duties, tolls and customs duties. Taxes were also collected on forest produce as well as from mining of metals etc. Salt tax was an important source of revenue and it was collected at the place of its extraction.

Kautilya described in detail, the trade and commerce carried on with foreign countries and the active interest of the Mauryan Empire to promote such trade. Goods were imported from China, Ceylon and other countries and levy known as a vartanam was collected on all foreign commodities imported in the country. There was another levy called Dvarodaya which was paid by the concerned businessman for the import of foreign goods. In addition, ferry fees of all kinds were levied to augment the tax collection.

Collection of Income-tax was well organised and it constituted a major part of the revenue of the State. A big portion was collected in the form of income-tax from dancers, musicians, actors and dancing girls, etc. This taxation was not progressive but proportional to the fluctuating income. An excess Profits Tax was also collected. General Sales-tax was also levied on sales and the sale and the purchase of buildings was also subject to tax. Even gambling operations were centralised and tax was collected on these operations. A tax called yatravetana was levied on pilgrims. Though revenues were collected from all possible sources, the underlying philosophy was not to exploit or over-tax people but to provide them as well as to the State and the King, immunity from external and internal danger. The revenues collected in this manner were spent on social services such as laying of roads, setting up of educational institutions, setting up of new villages and such other activities beneficial to the community.

The reason why Kautilya gave so much importance to public finance and the taxation system in the Arthasastra is not far to seek. According to him, the power of the government depended upon the strength of its treasury. He states – "From the treasury, comes the power of the government, and the Earth whose ornament is the treasury, is acquired by means of the Treasury and Army". However, he regarded revenue and taxes as the earning of the sovereign for the services which were to be rendered by him to the people and to afford them protection and to maintain law and order. Kautilya emphasised that the King was only a trustee of the land and his duty was to protect it and to make it more and more productive so that land revenue could be collected as a principal source of income for the State. According to him, tax was not a compulsory contribution to be made by the subject to the State but the relationship was based on Dharma and it was the King's sacred duty to protect its citizens in view of the tax collected and if the King failed in his duty, the subject had a right to stop paying taxes, and even to demand refund of the taxes paid.

Kautilya has also described in great detail the system of tax administration in the Mauryan Empire. It is remarkable that the present day tax system is in many ways similar to the system of taxation in vogue about 2300 years ago. According to the Arthasastra, each tax was specific and there was no scope for arbitratiness. Precision determined the schedule of each payment, and its time, manner and quantity being all pre-determined. The land revenue was fixed at 1/6 share of the produce and import and export duties were determined on advalorem basis. The import duties on foreign goods were roughly 20 per cent of their value. Similarly, tolls, road cess, ferry charges and other levies were all fixed. Kautilya's concept of taxation is more or less akin to the modern system of taxation. His over all emphasis was on equity and justice in taxation. The affluent had to pay higher taxes as compared to the not so fortunate. People who were suffering from diseases or were minor and students were exempted from tax or given suitable remissions. The revenue collectors maintained up-to-date records of collection and exemptions. The total revenue of the State was collected from a large number of sources as enumerated above. There were also other sources like profits from Stand land (Sita) religious taxes (Bali) and taxes paid in cash (Kara). Vanikpath was the income from roads and traffic paid as tolls.

He placed land revenues and taxes on commerce under the head of tax revenues. These were fixed taxes and included half yearly taxes like Bhadra, Padika, and Vasantika. Custom duties and duties on sales, taxes on trade and professions and direct taxes comprised the taxes on commerce. The non-tax revenues consisted of produce of sown lands, profits accuring from the manufacture of oil, sugarcane and beverage by the State, and other transactions carried on by the State. Commodities utilised on marriage occasions, the articles needed for sacrificial ceremonies and special kinds of gifts were exempted from taxation. All kinds of liquor were subject to a toll of 5 precent. Tax evaders and other offenders were fined to the tune of 600 panas.

Kautilya also laid down that during war or emergencies like famine or floods, etc. the taxation system should be made more stringent and the king could also raise war loans. The land revenue could be raised from 1/6th to 1/4th during the emergencies. The people engaged in commerce were to pay big donations to war efforts.

Taking an overall view, it can be said without fear of contradiction that Kautilya's Arthasastra was the first authoritative text on public finance, administration and the fiscal laws in this country. His concept of tax revenue and the on-tax revenue was a unique contribution in the field of tax administration. It was he, who gave the tax revenues its due importance in the running of the State and its far-reaching contribution to the prosperity and stability of the Empire. It is truly an unique treatise. It lays down in precise terms the art of state craft including economic and financialadministration.

History of Taxation Post 1922

1. Preliminary :
The rapid changes in administration of direct taxes, during the last decades, reflect the history of socio-economic thinking in India. From 1922 to the present day changes in direct tax laws have been so rapid that except in the bare outlines, the traces of the I.T. Act, 1922 can hardly be seen in the 1961 Act as it stands amended to date. It was but natural, in these circumstances, that the set up of the department should not only expand but undergo structural changes as well.

2. Changes in administrative set up since the inception of the department:
The organisational history of the Income-tax Department starts in the year 1922. The Income-tax Act, 1922, gave, for the first time, a specific nomenclature to various Income-tax authorities. The foundation of a proper system of administration was thus laid. In 1924, Central Board of Revenue Act constituted the Board as a statutory body with functional responsibilities for the administration of the Income-tax Act. Commissioners of Income- tax were appointed separately for each province and Assistant Commissioners and Income-tax Officers were provided under their control. The amendments to the Income tax Act, in 1939, made two vital structural changes: (i) appellate functions were separated from administrative functions; a class of officers, known as Appellate Assistant Commissioners, thus came into existence, and (ii) a central charge was created in Bombay. In 1940, with a view to exercising effective control over the progress and inspection of the work of Income-tax Department throughout India, the very first attached office of the Board, called Directorate of Inspection (Income Tax) - was created. As a result of separation of executive and judicial functions, in 1941, the Appellate Tribunal came into existence. In the same year, a central charge was created in Calcutta also.

2.1 World War II brought unusual profits to businessmen. During 1940 to 1947, Excess Profits Tax and Business Profits Tax were introduced and their administration handed over to the Department (These were later repealed in 1946 and 1949 respectively). In 1951, the 1st Voluntary Disclosure Scheme was brought in. It was during this period, in 1946, that a few Group 'A' officers were directly recruited. Later on in 1953, the Group 'A' Service was formally constituted as the 'Indian Revenue Service'.

2.2 This era was characterised by considerable emphasis on development of investigation techniques. In 1947, Taxation on Income (Investigation) Commission was set up which was declared ultra vires by the Supreme Court in 1956 but the necessity of deep investigation had by then been realised. In 1952, the Directorate of Inspection (Investigation) was set up. It was in this year that a new cadre known as Inspectors of Income Tax was created. The increase in 'large income' cases necessitated checking of the work done by departmental officers. Thus in 1954, the Internal Audit Scheme was introduced in the Income-tax Department.

2.3 As indicated earlier, in 1946, for the first time a few Group A officers were recruited in the department. Training them was important. The new recruits were sent to Bombay and Calcutta where they were trained, though not in an organised manner. In 1957, I.R.S. (Direct Taxes) Staff College started functioning in Nagpur. Today this attached office of the Board functions under a Director-General. It is called the National Academy of Direct Taxes. By 1963, the I.T. department, burdened with the administration of several other Acts like W.T., G.T., E.D., etc., had expanded to such an extent that it was considered necessary to put it under a separate Board. Consequently, the Central Board of Revenue Act, 1963 was passed. The Central Board of Direct Taxes was constituted, under this Act.

2.4 The developing nature of the economy of the country brought with it both steep rates of taxes and black incomes. In 1965, the Voluntary Disclosure Scheme was brought in followed by the 1975 Disclosure Scheme. Finally, the need for a permanent settlement mechanism resulted in the creation of the Settlement Commission.

2.5 A very important administrative change occurred during this period. The recovery of arrears of tax which till 1970 was the function of State authorities was passed on to the departmental officers. A whole new wing of Officers - Tax Recovery Officers was created and a new cadre of post of Tax Recovery Commissioners was introduced w.e.f. 1-1-1972.

2.6 In order to improve the quality of work, in 1977, a new cadre known as IAC (Assessment) and in 1978 another cadre known as CIT (Appeals) were created. The Commissioners' cadre was further reorganised and five posts of Chief Commissioners (Administration) were created in 1981.

2.7 Tax Reforms : Certain important policy and administrative reforms carried out over the past few years are as follows :-

(a). The policy reforms include :-
β€’ Lowering of rates;
β€’ Withdrawls/reduction of major incentives;
β€’ introduction of measures for presumptive taxation;
β€’ simplification of tax laws, particularly relating to capital gains; and
β€’ widening the tax base.
(b). The administrative reforms include :--
β€’ Computerisation involving allotment of a unique identification number to tax payers which is emerging as a unique business identification number; and
β€’ realignment of the available human resources with the changed business needs of the organisation.
2.8 Computerisation : Computerisation in the Income-tax Department started with the setting up of the Directorate of Income tax (Systems) in 1981. Initially computerisation of processing of challans was taken up. For this 3 computer centres were first set up in 1984-85 in metropolitan cities using SN-73 systems. This was later extended to 33 major cities by 1989. The computerized activities were subsequently extended to allotment of PAN under the old series, allotment of TAN, and pay roll accounting. These computer centres used batch process with dumb terminals for data entry.
In 1993 a Working Group was set up by the Government to recommend computerisation of the department. Based on the report of the Working Group a comprehensive computerisation plan was approved by the Government in October, 1993. In pursuance of this, Regional Computer Centres were set up in Delhi, Mumbai, and Chennai in 1994-95 with RS6000/59H Servers. PCs were first provided to officers in these cities in phases. The Plan involved networking of all users on LAN/WAN. Network with leased data circuits were accordingly set up in Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai in Phase-I during 1995-96. A National Computer Centre was set up at Delhi in 1996-97. Integrated application software were developed and deployed during 1997-99. Thereafter, RS6000 type mid range servers were provided in the other 33 Computer Centres in various major cities in 1996-97. These were connected to the National Computer Centre through leased lines. PCs were provided to officers of different level upto ITOs in stages between 1997 and 1999. In phase II offices in 57 cities were brought on the network and linked to RCCs and NCC.

2.9 Restructuring of the Income-tax department : The restructuring of the Income-tax Department was approved by the Cabinet in its meeting held on 31-8-2000 to achieve the following objectives :-

β€’ Increase in effectiveness and productivity;
β€’ Increase in revenue collection;
β€’ Improvement in services to tax payers;
β€’ Reduction in expenditure by downsizing the workforce;
β€’ Improved career prospects at all levels;
β€’ Induction of information technology; and
β€’ Standardization of work norms
The aforementioned objectives have been sought to be achieved by the department through a multi-pronged strategy of :

a. redesigning business processes through functionalisation;
b. increasing the number of officers to rationalise the span of control for better supervision, control and management of workload and to improve tax-payer services and
c. re-orient, retrain and redeploy the workforce with appropriate incentives in the form of career advancement.
3. Important events affecting the administrative set up in the Income-tax department:
1939
Appellate functions separated from inspecting functions.
A class of officers known as AACs came into existence.
Jurisdiction of Commissioners of Income tax extended to certain classes of cases and a central charge was created at Bombay.
1940
Directorate of Inspection (Income-tax) came into being.
Excess Profits Tax introduced w.e.f. 1-9-1939.
1941
Income-tax Appellate Tribunal came into existence.
central charge created at Calcutta.
1943
Special Investigation Branches set up.
1946
A few officers of Class-I directly recruited.
Demonetisation of high denomination notes made.
Excess Profits Tax Act repealed.
1947
Business Profits Tax enacted (for the period 1-4-1946 to 31-3-1949).
1951
Report of Income-tax Investigation Commission known as Vardhachari Commission received.
Voluntary Disclosure Scheme introduced.
1952
Directorate of Inspection (Investigation) set up.
Inspector of Income-tax declared as an I.T. authority.
1953
Estate Duty Act, 1953 came into existence w.e.f. 15-10-1953.
Act XXV of 1953 gave effect to the recommendations of Commission appointed under Taxation of Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947.
1954
Internal Audit Scheme in the Income-tax Department introduced.
Taxation Enquiry Commission known as John Mathai Commission set up.
1957
The Wealth tax Act, 1957 introduced w.e.f. 1-4-1957.
I.R.S.(DT) Staff College started functioning at Nagpur and much later four R.T.Is. stationed at Bombay, Calcutta, Bangalore and Lucknow opened.
1958
LI>The Gift-tax Act, 1958 introduced w.e.f. 1-4-1958.
Report of Law Commission received.
1959
Direct Taxes Administration Enquiry Committee submitted its report.
1960
Directorate of Inspection (Research, Statistics & Publications)was set up.
Two grades of Inspectors - selection and ordinary grades - merged into one single grade.
1961
Direct Taxes Advisory Committee set up - Direct Taxes Administrative Enquiry Committee constituted.
Income-tax Act, 1961 came into existence w.e.f. 1-4-1962.
Revenue Audit introduced for the first time in the Department.
New system for evaluation of work done by Income-tax Officers introduced.
1963, 1964
Central Board of Revenue bifurcated and a separate Board for Direct Taxes known as Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT)constituted under the Central Board of Revenue Act, 1963.
For the first time an officer from the department became Chairman of the CBDT w.e.f. 1-1-1964.
The Companies (Profits) Sur -tax Act, 1964 was introduced.
Annuity Deposit Scheme, 1964 introduced.
1965
Voluntary Disclosure Scheme came into operation.
1966
Functional Scheme introduced.
Special Recovery Unit created.
Intelligence Wing created and placed under the charge of Directorate of Inspection (Investigation).
1968
Valuation Cell came into existence in the Income tax Department.
Report of rationalisation and simplification of tax structure (Bhoothalingam Committee) received.
Administrative Reforms Commission set up.
1969
Direct Recruitment to Class II Income-tax Officers made.
The post of IAC (Audit) created in the Income-tax Department.
1970
The posts of Addl. Commissioner of Income-tax created and abolished after one year.
Recovery functions which were hitherto performed by Income- tax Officers, given to Tax Recovery Officers. Prior to that State Government officials exercised the functions of a Tax Recovery Officer.
1971
A new cadre of posts known as Tax Recovery Commissioners introduced w.e.f. 1.1.1972.
Report of Direct Taxes Enquiry Committee received.
Summary Assessment Scheme introduced w.e.f. 1-4-1971.
1972
A Special Cell within the Directorate of Inspection (Investigation) created to oversee the cases of big industrial houses.
A new cadre of posts known as IAC(Acq.) created and IAC appointed as Competent Authority with the insertion of new Chapter XXA in the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the acquisition of immovable properties in certain cases of transfer to counter evasion of tax.
Directorate of Organisation & Management Services (Income- tax) created.
The post of I.T.O. (Internal Audit) created.
Bradma Scheme in the Income-tax Department introduced.
System of Permanent Account Number introduced.
Valuation Officers given statutory powers under the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
1974
Compulsory Deposit Scheme (Income-tax Payers) Act, 1974 introduced.
Action Plan for the Income-tax Officers introduced for the first time.
Concept of M.B.O introduced.
1975
Voluntary Disclosure Scheme for Income and Wealth implemented.
Special Cell for dealing with Smugglers' cases created.
1976
Settlement Commission created and Taxation Laws (Amendment) Act,1975 inserted a new Chapter XIXA in the Income Tax Act w.e.f.1-4-1976.
Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 introduced w.e.f. 25-1-1976.
A new scheme for departmentalization of accounts introduced.
Chokshi Committee submitted its interim report.
1977
A new cadre of posts known as IAC (Assessment) created.
1978
Appellate functions given to a new cadre of Commissioners known as Commissioner (Appeals).
Directorate of Inspection (Recovery) set up.
A new directorate known as Directorate of Inspection (Vigilance) came into existence by bifurcating the functions of Directorate of Inspection (Investigation).
Chokshi Committee submitted its final report.
1979
A new directorate designated as Directorate of Inspection (Publication & Public Relations) created out of the Directorate of Inspection (RS&P).
1980
Hotel Receipt Tax Act, 1980 came into force w.e.f. 1.4.1981.
1981
Economic Administrative Reforms Commission set up.
Three new Directorates viz. Directorate of Inspection (Intelligence), Directorate of Inspection (Survey) and Directorate of Inspection (Systems) created.
Within the Directorate of Inspection (Income Tax and Audit), a separate Director of Inspection (Audit) appointed.
Directorate of Inspection (RS&P) re-organised and Directorate of Inspection (P&PR) re-designated as Directorate of Inspection (Printing & Publications).
I.R.S.(DT) Staff College, Nagpur, re-designated as National Academy of Direct Taxes.
Special Bearer Bonds (Immunities & Exemptions) Act promulgated.
Director General (Special Investigation) and Director General (Investigation) appointed to control the functioning of various Directorates under the control of Central Board of Direct Taxes.
Five posts of Chief Commissioner (Administration) created.
A few posts of Commissioner of Income-tax were earmarked as Commissioner of Income-tax (Inv.) and Commissioner of Income- tax (Recovery).
1982
Special Cell within the Directorate of Inspection (Investigation) converted into a separate Directorate and re-designated as Directorate of Inspection (Special Investigation).
DIT (Systems) appointed in the Directorate of Income-tax (Organisation and Management Services) to coordinate efforts in introducing electronic data processing in the IT Deptt. A microprocessor based EDP system along with data entry system was installed heralding the era of computerisation.
Levy of Hotel Receipts Tax discontinued.
Regional Training Institute at Nagpur started functioning under the control of the National Academy of Direct Taxes.
1983
The vigilance set up reorganised and the strength of Dy. Director (Vigilance) and Asstt. Director(Vigilance) augmented.
Computerised systems for processing challans and PAN designed and developed.
1984
Taxation Laws(Amendment) Act 1984 passed to streamline procedures in the interest of better work management; avoid inconvenience to tax payers; reduce litigation; remove anomalies and rationalise some provisions.
1985
Post of Director General (Investigation) created for more effective checking of tax evasion.
E.D.(Amendment) Act 1985 discontinues levy of estate duty on deaths occurring on or after 16.03.1985.
Compulsory Deposit Scheme (Income Tax Payers) Act 1974 discontinued w.e.f. 1.4.1985.
Interest Tax Act, 1974 discontinued w.e.f. 31.3.1985
A new "Reward Scheme" for motivating officers introduced w.e.f. 1.4.1985.
1986
The I.T. Act and W.T. Act amended by Taxation Laws (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act :-
Established Settlement Commission.
Introduced Block assets concept for depreciation.
Four offices of Appropriate Authority for acquiring property in which unaccounted money is invested set up in metropolitan cities.
1987
Government's approval obtained to set up three new benches of Settlement Commission.
L.K. Jha Committee set up for simplification and rationalisation of tax laws.
Office of Directorate General (Tax Exemption) set up at Calcutta.
The Direct Tax Law(Amendment) Act 1987 introduced uniform previous year and redesignated the following authorities :-
Director of Inspection
Insp. Asstt. Commissioner of I.Tax
Appellate. Asstt. Commissioner
Income tax Officer Gr. A
Income tax Officer Gr. B
Director of Income Tax
Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax.
-Do- (Appeals)
Asstt. Commissioner of I.Tax
Income tax Officer
Expenditure Tax Act 1987 brought into force.
1988
Benami Transactions Prohibition Act 1988 introduced.
The Government announced a "Time Window Scheme" which allowed tax payers 50% rebate of interest u/s 220(2) if they pay the tax and balance interest. The scheme was in operation between 1.7.88 to 30.9.88.
CIT (Central) placed under the control and supervision of Director General (Investigation).
Government decided that cadre control for Group 'C' and 'D' posts would be with Chief Commissioner and with CBDT for Group 'A' and 'B'posts.
Extension of Direct Tax Law to the State of Sikkim by a notification of the President of India dated 7.11.1988.
1989
Creation of an attached office of DGIT(Management Systems) to supervise Directorate of I.Tax(Research, Statistics, Publication & Public Relations) and Directorate of I.Tax (Organisation and Management Services) from Sept. 1989.
1990
Gift tax Bill introduced on 31.5.1990.
Creation of 65 posts of Dy. Commissioner of I.Tax by upgradation of equal number of posts of Asstt. Commissioner of I.Tax.
1991
Interest Tax Act, 1974 revived.
Directorate of I.Tax(Systems) started reporting directly to Board.
1992
Rs. 1400 Presumptive Taxation scheme introduced as a measure to widen tax base.
The post of Director General of Income-tax (Management Systems) was abolished.
1993
40 additional posts of Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) created.
Authority for Advance Rulings set up.
A comprehensive phased cadre review for Group B, C and D initiated.
1994
2068 additional posts in Group B, C and D sanctioned.
New PAN introduced.
Regional Computer Centres (RCCs) were set up in Chennai, Delhi and Mumbai.
1995
New procedure for search assessment introduced.
50 years of training commemorated and "Seminar Twenty Five" introduced by National Academy of Direct Taxes.
1996
77 posts of Commissioners of Income-tax created.
Infrastructure for operational needs strengthened.
Study report on 4th cadre review of Group 'A' officers (IRS) of the Department prepared by Directorate of Income Tax (Organisation and Management Services).
1997
Rates of Income-tax reduced significantly.
Legal measures to widen tax base on certain economic indicators introduced in selected cities.
Presumptive tax scheme discontinued.
Voluntary Disclosure Scheme 1997 introduced.
Minimum Alternate Tax introduced.
National Computer Centre (NCC) was set up in Delhi.
1998
Sec. 260A introduced enabling direct appeals to High Court.
1/6 Scheme & penalty for non-filing of return introduced to widen tax base.
Gift-tax abolished for gifts made after 1.10.1998.
Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme 1998 introduced.
Silver Jubilee of Regional Training Institutes celebrated.
Designation of Asstt. Commissioner (Senior Time Scale) changed to Dy. Commissioner and that of Dy. Commissioner (Junior Administrative Grade) to Joint Commissioner.
1999
Furnishing details of bank account and credit cards in the prescribed form made mandatory for refund purpose.
Prima-facie adjustments to return done away with; acknowledgments to serve as intimations.
Samman Scheme introduced in 1999 to honour deserving tax payers.
2000
The process of implementation of restructuring of the Department commenced to increase efficiency and to deal with increased workload.
Total sanctioned work force reduced from 61,031 to 58,315.
Certain rationalisation measures at structural levels introduced.
Interest-tax Act terminated with effect from 1-4-2000.
2001
The restructuring of the Department resulted in reducing the stagnation at all levels and large number of personnel were promoted in various grades.
Jurisdiction pattern was revamped.
New posts were created at the level of DGIT/DIT in the areas of Research, International Taxation and Infrastructure.
2002
Computerised processing of returns all over the country introduced.
Kelkar Committee Report, inter alia, recommended :-
i. Outsourcing of non-core functions of the department ;
ii. Reduction in exemptions, deductions, reliefs, rebates etc.
The National Website of the Income Tax Department (www.incometaxindia.gov.in) was launched to provide a vital interface between the Department and taxpayers.
2003
The National Website of the Department (www.incometaxindia.gov.in) won the Silver Medal in the category of the 'Government Websites'under the National e-Governance Awards.
2004
As a measure of widening of tax base, the concept of AIR (Annual Information Return) was introduced.
Fringe Benefit Tax (FBT) was introduced as a major step towards widening of tax base and bolstering of the Direct Tax Collection.
Securities Transaction Tax (STT) was introduced.
2005
Tonnage Tax was introduced for the Shipping Companies.
Banking Cash Transaction Tax (BCTT) was introduced w.e.f. 01-06-2005.
2006
A project for enabling electronic filing (e-filing) of Income Tax Returns was launched.
Tax Return Preparer Scheme (TRPS) was launched to assist individuals and HUF taxpayers to file their Return of Income.
The institution of Income Tax Ombudsman set up in 12 cities throughout the country to look into tax related grievances of the common public.
2007
The Refund Banker Scheme was launched in Delhi and Patna charges.
Sevottam Scheme was launchedto standardize service delivery to the taxpayers.
The first citizen-friendly single window Aayakar Seva Kendra (ASK)was setup,for centralized receipt and registration of specified categories of documents, including income tax returns.
The Income Tax Department became the biggest revenue mobiliser for the Government in 2007-08, with its share increasing from 34.76%in 1997-98 to 52.75%in 2007-08.
All India Tax Network (TAXNET) was setup connecting more than 700 offices in more than 500 cities. Consolidation of 36 (RCC) independent regional databases into a single centralized database (PDC or Primary Data Centre) was carried out.
Integrated Taxpayer Data Management System (ITDMS) for drawing of 360Β° taxpayer profile was launched.
2008
Cyber Forensic Labs were setup to identify relevant digital data during search and survey operations, recover hidden or password protected or deleted data and store retrieved data in a manner so that it could be used as evidence in judicial proceedings.
Electronic filing of Income Tax Returns Project was awarded Silver Award in the category "Outstanding Performance in Citizen Centric Service Delivery" under the National e-Governance Awardsfor the year 2007-08.
2009
Centralized Processing Centre was setup in Bengaluru for bulk processing of e-filed and paper returns. The Centre operates without any interface with taxpayers in a jurisdiction – free manner.
2010
Integrated Tax Payer Data Management System (ITDMS) was conferred the Prime Minister's Award for 'Excellence in Governance and Administration'.
CPC Bengaluru awarded the Gold Award for 'Excellence in Government Process Re-engineering' under the National e-Governance Awards for the year 2010-2011.
To simplify the 50 years old Income-tax Act, 1961,'The Direct Taxes Code Bill, 2010' was introduced in the Parliament.
2011
Foreign Tax Division of CBDT was strengthened to effectively handle the increase in tax information exchangeand transfer pricing issues.
Various IT initiatives were taken for efficient tax administration. These include e-filing and e-payment of taxes, adoption of 'Sevottam' concept by CBEC and CBDT, web based facility for tax payers to track the resolution of refunds and credit for pre-paid taxes and augmentation of processing capacity.
A new simplified form 'Sugam' was introduced to reduce the compliance burden of small tax payers falling within presumptive taxation.
2012
Senior Citizens (not having any income from business/profession), were exempted from payment of advance tax.
TRACES (TDS Reconciliation, Accounting and Correction Enabling System) launched to serve an integrated one-stop platform for the stakeholders to facilitate the services related to TDS operations.
2013
The Government approved the Cadre restructuring of the Department for the creation of 20,751 additional posts and for carrying out various measures to increase the effectiveness of the Department.
Briefly, the salient features of the approved restructuring are as under:
a. Number of assessment units (AUs) increased by 1080 from 3420 to 4500, for strengthening the tax-administration;
b. Each Range to have one more Assessing Officer;
c. Increase in the number` of Administrative CsIT deployed on assessment related functions to increase from 228 to 250;
d. 114 Special Ranges to be created, with adequate supporting manpower;
e. Creation of reserves numbering 620 created in the IRS cadre;
f. Bifurcation of the posts of the CITs in the HAG and SAG scales, on functional basis;
g. Upgradation of all existing 116 posts of CCsIT in HAG+ and Apex scales along with an increase of their number by 1 post;
h. Strengthening of the training set-up with creation of three more RTIs;
i. Strengthening the Appellate/Advocacy Structure by increasing the number of CIT Appeals and providing them supporting manpower. Advocacy structure in the ITAT to be strengthened.
2014
New National Website of the Income Tax Department www.incometaxindia.gov.in launched with enhanced new features and content.
SIT to investigate Black Money in Swiss Bank Accounts formed
Tax Administrative Reforms Commission (TARC) headed by Dr. Parthasarathi Shome submitted its report of reviewing the applicability of tax policies and tax laws in the context of global best practices and recommending measures for reforms required in tax administration to enhance its effectiveness and efficiency.

Address

Office No. 12-13, First Floor, Vikram Arcade, Railway Road
Aligarh
202001

Telephone

2512556

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Arun Varshney & Associates posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Arun Varshney & Associates:

Share