22/05/2026
๐๐ก๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐๐ง'๐ญ ๐๐ ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ฉ๐ซ๐ข๐ฌ๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ฅ๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐จ๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐จ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐?
If youโve been watching the US commencement ceremonies over the last couple of weeks, a fascinating and telling trend has emerged.
High-profile speakers, including tech leaders and executives, have taken the podium to give the classic "embrace the future" speech. But the moment they mention how Artificial Intelligence is "rewriting production" or driving "the next Industrial Revolution," they aren't met with polite applause. ๐๐ก๐๐ฒ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐๐๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐ฎ๐๐ฅ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐จ๐๐!!.
As professionals, leaders, and builders, it is easy for us to preach about "๐๐๐๐ฉ๐ญ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง," "๐ฎ๐ฉ๐ฌ๐ค๐ข๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐ง๐ ," ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฌ "๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐๐ง๐จ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ซ ๐ญ๐จ๐จ๐ฅ." But let's look at this from the perspective of a 22-year-old graduate entering the highest entry-level unemployment market we've seen in over a decade:
The mixed signal: For 4 years, these students were told that using AI was cheating, and they faced severe academic penalties if they did.
Now, at graduation, they are told their survival depends on it.
The entry-level squeeze: t๐ก๐๐ฒ ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฐ๐๐ญ๐๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐ก ๐ฅ๐๐ฒ๐จ๐๐๐ฌ, ๐ก๐ข๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ณ๐๐ฌ, ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐ฒ-๐ฅ๐๐ฏ๐๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฌ๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐ก๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ค ๐๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ ๐ ๐ฌ๐จ๐๐ญ๐ฐ๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฆ๐จ๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐๐ง ๐ง๐จ๐ฐ ๐๐ซ๐๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ซ๐๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐จ๐ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐๐๐ญ, ๐๐จ๐๐, ๐๐๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง ๐ ๐ซ๐๐ฉ๐ก๐ข๐, ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ค๐๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฆ๐จ.
Telling a room full of indebted, anxious graduates that "their replacement is scalable" or to just "deal with it" completely misses the human element of economic anxiety.
๐๐ก๐ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ?
๐๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ก๐๐ซ๐, ๐ข๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ซ๐๐๐ฅ, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ ๐ฅ๐จ๐๐๐ฅ ๐ฃ๐จ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ค๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฏ๐ข๐ญ๐๐๐ฅ๐. ๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ข๐ก๐๐๐ฆ ๐๐ โ๐๐ฃ๐ ๐ก๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ก. ๐ต๐ข๐ก ๐กโ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐๐๐ค๐๐ฆ? ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ ๐ ๐ก๐๐ ๐ก๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ก๐ โ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐กโ๐๐ฆ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ข๐ ๐ก ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ก๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ ๐ โ๐๐๐โ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ โ๐๐๐ก.
When corporate and tech elites talk about the "incredible efficiency gains" of AI without acknowledging the very real disruption to entry-level livelihoods, a defensive reaction is entirely rational.
If we want the next generation to build the future with these tools, we have to start by validating their fears, not dismissively telling them to "suck it up."