C. Opes-Mauleon, CPA - Tax, Accounting, Bookkeeping & Auditing Services

18/09/2025

29/08/2025

Urgent Hiring!!!

WFH

Position:
1. Accounting Data Analyst
2. AP Junior Analyst

Qualifications:
✅️ Accounting graduate
✅️ Trainable
✅️ Trustworthy
✅️ Can start immediately

Working hours: 11:00 pm to 7:00 am

Send your resume to: [email protected]

21/08/2025

02/07/2025

Revenue Regulations No. 16-2025

Amending certain provisions of RR No. 6-2019, as amended by RR No. 10-2023 and RR No. 17-2021, to provide extension on the period of submission of documentary requirements for Estate Tax Amnesty availment pursuant to R.A. No. 11956, further amending R.A. No. 111213, otherwise known as the "Tax Amnesty Act", as amended by R.A. No. 11569

Full text: https://tinyurl.com/mdfhcutk

20/06/2025

The (SC) has affirmed a Court of Appeals (CA) ruling finding that Philippine Airlines, Inc. (PAL) did not sufficiently prove payment of salaries and 13th month pay to its former pilots. To prove salary payment through banks, the Court held that employers must show that the payroll was submitted to and received by the bank.

In a Decision penned by Chief Justice Alexander G. Gesmundo, the SC’s First Division remanded to the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) the labor claims of 18 former PAL pilots, to determine the exact amount and to make a detailed computation of the monetary benefits due to them.

It found that the Payroll Listing and 13th Month Pay Payroll Register presented by PAL were not sufficient proof of payment, as they did not provide proof of actual receipt of payment by the employees.

The case stemmed from a 1998 strike by 49 PAL pilots, who later filed a complaint with the NLRC against PAL alleging illegal dismissal, unfair labor practice, and non-payment of various monetary benefits such as salaries, allowances, and bonuses.

The Labor Arbiter dismissed the claims of illegal dismissal and unfair labor practice. As for the monetary claims, PAL presented payroll documents to prove payment, which were accepted by both the Labor Arbiter and the NLRC.

The CA, however, reversed the NLRC. stating that the documents presented by PAL were not sufficient proof of payment.

The SC affirmed the CA, emphasizing that payroll records and vouchers can only be considered strong proof of payment if they clearly show that the employees actually received the money and when the payment was made.

Read the full text of the Press Release at https://tinyurl.com/ac5kehbk.

Read the full text of the Decision at https://tinyurl.com/c4dpa3sj.

Copying of this content is subject to the SC PIO’s Credit Attribution Policy: https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/credit-attribution-policy/.

16/06/2025

The Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) reiterates the reliability of the National ID, regardless of the format, as a valid proof of identity for registered persons, and the ease of authentication for relying parties in the government and private institutions.

Read here: https://psa.gov.ph/node/1684076354/

23/05/2025

JUST IN: Malacañang Palace declares Friday, 06 June 2025, a Regular Holiday in observance of Eid'l Adha, or the Feast of Sacrifice.

23/05/2025

Lunch out ng magigiting na mandirigma. 💪

Thank you so much, Jen! 💋

20/05/2025