06/16/2026
Another conversation this week with a VP/hiring manager with a critical position completely out of alignment with the marketplace. Over 1,500 resumes and not seeing the talent they need.
This particular role I have successfully supported over 20 times, so I understood not only the technical skills he desired but also the strategic reason for the position and how much the hire would impact the business over the next 6 months to a year as the company continued to scale.
I asked him why a couple of candidate profiles weren’t an option, he paused and said, “Well, I guess part of the problem is I am trying to fill two positions in one. I’d like them to help us scale up in automation and controls, but it would also be nice if they could support certain manufacturing projects or do program management.”
“Yes, that creates a challenge.”
I asked him about two other candidates that were spot on for the “main role” he was trying to fill. His response: “Well, they are too expensive and experienced really.”
I nodded, understanding completely because I have had this conversation weekly for years now.
How is a hiring manager going to get someone that has the skills to fill two positions with 3-5 years of experience or less while paying at or below the market for the talent?
With automation and controls, scaling up a business, creating efficiency…. One mistake can cost an organization significantly. What are the consequences of getting this hire wrong? Saving thousands could end up costing millions.
Misalignment in the marketplace is a significant drain on resources. While the cost of a mishire is significant…. spending time and resources to curate resumes for a role that is out of alignment means the role will stay open for months. Understanding what candidates are making in the market in real time versus older compensation data is critical.
What is the opportunity cost?
How does it effect revenue timelines?
What is cost relevant to risk management for wasted resources, warning letters, or patient safety?
Companies must invest in resources internally or partner with those resources externally to understand what they need a person to do in a position, how that role can change over the next 6-12 months, and have real time data on what it will cost to hire the right talent.
The Pareto Principle is undefeated.
Leadership must understand the skill/position that they need to hire for, what that skillset costs in the marketplace, and understand that they will pay for what they need proactively while having a search process that is in alignment…
Or they will pay on the backend. The backend tends to be a lot more expensive in more ways than one.