Lara Bezerra, WorkCoherence, Florida City, FL (2026)

06/12/2026

"Writing the Biology of the People You Lead"

More phrases I love to use because it creates a long pause in the room. It is from the chapter on neuroplasticity and epigenetics in Coherent Leadership: "Every leader is, whether they realize it or not, writing the biology of the people they lead." I did not put that sentence in casually. I put it in because after years of holding executive and CEO roles myself, and the years that followed working with senior leaders across very different industries, I have come to believe it is one of the most important and least understood truths in modern organizational life.

Over the last two decades, research has made this idea impossible to dismiss. Neuroplasticity research, popularized by Norman Doidge and grounded in pioneers like Michael Merzenich, has shown that the adult human brain physically rewires itself in response to repeated experiences and environments. The patterns we are most regularly exposed to become the patterns most easily activated, and over time, the most easily lived. A team member who spends forty hours a week inside a relational environment characterized by urgency, fear, or invisibility is being neurologically trained into a default state of urgency, fear, or invisibility. A state that will follow them home and shape every relationship they walk into when they leave the office.

The work in epigenetics has gone one layer deeper. Research from Michael Meaney at McGill, Moshe Szyf, Rachel Yehuda at Mount Sinai, and a growing field of scientists working on environmental gene expression has demonstrated that our environment not only influences our behavior. It influences which of our genes get expressed and which stay silent. Chronic psychological pressure measurably upregulates stress-related gene expression. Sustained experiences of safety, recognition, and meaning support immune, regulatory, and cognitive function at the cellular level. We are not being metaphorical when we say that culture matters. We are biological organisms whose interior, at the cellular level, is being shaped by the relational environment a leader creates.

Layered on top of this, Stephen Porges's polyvagal theory has given us a precise vocabulary for what teams are actually experiencing. The human nervous system is constantly scanning for cues of safety or threat, not through cognition, but through a process Porges calls neuroception. A leader's tone of voice, facial expression, pace, and presence are not soft variables. They are biological signals that determine which branch of the autonomic nervous system a team member's body is operating from. Lead from coherence, and their nervous systems regulate toward safety, creativity, and engagement. Lead from chronic dysregulation, and their nervous systems collapse into survival mode. And survival mode does not innovate, does not collaborate, and does not love anyone deeply enough to return home as a better partner or parent.

I continue this reflection in the first comment.

06/09/2026

The science is no longer fringe.

The relational environment a leader creates is one of the strongest predictors of which neural patterns become consolidated in their team, and which fall away. Epigenetics has shown that environment shapes gene expression itself. Chronic states of pressure turn certain genes on. States of safety, meaning, and recognition turn other genes on.

One line I keep returning to:

"Leaders are not influencing only the quarter. They are influencing biology."

And the influence does not stop at the office door. It travels home, into the dinner, into the parenting, into the marriage.

The full reflection is on my LinkedIn this week, in the newsletter Engineers of Their Teams. Coherent Leadership is available on Amazon.

06/08/2026

The Gap Between Self and Role

Let’s reflect together on another important discussion from my book Coherent Leadership: "Most leaders do not burn out from their work. They burn out from the gap between who they are and who they believe their role requires them to be." I understood it, how literally true this statement is, when the research caught up with what I have been sensing in so many different environments during my executive life and still with my clients.

The data on what we politely call "executive isolation" is unambiguous. A Stanford Graduate School of Business study with The Miles Group, conducted across hundreds of CEOs, found that roughly half of all chief executives report feeling lonely in the role, and the majority of those say the loneliness directly hurts their performance. Harvard Business Review research on CEO transitions and inner life converges on the same picture: that the higher a leader climbs, the smaller the circle of people they feel they can be honest with becomes, until eventually, for many, that circle reaches zero. Manfred Kets de Vries at INSEAD, who has spent more than forty years researching the inner world of senior leaders, has documented in book after book that the most consistent predictor of executive derailment is not strategic miscalculation. It is the unattended inner life of the person making the strategic decisions.

The psychology behind this has a name. E. Tory Higgins, in his self-discrepancy theory, identified that human beings hold three versions of themselves: the actual self, the self we believe we ought to be, and the ideal self we aspire to be. The greater the distance between those selves, the higher the level of chronic emotional pain, anxiety, and disconnection a person experiences. Senior leadership amplifies that gap to a degree most other roles never approach. You are required, almost daily, to perform a version of yourself that may be far ahead of, or far away from, who you actually are inside. And the longer you perform that version, the more the gap calcifies into a private pain you do not feel permission to name.

Carl Jung named this dynamic, decades before the research caught up, with a single word: persona. The mask we wear in our social role. He warned that the persona is necessary, without it social life would not function, but that its danger is when it becomes more present than the self underneath it, when the leader forgets, slowly, that they were ever anyone other than the role they are playing. The persona is not the enemy. The disappearance of the self behind it is.

I continue this reflection in the first comment.

06/05/2026

The Self-Recovery: A 15-Minute Weekly Practice for Leaders

The pain I described in last week's newsletter does not disappear because we have given it a name. It begins to ease because we have committed to a practice that brings us back, deliberately and weekly, into contact with the parts of ourselves the role has quietly asked us to set down.

Naming pain is the beginning. Reclaiming the self the pain has been pointing toward is the work.

Most of the executives I mentor are surprised to learn that this kind of work does not require a sabbatical, a retreat, or a redesign of their calendar. It requires fifteen minutes, once a week, used honestly. The same fifteen minutes you would not hesitate to give a quarterly review meeting, except that this is the quarterly review you have been postponing for years, the one whose subject is the person doing the leading.

I have come to call this practice The Self-Recovery. Because nothing has been lost permanently, and the parts of ourselves that go quiet during demanding seasons of leadership are still there, waiting to be invited back. The practice has five movements. Most leaders find that one of them, in particular, lands harder than the others, and that one is usually the one to begin with.

The Self-Recovery. Five movements for leaders who do not want the role to cost them the person:

1. Notice where you have been performing this week. Be specific. Which meeting, which conversation, which version of yourself were you wearing rather than being? Write it down without judgment.

2. Notice where you have been being. Where did you feel most like yourself this week? It might have been a five-minute moment, a conversation with one person, a walk between meetings. Locate it. That is the signal.

3. Identify the part that has gone quiet. What did you used to do, love, or care about that no longer makes it onto your week? Do not judge yourself or criticize the moment. Use it as data. The quiet part is telling you something.

4. Choose one small act of return. A walk without a phone, a call to an old friend, a meal alone with no agenda, a half hour with no screen, a conversation with your partner that is not logistics. Make it so small it cannot be skipped.

5. Hold the deeper question. Who am I becoming through this role, and is that who I want to be? You do not have to answer it. You only have to keep asking it, weekly, for the rest of your career. The asking is the work.

This is not a productivity practice. It is a coherence practice. The chapter on coherence in Coherent Leadership is, in many ways, an extended invitation into a version of this question. A slow, deliberate reorientation of the leader's inner life so that the work they do flows from a self that has not been disappeared by the work itself.

If you give this practice a real season, say, one quarter, you will begin to notice the shift others notice before you do. Decisions feel different. The room feels different when you walk into it. And the small, quiet pain you have been carrying for years begins to soften, not because the role has become easier, but because the human being inside it has come home.

If one of the five movements lands as the one to begin with, I would love to know which.

With love,
Lara

→ Get Coherent Leadership on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1965253873

06/03/2026

You are about to walk into the all-hands. You will tell the team the year is strong and the strategy is sound. Five minutes before, in the elevator, you feel the wave: you are not sure you believe the story you are about to tell.

You smooth your cloth. You walk in. You deliver.

I have lived that elevator. So has almost every leader I have sat with in the last twenty years. The pain leaders carry rarely shows up on the org chart, and almost never in the conversations our culture has decided to have about what it means to lead.

The first act of coherence is the simplest one:

"Name what is hurting. Begin there."

The full reflection is on my LinkedIn this week, in the newsletter The Pain Leaders Carry. Coherent Leadership is available on Amazon.

05/29/2026

The Sentence Underneath Every Decision

There is a sentence in Coherent Leadership I was not sure would survive translation into the executive world. Now, it has become the line readers quote back to me often: "We do not respond to the situations of our lives. We respond to the stories we tell ourselves about them."

I now understand why it carries the weight it does. It is the doorway into the most leveraged inner discipline a leader can develop, and the foundation everything else in the book rests on.

The neuroscience is no longer speculative. James Gross at Stanford has spent more than two decades researching what he calls cognitive reappraisal: the deliberate practice of reframing the meaning of a situation before reacting to it. His findings are consistent: reframing measurably reduces the physiological stress response, increases prefrontal cortex engagement, and improves decision quality in high-pressure environments. Lisa Feldman Barrett goes further. Her research on the constructed nature of emotion shows that emotions are not pre-formed reactions waiting inside us. They are constructed in real time by the meaning our mind is making of what is happening. Change the meaning, and you have changed the emotion itself.

Most of us are running an inner dialogue we never authored. It is inherited from our parents, our culture, our last difficult decade, our oldest wounds. And because we have never paused to examine it, we mistake it for reality. We believe we are reacting to the world. We are, in fact, reacting to a phrase we have been repeating to ourselves so long that we have stopped hearing it. The whole work of coherent leadership begins the moment we hear it again, and we ask the question that turns a life around: was this phrase chosen, or inherited?

There is a related chapter in the book, on the difference between love and like, that belongs alongside this one, because in the most demanding seasons of leadership, the two get confused. We assume that to love someone we must like everything they do. Loving the adolescent who is hurting you, the colleague whose choices have failed you, the parent whose expectations are weighing on you, does not require liking the behavior. It requires the maturity to hold both at once. And that maturity is itself a form of reframing.

Clarity is not a function of how much you know. It is a function of which story you have chosen to bring with you into the room. The leaders who develop this discipline, slowly, deliberately, across many demanding weeks, discover something quietly transformative. The world stops feeling like a series of problems happening to them. It starts feeling like a series of training opportunities being offered to them.

What is the sentence you are repeating to yourself today, and did you choose it, or did you inherit it?

If a sentence comes to mind, I would love to read it in the comments. Each one keeps shaping how I share this work.

With love,
Lara

05/27/2026

The Reframing Practice: 5 Steps to Come Back to Being

The chapter on reframing in my book ends with a practice. I have refined it over years of working with leaders carrying exactly the kind of week described in this week's newsletter: a restructuring at work, an adolescent in trouble at home, a friend in crisis, parents asking quietly for more presence, and a hundred smaller demands underneath.

The leaders who use this practice, even imperfectly, begin to notice within a few weeks that the same circumstances feel different to hold. That difference is not a trick. It is the result of a deliberate change in the inner phrase from which they are operating.

The practice is simple to describe and harder to do, which is why it belongs in the body of leadership work rather than at the edges of it. It is not positive thinking. It is honest re-authoring. You are not pretending the difficulty does not exist. You are asking yourself whether the story you have been telling about it is true, useful, and chosen.

Try it this week with whichever situation is most loudly asking for your attention. If it helps, work through each step on paper. Most leaders are surprised by how quickly the inner room reorganizes once these questions get asked out loud.

The Reframing Practice. Five steps:

1. Name the system. Identify one situation that is currently pulling at you: work, an adolescent child, a friend in crisis, a parent, a marriage, your own body. Just one. Be specific.

2. Hear the phrase. Notice the sentence running underneath your reaction. It usually begins with words like "I do not have time for," "I cannot believe," "why is this happening," or "I should have." Write it down without editing it.

3. Test it against your heart. Ask the question from the book: does this story create noise, or does it soothe my heart? You are not judging the phrase. You are listening to what it is doing to you.

4. Choose a truer phrase, rooted in gratitude. Not aspirational. Not performative. A sentence that is honest and that you can actually believe. For example: "I am the one carrying this decision, and that is a responsibility I am grateful to hold," or "I would rather be present for my child in this season than absent in their easier one," or "loving this person does not require me to like this behavior."

5. Walk back in. Re-enter the situation with the new phrase already in place. Do not announce it. Just let it shape your tone, your pace, your questions, and your choices. The system around you will reorganize itself in response to the human being who has come back to being.

If this practice resonates and you want to go deeper into the inner architecture beneath it, the chapter on reframing the stories I tell myself in Coherent Leadership is the longer conversation, and it is the conversation I love having most with leaders who are ready to lead themselves before they lead anyone else.

If you try one of the five steps this week, I would love to hear which one and what you noticed. Each story keeps shaping how I share what comes next.

With love,
Lara

→ Get Coherent Leadership on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/dp/1965253873

05/25/2026

Most weeks, leaders do not describe a single problem. They describe a Tuesday.

A restructuring at work where you have to let ten percent of people go, and you know each of them by name.
An adolescent at home who has gone quiet in a way you cannot read.
A friend in the middle of a divorce who needs you.
Parents still asking when you are coming to visit.

The line I keep returning to:

"We do not actually have a time problem. We have a being problem."

The full reflection is on my LinkedIn this week, in the newsletter Find Clarity. Coherent Leadership is available on Amazon.

Lara Bezerra, WorkCoherence

06/12/2026

06/09/2026

06/08/2026

06/05/2026

06/03/2026

05/29/2026

05/27/2026

05/25/2026

Address

Telephone

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share