12/12/2024
Employer Services Limited
December Newsletter 2024
CHRISTMAS/NEW YEAR HOLIDAYS
We will be closing our office for the Christmas/New Year break from Friday 20 December 2024 and re-opening on Tuesday 7 January 2025.
If you’re in need of advice or assistance during the break, our Director Murray Broadbelt is available by email and mobile phone throughout ([email protected]; mobile 0274300113). One of our team members Dave Watson is also available on [email protected]; mobile 021720566.
With Christmas almost here, we remind you of the public holidays coming up:
• Christmas Day falls on Wednesday 25 December
• Boxing Day falls on Thursday 26 December
• New Year’s Day falls on Wednesday 1 January 2025
• The Day after New Year’s Day falls on Thursday 2 January
Because all four public holidays fall during the normal working week this year, they are observed on the day on which they fall and are not transferred to another day.
DISCIPLINARY MEETINGS AND DISMISSALS
If you want to dismiss an employee (whether it be for poor performance or misconduct) and you have followed a fair and reasonable disciplinary process, you need to issue a preliminary decision and seek comments or a written submission from the employee before making your final decision. Allow a further 12 to 24 hours for the employee to comment, then consider anything that the employee has to say before issuing your final decision.
We can guide you through the process to minimise the risk of an unjustified dismissal claim – give us a call for further advice before embarking on this process.
RESTRAINTS OF TRADE
Whilst restraints of trade can prevent employees from competing with your business after their employment ends, they won’t be enforceable unless:
• You have legitimate interests like confidential information or customer relationships to protect
• They're reasonable in geographical distance and timeframe
• You’ve given due consideration for the restraint, i.e. you’ve compensated the employee for the restraint either as part of their wage from the start or as an additional payment
So, choose the right restraint according to what you’re trying to protect, and take into account the particular role the employee has performed in your business – the more senior the role, the more stringent the restraint can be.
Generally, restraints of trade are for:
• Non-competition (can't work for competitors)
• Non-solicitation of existing and former clients (can’t poach your clients)
• Can’t work for your clients/customers
• Non-solicitation of staff (can’t poach your staff)
REDUCING REMEDIES PAID TO EMPLOYEES WHO’VE CONTRIBUTED TO THEIR OWN DEMISE
Minister for Workplace Relations and Safety Brooke van Velden says employees can be incentivised to ‘try their luck’ raising a personal grievance in the hope of getting a payout. The Government has unveiled plans to reduce the amount aggrieved employees can be compensated by their employers – to zero in some cases. Both the Employment Relations Authority and Employment Court can make an employer compensate an employee if the employee can successfully argue they’ve been unjustifiably dismissed, sexually harassed, or treated unfairly.
Currently, remedies can be discounted to reflect the employee’s culpability in the dispute, but Minister van Velden wants to change the law, so that employees guilty of serious misconduct can have their remedies for hurt and humiliation discounted by up to 100% even if the employer’s process is flawed. Van Velden also wants to remove the ability for an employee to be reinstated in a role, and compensated for ‘hurt and humiliation’, if their behaviour contributed towards the dispute. The aim is to prevent employers from being disproportionately punished for minor procedural flaws in employment agreements and/or paperwork if the employee is the one more seriously at fault.
There has been a rise in the number of personal grievance claims, partially thanks to ‘no-win, no-fee’ services offered by employment advocates, that encourage employees to pursue claims with little risk to themselves. Employers often feel forced to settle rather than fight and face huge financial claims/payouts. Van Velden says she will introduce a bill – the Employment Relations Amendment Bill – to Parliament next year to bring about the changes.
REASONS FOR A RESTRUCTURE/REDUNDANCY
1. Genuine business reason – good transparent evidence, such as financial reports, sales figures, reporting lines etc. must support these reasons.
2. Position must be superfluous to the needs of the business – the restructure cannot be personal: it is the role and not the person doing that work that is the focus of the restructure.
3. Significant change to the role – minor changes to a role do not require a restructure. Roles that are very similar will be considered existing and the current incumbent should remain in the role. A significant change requires more than a 20% change to be considered ‘different’.
4. Restructure is not a good reason to exit employees from their employment. Poor performance or misconduct should be dealt with through a proper performance management plan or disciplinary process.
5. The process requires a fair and reasonable process in accordance with good faith principles. This means providing to the affected parties all relevant information relied upon by the employer for the proposed redundancy. Failure to provide all relevant information may make the redundancy unjustified and give rise to a personal grievance claim.
6. Redeployment – this is a crucial step when conducting a lawful redundancy process. When an employer disestablishes an employee’s role, they are required to explore any potential opportunities to retain the employee in a different role before dismissing them for redundancy. Termination of employment should always be a last resort. Where there is a vacant role which an employee impacted by restructuring has the necessary skills and experience to perform or would be capable of performing the role with reasonable training, the job should be offered to the employee, even if the role is at a lower level or for less pay.
7. Selection process - where two or more positions have been disestablished and a new hybrid position established, the employer will need to undertake a selection process to determine which of the affected employees should be redeployed into that position. The criteria for selection must be objective, transparent and relevant to the specific role. It should not consider previous misconduct or performance issues. The affected employee/s should still be considered as the preferred candidate prior to considering other unaffected employees or taking the role to market. This is another common mistake employers make. It is only after an employer has genuinely considered all possible redeployment opportunities (even in other branches or departments), and has reasonably concluded that they are not suitable, that it can move forward with declaring an employee redundant.
8. Restructure/Redundancy is probably the easiest area of employment law to get wrong. Even minor errors or oversights can result in an expensive personal grievance claim, so it’s advisable to seek advice before taking this step.
We wish you all a very happy festive season and look forward to catching up in the New Year 2025!
Murray, Wendy and Dave