10/08/2021
Two enforcement inspections, under different code names, were conducted in March and May 2021 by a senior leader from a regulatory/enforcement agency. This was in tandem with a call from industrial leaders for Safety Time Out (STO). As reported 400 such inspections were carried out during each period, mainly in construction, marine, process, manufacturing, etc. Focus was primarily on regulatory compliance and workplace conditions but seldom on workplace practices/acts. Outcome is that more non-compliance or breaches were identified, resulting in fines, stop work order and other punitive measures. Whether such impromptu/unplanned inspection is sustainable in the long term to translate into improved safety performance with significant reduction in accident rates remain to be seen in the months to come. Sustainability, as one would believe, is achievable when such inspections are pre-planned on a quarterly basis, perhaps led by a senior leader from the regulatory/enforcement agency jointly with senior corporate bosses from the stakeholders in particular the main contractors and the subcontractors. Such an arrangement would lend a strong weightage in its interest, involvement, investment (in terms of time and manpower) and commitment towards safety and accident prevention. Corporate team members, upon completion of the inspection, were invited by the team leader to a meeting for tea and follow-up action. Outcome was positive and results were impressive. This was done in the past and shouldn't this be revisited for consideration and implementation ? Site safety inspection, to identify hazards: potential and actual, pre-planned on a daily, weekly, monthly and quarterly basis is a good tool for accident prevention. However, observations through participation revealed shortcomings in the system. Most, of which the serious ones warrant concern are as follows: an element of biases against subcontractors to the extent that potential hazards are not covered or highlighted, fear of reprisals from main contractor representative for highlighting its shortcoming/deficiencies, inspecting and checking work progress instead of actual inspection activities, lacks completeness of inspection for the whole site with short duration of less than the minimum standard of 2 hours, lack of experience and trained team members whose competency leave much to be desired. Such is the way a normal inspection is carried out. Could this lead to a safer and healthy workplace? Remember, there's a safe way for every job only if inspections are well pre-planned and implemented by competent team members rather than having a group to shoot from the hips.