06/03/2026
We helped our client fill 12 roles in 45 days while reducing leadership involvement in hiring and onboarding by 30%.
This firm was entering a major growth phase across North America, and internally, leaders were starting to feel the operational drag that comes with scaling quickly. Hiring had become reactive. Interviewing varied from manager to manager. Onboarding depended heavily on whoever had time that week. Recruiting was pulling leadership attention away from the work they needed to do.
And like many fast-growing companies, they weren’t just trying to get butts in seats. They were trying to protect their culture and service delivery.
We understand this concept which is why we never approach it as “recruiting support.” We approached it as building a repeatable hiring system. Here's how we did it:
1. We redesigned their talent acquisition infrastructure with structured interview processes, screening systems, candidate communication workflows, and brand-aligned recruiting strategies. We centralized , built 30/60/90-day training plans, and reduced the amount of time leaders were spending on fragmented onboarding tasks by nearly 30%.
2. We embedded into the culture itself through an internal referral program and recruiting contest that increased applications by 14%. At the same time, we implemented retention and engagement checkpoints, peer mentorship systems, and structured performance conversations to support employees long after offer acceptance.
Within 45 days, 12 roles were filled with 3 more hires in progress supporting 16 openings overall. Turnover dropped by 22%. The hiring process became more consistent, more scalable, and significantly less reactive.
But that wasn’t even our real value. Instead of every hire feeling like a fire drill, there was finally rhythm. Managers weren’t chasing calendars or rebuilding processes from scratch every time a role opened. The company could focus on growth again because the people systems underneath the growth were finally strong enough to support it.
That’s the difference between filling jobs and building hiring infrastructure.