One 2Net Business Consult

One 2Net Business Consult We offer the consultancy in:
Business plans
Tax filing and return
Accounting and book keeping
General business Advisory
Data analysis and report writing

Tragedy of the commonsIn economic science, the tragedy of the commons is a situation in which individual users, who have...
11/11/2021

Tragedy of the commons

In economic science, the tragedy of the commons is a situation in which individual users, who have open access to a resource unhampered by shared social structures or formal rules that govern access and use, act independently according to their own self-interest and, contrary to the common good of all users, cause depletion of the resource through their uncoordinated action. The concept originated in an essay written in 1833 by the British economist William Forster Lloyd, who used a hypothetical example of the effects of unregulated grazing on common land (also known as a "common") in Great Britain and Ireland. The concept became widely known as the "tragedy of the commons" over a century later after an article written by Garrett Hardin in 1968
Industrial pollution, flooding, collapse of buildings are some of the consequences of operators ignoring its cost to the shared environment.
Although open-access resource systems may collapse due to overuse (such as in over-fishing), many examples have existed and still do exist where members of a community with regulated access to a common resource co-operate to exploit those resources prudently without collapse, or even creating "perfect order". Elinor Ostrom was awarded the 2009 Nobel Prize in Economic Science for demonstrating exactly this concept in her book Governing the Commons, which included examples of how local communities were able to do this without top-down regulations or privatization.

In a modern economic context, "commons" is taken to mean any open-access and unregulated resource such as the atmosphere, oceans, rivers, ocean fish stocks, or even an office refrigerator. In a legal context, it is a type of property that is neither private nor public, but rather held jointly by the members of a community, who govern access and use through social structures, traditions, or formal rules.

In environmental science, the "tragedy of the commons" is often cited in connection with sustainable development, meshing economic growth and environmental protection, as well as in the debate over global warming. It has also been used in analyzing behavior in the fields of economics, evolutionary psychology, anthropology, game theory, politics, taxation, and sociology.

To coordinate; "harmonize, correlate, interrelate, synchronize, bring together. fit together, mesh, dovetail. organize, ...
02/11/2021

To coordinate; "harmonize, correlate, interrelate, synchronize, bring together. fit together, mesh, dovetail. organize, arrange, order, systematize".

The word therefore means to work together with another person(s) or organization in order to achieve something: Retailers should coordinate with suppliers in order to maximize the benefits of advertising campaigns.

To coordinate does not mean to do on behalf of those who are meant to do.

16/10/2017

Continued from last week....
7. Only speak for yourself. In a client company, freelance writers interact on a forum. I found myself regularly annoyed by one colleague, who posts regularly. It took me awhile to figure out the problem, but once I did, I now see it in just about every post. She consistently tries to speak for all of the freelancers. She uses statements like “We all feel this way.” “This is the change we’d all like to see.” When coworkers speak this way, they think that they are putting weight behind their thoughts but all it does usually is make people angry.

Or, in the case of your coworker, the individual might see it as ganging up on her. Your coworker may also become distracted from the actual topic of the discussion as she pursues who we is. So, using the word we or any equivalent is unlikely to help with disagreement.

8. Step back from your job and how you perform a particular activity. To effectively disagree, you must be able to look at the situation from your coworker’s functional point of view. The further up the organization’s hierarchy your job is, the more important it becomes to look at each issue from a total organizational view. You must be open to new ideas and different ways of approaching problems. Why is your way the best way when other ways to obtain the same, or even better result, exist? In organizations, employees who can think about optimizing for the whole organization are the people who are promoted.

9. Avoid interrogating your coworker. Asking questions to understand your coworker’s viewpoint is appropriate. Throwing out an unending stream of questions to trip him up, confuse the issue, make him look silly or uninformed is not. It is also insulting and childish.

10. State the facts (if you have any, seriously is you have any) and share your knowledge. You can bring your experience, expertise, knowledge, and any data that you have that might support a direction to the table. You may talk about them to move your team forward. But, the opposite must be avoided. Just because something was tried, and didn’t work in the past, doesn’t mean that it won’t this time. The problem is different. The players are different. Even the will to make the solution work may have changed.

11. Speak to common interests and needs. Just as you started out the discussion by identifying what you and your coworker agree on, focus your discussion on shared interests and desired outcomes. If your coworker thinks that the two of you are headed in the same direction or have a shared outcome in mind, disagreement about how to get there is less scary and contentious.

12. Listen to try to see your coworker’s point of view. In a successful disagreement setting, both coworkers can state clearly the other party’s position on the issue. If you can’t, examine your listening. Use the technique of feeding back to your colleague what you believe he said. For example, say, “John, I believe that your position is this ___.” That tells your colleague that you are listening to what he has to say. People waste a lot of time in arguments that could have been avoided if they just understood the other person’s position better. They argue over ostensible disagreements and details.

13. Avoid putting down your coworker’s beliefs, interests, and ideas. You can have a disagreement with coworkers without making them feel like what they value or think is wrong. In fact, check your judgmental self at the door when you attend a meeting. Showing disrespect for a colleague’s ideas or position is inappropriate anywhere but especially at work. Making fun of them is even worse. Be careful of gentle teasing, too. Many of your coworkers were raised by mothers who taught them that “behind every bit of teasing is a grain of truth.”

14. The goal is not to win but to clear the air in any disagreement at work. You want to know that the issues have been carefully discussed and thought about deeply. You want to make sure that your relationship with your colleague is intact. If you win, you also lose, because your coworker lost. That loss will hang heavy in your relationship and it will affect your ability to disagree in the future. It is also important that your coworker and you are clear about your areas of agreement and disagreement.

15. Compromise when necessary. You may not agree on everything, but don’t let that fact keep you from reaching a general agreement on a direction or a solution. In an organization, you can’t freeze in place and do nothing just because you haven’t found a perfect solution that all parties own. You will need to agree to disagree on aspects of the solution or problem solving.

In a compromise, you need to make sure that the conceded items are ones that you can live with following the meeting. At the same time, you want to avoid consensus decision making in which the lowest common denominator determines the course of action. Consensus decision making can cause low quality decisions and solutions as a team struggles to come up with a solution that is acceptable to all

ORGANIZATIONS AND DISAGREEMENTS

Disagreement can happen in any setting. You can disagree with your neighbor Kajansi or Kayliwajala or Kawempe. You can disagree with your boss or initiate a discussion with a co-worker over lunch. But, many disagreements occur during meetings – or they should.

The reason organizations hold meetings is so that employees can engage each other in discussion. Otherwise, why hold a meeting? Meetings are for discussion, decisions, and commitments. If you don’t state your opinion, whether you agree or disagree, you are not part of the discussion.

You have no reason to attend the meeting or participate on the team if you are unwilling to discuss your opinions and agree or disagree with the opinions of your fellow attendees. If you’re afraid to disagree with your boss, why does he or she need you? To do what you’re told? To work on tasks and action items? Or, to think, innovate, plan, and disagree.

In fact, healthy disagreement is one of the hallmarks of a successful team. When constructive discussion and disagreement is absent, and apathy is the norm, you have a dysfunctional team or meeting.

So here are my fifteen best tips for successful disagreement.

1. Pick your battles wisely. Just do not disagree any how. If you disagree about everything, your coworkers will see you as argumentative and disagreeable. You’ll develop the reputation of always disagreeing and your reasonable disagreement will be viewed as same old, same old. So, pick areas that affect outcomes and that are substantial, meaningful, and important.

2. Don’t hold a conflict when you’re angry, emotional, or upset. You don’t want your emotions to affect your professionalism, arguments or data presentation. Above all, you don’t want your emotions to cause you to attack, name-call, or demean your coworkers. When speaking, at any point in a disagreement, stay calm. Your successful disagreement depends on it.

3. Disagreement should not be personal. You are not disagreeing with your coworker because there is something wrong with her or you don’t like her. You are disagreeing based on facts, experience, intuition, prior team successes and failures, your coworkers’ track record on similar projects, and your organization’s culture. Keep the discussion impersonal by not you-ing your colleague as in “you just don’t understand the ramifications of what you’re suggesting.” No personal attacks allowed.

4. You want to validate your coworker’s opinion. Identify the components with which you agree and acknowledge that you can understand or see why she might feel the way she does. Open your disagreement by repeating what the other party said rather than launching into your areas of disagreement first. Help the person feel as if he was listened to, heard out, and understood.

5. Maintain your professionalism. Be respectful of your coworkers. Disagreement can be cordial, yet candid and effective. Don’t try to manipulate the situation as one former coworker did. She cried. Another was always on the attack. He saved up his ammunition and hit his coworkers with everything he had in his arsenal on occasion. Neither were successful and their professional reputations suffered.

6. Understand what your coworker needs, fears, and hopes to obtain through the solution. If you identify what is at stake in the issue, the problem solving, the recommendation, or project, you are more likely to connect with your coworker to successfully disagree. Ask questions like these: What’s your real concern about the project? What’s bothering you about this current solution? What has to occur for you to comfortably support a solution? Are you comfortable with any aspects of my suggestion?

7. Only speak for yourself. In a client company, freelance writers interact on a forum. I found myself regularly annoyed by one colleague, who posts regularly. It took me awhile to figure out the problem, but once I did, I now see it in just about every post. She consistently tries to speak for all of the freelancers. She uses srkers speak this way, they think that they are putting weight behind their thoughts but all it does usually is make people angry.

Or, in the case of your coworker, the individual might see it as ganging up on her. Your coworker may also become distracted from the actual topic of the discussion as she pursues who we is. So, using the word we or any equivalent is unlikely to help with disagreement.

8. Step back from your job and how you perform a particular activity. To effectively disagree, you must be able to look at the situation from your coworker’s functional point of view. The further up the organization’s hierarchy your job is, the more important it becomes to look at each issue from a total organizational view. You must be open to new ideas and different ways of approaching problems. Why is your way the best way when other ways to obtain the same, or even better result, exist? In organizations, employees who can think about optimizing for the whole organization are the people who are promoted.

9. Avoid interrogating your coworker. Asking questions to understand your coworker’s viewpoint is appropriate. Throwing out an unending stream of questions to trip him up, confuse the issue, make him look silly or uninformed is not. It is also insulting and childish.

10. State the facts (if you have any, seriously is you have any) and share your knowledge. You can bring your experience, expertise, knowledge, and any data that you have that might support a direction to the table. You may talk about them to move your team forward. But, the opposite must be avoided. Just because something was tried, and didn’t work in the past, doesn’t mean that it won’t this time. The problem is different. The players are different. Even the will to make the solution work may have changed.

11. Speak to common interests and needs. Just as you started out the discussion by identifying what you and your coworker agree on, focus your discussion on shared interests and desired outcomes. If your coworker thinks that the two of you are headed in the same direction or have a shared outcome in mind, disagreement about how to get there is less scary and contentious.

12. Listen to try to see your coworker’s point of view. In a successful disagreement setting, both coworkers can state clearly the other party’s position on the issue. If you can’t, examine your listening. Use the technique of feeding back to your colleague what you believe he said. For example, say, “John, I believe that your position is this ___.” That tells your colleague that you are listening to what he has to say. People waste a lot of time in arguments that could have been avoided if they just understood the other person’s position better. They argue over ostensible disagreements and details.

13. Avoid putting down your coworker’s beliefs, interests, and ideas. You can have a disagreement with coworkers without making them feel like what they value or think is wrong. In fact, check your judgmental self at the door when you attend a meeting. Showing disrespect for a colleague’s ideas or position is inappropriate anywhere but especially at work. Making fun of them is even worse. Be careful of gentle teasing, too. Many of your coworkers were raised by mothers who taught them that “behind every bit of teasing is a grain of truth.”

14. The goal is not to win but to clear the air in any disagreement at work. You want to know that the issues have been carefully discussed and thought about deeply. You want to make sure that your relationship with your colleague is intact. If you win, you also lose, because your coworker lost. That loss will hang heavy in your relationship and it will affect your ability to disagree in the future. It is also important that your coworker and you are clear about your areas of agreement and disagreement.

15. Compromise when necessary. You may not agree on everything, but don’t let that fact keep you from reaching a general agreement on a direction or a solution. In an organization, you can’t freeze in place and do nothing just because you haven’t found a perfect solution that all parties own. You will need to agree to disagree on aspects of the solution or problem solving.

In a compromise, you need to make sure that the conceded items are ones that you can live with following the meeting. At the same time, you want to avoid consensus decision making in which the lowest common denominator determines the course of action. Consensus decision making can cause low quality decisions and solutions as a team struggles to come up with a solution that is acceptable to all

11/10/2017

ORGANIZATIONS AND DISAGREEMENTS
Disagreement can happen in any setting. You can disagree with your neighbor Nateete, Kyaliwajala or Luzira. You can disagree with your boss or initiate a discussion with a coworker over lunch. But, many disagreements occur during meetings – or they should.
The reason organizations hold meetings is so that employees can engage each other in discussion. Otherwise, why hold a meeting? Meetings are for discussion, decisions, and commitments. If you don’t state your opinion, whether you agree or disagree, you are not part of the discussion.
You have no reason to attend the meeting or participate on the team if you are unwilling to discuss your opinions and agree or disagree with the opinions of your fellow attendees. If you’re afraid to disagree with your boss, why does he or she need you? To do what you’re told? To work on tasks and action items? Or, to think, innovate, plan, and disagree.
In fact, healthy disagreement is one of the hallmarks of a successful team. When constructive discussion and disagreement is absent, and apathy is the norm, you have a dysfunctional team or meeting.
So here are my fifteen best tips for successful disagreement.
1. Pick your battles wisely. Just do not disagree any how. If you disagree about everything, your coworkers will see you as argumentative and disagreeable. You’ll develop the reputation of always disagreeing and your reasonable disagreement will be viewed as same old, same old. So, pick areas that affect outcomes and that are substantial, meaningful, and important.
2. Don’t hold a conflict when you’re angry, emotional, or upset. You don’t want your emotions to affect your professionalism, arguments or data presentation. Above all, you don’t want your emotions to cause you to attack, name-call, or demean your coworkers. When speaking, at any point in a disagreement, stay calm. Your successful disagreement depends on it.
3. Disagreement should not be personal. You are not disagreeing with your coworker because there is something wrong with her or you don’t like her. You are disagreeing based on facts, experience, intuition, prior team successes and failures, your coworkers’ track record on similar projects, and your organization’s culture. Keep the discussion impersonal by not you-ing your colleague as in “you just don’t understand the ramifications of what you’re suggesting.” No personal attacks allowed.
4. You want to validate your coworker’s opinion. Identify the components with which you agree and acknowledge that you can understand or see why she might feel the way she does. Open your disagreement by repeating what the other party said rather than launching into your areas of disagreement first. Help the person feel as if he was listened to, heard out, and understood.
5. Maintain your professionalism. Be respectful of your coworkers. Disagreement can be cordial, yet candid and effective. Don’t try to manipulate the situation as one former coworker did. She cried. Another was always on the attack. He saved up his ammunition and hit his coworkers with everything he had in his arsenal on occasion. Neither were successful and their professional reputations suffered.
6. Understand what your coworker needs, fears, and hopes to obtain through the solution. If you identify what is at stake in the issue, the problem solving, the recommendation, or project, you are more likely to connect with your coworker to successfully disagree. Ask questions like these: What’s your real concern about the project? What’s bothering you about this current solution? What has to occur for you to comfortably support a solution? Are you comfortable with any aspects of my suggestion?

We shall continue with more issues next week.

Hello our valued and prospective clients, are you a small and micro enterprise enterprise owner, an entrepreneur or just...
22/07/2017

Hello our valued and prospective clients, are you a small and micro enterprise enterprise owner, an entrepreneur or just an individual interested in business services, the listed products and services are available from our offices effective 1st August:

1. Accounting and Book keeping services
2. Auditing Services
3. Tax Returns preparation, Filing and payment.
4. Data analysis and report writing
5. Business plan
6. General Accounting and Finance consultancy.

Just tap on the call Button for a one-on-one chat with our customer care Representative who will advice you further.

we are at your service

Address

Makerere
Kampala

Opening Hours

Monday 09:00 - 17:00
Tuesday 09:00 - 17:00
Wednesday 09:00 - 17:00
Thursday 09:00 - 17:00
Friday 09:00 - 17:00
Saturday 09:00 - 17:00

Telephone

0705008467

Website

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when One 2Net Business Consult posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share