Jaibhole consultancy & services

05/11/2024

JAI BHOLE 🙏
Health is Wealth
Home remedies
Healthy tips

PAPAYA
Contains Potassium
which hydrates the
SKIN
removing dullness
& dryness
Rich with Healing
Enzymes
Papaya is also used
to Even the
Skin Tone
by reducing
dark spots
& blemishes
the skin

04/11/2024

JAI BHOLE 🙏
Health is Wealth
Home remedies
Healthy tips

NEEM
is called a
WONDER HERB
as it has more than
130 Biologically
ACTIVE COMPOUNDS
beneficial for the
SKIN, HAIR
and BLOOD
do not forget to keep
INFECTION away by
using NEEM
wherever possible

03/11/2024

JAI BHOLE 🙏
*Health is Wealth*
Home remedies
Healthy tips

Beans of all
kinds
LENTIL
KIDNEY
BLACK
have very
Low
Glycemic Index
This means that
CARBOHYDRATES
are released
gradually and
helps manage
BLOOD SUGAR
levels

01/11/2024

Jai bhole 🙏

Aap Sabh ko
Deepavali
Ki Hardhik Shubhkamnaye 🙏

28/10/2024

JAI BHOLE 🙏
Health is Wealth
Home remedies
Healthy tips

SUPERFOOD
the gluten-free
AMARANTH
is the ONLY grain
that contains
Vitamin C
Amaranth has high
concentrations of
Calcium
Iron , Potassium
Magnesium
and also Phophorus
Amaranth helps in
reducing HAIR LOSS
GREYING
& CARDIO DISEASE

27/10/2024

JAI BHOLE 🙏
Health is Wealth
Home remedies
Healthy tips

A change in Weather
condition affects the
body and also
the Hairs
The purifying
aspects of NEEM
reduces the poor
condition of the
scalp and makes the
HAIRS STRONG
and HEALTHY

22/07/2017

Right to Privacy
The following news item is self explanatory:-

Right To Privacy Is Not Absolute, Observes Supreme Court Judge: 10 Points

Updated: July 20, 2017

http://www.ndtv.com/india-news/privacy-heart-and-soul-of-constitution-9-top-judges-told-10-points-1726666

NEW DELHI: The right to privacy is not absolute and cannot be catalogued as it includes everything, a Supreme Court judge said on Wednesday. A nine-judge bench is revisiting the question of privacy 55 years after the Supreme Court decided that it is not a basic right for citizens. The decision of the judges is pivotal to petitions that challenge making the Aadhaar scheme mandatory for millions of Indians.

Here are the 10 big developments in this story:
1. The court crucially said that the right to privacy does not necessarily co-exist with data protection.
2. "Can this court define privacy? You can't make a catalogue of what constitutes privacy. Privacy is so amorphous and includes everything... if we make any attempt to catalogue privacy it will have disastrous consequences," said the constitution bench.
3. Justice DY Chandrachud, the judge who made these observations, said, "If I decide to co-habit with my wife, police can't barge into my bedroom. That's my privacy. Whether to send my children to school is not privacy because I have to send them to school under the Right to Education law."
4. Petitioners argued today that privacy is the heart and soul of the Constitution and is embedded in the rights to dignity and liberty.
5. To bolster their argument, they referred to Finance Minister Arun Jaitley's statement in Parliament in March. "The present bill (Aadhaar) pre-supposes and is based on a premise that it is too late in the day to contend that privacy is not a fundamental right. So I do accept that probably privacy is a fundamental right." According to news agency IANS, he told Rajya Sabha that "it is now accepted privacy is a part of individual liberty" and "let us assume that privacy is a part of liberty and no person shall be deprived of privacy without due process of law".
6. Representing the petitioners, senior lawyer Gopal Subramanium argued that the rights to life and liberty are pre-existing natural rights.
7. Petitions challenging Aadhaar say data like iris scans and fingerprints taken by the state violate citizens' privacy.
8. The Centre has said in court that the right to privacy is not in the Constitution and is not a part of the right to life.
9. The government's stand was criticised by opposition leaders like CPM's Sitaram Yechury, who tweeted: "We have a government which believes in the right to privacy for top loan defaulters from being named, but not in Privacy for ordinary citizens. Right to Privacy of the ordinary Indian cannot be invaded by any government. Every Indian's dignity is important." An eight-judge bench in 1954 and a six-judge bench in 1962 had both ruled that there is no right to privacy. After the mid-1970s, benches of two and three judges have consistently taken the position that privacy is indeed a fundamental right.
10. In past orders, the Supreme Court has expanded the right to life to include the right to clean air and even sleep. If the court does rule that privacy is a fundamental right, then all cases relating to the Aadhaar scheme will go back to the original three-judge bench or five-judge bench.

The right to privacy is not absolute and cannot be catalogued as it includes everything, a Supreme Court judge said on Wednesday. A nine-judge bench is revisiting the question of privacy 55 years after the Supreme Court decided that it is not a basic right for citizens. The decision of the judges is...

30/08/2015

HPHC: IT'S WOMAN'S RESPONSIBILITY TO SAVE HER MODESTY IN RELATIONSHIP
The Himachal Pradesh High Court has observed that it was the responsibility of the woman in a relationship to protect her modesty and dignity.
"It is the responsibility of a man not to exploit any woman by compelling her for sexual relationship but then it is ultimately the woman who is the protector of her own body and, therefore, her prime responsibility is to protect her own dignity and modesty," justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan said while accepting the pre-arrest bail application of r**e accused Baldev Raj.
Justice Chauhan observed that "the record reveals that the parties are not strangers and the affidavits and other documents placed on record do suggest that they shared a relationship which was more than just friends."
The woman, a widow and a mother, has submitted that the accused had forced her into a physical relationship on the pretext of marriage for more than a year and a half but the record reveals the case to be a classic example of a relationship having gone sour, the court said.
Justice Chauhan said that "once the prosecutrix knew that the petitioner is a married man, it was for her to restrain herself and not indulge in intimate activities and therefore her prime responsibility is to ensure that in a relationship, her own dignity and modesty is protected.
"A woman is not expected to throw herself to a man and indulge in promiscuity, thereby becoming a source of hilarity and it is for her to maintain her purity, chastity and virtues," the court said.
An FIR was registered at Chotta Shimla police station against the accused on July 28, 2015 under section 376 IPC on the complaint filed by a woman who is a widow.
In the present case, the accused was known to the woman and had shared the relationship for quite some time and once it turned sour, the charges of r**e were filed, the judge added.
To subscribe the LAWTELLER (print version):
Use Dr./Cr. Card or Net Banking, visit: www.lawteller.com
Use Cash on delivery, visit: http://bit.ly/1aDoq8K

19/04/2015

SC: LIVE-IN PARTNER ELIGIBLE TO INHERIT THE PROPERTY AFTER DEATH OF HER PARTNER
If an unmarried couple is living together as husband and wife, then they would be presumed to be legally married and the woman would be eligible to inherit the property after death of her partner, the Supreme Court has ruled.
A bench of Justice MY Eqbal and Justice Amitava Roy said continuous cohabitation of a couple would raise the presumption of valid marriage and it would be for the opposite party to prove that they were not legally married.
"It is well settled that the law presumes in favour of marriage and against concubinage, when a man and woman have cohabited continuously for a long time. However, the presumption can be rebutted by leading unimpeachable evidence. A heavy burden lies on a party who seeks to deprive the relationship of legal origin," the bench said.
The Supreme Court has since 2010 consistently ruled in favour of couples living together as husband and wife, giving the woman the right of a wife.
The court passed the order in a property dispute where family members contested that their grandfather, who was living with a woman for 20 years after his wife's death, was not legally wedded to the woman and she was not entitled to inherit the property after his death. They contended that she was their grandfather's mistress.
Despite the woman failing to prove that she was legally wedded, the court presumed that she was the legal wife after family members admitted that his grandfather had a relationship with the woman who was living with them in the joint family.
"Where a man and woman are proved to have lived together as husband and wife, the law will presume, unless the contrary is clearly proved, that they were living together in consequence of a valid marriage, and not in a state of concubinage," the bench said.
"In the fact of the case, there is strong presumption in favour of the validity of a marriage and the legitimacy of its child for the reason that the relationship is recognized by all persons concerned," it said.
The court said continuous cohabitation as husband and wife and their treatment as such for a number of years might raise the presumption of marriage which could be rebutted only if there were circumstances which destroyed the presumption.

17/04/2015

Doob can fight diabetes'
Rajiv Mani, TNN | Dec 31, 2007, 02.43AM IST
ALLAHABAD: You may say good bye to various pills and beauty therapies that dig a hole in your pocket, as a team of researchers at Allahabad University prove that 'doob' (common grass) can help in checking blood sugar level and also delays the aging process.
The light green thin blade of Cynodon Dactylon, as is known in Botanical terms, has shown characteristics of bringing down the blood glucose level and is a rich source of anti-oxidant.
The team, which has come out with this interesting finding is led by Geeta Watal, reader at the department of Chemistry, AU and the work includes cooperation by Bechan Sharma, Dolly Jaiswal, Prashant Kumar Rai and DK Rai.
It has been found that the extract of 'doob', when administered on diabetic rats brought down their blood glucose level by around 56 per cent. This decrease was almost the same when the extract was prepared in aqueous (water as the base) formulation or when it was prepared in an alcohol solution. The grass is also beneficial for person suffering from obesity as the extract brought down the level of bad cholesterol by around 35 percent.
The experiment concluded that the best suited doze would be 500 milligramme per kilogram of body weight. This means that if one is of 70 kg, the best doze would be around 3 grams of powdered extract per day. And if you are not yet convinced of the benefits, well, 'Doob' is also able to minimise the wrinkles on your face as the extract of this grass has the properties of antioxidants.
The experiment shows that when the extract was administered to rats it increased the level of various antioxidant enzymes.