CALMC Columbus Area Labor Management Committee(CALMC) helps employers and employees work together on workplace issues.

As a neutral, not-for-profit with over 25 years, CALMC focuses on affordable, quality assistance. Our services include consultation, training, facilitation and assessment services.

05/19/2024

Good-Bye (For Now, at Least)

That’s right, this is it. As of the end of May, I will be retiring from Columbus Area Labor-Management Committee.

Since I joined CALMC is 1995, Meredith and I have had the opportunity to promote labor-management cooperation in a wide range of situations. We have trained in workplaces of over 1000 employees to locals with as few as 6 bargaining unit members. Each has presented their own unique challenges. In most cases, we have watched them grow and find the ability to work cooperatively together.

In 2014 we began writing this blog. When we decided to try this, we wondered whether anyone would be interested enough to want to read it. Since then, we have posted over 500 entries and attracted over 21,000 readers from around the world. Although those numbers would be lower than blogs from a teenage rock star, we were able to share information each week that could help their organizations grow.

This is reflected in the most read topics, including “What Are the Differences Between a Committee and a Team”, “What is the Difference Between Mediation and Arbitration”, a variety of topics on effective meetings and problem solving, ways to improve communications, and an examination of trends and events with labor and management.

There are so many people and organizations I want to thank I can’t begin to list them all, so I am not going to list any. I don’t want to leave anyone out that gave us the opportunity to provide assistance and the tools to grow and succeed. We are grateful for all of you.

We also want to recognize the organizations and individuals who have been members of CALMC. Your commitment and support have helped us to continue operations and will continue to do so. At the end of each blog entry is a list of our members, and we appreciate their support for us and CALMC.

Over the years we have been privileged to have many outstanding members on our board of trustees. We have always been able to count on those trustees for the support and encouragement they have afforded us, as well as the expertise they offered. They not only talked about labor-management partnerships, they practiced it in their unions and employers.

I want to express my appreciation to everyone who participated in our trainings and seminars, was helped during a downsizing by a worker transition committee, came to our membership meetings, golf outings, and other activities, and read our blogs. Your involvement and enthusiasm kept us going.

The best news from all of this is that Columbus Area Labor-Management Committee will continue to operate. The Board of Trustees meet last week and submitted a contract offer to a new interim director. I hope you will continue to show that person you provided me.

It’s been 30 great years. I hope you will continue to support our new director and the mission of CALMC.
____________________________________
CALMC activities, including our blog, are made possible in part by the continuing support of our members, such as

• American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 8
• American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1656
• Columbus/Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council
• Columbus City School District
• Educational Service Center of Central Ohio
• Electrical Industries Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, including
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 683
Central Ohio Chapter, National Association of Electrical Contractors
• Franklin County Board of Commissioners, Department of Human Resources
• Ohio Civil Service Employees Association/AFSCME Local 11 and the Union Education Trust
• Ohio Education Association
• Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 189
• Roofers, Local 86
• Seafarers/United Industrial Workers
• Sheet Metal Contractors of Central Ohio
• Sheet Metal Workers Local 24
• Skinner Diesel Repair
• State Council of Professional Educators (SCOPE)
• State of Ohio Office of Collective Bargaining

Our activities are also made possible in part by a grant from the City of Columbus.

Contact us for more information about Columbus Area Labor-Management Committee or to become a member.

05/05/2024

How a Labor-Management Problem COULD be Resolved Cooperatively

A couple of weeks ago we wrote about a labor-management problem and how not to solve it. We discussed a problem impacting Major Leage Baseball (MLB) and the Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA), the union representing major and minor league players.

The dispute centers around serious injuries to pitchers. Both sides have resorted to traditional labor-management behaviors in approaching the problem. To summarize, this has involved:

1, One party announces to media that there is a problem,
2. The parties take a position and blame each other for the problem,
3, The sides present limited reasoning for their positions, often siting little or no evidence for their conclusions.
4. Fire up their constituents by continuing to blame each other.
5. When the problem does not go away on its own, move on, and hope no one will notice,

It is unlikely the parties will be able to find solutions to the problem unless they change their approach. Today, we would like to consider how they could approach the situation by working cooperatively.

We have discussed effective problem solving procedures in several earlier blogs, and detailed them in our instructional videos on our CALMC web site. To summarize the process, we use 5 basic steps.

1. Start by Defining the Problem. The union began the process by declaring an increase in pitcher injuries was caused by the use of a pitch clock. The timer is designed to speed up the game by limiting how long a pitcher can take between pitches. The union contends the clock increases the strain on pitchers’ arms by cutting down on the recovery time between pitches.

Management blames the problem on additional strain placed on pitchers’ arms by the increased velocity of the pitches they throw and the motion they use to add additional spin on the ball. This spin causes ball to break more, either vertically or horizontally to make it harder for the batter to hit.

Either of these accusations might be right, or they both might be wrong. We do not know unless we can analyze data to help understand what is really happening. Without information, we cannot consider the causation of the problem. We can only guess, and that is rarely effective.

Clearly, there are problems here that impact both management and labor. Pitchers are getting hurt and often out of action, sometimes for months or longer. This adversely affects the teams that lose these players as well as the careers of the players.

There is also no doubt there is additional strain placed on pitchers’ arms. In 2010, the Cincinnati Reds signed Cuban pitcher Aroldis Chapman after a bidding war for his services. The primary attraction was his ability to consistently throw the baseball over 100 miles per hour. You can imagine the strain placed on the arm and shoulder, especially when it is repeated multiple times per game.

When Chapman arrived in Cincinnati, he was very unusual. Fans loved to come to game to see how fast he could throw that day if he came out of the bullpen. He was one of very few pitchers who could throw with that velocity.

Now, there are multiple pitchers who can throw that fast, often one (or more) per team. Demand for this ability continues to increase, with resulting increases in salaries for those who can.

Additionally, pitchers want to put more spin on the baseball when the throw it. Those who are good at this can make the ball break over a foot on the way to the plate. Teams hire coaches who can teach pitchers to throw this and staff minor league teams with training facilities to help measure the ability to do this and throw the ball with more and more spin.

The human arm is not meant to throw a baseball this hard or with this spin rate. The average spin rate in major league baseball is around 2,150 revolutions per minute, and has been measured as high as 3,468 rpm. It is accomplished by rotating the arm as the pitch is thrown.

As you can imagine, the torque both of these actions result in tremendous strain on shoulders and elbows. Teams and players may want to strike a balance between the ability to throw hard with spin while limiting the risk of injury. Neither pitchers nor teams always make good decisions in this regard.

Before we can proceed, we need to consider the possible problems without trying to fix blame. The concerns impact both labor and management. Examining these factors takes effort and careful consideration, It seems like both labor and management could be right, but how can we know?

Interestingly, many prominent players disagree with the position of their union, Justin Verlander has been one of the best pitchers for many years, but has suffered significant injuries since 2021. He said, “it would be easiest to … blame the pitch clock.” He noted the desire of pitchers to throw harder with increased spin rates, even if it comes with a higher chance of injury.

2, Diagnose the Problem. Now for the hard part, gathering and analyzing data that is relevant to the problem. Without data and information, we cannot really understand what is happening.
Some groups try to skip this step. If they do, effective problem solving is not likely to occur. There are a variety of tools we could use in this effort. Some are statistical, others are qualitative. It can take time and could result in some expense, but doing so would avoid jumping to a wrong conclusion.

If baseball and the players work together to diagnose the problems, they might be able to come to common understandings of what is really happening. With this, they could also build on their ability to work together on future problems.

In an attempt to support their position, MLB released the results from a study conducted by Johns Hopkins University. It focused on the stress on elbows as the cause of pitcher injuries, but did not consider other factors. Although the data was impressive, by minimizing other possible factors, is is far from conclusive.
The MLBPA released no data in support of its position. Without data and information, attempting to solve problems is like throwing darts at a moving target while blindfolded.

3. Develop a List of Possible Solutions. If we have effectively diagnosed the problems, we can now focus on how they can be solved. Beginning to discuss solutions earlier increases the risk of jumping to conclusions. Use the information you have gathered about the issues and start finding solutions.

Do not focus on finding the one solution to the problem. Rarely do problems ever have just one solution, we want to consider as many as possible, Use brainstorming to determine as many options as possible without judgement about them. That will come later.
Possible solution to these problems could involve limiting the number of 100+ mile per hour pitches thrown per inning or limiting the spin rate and the number of pitches thrown at high rates. They could involve better training techniques for pitchers.

It should be possible to develop a long list of options. One we have, we can start to decide what we will do.

4. Develop Standards to Help Us Judge the Options. Standards are how we determine whether a possible solution is workable. We recommend labor management groups use three basic standards in dealing with problems.

Is the proposed solution feasible? If not, it will not work. Possible solutions such as “Eliminate pitchers and have a machine throw the ball” would not be workable without upending the game. Introducing a machine would interfere with the game too significantly.

Is the solution affordable? If not, there is no reason to move forward unless costs can be cut. Fortunately, we are dealing with a multi-billion dollar industry, so the options are more likely to meet this standard.

Will the proposed solution work to solve the problem? If not, we do not need to consider it.

There are other options we can use that relate to the specific problem, The team working on the issue can consider them. They might involve limiting spin rates, pitcher workloads, types of pitches that can be thrown, or many other factors relevant to the problem.

5. Determine Which Options Meet the Standards. If an option does not, it should be eliminated. Only those meeting all standards will remain under consideration. The team can then decide on which option (or options) they want to try. This decision should be made by consensus.

But what if I don’t know anything about baseball? How can I help a team solve the problem? This is really not a concern, since when solving labor-management problems you shuld be working with people from both sides in the industry or organization, no matter whether it is a manufacturer, retail store, safety committee, school, or other group. Members of the team will provide the organizational expertise to deal with the problem. As long as you, as a trainer or facilitator, know the tools and process of problem solving, you can be successful and so will your tram.

After MLB and the players’ union raised the issue of pitcher injuries, the parties engaged in a traditional labor-management process that focused on finger pointing and blame finding. In the intervening weeks, nothing aimed at solving the problem has occurred. As a result, pitcher injuries are still happening.

A team-based, cooperative process like the one outlined here would be more likely to find potential solutions. It permits the parties to jointly attack the problem rather than each other. The process is nt necessarily easy or quick, but the outcomes are far better than the stalemate that results from traditional approaches.
_________________________________________________

CALMC activities, including our blog, are made possible in part by the continuing support of our members, such as

• American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 8
• American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1656
• Central Ohio Labor Council, AFL-CIO
• Columbus/Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council
• Columbus City School District
• Educational Service Center of Central Ohio
• Electrical Industries Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, including
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 683
Central Ohio Chapter, National Association of Electrical Contractors
• Franklin County Board of Commissioners, Department of Human Resources
• Ohio Civil Service Employees Association/AFSCME Local 11 and the Union Education Trust
• Ohio Education Association
• Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 189
• Roofers, Local 86
• Seafarers/United Industrial Workers
• Sheet Metal Contractors of Central Ohio
• Sheet Metal Workers Local 24
• Skinner Diesel Repair
• State Council of Professional Educators (SCOPE)
• State of Ohio Office of Collective Bargaining

Our activities are also made possible in part by a grant from the City of Columbus.

Contact us for more information about Columbus Area Labor-Management Committee or to become a member.

04/20/2024

How Not To Solve a Labor-Management Problem

One of the things I enjoy when working with labor and management is helping them with problem solving. The sides learn they can proactively work together to find areas to improve their work systems.

Over the next couple of blogs, we want to take a look at a specific problem and examine how labor and management can try to solve the problem using a traditional approach and how it could be done more productively.

The problem we want to consider involves Major League Baseball (MLB) and the Major Leage Baseball Players Association (MLBPA), the union representing players in both the major and minor leagues.

The issue in question is regarding the number of injuries to pitchers this year. Although it is early in the season, it seems like many pitchers are suffering shoulder or elbow injuries, many of them requiring surgery and lengthy recoveries.

It would seem like this is a problem that should concern both the union and management, however both started by opening fire at each other. Their methods seem to be:

Step 1: Look at the Symptoms. Before carefully identifying the problem, both sides have considered the symptoms they have observed. The players association believes the injuries are resulting from rule changes imposed by management last year. Management believes the cause is from the extreme stress placed on pitcher’s arms by the way they throw.

While the symptoms may be accurate, they do not help identify the root cause of the problem. Treating symptoms is rarely effective when trying to resolve concerns. Unless we understand the causes of the problem, we are not likely to be successful in solving it.

Step 2: Blame the Other Side. The key is to put the focus on blame finding and finger pointing at the other side. Real evidence is not necessary, the us-vs-them is what is important at this stage.

The entire debate began at this step, with the MPBPA pointing at baseball Commissioner Rob Manfred for implementing the pitch clock. Management quickly slashed back at the union, pointing out the lack of evidence behind their stance.

Now, the battle lines are drawn with techniques designed to divide the parties, not resolve the problem. Nothing done so far is really designed to find a solution.

Step 3. Take a Position. The players union put out a statement on social media implying the pitch clock was the key contributing factor.

“Despite unanimous player opposition and significant concerns regarding health and safety, the commissioner’s office reduced the length of the pitch clock last December, just one season removed from imposing the most significant rule change in decades,” MLBPA executive director Tony Clark said. “Since then, our concerns about the health impacts of reduced recovery time have only intensified. The league’s unwillingness thus far to acknowledge or study the effects of these profound changes is an unprecedented threat to our game and its most valuable asset — the players.”

The pitch clock shows the amount of time pitchers have before they must begin their throwing motion. 2024 is the second season in which it has been in use at the major league level. In 2023, pitchers had 15 seconds between pitches when no runner was on base and 20 seconds to begin their delivery with runners aboard. Over the winter, the competition committee passed a rule change cutting the latter time from 20 to 18 seconds.

The proposals for the clock and the changes were approved by the six league representatives on the rule committee, while all four players on the panel voted against it. The MLBPA released a statement at the time calling the changes “unnecessary” and saying the 2024 season “should be used to gather additional data and fully examine the health, safety and injury impacts of reduced recovery time.”

Next, Major-League Baseball fired its own salvo. Arguing there has been “no empirical backing pointing to the clock as a contributing factor to pitcher injuries.” MLB instead suggested the main issue is the increased stress which pitchers are putting on their arms to improve the quality of their arsenals.

The league claimed “(The MLBPA’s) statement ignores the empirical evidence and much more significant long-term trend, over multiple decades, of velocity and spin increases that are highly correlated with arm injuries.”

Step 4: Cite Evidence Showing the Other Side is Wrong. In their statement, baseball said, “Nobody wants to see pitchers get hurt in this game, which is why MLB is currently undergoing a significant comprehensive research study into the causes of this long-term increase, interviewing prominent medical experts across baseball which to date has been consistent with an independent analysis by Johns Hopkins University that found no evidence to support that the introduction of the pitch clock has increased injuries.

“In fact, JHU found no evidence that pitchers who worked quickly in 2023 were more likely to sustain an injury than those who worked less quickly on average. JHU also found no evidence that pitchers who sped up their pace were more likely to sustain an injury than those who did not.”

The MLBPA referred to the number of injuries suffered by significant players at the start of the 2024 season. Gerrit Cole (elbow inflammation), Lucas Giolito (internal brace surgery), Eduardo Rodriguez (lat strain), Anthony DeSclafani (flexor tendon surgery), Trevor Stephan (Tommy John surgery), and others were among the pitchers to suffer notable injuries during Spring Training, and the union contends the increased strain resulting from pitching more quickly is the cause.

Step 5: Cling To Your Position and Continue to Blame the Other Side. Since the initial statements, both the MLBPA and MLB continue to tout their positions. Neither side appears to be ready to engage in real studies to determine the cause. In the meantime, more pitchers are getting hurt and the use of the pitch clock continues.

Step 6: Do Nothing and See If the Problem Soves Itself. Here is a hint: It Won’t. Problems rarely disappear on their own.

Could the Players’ Union be right, and the pitch clock is the problem? They might be, or they could be wrong.

Could MLB be right, and the increased strain on pitchers’ elbows and shoulders resulting from sharper, more forceful deliveries be correct? They might be, or they could be wrong.

What we do know is the problem has continued, and injuries continue to occur.

Traditional methods such as these are not likely to resolve significant labor-management issues, whether they are on the playing field, the factory floor, or an office. The goal of each side becomes victory, and that supersedes trying to solve the matter. At best, perhaps the sides will find some compromise that only serves to push things aside without solving the problem.

There has got to be a better way. In my next blog, we will look at how the sides could effectively attempt to resolve the issue for the benefit of baseball and the players,

_______________________________________________________

CALMC activities, including our blog, are made possible in part by the continuing support of our members, such as

American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 8

American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1656

Central Ohio Labor Council, AFL-CIO

Columbus/Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council

Columbus City School District

Educational Service Center of Central Ohio

Electrical Industries Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, including

International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 683

Central Ohio Chapter, National Association of Electrical Contractors

Franklin County Board of Commissioners, Department of Human Resources

Ohio Civil Service Employees Association/AFSCME Local 11 and the Union Education Trust

Ohio Education Association

Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 189

Roofers, Local 86

Seafarers/United Industrial Workers

Sheet Metal Contractors of Central Ohio

Sheet Metal Workers Local 24

Skinner Diesel Repair

State Council of Professional Educators (SCOPE)

State of Ohio Office of Collective Bargaining

Our activities are also made possible in part by a grant from the City of Columbus.

Contact us for more information about Columbus Area Labor-Management Committee or to bec

03/24/2024

Four Takeaways from Labor-Management News This Week

There has been a lot happening with labor and management in the last couple of weeks, so we would like to highlight four of them. Some show positive results for both labor and management, one is a sign of things that may be coming, and the other is trip back into a dark past (and possible future)

Progress at Starbucks

We will start with a positive. After years of brutal resistance, this week Starbucks announced they will begin negotiations with their employee union, Workers United. Several reports indicate the company has agreed to sit down with workers representing its 400 unionized stores in late April and start hammering out principles for a labor accord.

Both sides said the bargaining sessions were meant to create a framework for collective bargaining agreements at the stores represented by the union, Workers United. Each union store will have its own delegate, although those taking part in the in-person talks have yet to be determined.

In a statement to HuffPost, Starbucks said specific arrangements still needed to be worked out, but called the bargaining dates “a further demonstration of our joint commitment to a positive working relationship.” Starbucks also called it ” a further demonstration of our joint commitment to a positive working relationship.”

The union added, “We remain committed to charting a new path forward with Starbucks and are making progress on bargaining details.”

Workers United noted that any agreements that result from the talks would still be subject to ratification by the individual stores.
HuffPost reports the union has a list of bargaining demands that includes base pay of $20 per hour, expanded paid time off, guarantees for consistent scheduling and a fair process for organizing stores.

Although this is viewed as another sign the coffee chain and the union may be on the cusp of a new, productive relationship, there is still much to be done. Both sides will need to enter bargaining with a positive attitude toward good faith bargaining. If either party displays the hostility that has marred their relationship in the past, negotiations will be difficult. We will hope for the best.

More Public Support for Unions

A study by the Ough Foundation found majorities of Americans see the large reduction in the share of workers represented by unions over the past several decades as a bad thing for both the country and working people in the United States. 54% of U.S. adults say the decline has been bad for the country, and 59% say this has been bad for working people.

The study includes demographic from various groups and political affiliations. It is very comprehensive, and we suggest you take a look at the report (linked above) for more details.

Not surprisingly, a majority of conservative Republicans (60%) say the decline in organized labor membership has been at least somewhat good for working people, including 24% who say this has been very good. Liberal Democrats are particularly likely to say the decline in organized labor has been very bad for working people: 45% say this, compared with 21% of conservative and moderate Democrats

These results are reflected in the anti-union attitudes demonstrated in a Southern, conservative state.

New Anti-Union Legislation Pending in Georgia

GOP lawmakers in Georgia passed a bill Wednesday to punish employers that make it easier for workers to form unions, sending the legislation to Republican Gov. Brian Kemp for his signature.
Dave Jameison of HuffPost reports the legislation would bar companies from receiving state economic incentives if they voluntarily recognize a union instead of requiring employees to vote in a secret-ballot election. It is aimed at discouraging a process known as “card check,” whereby workers can unionize simply by showing that there’s majority support in the form of signed union cards.

The legislation passed the state Senate last month by a vote of 31-23. It cleared the House last week 96-78. Both votes fell mostly along party lines.

Although Kemp has indicated that he backs the legislation, it is likely to face legal challenges on the grounds that it conflicts with federal labor law. Long-standing interpretation of the National Labor Relations Act, the 1935 law governing private sector collective bargaining, allows for employers to recognize a union and immediately start bargaining when employees have made their wishes clear.

Voluntary recognition is favored by Unions due to the history of election processes that are damaged with intimidation and abuse. Jameison notes that during the campaign period, workers often get corralled into employers’ propagandistic captive-audience meetings, while union leaders end up singled out for retaliation and even firings. The process can also lead to long delays and litigation.
Employer groups and Republican lawmakers have pushed back against voluntary recognition for years, claiming that workers are bullied into signing union cards.

The Georgia bill is part of a broader GOP effort to hold unions back amid an uptick in organizing and work stoppages lately. In a speech to the Georgia Chamber of Commerce in January, Kemp bemoaned the large worker strikes of 2023 and said that “activists” were trying to “attack job creators” and “see the free market brought to a screeching halt.”

Liz Shuler, the president of the AFL-CIO labor federation, called the bill “appalling,” saying that it “attacks the fundamental freedoms” of both workers and employers. She also said that it violates “long-held precedent” under the National Labor Relations Act.

Benjamin Sachs, a labor law professor at Harvard Law School, told HuffPost that he believes the Georgia and Tennessee legislation would probably be preempted by federal law. Sachs doesn’t see a “market-based reason” for Georgia to try to block card check.

Another Frequently Used Tactic during Bargaining Seen in Ohio

Last week a tactic that us associated with traditional negotiations reared its head in Ohio. The State and their lagest employee union, the Ohio Civil Service Employees Association (OCSEA) are engaged in bargaining for their new contract. This week, informational picketing took place at a number of locations around the state.
This process involves union members setting up picket lines at state offices and facilities. They are not on strike, but are there to make a point.

The main reasons unions use informational picketing are:

- To raise public awareness and gain support for their cause or position. Informational picketing allows unions to share information with the public about issues like low wages, lack of benefits, or unfair labor practices by the employer. This can put pressure on the employer by garnering public sympathy.

- To apply pressure on the employer during contract negotiations. Even though this does not involve a work stoppage, it can disrupt operations. This is used to give unions leverage at the bargaining table.

- To build solidarity and mobilize union members. Picketing allows union members to visibly demonstrate their unity and commitment to the cause, which can strengthen the union's bargaining position.

One of the locations for picketing was the Manfield Correctional Institution, a close security men’s prison. The Richland Source reported a group of local OCSEA members, including workers from MANCI and the Richland Correctional Institution, as well as two other state agencies stood along Ohio Route 13 on Monday to demonstrate solidarity for a new statewide union contract.

James Beverly, Jr., a former employee if the institution and the current staff representative for the Ohio Civil Service Employees Association stated, “We are here to inform the public we are in contract negotiations. The state is not willing to negotiate and make things right with public employees.

“(Workers) at 20 other (Ohio) prisons are doing the same thing at the same time across the state because they feel this is the right thing to do to try to express their concerns about what they’re facing every day,” he said.

Ironically, the Mansfield Correctional Institution was conducting a hiring event on Monday to try to fill existing vacancies at the prison. Ben Valentine, a MANCI correctional officer and president of the local union, said they are about 80 correctional officers below where they feel the staffing level should be.

We can not measure the effectiveness of this picketing, but my belief is that it will have little real influence on the outcome of bargaining. The main benefit could be encouraging their members to stay the course should bargaining continue to be difficult.

The event may send up a warning sign to the citizens of Ohio. The negotiated agreement between the State and OCSEA will expire March 31. At this writing, the parties are engaged in Fact Finding, an advisory arbitration process. That means the parties will have the opportunity to vote on the fact finder’s proposal, and could reject it completely. If this occurs, a strike is possible for members of the union not employed in essential positions, such as prison guards.
We will follow this situation and keep everyone posted. Hopefully, these negotiations can end with an agreement.
______________________________-
CALMC activities, including our blog, are made possible in part by the continuing support of our members, such as

• American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Council 8
• American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees (AFSCME) Local 1656
• Central Ohio Labor Council, AFL-CIO
• Columbus/Central Ohio Building and Construction Trades Council
• Columbus City School District
• Educational Service Center of Central Ohio
• Electrical Industries Labor-Management Cooperation Committee, including
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local 683
Central Ohio Chapter, National Association of Electrical Contractors
• Franklin County Board of Commissioners, Department of Human Resources
• Ohio Civil Service Employees Association/AFSCME Local 11 and the Union Education Trust
• Ohio Education Association
• Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 189
• Roofers, Local 86
• Seafarers/United Industrial Workers
• Sheet Metal Contractors of Central Ohio
• Sheet Metal Workers Local 24
• Skinner Diesel Repair
• State Council of Professional Educators (SCOPE)
• State of Ohio Office of Collective Bargaining

Our activities are also made possible in part by a grant from the City of Columbus.

Contact us for more information about Columbus Area Labor-Management Committee or to become a member.

Address

2800 S High Street
Columbus, OH
43207

Telephone

+16142632044

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when CALMC posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to CALMC:

Share