09/07/2025
It's Not Who Votes That Counts. It's Who Counts the Votes: INEC Beware!
The phrase "It's not who votes that counts. It's who counts the votes" is a stark reminder of the critical role that electoral officials play in shaping the outcome of elections. This statement, often attributed to Joseph Stalin, but also linked to cartoonist Thomas Nast in 1871, satirizing William Marcy Tweed, underscores the significance of the vote-counting process in determining the legitimacy and outcome of elections. In Nigeria, where electoral malpractices have been a recurring issue, this phrase resonates deeply, highlighting the need for transparency, accountability, and fairness in the electoral process. The relevance of the statement to Nigeria's electoral landscape is undeniable. The country's democracy has been marred by allegations of electoral rigging, vote manipulation, and lack of transparency in the vote-counting process. The 2023 presidential election, which was widely criticized for its lack of transparency and fairness, is a case in point. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), the institution responsible for conducting elections, has faced intense scrutiny and criticism for its handling of the electoral process. The statement "It's not who votes that counts. It's who counts the votes" serves as a warning to INEC to uphold its constitutional mandate and ensure the integrity of the electoral process.
*Impact on INEC's Lack of Public Trust, Integrity, and Reputation*
INEC's lack of public trust, integrity, and reputation is a direct consequence of its perceived failure to conduct free and fair elections. The 2023 presidential election, which was marred by allegations of electoral malpractices, further eroded public trust in the institution. The statement highlights the critical role that INEC plays in shaping the outcome of elections and underscores the need for the institution to prioritize transparency, accountability, and fairness. To regain public trust, INEC must demonstrate its commitment to upholding the integrity of the electoral process and ensure that the vote-counting process is transparent, fair, and free from manipulation.
*The 2023 Presidential Election: A Lesson in Electoral Malpractice*
The 2023 presidential election was a stark reminder of the challenges that Nigeria's electoral process faces. The election was marred by allegations of electoral malpractices, including vote buying, ballot snatching, and manipulation of election results. INEC's handling of the election was widely criticized, with many stakeholders questioning the transparency and fairness of the process.
This statement reminds me of the shattered hopes of Nigerian youths who voted en masse for their chosen candidates in the 2023 presidential election, but their votes didn't count in some cities, villages, and polling booths due to the institution in charge of conducting the election. Before and during the election, people from particular ethnic nationalities were intimidated, beaten, maimed, or killed. Some were prevented from voting and were threatened to vote for a particular party or risk being killed. At different collation centers, the votes of those who voted didn't matter; what mattered was the brazen misconduct of INEC officials, party agents, and faithful. INEC jettisoned its guidelines or rules for the election. Many infractions reported across many states were ignored, including posting election results from polling booths to the IRF portal for real-time viewing, using BVAS for voter accreditation, and transmitting results to the viewing portal. INEC refused to review or reconcile some of the results that were mutilated and posted on the IRF. Even when various stakeholders reminded the electoral body to be transparent in its process, INEC turned a deaf ear to their reminders. This attitude of INEC gives credence to the phrase: "It's not who votes that counts; it's who counts the votes." INEC officials collate and count the votes. Yes, Nigerians voted for their chosen candidates, and INEC counted their votes against the candidates they voted for. Did INEC compromise and announce different results to favor a particular candidate? If that's true, does it validate the recent statement made by El-Rufai, the former governor of Kaduna State, that Peter Obi won the 2023 presidential election and was denied victory because he's an Igbo man? But why the conspiracy? Does it mean INEC was used to play the hatchet man's job? But wait, shouldn't INEC be independent in performing its functions? Why did it allow itself to be used to kill the spirit of the young generation? Will the young ones vote en masse again after being told their votes didn't count? Yes, it's who counts the votes that matters, not those who vote. What an irony! It's a stark reality that has undermined the legitimacy of the electoral process.
Warning and Way Forward
Visit comment section for the concluding part.