21/08/2025
Seems like this senator came prepared—finally, some homework done.
But let’s not kid ourselves.
On the ground, it’s an open secret: politicians are usually the real masterminds behind corruption.
Kickbacks are their business model—take 20% from projects, then give back 1% through financial aid, giveaways, and gimmicks.
That’s why the masses end up saying, “maayo ni siya na politiko kay mutabang gyud”—without realizing that the politician has already pocketed far more than what’s been provided as “aid” for them.
Now that the issue has hit the media spotlight, the engineers are suddenly painted as the villains.
In truth, they’re just convenient scapegoats.
The real power players—the politicians and these CONG-tractors—need someone else to carry the blame.
Just another circus show…
Summary of Sen. Ping Lacson’s privilege speech on flood control corruption (Aug 20, 2025):
* Massive Budget, Little to Show
– Over ₱1.9 trillion spent from 2011–2025 on DPWH flood control projects
– ₱1 trillion poured in just 3 years (2023–2025) yet floods remain rampant, with newly built d**es collapsing after recent storms
* Systemic “Pie-Sharing” of Funds
– Kickbacks and commissions eat up as much as 60% of project funds, leaving only crumbs for actual work
– Breakdown of SOP cuts (for a ₱100M project):
–– 8–10% DPWH officials
–– 5–6% Bids and Awards Committee
–– 0.5–1% COA
–– 5–6% “Parking fee” to local politicians
–– 20–25% to funder/congressman
– Often, only 40% (₱40M out of ₱100M) left for real construction
* Ghost Projects (Guni-guni Projects)
– Entirely non-existent structures declared “completed” in official records
– Some “completed” projects turned out to be subdivision fences or old structures reused
– Contractors like Darcy and Anna Builders and Wawao Builders repeatedly implicated in fake or recycled projects
* DISTINCT “Coded Budgets”
– Identical project costs (e.g., multiple ₱77.199M contracts) flagged as “DISTINCT” — codes marking ownership of projects by politicians
– Example: Bulacan 1st District had 28 projects all pegged at ₱72M each under two notorious district engineers
* Case Studies of Corruption
– Candating, Arayat (Pampanga): Original ₱20M project ballooned to over ₱274.8M in repeated repairs, all awarded to the same favored contractor (Eddmari Construction), yet still collapsing
– Bauang River Basin (La Union): From only ₱100M in the NEP, congressional insertions inflated to ₱1.59B, all won by Silverwolves Construction
– Naujan, Oriental Mindoro: Received a staggering ₱19B flood control budget in 3 years, with ₱10B in 2025 alone. Multiple d**es collapsed within months due to substandard materials (sand-filled instead of reinforced)
– Apitong, Naujan (Mindoro): A supposed ₱193M completed d**e project turned out to be non-existent — pure ghost project
– Bulacan (Malolos & Hagonoy): At least 30 ghost projects uncovered, all tagged with identical amounts. Darcy and Anna Builders found to be a fake company with only a gym/e-payment shop at its registered address
* Casino-Linked Officials
– A Bulacan district engineer allegedly lost hundreds of millions in casinos, funded by corruption proceeds
* Political Insertions
– Projects branded as “Congressional Projects” under banners like AGILA, openly claimed by legislators
– Funded through unprogrammed appropriations despite stringent requirements, raising suspicions of undue political power
* Standard for Substandard
– Widespread use of weak materials, improper piling, and shortcuts in construction
– Locals report d**es crumbling after light rains or being eaten away from within
* Well-Organized Syndicate
– Inside Bulacan 1st Engineering District, a network of DPWH officials and contractors systematically fabricate ghost projects, using contractors’ licenses as cover
* Overall Takeaway
– Billions allocated, yet floods persist
– Clear evidence of political ownership, fund diversion, fake projects, and repeat “repairs” designed to funnel taxpayer money into private pockets
– Lacson warns: what Filipinos need is not more flood control, but “greed control”