01/11/2023
GOOD REASONS WHY COMPANIES SHOULD NOT BUY BITCOIN
MicroStrategy Inc. under its charismatic CEO Michael J. Saylor has been investing its corporate profits in Bitcoin for some time now. These Bitcoins are directly held by the U.S. public company and appear on its balance sheet. However, tens of thousands of other corporations worldwide have analyzed whether to follow this behavior and have decided not to do so. Contrary to Mr. Saylor's predictions, MicroStrategy is, until today, the only major company on the global stage to invest its profits in Bitcoin.
Notwithstanding this failure of adopting Bitcoin in the corporate sector, crypto exchanges and virtual asset service providers are increasingly promoting and offering Bitcoin for businesses. The main reason might be that these new B2B markets are not as cost competitive and make it possible to add paid consulting services by their crypto sales agents. Also, corporations might be more naive Bitcoin buyers and an easier prey for crypto-marketing schemes.
The disadvantages of corporate Bitcoin ownership can't be denied. On a global scale, the tax treatment for individual Bitcoin ownership is more tax friendly. Also, the individual is much more flexible in case of a tightening of the tax regime. He is even able to leave the tax jurisdiction, while his company is typically unable to do so. As another aspect, Bitcoin reporting requirements, audit issues and various other bureaucracy make corporate ownership a hassle and in the worst case a nightmare.
Corporate Bitcoin purchases are typically more expensive, while the private Bitcoin buyer has significantly lower transaction fees. Worse, the corporate purchase process is more cumbersome and slower than the quick individual purchase. Typically, know-your-client regulations require more customer due diligence for a business than for an individual. This includes more documentation, more investigations, and a slower off-ramp process.
However, there is an easy and fully compliant shortcut to bypass the company's purchase of the Bitcoins from the exchange or middleman/broker. The entrepreneur simply needs to buy the Bitcoins himself and, after a grace period, sell them to his company at arm's length. If such a process is properly executed, it can't be qualified as a problematic straw purchase.
After all, it is not an insurmountable hurdle if the money is in the company and not with the investor. If a distribution of profits is not desired, the funds can flow from the company to the shareholders as a loan and be used there for private Bitcoin purchases. There are proven and tested structures for a simple and solid solution.
The article will be continued soon with a second part, which will show the problems of holding the Bitcoins for the company (multi-sig, etc.) and a third part, which will explain how the drawbacks of corporate ownership can be turned into an advantage in the case of Bitcoin Offshoring.
Bitcoin Offshoring is a modern digital asset protection strategy to shield crypto assets from government intervention. Its typical process involves the transfer of Bitcoins from the investor's wallet to a separate offsho...