Ar. Brian Ernest Regalado

Ar. Brian Ernest Regalado Construction Project Management Trainer and Mentor leading others to elevated CPM Excellence. I am a registered and licensed architect in the Philippines.

Not only that, I am a project manager in the Philippine Construction industry certified by the Department of Trade and Industry – Construction Manpower and Development Foundation (DTI-CMDF) and an ISO/IEC 17024:2012 certified project manager by the International Institute of Project and Program Management (I2P2M), where I obtained my Certificate in Project Management with distinctions. I am a memb

er of the International Association of Project Managers (IAPM) as Certified Senior Project Manager, as well as both a steering committee member and an ambassador to the Philippines and Southeast Asia of the International Construction Project Management Association (ICPMA). In my 18 years of practice, I have developed my expertise as a construction project manager through my project involvements and continuing professional education. But beyond that I am passionate about sharing my expertise and knowledge of the best practices in construction project management with the goal to elevate public knowledge about the construction industry and to help construction industry professionals improve the way they practice construction project management. This is what The Construction Project Mentor is all about--sharing years worth of knowledge and experience from the field and in continuous education to help both the layman and the professional get access to the best practices for construction project management in the Philippines and around the world. The vision has been set out for us through the Philippine Construction Industry Roadmap 2020-2030. As a Philippine Construction Project Manager, I am one with DTI-CMDF in advancing the Philippine construction Industry through the development of competent, confident and nationally certified construction project managers that the local construction industry needs to bring all these plans into successful fruition. It is my vision to help strengthen the profession of construction project management for the growth and advancement of the construction industry. Join me, and through our collective growth as an industry, we will be able to achieve our goals and ambitions for ourselves, for our families, and for our country. Let’s actively pursue nation building through outstanding construction project management. I am Brian Ernest L. Regalado – the Construction Project Mentor.

I wonder how many architects, engineers, and construction managers actually have a standardized Construction Inspection ...
10/08/2026

I wonder how many architects, engineers, and construction managers actually have a standardized Construction Inspection and Verification Process, supported by structured QA/QC forms, that they consistently use across their projects.

And perhaps the more interesting question is this:

If you had one, what could you actually do with it?

Those who have worked with me know that, at the heart of how we define and understand construction scope, two things are fundamental:

(1) the building element, and
(2) its specific location.

This is closely aligned with how the Construction Management Association of America (CMAA) approaches work for scheduling and programming, where an activity is generally defined by an action applied to something at a particular location.

But scope and work, while closely related, are not completely synonymous.

Scope can move up and down the different levels of decomposition.

Work, on the other hand, begins at the level where resources can actually be defined, assigned, scheduled, measured, and controlled.

For me, work should at the very least be defined at Level 5 – Assembly Groups, but ideally at Level 6 – Individual Assemblies / Work Package Assemblies (WPA).

We call these Work Package Assemblies.

I have always advocated moving away from defining scope primarily at Levels 8 and 9—Parts and Materials—which is where many professionals tend to focus.

At those levels, we are no longer really defining the scope itself.

We are already describing the resources contained within the scope.

That distinction is important.

Scope is ultimately what we have to define and control if we are to truly deliver projects successfully.

And at minimum, that control should reach the WPA.

If quality is fundamentally about conformance to scope and requirements, then inspection, verification, review, and acceptance should also be structured around the WPA.

A WPA should always be traceable.

Think of the WPA as the basic container of construction scope.

Inside that container are its components, parts, materials, and material properties or metadata.

This is also why I have never been comfortable with QA/QC systems that begin and end with generic material checklists.

The better question is not simply:

“Was the material acceptable?”

The better questions are:

What assembly is this material part of?

Where is that assembly located?

What requirements govern it?

What exactly was inspected or verified?

What was the result?

And where is the evidence?

Two of the basic forms we have historically used are the PPD and the RDS—and I hope some of my former apprentices and interns still remember them.

Both follow the same fundamental logic:

Building element + actual location.

Our current inspection and verification process builds on that same thinking.

The process is aligned with the logic of the ASTM Property Condition Assessment process, but adapted specifically to the construction stage of the asset life cycle.

Some versions of these tools are used during planning. The versions I have been developing more recently are intended specifically for construction-stage inspection, verification, and quality control.

The objective is actually very simple:

The same structure used to define scope should carry through planning, ex*****on, inspection, verification, acceptance, turnover, and eventually the asset record.

That means quality should never become a disconnected checklist.

Quality must remain traceable to scope.

And this is where it becomes interesting.

If every inspection, verification, nonconformance, correction, acceptance, photo, test result, and record were tied to a specific Work Package Assembly at a specific location, what else could you do with that information?

Could you use it for quality control?

Progress measurement?

Punchlisting?

Payment validation?

Claims?

Turnover?

Defects management?

Maintenance?

Asset records?

Contract administration?

Project closeout?

That is the part I am interested in exploring further.

Because once scope becomes structured and traceable, QA/QC may be only one of the things the same system can control.

So here is the question:

If you had a standardized, assembly-based and location-specific Construction Inspection and Verification system on your projects, where would you find the greatest use for it?

For more than 20 years of professional practice as a consultant, I have had the opportunity to work from different sides...
07/08/2026

For more than 20 years of professional practice as a consultant, I have had the opportunity to work from different sides of the construction project—as adviser to project owners, alongside architects and engineers, with builders and contractors, and with project teams responsible for turning plans into completed buildings.

Over those years, we developed our own guides, forms, checklists, frameworks, proposal formats, and working documents.

They were never originally created for publication.

They were created because we needed them in actual practice—to help clients define what they wanted, identify what should be included, organize project information, compare proposals, manage construction, document decisions, control changes, and verify what was actually being delivered.

Those who have attended my classes over the years have probably seen many of these actual forms and documents. I have always been generous in sharing them because I believe that professional knowledge becomes more valuable when it helps improve practice beyond our own projects.

But being a busy practitioner also meant that we never really had the time to sit down, organize everything, and look at this growing body of work as something that could eventually be published.

Interestingly, some of these materials have already found their way into the work of former students and other practitioners.

Some have been professional enough to acknowledge me and BUILD QUOTIENT® as the source.

Others, unfortunately, have substantially reproduced forms, proposal formats, frameworks, and documents we developed and presented them without attribution—or even as their own work.

Rather than allowing that to discourage us, it has made us think more seriously about properly documenting and publishing what we have developed through actual practice.

The screenshots here show only a portion of what we are now organizing under BUILDING IT RIGHT—a practical, independent advisory series intended primarily for people who are planning to build a house, currently working with their design consultants, already under construction with a builder or contractor, or approaching project completion and turnover.

The purpose is not to teach project owners to design, engineer, estimate, or construct the house themselves.

The technical work remains with the architects, engineers, builders, contractors, project managers, and other qualified professionals responsible for it.

A project owner should not have to become a technical professional simply to protect his or her interests in a construction project.

BUILDING IT RIGHT is intended to help the owner become a better-informed client.

It provides an independent reference for understanding what should be discussed, defined, documented, priced, coordinated, inspected, and eventually accepted.

In many residential projects, the owner is surrounded by professionals yet may still struggle to answer very basic questions:

Have I clearly communicated what I require?

Is everything I expect actually included?

Are the quotations I am comparing based on the same scope?

What decisions are still mine to make?

What should my consultants and builder be coordinating?

What should be checked before work is concealed?

How do I know whether what I am being billed for has actually been completed?

What should I receive before I accept the house?

These are not questions about doing the architect’s, engineer’s, or contractor’s job.

They are questions every responsible project owner should be able to ask.

The guides are therefore being developed as an independent project-owner advisory reference—based on more than two decades of our own consulting and construction project management practice, and on the same BUILD QUOTIENT® governance systems we use professionally.

They are intended to sit on the owner’s side of the table: helping the owner understand the project sufficiently to communicate better with the professional team, make informed decisions, recognize omissions or unresolved issues, maintain clearer accountability, and know when further professional advice is needed.

The guides are being developed to help owners:

define what they really need before design begins;
identify the rooms, spaces, systems, assemblies, and materials that may need to form part of the project;
discover possible scope omissions before they become additional costs or change orders;
understand what is actually included—and excluded—in proposals and quotations;
compare builders and contractors based on scope, responsibility, and value—not price alone;
understand which decisions need to be made and when;
know how construction work should generally be organized and sequenced;
recognize what should be inspected before it gets covered up;
verify materials, workmanship, fixtures, finishes, and building systems;
track incomplete work, defects, changes, and responsibilities;
understand what should be completed before progress payments and final acceptance;
know what drawings, warranties, manuals, testing records, and other information should be received at turnover; and
maintain a clearer record of the house after construction.

We are now at a crossroads.

Do we publish everything as one comprehensive BUILDING IT RIGHT Residential Project Owner Guide, following the owner from the earliest project requirements all the way through construction, quality verification, turnover, and maintenance?

Or would it be more useful to release the material volume by volume, with shorter practical guides addressing the different stages of building a house?

For example:

Before You Design — What do you really need?

Before You Price — What exactly should be included?

Before You Contract — What are you buying, and who is responsible for what?

Before You Build — How should the work be organized?

While You Build — How do you know the project is actually under control?

Before Work Is Covered — What should have been inspected?

Before You Pay — What has actually been completed?

Before You Accept — Was it built right?

After You Move In — What records and information should you keep?

Before we finalize the publication format, I would genuinely like to hear from project owners, future homeowners, architects, engineers, builders, contractors, project managers, and anyone who has recently gone through the experience of building a house.

Which three of these benefits would matter most to you as a project owner?

And which format would you prefer?

A — One comprehensive reference covering the entire residential project journey

B — Shorter practical guides for each stage

C — Both: individual guides first, eventually forming one complete reference

Most importantly:

If you could avoid just one costly mistake when building your house, what would you want a guide like this to help you prevent?

I would be very interested to hear your answers before we decide what to publish first.

BUILDING IT RIGHT

Know what you need.
Know what should be included.
Know what you are paying for.
Know what to check.
Know when the work is truly complete.

I am grateful to the Construction Manpower Development Foundation for renewing its partnership with Build Quotient + To...
30/07/2026

I am grateful to the Construction Manpower Development Foundation for renewing its partnership with Build Quotient +

Today, many professionals are being taught how to create content, build an audience, and increase their visibility. Those may be useful, but they are not substitutes for the actual capability required to deliver construction projects successfully.

My work is not centered on teaching professionals how to become content creators. It is centered on developing their competence as construction professionals.

That work is grounded in more than 20 years of professional practice, formal project management certification, competency-framework development, and the continuing education, assessment, and mentoring of construction practitioners.

I do not merely want construction professionals to become more visible. I want them to become demonstrably more capable—and to gain credible recognition for what they can actually do.

Thank you, CMDF, for the continued trust and partnership. We look forward to advancing construction project management excellence together.

27/07/2026

Before assuming you can simply follow whichever is more favorable or convenient, see what CIAP Document 102, Article 2.03 actually says.

In this episode of Construction Questions Answered by CIAP Document 102, we explain the contractual rule on conflicts between written words and numerical figures, why the rule exists, and what you should do when you encounter this situation in practice.

Watch the full video and avoid costly contract interpretation mistakes.

Presented by Build Quotient®

23/07/2026

Kapag hindi magkasundo ang Contract Documents, alin ang masusunod?

Before assuming one document always prevails, see what CIAP Document 102, Article 2.03 actually says about resolving conflicts between Contract Documents.

🎥 Watch the full video.

Have a construction contract question? Leave it in the comments. We may add it to our growing list of Construction Questions answered by CIAP Document 102.

Presented by Build Quotient + tient

22/07/2026

Anong mangyayari kung nagka-conflict ang Contract Documents?

Before assuming someone is automatically right—or deciding which document to follow—see what CIAP Document 102, Article 2.03 actually says.

🎥 Watch the full video.

Have a construction contract question? Leave it in the comments. We may add it to our growing list of Construction Questions answered by CIAP Document 102.

Presented by Build Quotient +

21/07/2026

Paano ba dapat binabasa at ini-interpret ang isang construction contract?

Before relying on a single clause or interpreting a provision in isolation, see what CIAP Document 102, Article 2.03 actually says.

🎥 Watch the full video.

Have a construction contract question? Leave it in the comments. We may add it to our growing list of Construction Questions answered by CIAP Document 102.

Presented by Build Quotient +

|

20/07/2026

Ano ba talaga ang standard of conduct na inaasahan ng Owner at Contractor?

Before assuming it's just about being honest or acting in good faith, see what CIAP Document 102, Article 2.02 actually requires.

🎥 Watch the full video.

Have a construction contract question? Leave it in the comments. We may add it to our growing list of Construction Questions answered by CIAP Document 102.

Presented by

18/07/2026

Kasama ba sa kontrata kahit hindi nakalista?
Before concluding it's included—or automatically calling it extra work—see what CIAP Document 102, Article 2.01 actually says.
🎥 Watch the full video.
Have a construction contract question? Leave it in the comments. We may add it to our growing list of Construction Questions answered by CIAP Document 102.
Presented by Build Quotient +
See less

17/07/2026

Kasama ba sa kontrata kahit hindi nakalista?

Before concluding it's included—or automatically calling it extra work—see what CIAP Document 102, Article 2.01 actually says.

🎥 Watch the full video.

Have a construction contract question? Leave it in the comments. We may add it to our growing list of Construction Questions answered by CIAP Document 102.

Presented by Build Quotient +

Address

Quezon City

Opening Hours

Monday 9am - 6pm
Tuesday 9am - 6pm
Wednesday 9am - 6pm
Thursday 9am - 6pm
Friday 9am - 6pm
Saturday 9am - 6pm

Telephone

+639175231997

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Ar. Brian Ernest Regalado posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Ar. Brian Ernest Regalado:

Shortcuts

Share

Category