02/20/2020
Last month I had brought up the question, which is a better solution for a larger screen home theater, with a minimum size screen of 85" or larger? I had mentioned that technically,
a 85", high quality (not all TVs are created equal) TV is better,
BUT, now with the outstanding picture quality available today,
a screen that is 100''+++, makes the overall experience much more lifelike, and really, in my opinion, no contest. The pictures posted consist of a Sony entry level 4K projector and a 135" screen, valued at $6199.00 To give you some idea of what a screen that size would measure..it is about 120" (10') wide and 66" tall.
Going back about 10 years ago, I did a screen this size where the bottom of the screen was only about 15" off the floor. The mother who was about 5'4" (64") and her 3 small children walked in front of the screen. Their silhouettes fit perfectly on the screen as they crossed from left to right. Kinda funny!
The pictures you are seeing were taken about 4-6' from the screen with a 3 year old iPhone. The source is a Direct TV receiver and the animated movie is using a $100.00
Sony Blu-ray player. Neither of these are 4K sources.
My point is this...and I know seeing it on such a small scale is
not the same as in person, but try and look at the detail especially on the Direct TV feed. That is a 135" screen with a
Sony 4K projector standing 4' from screen, the picture is amazing, even at that size.
Again as I have mentioned, having life sized figures that have
a tremendous amount of clarity and detail, makes the overall watching experience much more entertaining, even just watching the news.
Next time I will discuss the importance of the "sound".Is it as
critical as the picture, or possibly more important then the picture????