06/04/2026
๐๐ข๐ช ๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐๐ก๐ง ๐๐ข๐๐ฆ๐กโ๐ง ๐๐ข๐ข๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ข๐ฃ๐๐ ๐ก๐ข๐ง ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐ก๐
One of the most misunderstood ideas in Patrick Lencioni's ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐๐๐ณ๐๐ป๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ฎ ๐ง๐ฒ๐ฎ๐บ is commitment.
Many leaders assume a lack of commitment means employees are lazy, disengaged, or resistant to change.
In my experience, that's rarely the case.
More often, low commitment looks like:
๐น People leaving meetings unsure about what was actually decided
๐น Team members nodding in agreement but not following through
๐น The same conversations happening over and over again
๐น Employees quietly questioning decisions after the meeting ends
๐น Leaders avoiding difficult discussions to keep the peace
The root problem is usually not commitment.
It's a lack of healthy conflict.
Lencioni argues that teams struggle to commit when people haven't had the opportunity to weigh in, challenge ideas, and be heard.
When team members feel their perspective matters, they are much more likely to support a decision, even if it wasn't their preferred option.
I've seen organizations spend months trying to solve accountability problems when the real issue was that nobody ever created clarity or buy-in around the decision in the first place.
๐๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ถ๐๐บ๐ฒ๐ป๐.
Commitment creates accountability.
Accountability drives results.
If your team seems hesitant, resistant, or slow to act, ask yourself:
Did they truly have a chance to contribute before the decision was made?
I'd love to hear from other leaders.
What is one sign you've noticed that a team is struggling with commitment?