27/05/2026
During my time leading training in Indonesia’s mining industry, workplace mentoring became a key part of how we supported nationalisation.
The idea was simple:
Pair experienced expat operators, artisans and supervisors with their Indonesian counterparts, transfer knowledge, build capability and support the long-term goal of localising roles.
The intention was excellent.
But we learned quickly that mentoring does not work properly just because a policy says it should. We made mistakes.
- We assumed technical experts would naturally know how to mentor.
- We underestimated how much structure, guidance and support they needed.
- We did not always give mentors the tools to coach, document progress, give feedback and build confidence in their counterparts.
- And we did not always recognise mentoring as the valuable professional skill it actually is.
Because mentoring someone to eventually nationalise your own position is not a small ask.
It requires patience, trust, humility, communication skill and a clear system behind it.
What we learned was simple:
- If nationals are expected to receive quality mentoring, expats must be properly trained, supported and empowered to mentor well.
- And if we ask expats to play that role, we should recognise it properly; in performance discussions, career records, their CVs and leadership pathways.
Workplace mentoring can be one of the most powerful tools for nationalisation and capability transfer.
But only when it is treated as a structured development process, not just an extra duty added to someone’s job.