Steven P. Lindenberg Ph.D.

Call Directions Website

Steven P. Lindenberg Ph.D. High-Conflict Custody Evals; Parent Alienation; Reunification; Expert Witness; Consultation Graduated with honors from the University of Georgia.

Thirty-five years in private practice. Thirteen and one-half years as a PA Certified School Psychologist. Hundreds of hours of sworn, expert testimony in custody cases. Advanced mediation training and certification. Ability to perform independent educational evaluations, 504 Plans, behavioral plans for both districts and families, gifted evaluations, second opinions for children with IEP's, on site assistance at IEP meetings, assisting in developing Functional Behavioral Support, Safety, Crisis and Positive Behavioral Support Plans that work, data collection strategies, interpretation of data, accountability for IEP and behavioral plans, and collaborating with counsel as an expert witness in due process hearings. Flexible scheduling. Convenient office hours at 218 W. Governor Road in Hershey PA.First one-half hour of consultation in custody and special education advocacy matters at no cost.

07/14/2026
I am the Founder of PACCS.  We are an international organization dedicated to child-centered safety.  Please join us.
10/15/2025

I am the Founder of PACCS. We are an international organization dedicated to child-centered safety. Please join us.

We bring science, integrity, and child-first principles back to family courts. Through professional training, lived experience leadership, and evidence-based reform, we work to protect children from emotional, psychological, and physical harm while helping families heal.

Life is as ubiquitous as all elements in the Universe. We are all stardust.
06/22/2023

Life is as ubiquitous as all elements in the Universe. We are all stardust.

As they say, we are all made of stardust! Interestingly, an amino acid essential for normal human growth has been spotted in the inters...

To repeat, I have closed my office in Hershey, but I have not closed my practice. I am working from my home office. When...
06/22/2023

To repeat, I have closed my office in Hershey, but I have not closed my practice. I am working from my home office. When necessary, I have space that I can rent by the hour in Hershey. I do most of my work via Zoom and can test remotely through Pearson Publishing.

My new address and contact information:

Steven P. Lindenberg, Ph.D.
PO Box 161
Elm PA 17521

717-533-1026

Email: [email protected]
[email protected]

Social Media:

LinkedIn:
https://www.linkedin.com/in/steven-lindenberg-36b51928/
Facebook:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100064260481829

Please feel free to share this message with anyone.

High-Conflict Custody Evals; Parent Alienation; Reunification; Expert Witness; Consultation

04/23/2022

I wanted to let those who read this page know that I am still in practice as a forensic evaluator/consultant specializing in custody and parent alienation evaluations as well as reunification therapy.

YOUR CHILD’S RIGHT TO SPECIAL EDUCATIONHow to get Around Your District’s “Confuse, Delay, and Deny” Strategy to Keep You...
02/16/2012

YOUR CHILD’S RIGHT TO SPECIAL EDUCATION

How to get Around Your District’s “Confuse, Delay, and Deny” Strategy to
Keep Your Child from Getting Special Education and Related Services

As if understanding your rights as a parent of a child with learning problems were not difficult enough, school districts throughout the country are denying children their federal rights under both Child Find (www.childfindidea.org/) and the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act (http://idea.ed.gov) in order to save money. The vehicle for denial, the school administrator’s friend, is called Response to Intervention (Rti). And it’s legal!

According to Wikipedia,“response to intervention (commonly abbreviated RTI or Rti) is a method of academic intervention used in the United States to provide early, systematic assistance to children who are having difficulty learning. RTI seeks to prevent academic failure through early intervention, frequent progress measurement, and increasingly intensive research-based instructional interventions for children who continue to have difficulty. It is believed that students who do not show a response to effective interventions are likely (or, more likely than students who respond) to have biologically-based learning disabilities and to be in need of special education.”

A recent article entitled, “New Strategy to Keep Kids Out of Special Ed” (http://www.usnews.com/education/articles/2008/07/25/new-strategy-to-keep-kids-out-of-special-ed?page=2 ) describes many of the difficulties with the Rti approach to identifying children. For instance, implementing Rti strategies is very difficult in schools with limited resources. There are three levels of intervention. In order for an intervention to be evaluated, it must be implemented with “fidelity” (faithfulness). Outcomes of interventions must be the result of copious data collection and progress monitoring. There is no flexibility. Some worry that RTI techniques overwhelm individual teachers who have to implement all aspects of the program by themselves for each of their students—data collection, interventions, and data analysis—on top of everyday instruction. And many staff members are not sufficiently trained in Rti in order to administer and evaluate outcomes of interventions.
Instead of spending limited resources on special education, IDEA allows districts to spend up to 15% of their special education funds on Rti – that’s 15% taken away from those who are truly in need of specially designed instruction. Those who are believers in the Rti model do not believe that any standardized testing is necessary. So children do not get IQ tests or Standardized Achievement Testing until Tier 3 if at all! Rti is not diagnostic. It is trial and error. It can take months or even years of experimentation with interventions in reading, doing math, or written expression to address delays before they become “significant” enough for further evaluation.
I have had cases as an educational advocate where parents have tried to exercise their rights to have a comprehensive evaluation performed on their child because of concerns about learning or school behaviors. In one case a child with documented medical conditions indicating the need for special education, speech and language support, physical therapy, and occupational therapy was given a “wait and see” approach to intervention even though the child had an IEP from another district. The parent had to retain an attorney to remind the district of their legal responsibilities under special education law. I had another couple who were given the run around by the building principal – schmoozed, confused, and assured that the child was doing as well as her peers (which isn’t saying much in many failing public schools) and so there was nothing to worry about. She was being monitored under Rti. Two years later, the child was identified for special education with a specific learning disability in Reading Comprehension and she was 2 years behind her grade level.
Bottom line? You have a LEGAL RIGHT to have a Comprehensive Evaluation performed on your child within 60 calendar days of the district’s receipt of a signed permission to evaluate. If you think your child has a learning disability or any other condition that impacts on her education, go to the building principal, insist on having an evaluation in writing and don’t leave without signing a Permission to Evaluate Form. Make sure you take a copy with you before you leave.

And IF you get the run around, call me. I’ll get it done.



Welcome to the Child Find web site! This site offers information and resources related to the earliest possible identification of young children and their families who may benefit from early intervention or education services.

10/29/2011

Title 23 Chapter 53 presents new opportunities to help divorcing couples benefit from having more data for making an informed decision about the best interests of their child(ren) in cases involving proposed relocation of one of their parents:

"(h) Relocation factors.--In determining whether to grant a proposed relocation, the court shall consider the following factors, giving weighted consideration to those factors which affect the safety of the child:
(1) The nature, quality, extent of involvement and duration of the child's relationship with the party proposing to relocate and with the nonrelocating party, siblings and other significant persons in the child's life.
(2) The age, developmental stage, needs of the child and the like ly impact the relocation will have on the child's physical, educational and emotional development, taking into consideration any special needs of the child.
(3) The feasibility of preserving the relationship between the nonrelocating party and the child through suitable custody arrangements, considering the logistics and financial circumstances of the parties.
(4) The child's preference, taking into consideration the age and maturity of the child.
(5) Whether there is an established pattern of conduct of either party to promote or thwart the relationship of the child and the other party.
(6) Whether the relocation will enhance the general quality of life for the party seeking the relocation, including, but not limited to, financial or emotional benefit or educational opportunity.
(7) Whether the relocation will enhance the general quality of life for the child, including, but not limited to, financial or emotional benefit or educational opportunity.
(8) The reasons and motivation of each party for seeking or opposing the relocation.
(9) The present and past abuse committed by a party or member of the party's household and whether there is a continued risk of harm to the child or an abused party.
(10) Any other factor affecting the best interest of the child."

Subsection (h)(2) is a critical component in the overall assessment of the benefits IN THE INTERESTS OF THE CHILD for relocation.

Recently, I've had three referrals involving special needs (children with an IEP or a Rehabilitation Act 504 Plan) who are the focus of custody disputes. One of these cases has parents wanting to relocate. Because of my years of experience in custody evaluations and almost 14 years as a school psychologist, I believe that I will be able to provide counsels and the court as well as help these families make informed decisions in the interests of their children.

08/18/2011

I can now be found on LinkedIn.

07/28/2011

High-Conflict Custody Evals; Parent Alienation; Reunification; Expert Witness; Consultation

Address

PO Box 161
Elm, PA
17521

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Steven P. Lindenberg Ph.D. posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Shortcuts

Share